An oblong revision cup for large acetabular defects: Design rationale and two- to seven-year follow-up

• Published in: The Journal of arthroplasty 1998, Vol.13 (5), p.559-569
• Main Authors: Köster, Georg, Willert, Hans-Georg, Köhler, Horst-Peter, Döpkens, Karen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: acetabular defects; Acetabulum; Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; bone grafting; cementless fixation; Female; Follow-Up Studies; hip; Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; Male; oblong cup; Osseointegration; Polyethylenes; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Radiography; Reoperation; revision arthroplasty; Time Factors; Titanium; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0883-5403; 1532-8406
• DOI: 10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90056-0

Loosening and migration of acetabular components often lead to extensive bony defects with an elongated, oval acetabular cavity. In these cases standard implants will not reestablish and maintain sufficient stability without leaving bone defects or using massive bone grafts or excess cement and additional metal rings or shells, disadvantages that are overcome by using an oblong revision cup without cement. The titanium shell is available in different sizes, is screwed to the autochthonous acetabular bone and houses an oblong polyethylene inlay, designed to reestablish the normal anatomic hip center. Of 109 consecutive revision cups, 102, implanted for American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) defects types I–IV, were followed up clinically and radiologically for 2 to 7 years (mean, 3.6 years). Primary stability was achieved in all cases. In 40% no bone grafting was necessary at all. The radiological follow-up revealed good remodeling of the surrounding bone and osseointegration of the implants. Zonal radiolucent lines, always smaller than 2 mm, were seen in 18 cases, only once completely and in only 5 cases partially progressing. Six cups migrated slightly (≤2 mm), two moderately (3–5 mm), all without clinical symptoms, and two more than 5 mm. Migration and radiolucencies were mainly seen in patients with allografts and major defects, which indicates that bone ingrowth appears more unlikely in such cases. Few asymptomatic cases showed zonal sclerotic lines. There were two aseptic loosenings, one in a case with pelvic discontinuity, the other in a patient with severe rheumatoid arthritis following two previous revisions. Survivorship analysis based on implant removal because of aseptic loosening as the endpoint shows a cumulative success rate of 98.1% at 8 years.