Loading…

Liaison psychiatry or psychological medicine?

Liaison psychiatry has been recognised in many countries as a special interest or sub-speciality of psychiatry concerned with the management of general hospital patients with psychological problems. However, despite increasing awareness of the emotional and behavioural aspects of illness, it has yet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of psychiatry 2003-07, Vol.183 (1), p.5-7
Main Authors: Lloyd, Geoffrey G., Mayou, Richard A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43
container_end_page 7
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title British journal of psychiatry
container_volume 183
creator Lloyd, Geoffrey G.
Mayou, Richard A.
description Liaison psychiatry has been recognised in many countries as a special interest or sub-speciality of psychiatry concerned with the management of general hospital patients with psychological problems. However, despite increasing awareness of the emotional and behavioural aspects of illness, it has yet to achieve substantial influence within psychiatry and, more importantly, has had only modest effects on the delivery of medical care by physicians and other specialists. Recognition of its potential by planners and commissioners has been disappointing. Regrettably, in the UK and elsewhere, recent changes in the organisation of health care could hinder its development. This paper argues that in order to make substantial progress there is a compelling need to solve a fundamental obstacle – the separation between psychiatric and general medical care. This requires: (a) convincing the psychiatric profession that consultation-liaison is a distinct sub-speciality; (b) continuing efforts by liaison psychiatrists to define their special expertise and to demonstrate that their services are effective and acceptable to medical colleagues and to patients; (c) persuading those who organise health care that liaison psychiatry services need to be provided and administered as an integral component of comprehensive medical care.
doi_str_mv 10.1192/bjp.183.1.5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73432880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1192_bjp_183_1_5</cupid><sourcerecordid>2315601240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMotlZP3qUgeJFdM_nYZE8ixS8oeNFzyGazNWW3WZPuof_elC4UxNPwwsMzMy9C14BzgJI8VOs-B0lzyPkJmgITJANW8FM0xRiLDAjHE3QR4zpFyog4RxMgknJC2RRlS6dd9Jt5H3fm2-lt2M19OCTf-pUzup13tnbGbezjJTprdBvt1Thn6Ovl-XPxli0_Xt8XT8vMUCm3mSwLKZkspaCFsMJQY4qmoqIGI2hlTEMslHVdUMOtxg0IWsqqaEBy29SsYnSG7g7ePvifwcat6lw0tm31xvohKkEZJVLiBN7-Add-CJt0myIUeIGBsD11f6BM8DEG26g-uE6HnQKs9h2q1KFKHSpQPNE3o3Oo0udHdiwtAdmo010VXL2yx63_CX8BbEp6bg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2315601240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Liaison psychiatry or psychological medicine?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><creator>Lloyd, Geoffrey G. ; Mayou, Richard A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Geoffrey G. ; Mayou, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><description>Liaison psychiatry has been recognised in many countries as a special interest or sub-speciality of psychiatry concerned with the management of general hospital patients with psychological problems. However, despite increasing awareness of the emotional and behavioural aspects of illness, it has yet to achieve substantial influence within psychiatry and, more importantly, has had only modest effects on the delivery of medical care by physicians and other specialists. Recognition of its potential by planners and commissioners has been disappointing. Regrettably, in the UK and elsewhere, recent changes in the organisation of health care could hinder its development. This paper argues that in order to make substantial progress there is a compelling need to solve a fundamental obstacle – the separation between psychiatric and general medical care. This requires: (a) convincing the psychiatric profession that consultation-liaison is a distinct sub-speciality; (b) continuing efforts by liaison psychiatrists to define their special expertise and to demonstrate that their services are effective and acceptable to medical colleagues and to patients; (c) persuading those who organise health care that liaison psychiatry services need to be provided and administered as an integral component of comprehensive medical care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1250</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-1465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1192/bjp.183.1.5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12835234</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Chronic illnesses ; Departments ; Editorials ; Emotional behavior ; Experts ; Health care ; Health care delivery ; Health services ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Interprofessional Relations ; Liaison ; Liaison psychiatry ; Medicine ; Mental disorders ; Mental health care ; Mental Health Services - organization &amp; administration ; Organizational Innovation ; Patients ; Physicians ; Primary care ; Psychiatrists ; Psychiatry ; Psychiatry - methods ; Psychiatry - organization &amp; administration ; Psychological medicine ; Psychological problems ; Psychology, Medical ; Psychosis ; Referral and Consultation ; Specialists ; State Medicine - organization &amp; administration ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>British journal of psychiatry, 2003-07, Vol.183 (1), p.5-7</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2315601240/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2315601240?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,21393,21394,27923,27924,30998,33610,33611,34529,34530,43732,44114,72731,73992,74410</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12835234$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Geoffrey G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayou, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><title>Liaison psychiatry or psychological medicine?</title><title>British journal of psychiatry</title><addtitle>Br J Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Liaison psychiatry has been recognised in many countries as a special interest or sub-speciality of psychiatry concerned with the management of general hospital patients with psychological problems. However, despite increasing awareness of the emotional and behavioural aspects of illness, it has yet to achieve substantial influence within psychiatry and, more importantly, has had only modest effects on the delivery of medical care by physicians and other specialists. Recognition of its potential by planners and commissioners has been disappointing. Regrettably, in the UK and elsewhere, recent changes in the organisation of health care could hinder its development. This paper argues that in order to make substantial progress there is a compelling need to solve a fundamental obstacle – the separation between psychiatric and general medical care. This requires: (a) convincing the psychiatric profession that consultation-liaison is a distinct sub-speciality; (b) continuing efforts by liaison psychiatrists to define their special expertise and to demonstrate that their services are effective and acceptable to medical colleagues and to patients; (c) persuading those who organise health care that liaison psychiatry services need to be provided and administered as an integral component of comprehensive medical care.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Editorials</subject><subject>Emotional behavior</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, General</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Liaison</subject><subject>Liaison psychiatry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Psychiatrists</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychiatry - methods</subject><subject>Psychiatry - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Psychological medicine</subject><subject>Psychological problems</subject><subject>Psychology, Medical</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Specialists</subject><subject>State Medicine - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0007-1250</issn><issn>1472-1465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMotlZP3qUgeJFdM_nYZE8ixS8oeNFzyGazNWW3WZPuof_elC4UxNPwwsMzMy9C14BzgJI8VOs-B0lzyPkJmgITJANW8FM0xRiLDAjHE3QR4zpFyog4RxMgknJC2RRlS6dd9Jt5H3fm2-lt2M19OCTf-pUzup13tnbGbezjJTprdBvt1Thn6Ovl-XPxli0_Xt8XT8vMUCm3mSwLKZkspaCFsMJQY4qmoqIGI2hlTEMslHVdUMOtxg0IWsqqaEBy29SsYnSG7g7ePvifwcat6lw0tm31xvohKkEZJVLiBN7-Add-CJt0myIUeIGBsD11f6BM8DEG26g-uE6HnQKs9h2q1KFKHSpQPNE3o3Oo0udHdiwtAdmo010VXL2yx63_CX8BbEp6bg</recordid><startdate>200307</startdate><enddate>200307</enddate><creator>Lloyd, Geoffrey G.</creator><creator>Mayou, Richard A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200307</creationdate><title>Liaison psychiatry or psychological medicine?</title><author>Lloyd, Geoffrey G. ; Mayou, Richard A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Editorials</topic><topic>Emotional behavior</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, General</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Liaison</topic><topic>Liaison psychiatry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Psychiatrists</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychiatry - methods</topic><topic>Psychiatry - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Psychological medicine</topic><topic>Psychological problems</topic><topic>Psychology, Medical</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Specialists</topic><topic>State Medicine - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Geoffrey G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayou, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lloyd, Geoffrey G.</au><au>Mayou, Richard A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Liaison psychiatry or psychological medicine?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2003-07</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>5-7</pages><issn>0007-1250</issn><eissn>1472-1465</eissn><abstract>Liaison psychiatry has been recognised in many countries as a special interest or sub-speciality of psychiatry concerned with the management of general hospital patients with psychological problems. However, despite increasing awareness of the emotional and behavioural aspects of illness, it has yet to achieve substantial influence within psychiatry and, more importantly, has had only modest effects on the delivery of medical care by physicians and other specialists. Recognition of its potential by planners and commissioners has been disappointing. Regrettably, in the UK and elsewhere, recent changes in the organisation of health care could hinder its development. This paper argues that in order to make substantial progress there is a compelling need to solve a fundamental obstacle – the separation between psychiatric and general medical care. This requires: (a) convincing the psychiatric profession that consultation-liaison is a distinct sub-speciality; (b) continuing efforts by liaison psychiatrists to define their special expertise and to demonstrate that their services are effective and acceptable to medical colleagues and to patients; (c) persuading those who organise health care that liaison psychiatry services need to be provided and administered as an integral component of comprehensive medical care.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>12835234</pmid><doi>10.1192/bjp.183.1.5</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1250
ispartof British journal of psychiatry, 2003-07, Vol.183 (1), p.5-7
issn 0007-1250
1472-1465
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73432880
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge Journals Online; Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection
subjects Behavior
Chronic illnesses
Departments
Editorials
Emotional behavior
Experts
Health care
Health care delivery
Health services
Hospitals
Hospitals, General
Humans
Interprofessional Relations
Liaison
Liaison psychiatry
Medicine
Mental disorders
Mental health care
Mental Health Services - organization & administration
Organizational Innovation
Patients
Physicians
Primary care
Psychiatrists
Psychiatry
Psychiatry - methods
Psychiatry - organization & administration
Psychological medicine
Psychological problems
Psychology, Medical
Psychosis
Referral and Consultation
Specialists
State Medicine - organization & administration
United Kingdom
title Liaison psychiatry or psychological medicine?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A58%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Liaison%20psychiatry%20or%20psychological%20medicine?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20psychiatry&rft.au=Lloyd,%20Geoffrey%20G.&rft.date=2003-07&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=5-7&rft.issn=0007-1250&rft.eissn=1472-1465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1192/bjp.183.1.5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2315601240%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-8968848987367e7c3cc6fb37d1c73bccf2e19dd63c5ea0f17398b6f185efd4b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2315601240&rft_id=info:pmid/12835234&rft_cupid=10_1192_bjp_183_1_5&rfr_iscdi=true