Loading…
Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Improve Insulin Tolerance in Mice
Objective: To determine if the addition or removal of dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) would alter insulin tolerances in mice from two genetic lines. Research Methods and Procedures: High metabolic rate (MH) and low metabolic rate (ML) mice were assigned to consume 1) a control diet ad libitum...
Saved in:
Published in: | Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Md.), 2003-09, Vol.11 (9), p.1104-1115 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3 |
container_end_page | 1115 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1104 |
container_title | Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Hargrave, Kimberly M. Azain, Michael J. Kachman, Stephen D. Miner, Jess L. |
description | Objective: To determine if the addition or removal of dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) would alter insulin tolerances in mice from two genetic lines.
Research Methods and Procedures: High metabolic rate (MH) and low metabolic rate (ML) mice were assigned to consume 1) a control diet ad libitum, 2) a control diet at a restricted intake, or 3) a diet containing 1% CLA ad libitum. After 9 weeks, an insulin tolerance test was conducted, and a portion of the mice were killed. All remaining mice consumed the control diet ad libitum. Insulin tolerance tests were conducted 11 and 32 days after the diet change, and mice were killed 3 days after each test. Body fatness, fat pad weights, and serum insulin concentrations of mice were determined at each time‐point. Two follow‐up experiments were also conducted.
Results: Restricted mice had insulin sensitivities not different than control mice. CLA‐fed MH mice in experiment 1 were resistant (p < 0.001) to insulin on each day measured. CLA‐fed ML mice were slightly resistant (p = 0.08) to exogenous insulin on day 0 of recovery and not different from control mice on day 11 or 32. Glucose response to insulin in MH mice fed CLA in experiments 2 or 3 did not differ from control mice.
Discussion: Mice fed CLA did not have improved insulin tolerances compared with control mice. In some cases, dietary CLA may cause insulin resistance. MH mice seem more sensitive to CLA than ML mice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/oby.2003.151 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73666922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73666922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgipvTm2cJCJ7szFeb9jjr12C6ywQ9lSx5Kx1dM5tW2X9vSscED56SwO998_AgdE7JmBIe39jldswI4WMa0gM0pAkngeTJ2-H-HtMBOnFuRYiISEiP0YCyRLIopkOUprZatR-qAYNnRWVLKDSe6MLgOwsOv9gGT9eb2n4BnlauLYsKLzyqVaUB-8dzoeEUHeWqdHC2O0fo9eF-kT4Fs_njNJ3MAu0jsEBCLqQxmi-ZAUKB6lhxSXRkBJUhUZzkoc5NEnrAQiEEA4iUFEYkhid5zkfoqt_r83y24JpsXTgNZakqsK3LJI-iKGHMw8s_cGXbuvLZMl8ZkbGQIffqule6ts7VkGebulireutR5-LMV5t11Wa-Ws8vdkvb5RrML9516QHpwXdRwvbfZdn89j2hXVDcj1SqaWvYz3jb0e7bH5MPjKM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030784753</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Improve Insulin Tolerance in Mice</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Hargrave, Kimberly M. ; Azain, Michael J. ; Kachman, Stephen D. ; Miner, Jess L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hargrave, Kimberly M. ; Azain, Michael J. ; Kachman, Stephen D. ; Miner, Jess L.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To determine if the addition or removal of dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) would alter insulin tolerances in mice from two genetic lines.
Research Methods and Procedures: High metabolic rate (MH) and low metabolic rate (ML) mice were assigned to consume 1) a control diet ad libitum, 2) a control diet at a restricted intake, or 3) a diet containing 1% CLA ad libitum. After 9 weeks, an insulin tolerance test was conducted, and a portion of the mice were killed. All remaining mice consumed the control diet ad libitum. Insulin tolerance tests were conducted 11 and 32 days after the diet change, and mice were killed 3 days after each test. Body fatness, fat pad weights, and serum insulin concentrations of mice were determined at each time‐point. Two follow‐up experiments were also conducted.
Results: Restricted mice had insulin sensitivities not different than control mice. CLA‐fed MH mice in experiment 1 were resistant (p < 0.001) to insulin on each day measured. CLA‐fed ML mice were slightly resistant (p = 0.08) to exogenous insulin on day 0 of recovery and not different from control mice on day 11 or 32. Glucose response to insulin in MH mice fed CLA in experiments 2 or 3 did not differ from control mice.
Discussion: Mice fed CLA did not have improved insulin tolerances compared with control mice. In some cases, dietary CLA may cause insulin resistance. MH mice seem more sensitive to CLA than ML mice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-7381</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-7323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-739X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-8528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/oby.2003.151</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12972681</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adipose Tissue - metabolism ; Animals ; Blood Glucose - analysis ; Body Composition ; body fat ; conjugated linoleic acid ; Energy Metabolism - genetics ; Energy Metabolism - physiology ; Fatty Acids - analysis ; Insulin - metabolism ; insulin tolerance ; Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - administration & dosage ; Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - pharmacology ; Male ; Mice ; Random Allocation</subject><ispartof>Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2003-09, Vol.11 (9), p.1104-1115</ispartof><rights>2003 North American Association for the Study of Obesity (NAASO)</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Sep 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12972681$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hargrave, Kimberly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azain, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachman, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miner, Jess L.</creatorcontrib><title>Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Improve Insulin Tolerance in Mice</title><title>Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)</title><addtitle>Obes Res</addtitle><description>Objective: To determine if the addition or removal of dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) would alter insulin tolerances in mice from two genetic lines.
Research Methods and Procedures: High metabolic rate (MH) and low metabolic rate (ML) mice were assigned to consume 1) a control diet ad libitum, 2) a control diet at a restricted intake, or 3) a diet containing 1% CLA ad libitum. After 9 weeks, an insulin tolerance test was conducted, and a portion of the mice were killed. All remaining mice consumed the control diet ad libitum. Insulin tolerance tests were conducted 11 and 32 days after the diet change, and mice were killed 3 days after each test. Body fatness, fat pad weights, and serum insulin concentrations of mice were determined at each time‐point. Two follow‐up experiments were also conducted.
Results: Restricted mice had insulin sensitivities not different than control mice. CLA‐fed MH mice in experiment 1 were resistant (p < 0.001) to insulin on each day measured. CLA‐fed ML mice were slightly resistant (p = 0.08) to exogenous insulin on day 0 of recovery and not different from control mice on day 11 or 32. Glucose response to insulin in MH mice fed CLA in experiments 2 or 3 did not differ from control mice.
Discussion: Mice fed CLA did not have improved insulin tolerances compared with control mice. In some cases, dietary CLA may cause insulin resistance. MH mice seem more sensitive to CLA than ML mice.</description><subject>Adipose Tissue - metabolism</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>body fat</subject><subject>conjugated linoleic acid</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - genetics</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Fatty Acids - analysis</subject><subject>Insulin - metabolism</subject><subject>insulin tolerance</subject><subject>Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - pharmacology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><issn>1930-7381</issn><issn>1071-7323</issn><issn>1930-739X</issn><issn>1550-8528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgipvTm2cJCJ7szFeb9jjr12C6ywQ9lSx5Kx1dM5tW2X9vSscED56SwO998_AgdE7JmBIe39jldswI4WMa0gM0pAkngeTJ2-H-HtMBOnFuRYiISEiP0YCyRLIopkOUprZatR-qAYNnRWVLKDSe6MLgOwsOv9gGT9eb2n4BnlauLYsKLzyqVaUB-8dzoeEUHeWqdHC2O0fo9eF-kT4Fs_njNJ3MAu0jsEBCLqQxmi-ZAUKB6lhxSXRkBJUhUZzkoc5NEnrAQiEEA4iUFEYkhid5zkfoqt_r83y24JpsXTgNZakqsK3LJI-iKGHMw8s_cGXbuvLZMl8ZkbGQIffqule6ts7VkGebulireutR5-LMV5t11Wa-Ws8vdkvb5RrML9516QHpwXdRwvbfZdn89j2hXVDcj1SqaWvYz3jb0e7bH5MPjKM</recordid><startdate>200309</startdate><enddate>200309</enddate><creator>Hargrave, Kimberly M.</creator><creator>Azain, Michael J.</creator><creator>Kachman, Stephen D.</creator><creator>Miner, Jess L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200309</creationdate><title>Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Improve Insulin Tolerance in Mice</title><author>Hargrave, Kimberly M. ; Azain, Michael J. ; Kachman, Stephen D. ; Miner, Jess L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adipose Tissue - metabolism</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>body fat</topic><topic>conjugated linoleic acid</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - genetics</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Fatty Acids - analysis</topic><topic>Insulin - metabolism</topic><topic>insulin tolerance</topic><topic>Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - pharmacology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hargrave, Kimberly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azain, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachman, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miner, Jess L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hargrave, Kimberly M.</au><au>Azain, Michael J.</au><au>Kachman, Stephen D.</au><au>Miner, Jess L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Improve Insulin Tolerance in Mice</atitle><jtitle>Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Obes Res</addtitle><date>2003-09</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1104</spage><epage>1115</epage><pages>1104-1115</pages><issn>1930-7381</issn><issn>1071-7323</issn><eissn>1930-739X</eissn><eissn>1550-8528</eissn><abstract>Objective: To determine if the addition or removal of dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) would alter insulin tolerances in mice from two genetic lines.
Research Methods and Procedures: High metabolic rate (MH) and low metabolic rate (ML) mice were assigned to consume 1) a control diet ad libitum, 2) a control diet at a restricted intake, or 3) a diet containing 1% CLA ad libitum. After 9 weeks, an insulin tolerance test was conducted, and a portion of the mice were killed. All remaining mice consumed the control diet ad libitum. Insulin tolerance tests were conducted 11 and 32 days after the diet change, and mice were killed 3 days after each test. Body fatness, fat pad weights, and serum insulin concentrations of mice were determined at each time‐point. Two follow‐up experiments were also conducted.
Results: Restricted mice had insulin sensitivities not different than control mice. CLA‐fed MH mice in experiment 1 were resistant (p < 0.001) to insulin on each day measured. CLA‐fed ML mice were slightly resistant (p = 0.08) to exogenous insulin on day 0 of recovery and not different from control mice on day 11 or 32. Glucose response to insulin in MH mice fed CLA in experiments 2 or 3 did not differ from control mice.
Discussion: Mice fed CLA did not have improved insulin tolerances compared with control mice. In some cases, dietary CLA may cause insulin resistance. MH mice seem more sensitive to CLA than ML mice.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>12972681</pmid><doi>10.1038/oby.2003.151</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1930-7381 |
ispartof | Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2003-09, Vol.11 (9), p.1104-1115 |
issn | 1930-7381 1071-7323 1930-739X 1550-8528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73666922 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adipose Tissue - metabolism Animals Blood Glucose - analysis Body Composition body fat conjugated linoleic acid Energy Metabolism - genetics Energy Metabolism - physiology Fatty Acids - analysis Insulin - metabolism insulin tolerance Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - administration & dosage Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - pharmacology Male Mice Random Allocation |
title | Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Improve Insulin Tolerance in Mice |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A25%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conjugated%20Linoleic%20Acid%20Does%20Not%20Improve%20Insulin%20Tolerance%20in%20Mice&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20(Silver%20Spring,%20Md.)&rft.au=Hargrave,%20Kimberly%20M.&rft.date=2003-09&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1104&rft.epage=1115&rft.pages=1104-1115&rft.issn=1930-7381&rft.eissn=1930-739X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/oby.2003.151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73666922%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030784753&rft_id=info:pmid/12972681&rfr_iscdi=true |