Loading…

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a prospective audit of epidural pethidine 4 mg/ml and ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml

A prospective audit of one hundred and forty-seven (147) Acute Pain Service (APS) patients, who received postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using pethidine 4 mg/ml or ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml in general surgical or orthopaedic wards over a twelve-month p...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Anaesthesia and intensive care 2003-08, Vol.31 (4), p.412-417
Main Authors:	Tay, T G, Brake, T J, Kwan, A S
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Amides Analgesia, Epidural Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods Analgesics, Opioid Anesthetics, Local Blood Pressure Drug Combinations Female Fentanyl Humans Male Meperidine Middle Aged Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy Prospective Studies Respiration Ropivacaine
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by
cites
container_end_page	417
container_issue	4
container_start_page	412
container_title	Anaesthesia and intensive care
container_volume	31
creator	Tay, T G Brake, T J Kwan, A S
description	A prospective audit of one hundred and forty-seven (147) Acute Pain Service (APS) patients, who received postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using pethidine 4 mg/ml or ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml in general surgical or orthopaedic wards over a twelve-month period, is presented. Data were collected from APS observation charts over a 48-hour period postoperatively. We found no significant difference in postoperative analgesia or side-effects between pethidine and ropivacaine with fentanyl in orthopaedic or general surgical patients.
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73670461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73670461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p546-6c91ac7da08031b850d500d19d5a9142396bd706aee120946ae5d27e492c5fc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRb0A0VL4BeQN7AK2E8c1O1TxkpBg0QW7aGpPWiPnge0U9Rv4aVJRxGpGo3NndOaITFnOWcakep-Q0xg_GONaKHlCJlxoleuynJLvN0gO25SZrk2h8x4txd7ZIYCn0IJfY3RwS4H2oYs9muS2SGGwLtGu_kd7TBtnXYu0oM36ptmHLQ1d77ZgYD9n1-KSfrm0ofV4D9qdp4I2zoRuHaCJY-SMHNfgI54f6owsH-6Xi6fs5fXxeXH3kvWyKLPSaA5GWWDz0W81l8xKxizXVoLmhRi9VlaxEhC5YLoYG2mFwkILI2sj8xm5-l07Gn0OGFPVuGjQe2ixG2Kl8lKxouQjeHEAh1WDtuqDayDsqr_v5T_7yWvJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73670461</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a prospective audit of epidural pethidine 4 mg/ml and ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Tay, T G ; Brake, T J ; Kwan, A S</creator><creatorcontrib>Tay, T G ; Brake, T J ; Kwan, A S</creatorcontrib><description>A prospective audit of one hundred and forty-seven (147) Acute Pain Service (APS) patients, who received postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using pethidine 4 mg/ml or ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml in general surgical or orthopaedic wards over a twelve-month period, is presented. Data were collected from APS observation charts over a 48-hour period postoperatively. We found no significant difference in postoperative analgesia or side-effects between pethidine and ropivacaine with fentanyl in orthopaedic or general surgical patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0310-057X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12973966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amides ; Analgesia, Epidural ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods ; Analgesics, Opioid ; Anesthetics, Local ; Blood Pressure ; Drug Combinations ; Female ; Fentanyl ; Humans ; Male ; Meperidine ; Middle Aged ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Prospective Studies ; Respiration ; Ropivacaine</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2003-08, Vol.31 (4), p.412-417</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12973966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tay, T G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brake, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan, A S</creatorcontrib><title>Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a prospective audit of epidural pethidine 4 mg/ml and ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml</title><title>Anaesthesia and intensive care</title><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><description>A prospective audit of one hundred and forty-seven (147) Acute Pain Service (APS) patients, who received postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using pethidine 4 mg/ml or ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml in general surgical or orthopaedic wards over a twelve-month period, is presented. Data were collected from APS observation charts over a 48-hour period postoperatively. We found no significant difference in postoperative analgesia or side-effects between pethidine and ropivacaine with fentanyl in orthopaedic or general surgical patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Amides</subject><subject>Analgesia, Epidural</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meperidine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Ropivacaine</subject><issn>0310-057X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRb0A0VL4BeQN7AK2E8c1O1TxkpBg0QW7aGpPWiPnge0U9Rv4aVJRxGpGo3NndOaITFnOWcakep-Q0xg_GONaKHlCJlxoleuynJLvN0gO25SZrk2h8x4txd7ZIYCn0IJfY3RwS4H2oYs9muS2SGGwLtGu_kd7TBtnXYu0oM36ptmHLQ1d77ZgYD9n1-KSfrm0ofV4D9qdp4I2zoRuHaCJY-SMHNfgI54f6owsH-6Xi6fs5fXxeXH3kvWyKLPSaA5GWWDz0W81l8xKxizXVoLmhRi9VlaxEhC5YLoYG2mFwkILI2sj8xm5-l07Gn0OGFPVuGjQe2ixG2Kl8lKxouQjeHEAh1WDtuqDayDsqr_v5T_7yWvJ</recordid><startdate>200308</startdate><enddate>200308</enddate><creator>Tay, T G</creator><creator>Brake, T J</creator><creator>Kwan, A S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200308</creationdate><title>Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a prospective audit of epidural pethidine 4 mg/ml and ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml</title><author>Tay, T G ; Brake, T J ; Kwan, A S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p546-6c91ac7da08031b850d500d19d5a9142396bd706aee120946ae5d27e492c5fc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Amides</topic><topic>Analgesia, Epidural</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meperidine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Ropivacaine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tay, T G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brake, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan, A S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tay, T G</au><au>Brake, T J</au><au>Kwan, A S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a prospective audit of epidural pethidine 4 mg/ml and ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><date>2003-08</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>412</spage><epage>417</epage><pages>412-417</pages><issn>0310-057X</issn><abstract>A prospective audit of one hundred and forty-seven (147) Acute Pain Service (APS) patients, who received postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using pethidine 4 mg/ml or ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml in general surgical or orthopaedic wards over a twelve-month period, is presented. Data were collected from APS observation charts over a 48-hour period postoperatively. We found no significant difference in postoperative analgesia or side-effects between pethidine and ropivacaine with fentanyl in orthopaedic or general surgical patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>12973966</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0310-057X
ispartof	Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2003-08, Vol.31 (4), p.412-417
issn	0310-057X
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73670461
source	Alma/SFX Local Collection; SAGE
subjects	Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Amides Analgesia, Epidural Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods Analgesics, Opioid Anesthetics, Local Blood Pressure Drug Combinations Female Fentanyl Humans Male Meperidine Middle Aged Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy Prospective Studies Respiration Ropivacaine
title	Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a prospective audit of epidural pethidine 4 mg/ml and ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A04%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient-controlled%20epidural%20analgesia:%20a%20prospective%20audit%20of%20epidural%20pethidine%204%20mg/ml%20and%20ropivacaine%200.2%25%20with%20fentanyl%202%20micrograms/ml&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia%20and%20intensive%20care&rft.au=Tay,%20T%20G&rft.date=2003-08&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=412&rft.epage=417&rft.pages=412-417&rft.issn=0310-057X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E73670461%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p546-6c91ac7da08031b850d500d19d5a9142396bd706aee120946ae5d27e492c5fc53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73670461&rft_id=info:pmid/12973966&rfr_iscdi=true