Loading…

Comparison between Rules-Based Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Genotype Interpretations and Real or Virtual Phenotype: Concordance Analysis and Correlation with Clinical Outcome in Heavily Treated Patients

We compared 2 rules-based genotype interpretation systems and real or virtual phenotype through a retrospective analysis of a prospective trial. Genotypes were determined with VircoGEN II (VIRCO) and were interpreted with either RetroGram 1.4 or TRUGENE HIV-1 (guidelines 3.0) or original virtual phe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of infectious diseases 2003-07, Vol.188 (2), p.194-201
Main Authors: Torti, Carlo, Quiros-Roldan, Eugenia, Keulen, Wilco, Scudeller, Luigia, Lo Caputo, Sergio, Boucher, Charles, Castelli, Francesco, Mazzotta, Francesco, Pierotti, Piera, Been-Tiktak, Anne Mieke, Buccoliero, Giovanni, De Gennaro, Michele, Carosi, Giampiero, Tinelli, Carmine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We compared 2 rules-based genotype interpretation systems and real or virtual phenotype through a retrospective analysis of a prospective trial. Genotypes were determined with VircoGEN II (VIRCO) and were interpreted with either RetroGram 1.4 or TRUGENE HIV-1 (guidelines 3.0) or original virtual phenotype (Virtual Phenotype; VIRCO), as available in the year 2000. Among 188 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 isolates, overall concordance (κ agreement) was observed for the 2 rules-based systems, whereas striking discordances were noted between them and real and virtual phenotype interpretations for stavudine, didanosine, zalcitabine, abacavir, and amprenavir (κ
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1086/376512