Loading…

Adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of cefetamet in human urine

On the basis of previously established mechanism of cefetamet (CEF) reduction, two methods were suggested for CEF determination—differential pulse polarographic and differential pulse adsorptive stripping voltammetric method. Two pH values were chosen, 2.0 and 8.4, where the electrochemical process...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis 2003-08, Vol.32 (4), p.957-966
Main Authors: ALEKSIC, Mara, MILOVANOVIC, Ljiljana, KAPETANOVIC, Vera
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:On the basis of previously established mechanism of cefetamet (CEF) reduction, two methods were suggested for CEF determination—differential pulse polarographic and differential pulse adsorptive stripping voltammetric method. Two pH values were chosen, 2.0 and 8.4, where the electrochemical process was defined as one four-electron and two two-electron processes, respectively. The methods were performed in Britton–Robinson (BR) buffer and the corresponding calibration graphs were constructed and statistical parameters were evaluated. Applying the AdSV method at pH 2.0 linearity was achieved from 2×10 −8 to 2×10 −7 M with limit detection and limit determination of 4×10 −9 and 1.4×10 −8 M, respectively. At pH 8.4, the linearity was obtained between 6×10 −8 and 6×10 −7 M, with limit detection and limit determination of 1.5×10 −8 and 5×10 −8 M, respectively. Since the AdSV method enabled lower concentrations of CEF to be determined, this method was tested for CEF determination in spiked urine samples, and DPP method was used as a comparative one.
ISSN:0731-7085
1873-264X
DOI:10.1016/S0731-7085(03)00197-3