Loading…

Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: an evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics

The aim of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate bond strength and debonding characteristics when a xenon plasma arc curing light is used to bond polycrystalline and monocrystalline ceramic brackets. Brackets were bonded to 240 extracted bovine mandibular incisors with a composite adhesive. Cu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2003-09, Vol.124 (3), p.309-315
Main Authors: Klocke, Arndt, Korbmacher, Heike M, Huck, Lothar G, Ghosh, Joydeep, Kahl-Nieke, Bärbel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate bond strength and debonding characteristics when a xenon plasma arc curing light is used to bond polycrystalline and monocrystalline ceramic brackets. Brackets were bonded to 240 extracted bovine mandibular incisors with a composite adhesive. Curing intervals of 1, 3, and 6 seconds were chosen for curing with the plasma arc light, and the control group was cured at 10 seconds per bracket with a conventional halogen light. Debonding was performed on a universal testing machine and according to the bracket manufacturers’ recommendations. Both the polycrystalline and the monocrystalline brackets consistently debonded at the bracket-adhesive interface, regardless of debonding method, curing interval, or curing light. No enamel fractures were observed after debonding. Bracket fractures were rare and did not affect debonding. Bond strength was significantly higher for the monocrystalline brackets ( P < .0001): mean shear bond strength ranged between 9.68 ± 2.17 MPa (plasma arc curing light, 1 sec curing interval) and 10.73 ± 3.22 MPa (halogen light, 10 sec curing interval) for the polycrystalline brackets and between 19.85 ± 2.97 MPa (plasma arc curing light, 1 sec curing interval) and 22.94 ± 3.20 MPa (plasma arc curing light, 3 sec curing interval) for the monocrystalline brackets. Significant differences were also found for the curing methods used ( P = .047). A curing interval of 3 seconds with the plasma arc curing light is recommended for both polycrystalline and monocrystalline ceramic brackets.
ISSN:0889-5406
1097-6752
DOI:10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00310-X