Loading…
Multicenter phase-II trial of safety and efficacy of NC100150 for steady-state contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography
The aim of this study was to test the safety and efficacy of NC100150 injection for steady-state contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography in a multicentre phase-II trial. Thirty-three patients underwent steady-state NC100150 enhanced MR angiography (5 mg Fe/kg body weight) of the aortoiliac and f...
Saved in:
Published in: | European radiology 2003-07, Vol.13 (7), p.1620-1627 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f860ddd47b9292bec10d4103c7f86ec833e3e44f23230cf0f194f0ee5dc30c8d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f860ddd47b9292bec10d4103c7f86ec833e3e44f23230cf0f194f0ee5dc30c8d3 |
container_end_page | 1627 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1620 |
container_title | European radiology |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Leiner, Tim Ho, Kai Yiu J A M Ho, Vincent B Bongartz, Georg Mali, Willem P T M Rasch, Wenche van Engelshoven, Jos M A |
description | The aim of this study was to test the safety and efficacy of NC100150 injection for steady-state contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography in a multicentre phase-II trial. Thirty-three patients underwent steady-state NC100150 enhanced MR angiography (5 mg Fe/kg body weight) of the aortoiliac and femoropopliteal arteries. Safety assessment consisted of pre- and post-injection (2, 24 and 72 h) monitoring of vital signs, physical examination as well as laboratory and electrocardiographic parameters. To determine sensitivity and specificity for detection of haemodynamically significant stenoses (HSS; >50% reduction of luminal diameter) MR angiograms were compared with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA DSA), which was considered the standard of reference. In 33 patients a mean of 12.8 ml NC100150 was injected. Eleven patients reported 13 mild and 2 moderate adverse events. Five mild and one moderate adverse event were considered due to NC100150 injection. There were no significant changes in vital signs, laboratory or electrocardiographic parameters. Sensitivity and specificity (in percent) for detection of HSS were 87 and 64, 56 and 76, and 75 and 84, for iliac, femoral and popliteal arteries, respectively. NC100150 high-resolution steady-state MR angiography can be performed safely and is feasible for the detection of peripheral arterial HSS, but is as yet not a clinically useful alternative to conventional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00330-002-1791-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73447930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2084596861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f860ddd47b9292bec10d4103c7f86ec833e3e44f23230cf0f194f0ee5dc30c8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFuEzEQhi0EoqHwAFyQxaE3w3jtxOsjiqBEKnBpz5Zjj5OtNvZiew_7Cjw1jhIJidNoZv75_5E-Qt5z-MQB1OcCIAQwgI5xpTnbvCArLkXroJcvyQq06JnSWt6QN6U8A4DmUr0mN7zrxVortSJ_fsxjHRzGiplOR1uQ7Xa05sGONAVabMC6UBs9xRAGZ91yHv_ctny-BhpSpqWi9Qsr1VakLsWabakM49FGh55OmIfpiLkZnuwhYkujGUuK53VzPgzpkO10XN6SV8GOBd9d6y15-vb1cfudPfy6322_PDAnOllZ6DfgvZdqrzvd7dFx8JKDcKpt0PVCoEApQyc6AS5A4FoGQFx71_rei1tyd_Gdcvo9Y6nmNBSH42gjprkYJaRUWkATfvxP-JzmHNtvZsOF6jq9Fk3ELyKXUykZg5nycLJ5MRzMmZK5UDKNkjlTMpt28-FqPO9P6P9dXLGIvwuPjk4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>613722953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multicenter phase-II trial of safety and efficacy of NC100150 for steady-state contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Leiner, Tim ; Ho, Kai Yiu J A M ; Ho, Vincent B ; Bongartz, Georg ; Mali, Willem P T M ; Rasch, Wenche ; van Engelshoven, Jos M A</creator><creatorcontrib>Leiner, Tim ; Ho, Kai Yiu J A M ; Ho, Vincent B ; Bongartz, Georg ; Mali, Willem P T M ; Rasch, Wenche ; van Engelshoven, Jos M A</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to test the safety and efficacy of NC100150 injection for steady-state contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography in a multicentre phase-II trial. Thirty-three patients underwent steady-state NC100150 enhanced MR angiography (5 mg Fe/kg body weight) of the aortoiliac and femoropopliteal arteries. Safety assessment consisted of pre- and post-injection (2, 24 and 72 h) monitoring of vital signs, physical examination as well as laboratory and electrocardiographic parameters. To determine sensitivity and specificity for detection of haemodynamically significant stenoses (HSS; >50% reduction of luminal diameter) MR angiograms were compared with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA DSA), which was considered the standard of reference. In 33 patients a mean of 12.8 ml NC100150 was injected. Eleven patients reported 13 mild and 2 moderate adverse events. Five mild and one moderate adverse event were considered due to NC100150 injection. There were no significant changes in vital signs, laboratory or electrocardiographic parameters. Sensitivity and specificity (in percent) for detection of HSS were 87 and 64, 56 and 76, and 75 and 84, for iliac, femoral and popliteal arteries, respectively. NC100150 high-resolution steady-state MR angiography can be performed safely and is feasible for the detection of peripheral arterial HSS, but is as yet not a clinically useful alternative to conventional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1791-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12835977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Angiography, Digital Subtraction ; Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnosis ; Contrast Media ; Dextrans ; Female ; Ferrosoferric Oxide ; Humans ; Iron ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography ; Magnetite Nanoparticles ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Oxides ; Peripheral Vascular Diseases - diagnosis ; Safety ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2003-07, Vol.13 (7), p.1620-1627</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f860ddd47b9292bec10d4103c7f86ec833e3e44f23230cf0f194f0ee5dc30c8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f860ddd47b9292bec10d4103c7f86ec833e3e44f23230cf0f194f0ee5dc30c8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12835977$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leiner, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Kai Yiu J A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Vincent B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bongartz, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mali, Willem P T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasch, Wenche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Engelshoven, Jos M A</creatorcontrib><title>Multicenter phase-II trial of safety and efficacy of NC100150 for steady-state contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to test the safety and efficacy of NC100150 injection for steady-state contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography in a multicentre phase-II trial. Thirty-three patients underwent steady-state NC100150 enhanced MR angiography (5 mg Fe/kg body weight) of the aortoiliac and femoropopliteal arteries. Safety assessment consisted of pre- and post-injection (2, 24 and 72 h) monitoring of vital signs, physical examination as well as laboratory and electrocardiographic parameters. To determine sensitivity and specificity for detection of haemodynamically significant stenoses (HSS; >50% reduction of luminal diameter) MR angiograms were compared with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA DSA), which was considered the standard of reference. In 33 patients a mean of 12.8 ml NC100150 was injected. Eleven patients reported 13 mild and 2 moderate adverse events. Five mild and one moderate adverse event were considered due to NC100150 injection. There were no significant changes in vital signs, laboratory or electrocardiographic parameters. Sensitivity and specificity (in percent) for detection of HSS were 87 and 64, 56 and 76, and 75 and 84, for iliac, femoral and popliteal arteries, respectively. NC100150 high-resolution steady-state MR angiography can be performed safely and is feasible for the detection of peripheral arterial HSS, but is as yet not a clinically useful alternative to conventional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.</description><subject>Angiography, Digital Subtraction</subject><subject>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Dextrans</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ferrosoferric Oxide</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Angiography</subject><subject>Magnetite Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oxides</subject><subject>Peripheral Vascular Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcFuEzEQhi0EoqHwAFyQxaE3w3jtxOsjiqBEKnBpz5Zjj5OtNvZiew_7Cjw1jhIJidNoZv75_5E-Qt5z-MQB1OcCIAQwgI5xpTnbvCArLkXroJcvyQq06JnSWt6QN6U8A4DmUr0mN7zrxVortSJ_fsxjHRzGiplOR1uQ7Xa05sGONAVabMC6UBs9xRAGZ91yHv_ctny-BhpSpqWi9Qsr1VakLsWabakM49FGh55OmIfpiLkZnuwhYkujGUuK53VzPgzpkO10XN6SV8GOBd9d6y15-vb1cfudPfy6322_PDAnOllZ6DfgvZdqrzvd7dFx8JKDcKpt0PVCoEApQyc6AS5A4FoGQFx71_rei1tyd_Gdcvo9Y6nmNBSH42gjprkYJaRUWkATfvxP-JzmHNtvZsOF6jq9Fk3ELyKXUykZg5nycLJ5MRzMmZK5UDKNkjlTMpt28-FqPO9P6P9dXLGIvwuPjk4</recordid><startdate>200307</startdate><enddate>200307</enddate><creator>Leiner, Tim</creator><creator>Ho, Kai Yiu J A M</creator><creator>Ho, Vincent B</creator><creator>Bongartz, Georg</creator><creator>Mali, Willem P T M</creator><creator>Rasch, Wenche</creator><creator>van Engelshoven, Jos M A</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200307</creationdate><title>Multicenter phase-II trial of safety and efficacy of NC100150 for steady-state contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography</title><author>Leiner, Tim ; Ho, Kai Yiu J A M ; Ho, Vincent B ; Bongartz, Georg ; Mali, Willem P T M ; Rasch, Wenche ; van Engelshoven, Jos M A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f860ddd47b9292bec10d4103c7f86ec833e3e44f23230cf0f194f0ee5dc30c8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Angiography, Digital Subtraction</topic><topic>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Dextrans</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ferrosoferric Oxide</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Angiography</topic><topic>Magnetite Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oxides</topic><topic>Peripheral Vascular Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leiner, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Kai Yiu J A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Vincent B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bongartz, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mali, Willem P T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasch, Wenche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Engelshoven, Jos M A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leiner, Tim</au><au>Ho, Kai Yiu J A M</au><au>Ho, Vincent B</au><au>Bongartz, Georg</au><au>Mali, Willem P T M</au><au>Rasch, Wenche</au><au>van Engelshoven, Jos M A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multicenter phase-II trial of safety and efficacy of NC100150 for steady-state contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2003-07</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1620</spage><epage>1627</epage><pages>1620-1627</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to test the safety and efficacy of NC100150 injection for steady-state contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography in a multicentre phase-II trial. Thirty-three patients underwent steady-state NC100150 enhanced MR angiography (5 mg Fe/kg body weight) of the aortoiliac and femoropopliteal arteries. Safety assessment consisted of pre- and post-injection (2, 24 and 72 h) monitoring of vital signs, physical examination as well as laboratory and electrocardiographic parameters. To determine sensitivity and specificity for detection of haemodynamically significant stenoses (HSS; >50% reduction of luminal diameter) MR angiograms were compared with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA DSA), which was considered the standard of reference. In 33 patients a mean of 12.8 ml NC100150 was injected. Eleven patients reported 13 mild and 2 moderate adverse events. Five mild and one moderate adverse event were considered due to NC100150 injection. There were no significant changes in vital signs, laboratory or electrocardiographic parameters. Sensitivity and specificity (in percent) for detection of HSS were 87 and 64, 56 and 76, and 75 and 84, for iliac, femoral and popliteal arteries, respectively. NC100150 high-resolution steady-state MR angiography can be performed safely and is feasible for the detection of peripheral arterial HSS, but is as yet not a clinically useful alternative to conventional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>12835977</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-002-1791-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
ispartof | European radiology, 2003-07, Vol.13 (7), p.1620-1627 |
issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73447930 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Angiography, Digital Subtraction Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnosis Contrast Media Dextrans Female Ferrosoferric Oxide Humans Iron Magnetic Resonance Angiography Magnetite Nanoparticles Male Medical imaging Middle Aged Oxides Peripheral Vascular Diseases - diagnosis Safety Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Multicenter phase-II trial of safety and efficacy of NC100150 for steady-state contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A54%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicenter%20phase-II%20trial%20of%20safety%20and%20efficacy%20of%20NC100150%20for%20steady-state%20contrast-enhanced%20peripheral%20magnetic%20resonance%20angiography&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Leiner,%20Tim&rft.date=2003-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1620&rft.epage=1627&rft.pages=1620-1627&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-002-1791-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2084596861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f860ddd47b9292bec10d4103c7f86ec833e3e44f23230cf0f194f0ee5dc30c8d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=613722953&rft_id=info:pmid/12835977&rfr_iscdi=true |