Loading…
Liaison psychiatry or psychological medicine?
Liaison psychiatry has been recognised in many countries as a special interest or sub-speciality of psychiatry concerned with the management of general hospital patients with psychological problems. However, despite increasing awareness of the emotional and behavioural aspects of illness, it has yet...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of psychiatry 2003-07, Vol.183 (1), p.5-7 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43 |
container_end_page | 7 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 5 |
container_title | British journal of psychiatry |
container_volume | 183 |
creator | Lloyd, Geoffrey G. Mayou, Richard A. |
description | Liaison psychiatry has been recognised in many countries as a special interest or sub-speciality of psychiatry concerned with the management of general hospital patients with psychological problems. However, despite increasing awareness of the emotional and behavioural aspects of illness, it has yet to achieve substantial influence within psychiatry and, more importantly, has had only modest effects on the delivery of medical care by physicians and other specialists. Recognition of its potential by planners and commissioners has been disappointing. Regrettably, in the UK and elsewhere, recent changes in the organisation of health care could hinder its development. This paper argues that in order to make substantial progress there is a compelling need to solve a fundamental obstacle – the separation between psychiatric and general medical care. This requires: (a) convincing the psychiatric profession that consultation-liaison is a distinct sub-speciality; (b) continuing efforts by liaison psychiatrists to define their special expertise and to demonstrate that their services are effective and acceptable to medical colleagues and to patients; (c) persuading those who organise health care that liaison psychiatry services need to be provided and administered as an integral component of comprehensive medical care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1192/bjp.183.1.5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73432880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1192_bjp_183_1_5</cupid><sourcerecordid>2315601240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMotlZP3qUgeJFdM_nYZE8ixS8oeNFzyGazNWW3WZPuof_elC4UxNPwwsMzMy9C14BzgJI8VOs-B0lzyPkJmgITJANW8FM0xRiLDAjHE3QR4zpFyog4RxMgknJC2RRlS6dd9Jt5H3fm2-lt2M19OCTf-pUzup13tnbGbezjJTprdBvt1Thn6Ovl-XPxli0_Xt8XT8vMUCm3mSwLKZkspaCFsMJQY4qmoqIGI2hlTEMslHVdUMOtxg0IWsqqaEBy29SsYnSG7g7ePvifwcat6lw0tm31xvohKkEZJVLiBN7-Add-CJt0myIUeIGBsD11f6BM8DEG26g-uE6HnQKs9h2q1KFKHSpQPNE3o3Oo0udHdiwtAdmo010VXL2yx63_CX8BbEp6bg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2315601240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Liaison psychiatry or psychological medicine?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><creator>Lloyd, Geoffrey G. ; Mayou, Richard A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Geoffrey G. ; Mayou, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><description>Liaison psychiatry has been recognised in many countries as a special interest or sub-speciality of psychiatry concerned with the management of general hospital patients with psychological problems. However, despite increasing awareness of the emotional and behavioural aspects of illness, it has yet to achieve substantial influence within psychiatry and, more importantly, has had only modest effects on the delivery of medical care by physicians and other specialists. Recognition of its potential by planners and commissioners has been disappointing. Regrettably, in the UK and elsewhere, recent changes in the organisation of health care could hinder its development. This paper argues that in order to make substantial progress there is a compelling need to solve a fundamental obstacle – the separation between psychiatric and general medical care. This requires: (a) convincing the psychiatric profession that consultation-liaison is a distinct sub-speciality; (b) continuing efforts by liaison psychiatrists to define their special expertise and to demonstrate that their services are effective and acceptable to medical colleagues and to patients; (c) persuading those who organise health care that liaison psychiatry services need to be provided and administered as an integral component of comprehensive medical care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1250</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-1465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1192/bjp.183.1.5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12835234</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Chronic illnesses ; Departments ; Editorials ; Emotional behavior ; Experts ; Health care ; Health care delivery ; Health services ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Interprofessional Relations ; Liaison ; Liaison psychiatry ; Medicine ; Mental disorders ; Mental health care ; Mental Health Services - organization & administration ; Organizational Innovation ; Patients ; Physicians ; Primary care ; Psychiatrists ; Psychiatry ; Psychiatry - methods ; Psychiatry - organization & administration ; Psychological medicine ; Psychological problems ; Psychology, Medical ; Psychosis ; Referral and Consultation ; Specialists ; State Medicine - organization & administration ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>British journal of psychiatry, 2003-07, Vol.183 (1), p.5-7</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2315601240/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2315601240?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,21393,21394,27923,27924,30998,33610,33611,34529,34530,43732,44114,72731,73992,74410</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12835234$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Geoffrey G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayou, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><title>Liaison psychiatry or psychological medicine?</title><title>British journal of psychiatry</title><addtitle>Br J Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Liaison psychiatry has been recognised in many countries as a special interest or sub-speciality of psychiatry concerned with the management of general hospital patients with psychological problems. However, despite increasing awareness of the emotional and behavioural aspects of illness, it has yet to achieve substantial influence within psychiatry and, more importantly, has had only modest effects on the delivery of medical care by physicians and other specialists. Recognition of its potential by planners and commissioners has been disappointing. Regrettably, in the UK and elsewhere, recent changes in the organisation of health care could hinder its development. This paper argues that in order to make substantial progress there is a compelling need to solve a fundamental obstacle – the separation between psychiatric and general medical care. This requires: (a) convincing the psychiatric profession that consultation-liaison is a distinct sub-speciality; (b) continuing efforts by liaison psychiatrists to define their special expertise and to demonstrate that their services are effective and acceptable to medical colleagues and to patients; (c) persuading those who organise health care that liaison psychiatry services need to be provided and administered as an integral component of comprehensive medical care.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Editorials</subject><subject>Emotional behavior</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, General</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Liaison</subject><subject>Liaison psychiatry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Psychiatrists</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychiatry - methods</subject><subject>Psychiatry - organization & administration</subject><subject>Psychological medicine</subject><subject>Psychological problems</subject><subject>Psychology, Medical</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Specialists</subject><subject>State Medicine - organization & administration</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0007-1250</issn><issn>1472-1465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMotlZP3qUgeJFdM_nYZE8ixS8oeNFzyGazNWW3WZPuof_elC4UxNPwwsMzMy9C14BzgJI8VOs-B0lzyPkJmgITJANW8FM0xRiLDAjHE3QR4zpFyog4RxMgknJC2RRlS6dd9Jt5H3fm2-lt2M19OCTf-pUzup13tnbGbezjJTprdBvt1Thn6Ovl-XPxli0_Xt8XT8vMUCm3mSwLKZkspaCFsMJQY4qmoqIGI2hlTEMslHVdUMOtxg0IWsqqaEBy29SsYnSG7g7ePvifwcat6lw0tm31xvohKkEZJVLiBN7-Add-CJt0myIUeIGBsD11f6BM8DEG26g-uE6HnQKs9h2q1KFKHSpQPNE3o3Oo0udHdiwtAdmo010VXL2yx63_CX8BbEp6bg</recordid><startdate>200307</startdate><enddate>200307</enddate><creator>Lloyd, Geoffrey G.</creator><creator>Mayou, Richard A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200307</creationdate><title>Liaison psychiatry or psychological medicine?</title><author>Lloyd, Geoffrey G. ; Mayou, Richard A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Editorials</topic><topic>Emotional behavior</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, General</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Liaison</topic><topic>Liaison psychiatry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Psychiatrists</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychiatry - methods</topic><topic>Psychiatry - organization & administration</topic><topic>Psychological medicine</topic><topic>Psychological problems</topic><topic>Psychology, Medical</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Specialists</topic><topic>State Medicine - organization & administration</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Geoffrey G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayou, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lloyd, Geoffrey G.</au><au>Mayou, Richard A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Liaison psychiatry or psychological medicine?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2003-07</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>5-7</pages><issn>0007-1250</issn><eissn>1472-1465</eissn><abstract>Liaison psychiatry has been recognised in many countries as a special interest or sub-speciality of psychiatry concerned with the management of general hospital patients with psychological problems. However, despite increasing awareness of the emotional and behavioural aspects of illness, it has yet to achieve substantial influence within psychiatry and, more importantly, has had only modest effects on the delivery of medical care by physicians and other specialists. Recognition of its potential by planners and commissioners has been disappointing. Regrettably, in the UK and elsewhere, recent changes in the organisation of health care could hinder its development. This paper argues that in order to make substantial progress there is a compelling need to solve a fundamental obstacle – the separation between psychiatric and general medical care. This requires: (a) convincing the psychiatric profession that consultation-liaison is a distinct sub-speciality; (b) continuing efforts by liaison psychiatrists to define their special expertise and to demonstrate that their services are effective and acceptable to medical colleagues and to patients; (c) persuading those who organise health care that liaison psychiatry services need to be provided and administered as an integral component of comprehensive medical care.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>12835234</pmid><doi>10.1192/bjp.183.1.5</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1250 |
ispartof | British journal of psychiatry, 2003-07, Vol.183 (1), p.5-7 |
issn | 0007-1250 1472-1465 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73432880 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge Journals Online; Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection |
subjects | Behavior Chronic illnesses Departments Editorials Emotional behavior Experts Health care Health care delivery Health services Hospitals Hospitals, General Humans Interprofessional Relations Liaison Liaison psychiatry Medicine Mental disorders Mental health care Mental Health Services - organization & administration Organizational Innovation Patients Physicians Primary care Psychiatrists Psychiatry Psychiatry - methods Psychiatry - organization & administration Psychological medicine Psychological problems Psychology, Medical Psychosis Referral and Consultation Specialists State Medicine - organization & administration United Kingdom |
title | Liaison psychiatry or psychological medicine? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A58%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Liaison%20psychiatry%20or%20psychological%20medicine?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20psychiatry&rft.au=Lloyd,%20Geoffrey%20G.&rft.date=2003-07&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=5-7&rft.issn=0007-1250&rft.eissn=1472-1465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1192/bjp.183.1.5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2315601240%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2315601240&rft_id=info:pmid/12835234&rft_cupid=10_1192_bjp_183_1_5&rfr_iscdi=true |