Child death review: The state of the nation

Child death review (CDR) is a mechanism to more accurately describe the causes and circumstances of death among children. The number of states performing CDR has more than doubled since 1992, but little is known about the characteristics of these programs. The purpose of this study was to describe t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2003-07, Vol.25 (1), p.58-64
Main Authors: Webster, Romi A, Schnitzer, Patricia G, Jenny, Carole, Ewigman, Bernard G, Alario, Anthony J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Cause of Death
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Infant
Infant Mortality
Male
Program Development
Public Health Informatics
United States - epidemiology
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Child death review (CDR) is a mechanism to more accurately describe the causes and circumstances of death among children. The number of states performing CDR has more than doubled since 1992, but little is known about the characteristics of these programs. The purpose of this study was to describe the current status of CDR in the United States and to document variability in program purpose, scope, organization, and process. Investigators administered a written survey to CDR program representatives from 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC), followed by a telephone interview. All 50 states and DC participated; 48 states and DC have an active CDR program. A total of 94% of programs agreed that identifying the cause of and preventing future deaths are important purposes of CDR. Assistance with child maltreatment prosecution was cited as an important purpose by only 13 states (27%). Twenty-two states (45%) review deaths from all causes, while six states (12%) review only deaths due to child maltreatment. CDR legislation exists in 33 states. Fifty-three percent of the CDR programs were implemented since 1996, and 59% report no or inadequate funding. CDR contributes to the death investigation process in seven states (14%), but the majority (59%) of reviews are retrospective, occurring months to years after the child’s death. CDR programs in the United States share commonalities in purpose and scope. Without national leadership, however, the wide variation in organization and process threatens to limit CDR effectiveness.
ISSN:0749-3797
1873-2607
DOI:10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00091-6