Loading…

Outcome from a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic

Chest pain accounts for much of the rising numbers of emergency admissions, but in-patient assessment is not necessarily the best way of dealing with these patients. We ran a 'rapid-assessment chest pain clinic' to provide an alternative route of assessment, and audited its outcome. Genera...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:QJM : An International Journal of Medicine 1998-05, Vol.91 (5), p.339-343
Main Authors: DAVIE, A. P, CAESAR, D, CARUANA, L, CLEGG, G, SPILLER, J, CAPEWELL, S, STARKEY, I. R, SHAW, T. R. D, MCMURRAY, J. J. V
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-604985e3dc8ef5ae6446ac9bb38f1abd677b2c457f90fc5b79cf7a82f6019dd83
cites
container_end_page 343
container_issue 5
container_start_page 339
container_title QJM : An International Journal of Medicine
container_volume 91
creator DAVIE, A. P
CAESAR, D
CARUANA, L
CLEGG, G
SPILLER, J
CAPEWELL, S
STARKEY, I. R
SHAW, T. R. D
MCMURRAY, J. J. V
description Chest pain accounts for much of the rising numbers of emergency admissions, but in-patient assessment is not necessarily the best way of dealing with these patients. We ran a 'rapid-assessment chest pain clinic' to provide an alternative route of assessment, and audited its outcome. General practitioners referred patients with recent-onset chest pain, increasing chest pain, chest pain at rest, or other chest pain of concern, on the understanding that they would be seen within 24 h. During 8 1/2 months, 334 patients were referred and 317 patients were seen, most of whom had exercise electrocardiography. A median of 6 months later, 278 patients were personally contacted to determine outcome. Of these, 18% had been admitted immediately with acute coronary syndromes, and 49% had been diagnosed as non-coronary chest pain (none of whom subsequently infarcted or died). Continuing symptoms were infrequent, and satisfaction was high, although 13% of patients had been revascularized. A significant number of patients required immediate admission and/or ultimate revascularization, but many more did not. The majority of these patients had non-coronary chest pain, and this diagnosis was substantiated by their excellent outcome and (in some cases) by further investigation.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/qjmed/91.5.339
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73865147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73865147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-604985e3dc8ef5ae6446ac9bb38f1abd677b2c457f90fc5b79cf7a82f6019dd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAURi0EKqWwsiFlQGxJ7fg9ooqXVKkLzNaNY4tUedVOBv49KU2Z7pW-cz9dHYTuCc4I1nR92DeuXGuS8YxSfYGWhAmc5lTTy_Muc36NbmLcY4yZZGqBFlpizYRcIrIbB9s1LvGhaxJIAvRVmUKMLsbGtUNiv10ckh6qNrF11Vb2Fl15qKO7m-cKfb2-fG7e0-3u7WPzvE0t5XpIBWZacUdLq5zn4ARjAqwuCqo8gaIUUha5ZVx6jb3lhdTWS1C5F5joslR0hZ5OvX3oDuP0hGmqaF1dQ-u6MRpJleCEyQnMTqANXYzBedOHqoHwYwg2R0fmz5HRxHAzOZoOHubmsTgGZ3yWMuWPcw7RQu0DtLaK_1ieK8Yxo793WW-B</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73865147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome from a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>DAVIE, A. P ; CAESAR, D ; CARUANA, L ; CLEGG, G ; SPILLER, J ; CAPEWELL, S ; STARKEY, I. R ; SHAW, T. R. D ; MCMURRAY, J. J. V</creator><creatorcontrib>DAVIE, A. P ; CAESAR, D ; CARUANA, L ; CLEGG, G ; SPILLER, J ; CAPEWELL, S ; STARKEY, I. R ; SHAW, T. R. D ; MCMURRAY, J. J. V</creatorcontrib><description>Chest pain accounts for much of the rising numbers of emergency admissions, but in-patient assessment is not necessarily the best way of dealing with these patients. We ran a 'rapid-assessment chest pain clinic' to provide an alternative route of assessment, and audited its outcome. General practitioners referred patients with recent-onset chest pain, increasing chest pain, chest pain at rest, or other chest pain of concern, on the understanding that they would be seen within 24 h. During 8 1/2 months, 334 patients were referred and 317 patients were seen, most of whom had exercise electrocardiography. A median of 6 months later, 278 patients were personally contacted to determine outcome. Of these, 18% had been admitted immediately with acute coronary syndromes, and 49% had been diagnosed as non-coronary chest pain (none of whom subsequently infarcted or died). Continuing symptoms were infrequent, and satisfaction was high, although 13% of patients had been revascularized. A significant number of patients required immediate admission and/or ultimate revascularization, but many more did not. The majority of these patients had non-coronary chest pain, and this diagnosis was substantiated by their excellent outcome and (in some cases) by further investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2725</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2393</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/91.5.339</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9709467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Chest Pain - etiology ; Chest Pain - therapy ; Coronary Disease - diagnosis ; Coronary Disease - therapy ; Coronary heart disease ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart ; Hospitals, Public ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Audit ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Pain Clinics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patient Satisfaction ; Scotland</subject><ispartof>QJM : An International Journal of Medicine, 1998-05, Vol.91 (5), p.339-343</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-604985e3dc8ef5ae6446ac9bb38f1abd677b2c457f90fc5b79cf7a82f6019dd83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2284504$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9709467$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DAVIE, A. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAESAR, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARUANA, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLEGG, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPILLER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAPEWELL, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STARKEY, I. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAW, T. R. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCMURRAY, J. J. V</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome from a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic</title><title>QJM : An International Journal of Medicine</title><addtitle>QJM</addtitle><description>Chest pain accounts for much of the rising numbers of emergency admissions, but in-patient assessment is not necessarily the best way of dealing with these patients. We ran a 'rapid-assessment chest pain clinic' to provide an alternative route of assessment, and audited its outcome. General practitioners referred patients with recent-onset chest pain, increasing chest pain, chest pain at rest, or other chest pain of concern, on the understanding that they would be seen within 24 h. During 8 1/2 months, 334 patients were referred and 317 patients were seen, most of whom had exercise electrocardiography. A median of 6 months later, 278 patients were personally contacted to determine outcome. Of these, 18% had been admitted immediately with acute coronary syndromes, and 49% had been diagnosed as non-coronary chest pain (none of whom subsequently infarcted or died). Continuing symptoms were infrequent, and satisfaction was high, although 13% of patients had been revascularized. A significant number of patients required immediate admission and/or ultimate revascularization, but many more did not. The majority of these patients had non-coronary chest pain, and this diagnosis was substantiated by their excellent outcome and (in some cases) by further investigation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Chest Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Chest Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Coronary heart disease</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Hospitals, Public</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Pain Clinics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Scotland</subject><issn>1460-2725</issn><issn>1460-2393</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAURi0EKqWwsiFlQGxJ7fg9ooqXVKkLzNaNY4tUedVOBv49KU2Z7pW-cz9dHYTuCc4I1nR92DeuXGuS8YxSfYGWhAmc5lTTy_Muc36NbmLcY4yZZGqBFlpizYRcIrIbB9s1LvGhaxJIAvRVmUKMLsbGtUNiv10ckh6qNrF11Vb2Fl15qKO7m-cKfb2-fG7e0-3u7WPzvE0t5XpIBWZacUdLq5zn4ARjAqwuCqo8gaIUUha5ZVx6jb3lhdTWS1C5F5joslR0hZ5OvX3oDuP0hGmqaF1dQ-u6MRpJleCEyQnMTqANXYzBedOHqoHwYwg2R0fmz5HRxHAzOZoOHubmsTgGZ3yWMuWPcw7RQu0DtLaK_1ieK8Yxo793WW-B</recordid><startdate>19980501</startdate><enddate>19980501</enddate><creator>DAVIE, A. P</creator><creator>CAESAR, D</creator><creator>CARUANA, L</creator><creator>CLEGG, G</creator><creator>SPILLER, J</creator><creator>CAPEWELL, S</creator><creator>STARKEY, I. R</creator><creator>SHAW, T. R. D</creator><creator>MCMURRAY, J. J. V</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980501</creationdate><title>Outcome from a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic</title><author>DAVIE, A. P ; CAESAR, D ; CARUANA, L ; CLEGG, G ; SPILLER, J ; CAPEWELL, S ; STARKEY, I. R ; SHAW, T. R. D ; MCMURRAY, J. J. V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-604985e3dc8ef5ae6446ac9bb38f1abd677b2c457f90fc5b79cf7a82f6019dd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Chest Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Chest Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Coronary heart disease</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Hospitals, Public</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Pain Clinics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Scotland</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DAVIE, A. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAESAR, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARUANA, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLEGG, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPILLER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAPEWELL, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STARKEY, I. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAW, T. R. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCMURRAY, J. J. V</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>QJM : An International Journal of Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DAVIE, A. P</au><au>CAESAR, D</au><au>CARUANA, L</au><au>CLEGG, G</au><au>SPILLER, J</au><au>CAPEWELL, S</au><au>STARKEY, I. R</au><au>SHAW, T. R. D</au><au>MCMURRAY, J. J. V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome from a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic</atitle><jtitle>QJM : An International Journal of Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>QJM</addtitle><date>1998-05-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>339-343</pages><issn>1460-2725</issn><eissn>1460-2393</eissn><abstract>Chest pain accounts for much of the rising numbers of emergency admissions, but in-patient assessment is not necessarily the best way of dealing with these patients. We ran a 'rapid-assessment chest pain clinic' to provide an alternative route of assessment, and audited its outcome. General practitioners referred patients with recent-onset chest pain, increasing chest pain, chest pain at rest, or other chest pain of concern, on the understanding that they would be seen within 24 h. During 8 1/2 months, 334 patients were referred and 317 patients were seen, most of whom had exercise electrocardiography. A median of 6 months later, 278 patients were personally contacted to determine outcome. Of these, 18% had been admitted immediately with acute coronary syndromes, and 49% had been diagnosed as non-coronary chest pain (none of whom subsequently infarcted or died). Continuing symptoms were infrequent, and satisfaction was high, although 13% of patients had been revascularized. A significant number of patients required immediate admission and/or ultimate revascularization, but many more did not. The majority of these patients had non-coronary chest pain, and this diagnosis was substantiated by their excellent outcome and (in some cases) by further investigation.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>9709467</pmid><doi>10.1093/qjmed/91.5.339</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1460-2725
ispartof QJM : An International Journal of Medicine, 1998-05, Vol.91 (5), p.339-343
issn 1460-2725
1460-2393
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73865147
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiology. Vascular system
Chest Pain - etiology
Chest Pain - therapy
Coronary Disease - diagnosis
Coronary Disease - therapy
Coronary heart disease
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart
Hospitals, Public
Humans
Male
Medical Audit
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pain Clinics - statistics & numerical data
Patient Satisfaction
Scotland
title Outcome from a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A20%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20from%20a%20rapid-assessment%20chest%20pain%20clinic&rft.jtitle=QJM%20:%20An%20International%20Journal%20of%20Medicine&rft.au=DAVIE,%20A.%20P&rft.date=1998-05-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=339-343&rft.issn=1460-2725&rft.eissn=1460-2393&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/91.5.339&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73865147%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-604985e3dc8ef5ae6446ac9bb38f1abd677b2c457f90fc5b79cf7a82f6019dd83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73865147&rft_id=info:pmid/9709467&rfr_iscdi=true