Loading…
The psychophysics of categorical perception
For most perceptual continua, observers' ability to discriminate exceeds their ability to identify. Certain dimensions, however, particularly in speech perception, are said to be categorically perceived, in the sense that they can be discriminated only as well as they can be labeled. The presen...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychological review 1977-09, Vol.84 (5), p.452-471 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 471 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 452 |
container_title | Psychological review |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Macmillan, Neil A Kaplan, Howard L Creelman, C. Douglas |
description | For most perceptual continua, observers' ability to discriminate exceeds their ability to identify. Certain dimensions, however, particularly in speech perception, are said to be categorically perceived, in the sense that they can be discriminated only as well as they can be labeled. The present article offers a signal detection theory analysis of categorical perception; in previous models, low-threshold assumptions have been made. Discrimination paradigms popularly used to test the categorical perception hypothesis, such as the ABX and same-different designs, are analyzed, and unbiased sensitivity measures (
d
′) abstracted. A Thurstonian model is used to predict discrimination from identification under the hypothesis that perception is categorical. For cases in which perception is found to be categorical, it is shown how the hypothesis of dual processing of phonemic and nonphonemic information can be distinguished from alternative models. (49 ref) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0033-295X.84.5.452 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73680091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614289893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a332t-635418b0c2df54466366e883801126e0bb3f088bcb79da1d126845550f854db33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtLwzAYQIN4m9M_ID4UFV-kNfcmjzK8wcCXCb6FNE1dpVtq0gr796Z0TBDMSyDf-Q7hAHCOYIYgye8gJCTFkr1ngmYsowzvgQmSRKaI5mgfTHbAMTgJ4RPGg6Q8AocSskhMwO1iaZM2bMzStctNqE1IXJUY3dkP52ujm6S13ti2q936FBxUugn2bHtPwdvjw2L2nM5fn15m9_NUE4K7lBNGkSigwWXFKOWccG6FIAIihLmFRUEqKERhilyWGpXxUVDGGKwEo2VByBTcjN7Wu6_ehk6t6mBs0-i1dX1QOeECQokiePkH_HS9X8e_KY4oFlLIwXb1H4SwhJIRiAcVHinjXQjeVqr19Ur7jUJQDa3VkFINKZWgiqnYOi5dbNV9sbLlbmWMG8fX41i3Wg2Nte9q09igvP3-tfwASEqC2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614289893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The psychophysics of categorical perception</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Macmillan, Neil A ; Kaplan, Howard L ; Creelman, C. Douglas</creator><creatorcontrib>Macmillan, Neil A ; Kaplan, Howard L ; Creelman, C. Douglas</creatorcontrib><description>For most perceptual continua, observers' ability to discriminate exceeds their ability to identify. Certain dimensions, however, particularly in speech perception, are said to be categorically perceived, in the sense that they can be discriminated only as well as they can be labeled. The present article offers a signal detection theory analysis of categorical perception; in previous models, low-threshold assumptions have been made. Discrimination paradigms popularly used to test the categorical perception hypothesis, such as the ABX and same-different designs, are analyzed, and unbiased sensitivity measures (
d
′) abstracted. A Thurstonian model is used to predict discrimination from identification under the hypothesis that perception is categorical. For cases in which perception is found to be categorical, it is shown how the hypothesis of dual processing of phonemic and nonphonemic information can be distinguished from alternative models. (49 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-295X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1471</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.5.452</identifier><identifier>PMID: 905471</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Auditory Perception ; Classification (Cognitive Process) ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Human ; Humans ; Models, Psychological ; Psychophysics ; Research Design ; Speech ; Speech Perception</subject><ispartof>Psychological review, 1977-09, Vol.84 (5), p.452-471</ispartof><rights>1977 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1977, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/905471$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macmillan, Neil A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Howard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creelman, C. Douglas</creatorcontrib><title>The psychophysics of categorical perception</title><title>Psychological review</title><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>For most perceptual continua, observers' ability to discriminate exceeds their ability to identify. Certain dimensions, however, particularly in speech perception, are said to be categorically perceived, in the sense that they can be discriminated only as well as they can be labeled. The present article offers a signal detection theory analysis of categorical perception; in previous models, low-threshold assumptions have been made. Discrimination paradigms popularly used to test the categorical perception hypothesis, such as the ABX and same-different designs, are analyzed, and unbiased sensitivity measures (
d
′) abstracted. A Thurstonian model is used to predict discrimination from identification under the hypothesis that perception is categorical. For cases in which perception is found to be categorical, it is shown how the hypothesis of dual processing of phonemic and nonphonemic information can be distinguished from alternative models. (49 ref)</description><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Classification (Cognitive Process)</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology)</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><issn>0033-295X</issn><issn>1939-1471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kFtLwzAYQIN4m9M_ID4UFV-kNfcmjzK8wcCXCb6FNE1dpVtq0gr796Z0TBDMSyDf-Q7hAHCOYIYgye8gJCTFkr1ngmYsowzvgQmSRKaI5mgfTHbAMTgJ4RPGg6Q8AocSskhMwO1iaZM2bMzStctNqE1IXJUY3dkP52ujm6S13ti2q936FBxUugn2bHtPwdvjw2L2nM5fn15m9_NUE4K7lBNGkSigwWXFKOWccG6FIAIihLmFRUEqKERhilyWGpXxUVDGGKwEo2VByBTcjN7Wu6_ehk6t6mBs0-i1dX1QOeECQokiePkH_HS9X8e_KY4oFlLIwXb1H4SwhJIRiAcVHinjXQjeVqr19Ur7jUJQDa3VkFINKZWgiqnYOi5dbNV9sbLlbmWMG8fX41i3Wg2Nte9q09igvP3-tfwASEqC2A</recordid><startdate>197709</startdate><enddate>197709</enddate><creator>Macmillan, Neil A</creator><creator>Kaplan, Howard L</creator><creator>Creelman, C. Douglas</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197709</creationdate><title>The psychophysics of categorical perception</title><author>Macmillan, Neil A ; Kaplan, Howard L ; Creelman, C. Douglas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a332t-635418b0c2df54466366e883801126e0bb3f088bcb79da1d126845550f854db33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Classification (Cognitive Process)</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology)</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macmillan, Neil A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Howard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creelman, C. Douglas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macmillan, Neil A</au><au>Kaplan, Howard L</au><au>Creelman, C. Douglas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The psychophysics of categorical perception</atitle><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>1977-09</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>452</spage><epage>471</epage><pages>452-471</pages><issn>0033-295X</issn><eissn>1939-1471</eissn><abstract>For most perceptual continua, observers' ability to discriminate exceeds their ability to identify. Certain dimensions, however, particularly in speech perception, are said to be categorically perceived, in the sense that they can be discriminated only as well as they can be labeled. The present article offers a signal detection theory analysis of categorical perception; in previous models, low-threshold assumptions have been made. Discrimination paradigms popularly used to test the categorical perception hypothesis, such as the ABX and same-different designs, are analyzed, and unbiased sensitivity measures (
d
′) abstracted. A Thurstonian model is used to predict discrimination from identification under the hypothesis that perception is categorical. For cases in which perception is found to be categorical, it is shown how the hypothesis of dual processing of phonemic and nonphonemic information can be distinguished from alternative models. (49 ref)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>905471</pmid><doi>10.1037/0033-295X.84.5.452</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-295X |
ispartof | Psychological review, 1977-09, Vol.84 (5), p.452-471 |
issn | 0033-295X 1939-1471 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73680091 |
source | PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Auditory Perception Classification (Cognitive Process) Discrimination (Psychology) Human Humans Models, Psychological Psychophysics Research Design Speech Speech Perception |
title | The psychophysics of categorical perception |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A08%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20psychophysics%20of%20categorical%20perception&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20review&rft.au=Macmillan,%20Neil%20A&rft.date=1977-09&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=452&rft.epage=471&rft.pages=452-471&rft.issn=0033-295X&rft.eissn=1939-1471&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0033-295X.84.5.452&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614289893%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a332t-635418b0c2df54466366e883801126e0bb3f088bcb79da1d126845550f854db33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614289893&rft_id=info:pmid/905471&rfr_iscdi=true |