Loading…

Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Improve Insulin Tolerance in Mice

Objective: To determine if the addition or removal of dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) would alter insulin tolerances in mice from two genetic lines. Research Methods and Procedures: High metabolic rate (MH) and low metabolic rate (ML) mice were assigned to consume 1) a control diet ad libitum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Md.), 2003-09, Vol.11 (9), p.1104-1115
Main Authors: Hargrave, Kimberly M., Azain, Michael J., Kachman, Stephen D., Miner, Jess L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3
container_end_page 1115
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1104
container_title Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)
container_volume 11
creator Hargrave, Kimberly M.
Azain, Michael J.
Kachman, Stephen D.
Miner, Jess L.
description Objective: To determine if the addition or removal of dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) would alter insulin tolerances in mice from two genetic lines. Research Methods and Procedures: High metabolic rate (MH) and low metabolic rate (ML) mice were assigned to consume 1) a control diet ad libitum, 2) a control diet at a restricted intake, or 3) a diet containing 1% CLA ad libitum. After 9 weeks, an insulin tolerance test was conducted, and a portion of the mice were killed. All remaining mice consumed the control diet ad libitum. Insulin tolerance tests were conducted 11 and 32 days after the diet change, and mice were killed 3 days after each test. Body fatness, fat pad weights, and serum insulin concentrations of mice were determined at each time‐point. Two follow‐up experiments were also conducted. Results: Restricted mice had insulin sensitivities not different than control mice. CLA‐fed MH mice in experiment 1 were resistant (p < 0.001) to insulin on each day measured. CLA‐fed ML mice were slightly resistant (p = 0.08) to exogenous insulin on day 0 of recovery and not different from control mice on day 11 or 32. Glucose response to insulin in MH mice fed CLA in experiments 2 or 3 did not differ from control mice. Discussion: Mice fed CLA did not have improved insulin tolerances compared with control mice. In some cases, dietary CLA may cause insulin resistance. MH mice seem more sensitive to CLA than ML mice.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/oby.2003.151
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73666922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73666922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgipvTm2cJCJ7szFeb9jjr12C6ywQ9lSx5Kx1dM5tW2X9vSscED56SwO998_AgdE7JmBIe39jldswI4WMa0gM0pAkngeTJ2-H-HtMBOnFuRYiISEiP0YCyRLIopkOUprZatR-qAYNnRWVLKDSe6MLgOwsOv9gGT9eb2n4BnlauLYsKLzyqVaUB-8dzoeEUHeWqdHC2O0fo9eF-kT4Fs_njNJ3MAu0jsEBCLqQxmi-ZAUKB6lhxSXRkBJUhUZzkoc5NEnrAQiEEA4iUFEYkhid5zkfoqt_r83y24JpsXTgNZakqsK3LJI-iKGHMw8s_cGXbuvLZMl8ZkbGQIffqule6ts7VkGebulireutR5-LMV5t11Wa-Ws8vdkvb5RrML9516QHpwXdRwvbfZdn89j2hXVDcj1SqaWvYz3jb0e7bH5MPjKM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030784753</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Improve Insulin Tolerance in Mice</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Hargrave, Kimberly M. ; Azain, Michael J. ; Kachman, Stephen D. ; Miner, Jess L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hargrave, Kimberly M. ; Azain, Michael J. ; Kachman, Stephen D. ; Miner, Jess L.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To determine if the addition or removal of dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) would alter insulin tolerances in mice from two genetic lines. Research Methods and Procedures: High metabolic rate (MH) and low metabolic rate (ML) mice were assigned to consume 1) a control diet ad libitum, 2) a control diet at a restricted intake, or 3) a diet containing 1% CLA ad libitum. After 9 weeks, an insulin tolerance test was conducted, and a portion of the mice were killed. All remaining mice consumed the control diet ad libitum. Insulin tolerance tests were conducted 11 and 32 days after the diet change, and mice were killed 3 days after each test. Body fatness, fat pad weights, and serum insulin concentrations of mice were determined at each time‐point. Two follow‐up experiments were also conducted. Results: Restricted mice had insulin sensitivities not different than control mice. CLA‐fed MH mice in experiment 1 were resistant (p &lt; 0.001) to insulin on each day measured. CLA‐fed ML mice were slightly resistant (p = 0.08) to exogenous insulin on day 0 of recovery and not different from control mice on day 11 or 32. Glucose response to insulin in MH mice fed CLA in experiments 2 or 3 did not differ from control mice. Discussion: Mice fed CLA did not have improved insulin tolerances compared with control mice. In some cases, dietary CLA may cause insulin resistance. MH mice seem more sensitive to CLA than ML mice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-7381</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-7323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-739X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-8528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/oby.2003.151</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12972681</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adipose Tissue - metabolism ; Animals ; Blood Glucose - analysis ; Body Composition ; body fat ; conjugated linoleic acid ; Energy Metabolism - genetics ; Energy Metabolism - physiology ; Fatty Acids - analysis ; Insulin - metabolism ; insulin tolerance ; Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - administration &amp; dosage ; Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - pharmacology ; Male ; Mice ; Random Allocation</subject><ispartof>Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2003-09, Vol.11 (9), p.1104-1115</ispartof><rights>2003 North American Association for the Study of Obesity (NAASO)</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Sep 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12972681$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hargrave, Kimberly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azain, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachman, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miner, Jess L.</creatorcontrib><title>Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Improve Insulin Tolerance in Mice</title><title>Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)</title><addtitle>Obes Res</addtitle><description>Objective: To determine if the addition or removal of dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) would alter insulin tolerances in mice from two genetic lines. Research Methods and Procedures: High metabolic rate (MH) and low metabolic rate (ML) mice were assigned to consume 1) a control diet ad libitum, 2) a control diet at a restricted intake, or 3) a diet containing 1% CLA ad libitum. After 9 weeks, an insulin tolerance test was conducted, and a portion of the mice were killed. All remaining mice consumed the control diet ad libitum. Insulin tolerance tests were conducted 11 and 32 days after the diet change, and mice were killed 3 days after each test. Body fatness, fat pad weights, and serum insulin concentrations of mice were determined at each time‐point. Two follow‐up experiments were also conducted. Results: Restricted mice had insulin sensitivities not different than control mice. CLA‐fed MH mice in experiment 1 were resistant (p &lt; 0.001) to insulin on each day measured. CLA‐fed ML mice were slightly resistant (p = 0.08) to exogenous insulin on day 0 of recovery and not different from control mice on day 11 or 32. Glucose response to insulin in MH mice fed CLA in experiments 2 or 3 did not differ from control mice. Discussion: Mice fed CLA did not have improved insulin tolerances compared with control mice. In some cases, dietary CLA may cause insulin resistance. MH mice seem more sensitive to CLA than ML mice.</description><subject>Adipose Tissue - metabolism</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>body fat</subject><subject>conjugated linoleic acid</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - genetics</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Fatty Acids - analysis</subject><subject>Insulin - metabolism</subject><subject>insulin tolerance</subject><subject>Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - pharmacology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><issn>1930-7381</issn><issn>1071-7323</issn><issn>1930-739X</issn><issn>1550-8528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgipvTm2cJCJ7szFeb9jjr12C6ywQ9lSx5Kx1dM5tW2X9vSscED56SwO998_AgdE7JmBIe39jldswI4WMa0gM0pAkngeTJ2-H-HtMBOnFuRYiISEiP0YCyRLIopkOUprZatR-qAYNnRWVLKDSe6MLgOwsOv9gGT9eb2n4BnlauLYsKLzyqVaUB-8dzoeEUHeWqdHC2O0fo9eF-kT4Fs_njNJ3MAu0jsEBCLqQxmi-ZAUKB6lhxSXRkBJUhUZzkoc5NEnrAQiEEA4iUFEYkhid5zkfoqt_r83y24JpsXTgNZakqsK3LJI-iKGHMw8s_cGXbuvLZMl8ZkbGQIffqule6ts7VkGebulireutR5-LMV5t11Wa-Ws8vdkvb5RrML9516QHpwXdRwvbfZdn89j2hXVDcj1SqaWvYz3jb0e7bH5MPjKM</recordid><startdate>200309</startdate><enddate>200309</enddate><creator>Hargrave, Kimberly M.</creator><creator>Azain, Michael J.</creator><creator>Kachman, Stephen D.</creator><creator>Miner, Jess L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200309</creationdate><title>Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Improve Insulin Tolerance in Mice</title><author>Hargrave, Kimberly M. ; Azain, Michael J. ; Kachman, Stephen D. ; Miner, Jess L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adipose Tissue - metabolism</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>body fat</topic><topic>conjugated linoleic acid</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - genetics</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Fatty Acids - analysis</topic><topic>Insulin - metabolism</topic><topic>insulin tolerance</topic><topic>Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - pharmacology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hargrave, Kimberly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azain, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachman, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miner, Jess L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hargrave, Kimberly M.</au><au>Azain, Michael J.</au><au>Kachman, Stephen D.</au><au>Miner, Jess L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Improve Insulin Tolerance in Mice</atitle><jtitle>Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Obes Res</addtitle><date>2003-09</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1104</spage><epage>1115</epage><pages>1104-1115</pages><issn>1930-7381</issn><issn>1071-7323</issn><eissn>1930-739X</eissn><eissn>1550-8528</eissn><abstract>Objective: To determine if the addition or removal of dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) would alter insulin tolerances in mice from two genetic lines. Research Methods and Procedures: High metabolic rate (MH) and low metabolic rate (ML) mice were assigned to consume 1) a control diet ad libitum, 2) a control diet at a restricted intake, or 3) a diet containing 1% CLA ad libitum. After 9 weeks, an insulin tolerance test was conducted, and a portion of the mice were killed. All remaining mice consumed the control diet ad libitum. Insulin tolerance tests were conducted 11 and 32 days after the diet change, and mice were killed 3 days after each test. Body fatness, fat pad weights, and serum insulin concentrations of mice were determined at each time‐point. Two follow‐up experiments were also conducted. Results: Restricted mice had insulin sensitivities not different than control mice. CLA‐fed MH mice in experiment 1 were resistant (p &lt; 0.001) to insulin on each day measured. CLA‐fed ML mice were slightly resistant (p = 0.08) to exogenous insulin on day 0 of recovery and not different from control mice on day 11 or 32. Glucose response to insulin in MH mice fed CLA in experiments 2 or 3 did not differ from control mice. Discussion: Mice fed CLA did not have improved insulin tolerances compared with control mice. In some cases, dietary CLA may cause insulin resistance. MH mice seem more sensitive to CLA than ML mice.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>12972681</pmid><doi>10.1038/oby.2003.151</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1930-7381
ispartof Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2003-09, Vol.11 (9), p.1104-1115
issn 1930-7381
1071-7323
1930-739X
1550-8528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73666922
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adipose Tissue - metabolism
Animals
Blood Glucose - analysis
Body Composition
body fat
conjugated linoleic acid
Energy Metabolism - genetics
Energy Metabolism - physiology
Fatty Acids - analysis
Insulin - metabolism
insulin tolerance
Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - administration & dosage
Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - pharmacology
Male
Mice
Random Allocation
title Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Improve Insulin Tolerance in Mice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A25%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conjugated%20Linoleic%20Acid%20Does%20Not%20Improve%20Insulin%20Tolerance%20in%20Mice&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20(Silver%20Spring,%20Md.)&rft.au=Hargrave,%20Kimberly%20M.&rft.date=2003-09&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1104&rft.epage=1115&rft.pages=1104-1115&rft.issn=1930-7381&rft.eissn=1930-739X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/oby.2003.151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73666922%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-7ef47ddc3b2de01e1c8a370c6d41750a30f5cfd953b2254442ee6a74d49d39ff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030784753&rft_id=info:pmid/12972681&rfr_iscdi=true