ASSESSMENT OF A RADIOTHERAPY PATIENT IMMOBILIZATION DEVICE USING SINGLE PLANE PORT RADIOGRAPHS AND A REMOTE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER

Radiation treatment requires a precise procedure for Intel‐fraction repositioning of the patient. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of our fixation device in treatment position and to evaluate the setup accuracy with two different methods. The positioning data of 19 canine pati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veterinary radiology & ultrasound 2003-07, Vol.44 (4), p.470-475
Main Authors: Rohrer Bley, Carla, Blattmann, Hans, Roos, Malgorzata, Sumova, Andrea, Kaser-Hotz, Barbara
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animals
Dog Diseases - radiotherapy
Dogs
Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Head and Neck Neoplasms - veterinary
Immobilization
immobilization device
radiation therapy
Radiotherapy - methods
Radiotherapy - veterinary
random displacement
systematic displacement
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Radiation treatment requires a precise procedure for Intel‐fraction repositioning of the patient. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of our fixation device in treatment position and to evaluate the setup accuracy with two different methods. The positioning data of 19 canine patients with tumors in the head region (oral, nasal, cerebral) treated with photon or proton irradiation were included in this study. The patients were immobilized by means of an individualized fixation device. Focus was set upon interfraction displacement with systematic and random components. In one method, treatment position was evaluated using single plane port radiographs and megavoltage x‐rays. In the other method, two orthogonal CT‐topograms were acquired to evaluate the precision of positioning of the patient in the immobilization device. Systematic and random displacements were calculated and presented as mean values with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. In spite of a difference between both methods, the positioning seemed to be accurate within the expected range. It seems that a safety margin of 3.7 mm would be enough for both methods to take into account systematic and random position variability in the fixation device, thereby preventing geometric inaccuracies of treatment delivery. The reported immobilization protocol provides accurate patient immobilization for photon and conformal proton radiation therapy.
ISSN:1058-8183
1740-8261
DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8261.2003.tb00487.x