Does a Gatekeeper Suicide Prevention Program Work in a School Setting? Evaluating Training Outcome and Moderators of Effectiveness

The current study sought to evaluate the suicide prevention gatekeeper training program QPR (Question, Persuade, and Refer) among school personnel using a non‐equivalent control group design. Substantial gains were demonstrated from pre‐ to post‐test for attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs regarding s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Suicide & life-threatening behavior 2009-12, Vol.39 (6), p.671-681
Main Authors: Tompkins, Tanya L., Witt, Jody, Abraibesh, Nadia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescents
Adult
Age
Analysis of Variance
Attitude Change
Behavior
Beliefs
Biological and medical sciences
Chi-Square Distribution
Community
Community Involvement
Control Groups
Cooperation
Disease control
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Inservice Training
Male
Medical sciences
Mental health
Middle Aged
National Surveys
Pretests Posttests
Prevention
Prevention. Health policy. Planification
Prior Learning
Program Evaluation
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Research Design
Rural schools
School districts
School Personnel
Schools
Scores
Self Efficacy
Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry
Suicide
Suicide - prevention & control
Suicides & suicide attempts
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teaching
Tests
Time Factors
Youth
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5117-2eeefbb3c58cc693c9bd911f02b1a41364a4728656c384fad4ffae66bf3b6f313
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5117-2eeefbb3c58cc693c9bd911f02b1a41364a4728656c384fad4ffae66bf3b6f313
container_end_page 681
container_issue 6
container_start_page 671
container_title Suicide & life-threatening behavior
container_volume 39
creator Tompkins, Tanya L.
Witt, Jody
Abraibesh, Nadia
description The current study sought to evaluate the suicide prevention gatekeeper training program QPR (Question, Persuade, and Refer) among school personnel using a non‐equivalent control group design. Substantial gains were demonstrated from pre‐ to post‐test for attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs regarding suicide and suicide prevention. Exploratory analyses revealed the possible moderating effects of age, professional role, prior training, and recent contact with suicidal youth on QPR participants' general knowledge, questioning, attitudes toward suicide and suicide prevention, QPR quiz scores, and self‐efficacy. The need for replication using a more rigorous experimental design in the context of strong community collaboration is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1521/suli.2009.39.6.671
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734268310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ871502</ericid><sourcerecordid>2008046911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5117-2eeefbb3c58cc693c9bd911f02b1a41364a4728656c384fad4ffae66bf3b6f313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2O0zAUhS0EYobCCyCELCTEKsV_cZIVgqEUUGFALRSxsRznevA0jYudDMyWJ8dRS5FY4Y2PdL9z7pUOQvcpmdKc0adxaN2UEVJNeTWVU1nQG-iUVoJnrCi_3ESnhEueEcbFCboT4yVJL-G30QkjlFHOySn69dJDxBrPdQ8bgB0EvByccQ3gDwGuoOud75L0F0Fv8dqHDXZd4pfmm_ctXkLfu-7iGZ5d6XbQo8aroF03ivOhN34LWHcNfucbCLr3IWJv8cxaML1L8RDjXXTL6jbCvcM_QZ9ezVZnr7PF-fzN2fNFZnJKi4wBgK1rbvLSGFlxU9VNRaklrKZaUC6FFgUrZS4NL4XVjbBWg5S15bW0nPIJerLP3QX_fYDYq62LBtpWd-CHqAoumCw5JYl89A956YfQpeMUYyKtKOUIsT1kgo8xgFW74LY6XCtK1NiPGvtRYz-KV0qq1E8yPTwkD_UWmqPlTyEJeHwAdDS6tUF3xsW_HONE0HwMerDnIDhzHM_elgXNU-MTVO7HP1wL1_9xmVouVi-oIEWyZnuriz38PFp12CSOF7lav5-rr59X1cd1vlSc_wYsccRt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224865860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does a Gatekeeper Suicide Prevention Program Work in a School Setting? Evaluating Training Outcome and Moderators of Effectiveness</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>Wiley</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Tompkins, Tanya L. ; Witt, Jody ; Abraibesh, Nadia</creator><creatorcontrib>Tompkins, Tanya L. ; Witt, Jody ; Abraibesh, Nadia</creatorcontrib><description>The current study sought to evaluate the suicide prevention gatekeeper training program QPR (Question, Persuade, and Refer) among school personnel using a non‐equivalent control group design. Substantial gains were demonstrated from pre‐ to post‐test for attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs regarding suicide and suicide prevention. Exploratory analyses revealed the possible moderating effects of age, professional role, prior training, and recent contact with suicidal youth on QPR participants' general knowledge, questioning, attitudes toward suicide and suicide prevention, QPR quiz scores, and self‐efficacy. The need for replication using a more rigorous experimental design in the context of strong community collaboration is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-0234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-278X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1521/suli.2009.39.6.671</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20121330</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SLBEDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Adult ; Age ; Analysis of Variance ; Attitude Change ; Behavior ; Beliefs ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Community ; Community Involvement ; Control Groups ; Cooperation ; Disease control ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Inservice Training ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mental health ; Middle Aged ; National Surveys ; Pretests Posttests ; Prevention ; Prevention. Health policy. Planification ; Prior Learning ; Program Evaluation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Research Design ; Rural schools ; School districts ; School Personnel ; Schools ; Scores ; Self Efficacy ; Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry ; Suicide ; Suicide - prevention &amp; control ; Suicides &amp; suicide attempts ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching ; Tests ; Time Factors ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Suicide &amp; life-threatening behavior, 2009-12, Vol.39 (6), p.671-681</ispartof><rights>2009 The American Association for Suicidology</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Guilford Publications, Inc. Dec 2009</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5117-2eeefbb3c58cc693c9bd911f02b1a41364a4728656c384fad4ffae66bf3b6f313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5117-2eeefbb3c58cc693c9bd911f02b1a41364a4728656c384fad4ffae66bf3b6f313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/224865860?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21357,21359,21375,21376,27905,27906,33592,33593,33750,33751,33858,33859,34511,34512,43714,43795,43861,44096</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ871502$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22304151$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20121330$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tompkins, Tanya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Jody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraibesh, Nadia</creatorcontrib><title>Does a Gatekeeper Suicide Prevention Program Work in a School Setting? Evaluating Training Outcome and Moderators of Effectiveness</title><title>Suicide &amp; life-threatening behavior</title><addtitle>Suicide Life Threat Behav</addtitle><description>The current study sought to evaluate the suicide prevention gatekeeper training program QPR (Question, Persuade, and Refer) among school personnel using a non‐equivalent control group design. Substantial gains were demonstrated from pre‐ to post‐test for attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs regarding suicide and suicide prevention. Exploratory analyses revealed the possible moderating effects of age, professional role, prior training, and recent contact with suicidal youth on QPR participants' general knowledge, questioning, attitudes toward suicide and suicide prevention, QPR quiz scores, and self‐efficacy. The need for replication using a more rigorous experimental design in the context of strong community collaboration is discussed.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attitude Change</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community Involvement</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inservice Training</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>National Surveys</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prevention. Health policy. Planification</subject><subject>Prior Learning</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Rural schools</subject><subject>School districts</subject><subject>School Personnel</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>Suicide - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Suicides &amp; suicide attempts</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0363-0234</issn><issn>1943-278X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc2O0zAUhS0EYobCCyCELCTEKsV_cZIVgqEUUGFALRSxsRznevA0jYudDMyWJ8dRS5FY4Y2PdL9z7pUOQvcpmdKc0adxaN2UEVJNeTWVU1nQG-iUVoJnrCi_3ESnhEueEcbFCboT4yVJL-G30QkjlFHOySn69dJDxBrPdQ8bgB0EvByccQ3gDwGuoOud75L0F0Fv8dqHDXZd4pfmm_ctXkLfu-7iGZ5d6XbQo8aroF03ivOhN34LWHcNfucbCLr3IWJv8cxaML1L8RDjXXTL6jbCvcM_QZ9ezVZnr7PF-fzN2fNFZnJKi4wBgK1rbvLSGFlxU9VNRaklrKZaUC6FFgUrZS4NL4XVjbBWg5S15bW0nPIJerLP3QX_fYDYq62LBtpWd-CHqAoumCw5JYl89A956YfQpeMUYyKtKOUIsT1kgo8xgFW74LY6XCtK1NiPGvtRYz-KV0qq1E8yPTwkD_UWmqPlTyEJeHwAdDS6tUF3xsW_HONE0HwMerDnIDhzHM_elgXNU-MTVO7HP1wL1_9xmVouVi-oIEWyZnuriz38PFp12CSOF7lav5-rr59X1cd1vlSc_wYsccRt</recordid><startdate>200912</startdate><enddate>200912</enddate><creator>Tompkins, Tanya L.</creator><creator>Witt, Jody</creator><creator>Abraibesh, Nadia</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Guilford Press</general><general>Guilford</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200912</creationdate><title>Does a Gatekeeper Suicide Prevention Program Work in a School Setting? Evaluating Training Outcome and Moderators of Effectiveness</title><author>Tompkins, Tanya L. ; Witt, Jody ; Abraibesh, Nadia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5117-2eeefbb3c58cc693c9bd911f02b1a41364a4728656c384fad4ffae66bf3b6f313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attitude Change</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community Involvement</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inservice Training</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>National Surveys</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prevention. Health policy. Planification</topic><topic>Prior Learning</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Rural schools</topic><topic>School districts</topic><topic>School Personnel</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>Suicide - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Suicides &amp; suicide attempts</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tompkins, Tanya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Jody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraibesh, Nadia</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Suicide &amp; life-threatening behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tompkins, Tanya L.</au><au>Witt, Jody</au><au>Abraibesh, Nadia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ871502</ericid><atitle>Does a Gatekeeper Suicide Prevention Program Work in a School Setting? Evaluating Training Outcome and Moderators of Effectiveness</atitle><jtitle>Suicide &amp; life-threatening behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Suicide Life Threat Behav</addtitle><date>2009-12</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>671</spage><epage>681</epage><pages>671-681</pages><issn>0363-0234</issn><eissn>1943-278X</eissn><coden>SLBEDP</coden><abstract>The current study sought to evaluate the suicide prevention gatekeeper training program QPR (Question, Persuade, and Refer) among school personnel using a non‐equivalent control group design. Substantial gains were demonstrated from pre‐ to post‐test for attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs regarding suicide and suicide prevention. Exploratory analyses revealed the possible moderating effects of age, professional role, prior training, and recent contact with suicidal youth on QPR participants' general knowledge, questioning, attitudes toward suicide and suicide prevention, QPR quiz scores, and self‐efficacy. The need for replication using a more rigorous experimental design in the context of strong community collaboration is discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20121330</pmid><doi>10.1521/suli.2009.39.6.671</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-0234
ispartof Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2009-12, Vol.39 (6), p.671-681
issn 0363-0234
1943-278X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734268310
source Criminology Collection; Wiley; Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; ERIC; Education Collection
subjects Adolescents
Adult
Age
Analysis of Variance
Attitude Change
Behavior
Beliefs
Biological and medical sciences
Chi-Square Distribution
Community
Community Involvement
Control Groups
Cooperation
Disease control
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Inservice Training
Male
Medical sciences
Mental health
Middle Aged
National Surveys
Pretests Posttests
Prevention
Prevention. Health policy. Planification
Prior Learning
Program Evaluation
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Research Design
Rural schools
School districts
School Personnel
Schools
Scores
Self Efficacy
Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry
Suicide
Suicide - prevention & control
Suicides & suicide attempts
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teaching
Tests
Time Factors
Youth
title Does a Gatekeeper Suicide Prevention Program Work in a School Setting? Evaluating Training Outcome and Moderators of Effectiveness
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T22%3A43%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20a%20Gatekeeper%20Suicide%20Prevention%20Program%20Work%20in%20a%20School%20Setting?%20Evaluating%20Training%20Outcome%20and%20Moderators%20of%20Effectiveness&rft.jtitle=Suicide%20&%20life-threatening%20behavior&rft.au=Tompkins,%20Tanya%20L.&rft.date=2009-12&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=671&rft.epage=681&rft.pages=671-681&rft.issn=0363-0234&rft.eissn=1943-278X&rft.coden=SLBEDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1521/suli.2009.39.6.671&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2008046911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5117-2eeefbb3c58cc693c9bd911f02b1a41364a4728656c384fad4ffae66bf3b6f313%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224865860&rft_id=info:pmid/20121330&rft_ericid=EJ871502&rfr_iscdi=true