Loading…

Thermography in breast diagnosis

The role of two types of thermography in the diagnosis of breast disease was studied in 502 women seen over a two‐year period. Thirteen cancers were diagnosed in eleven women. The most significant finding was the large number of equivocal or abnormal thermograms in women with normal breasts or benig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer 1982-07, Vol.50 (2), p.323-325
Main Authors: Sterns, Ernest E., Curtis, Arthur C., Miller, Sally, Hancock, John R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4666-9751a8ad9a3bc5f9096aaf9328a0d42b5a66050418b1e6de02c981758229e0a83
container_end_page 325
container_issue 2
container_start_page 323
container_title Cancer
container_volume 50
creator Sterns, Ernest E.
Curtis, Arthur C.
Miller, Sally
Hancock, John R.
description The role of two types of thermography in the diagnosis of breast disease was studied in 502 women seen over a two‐year period. Thirteen cancers were diagnosed in eleven women. The most significant finding was the large number of equivocal or abnormal thermograms in women with normal breasts or benign disease, while in patients with proven cancer, the thermogram was abnormal in less than half. Clinical diagnosis of breast cancer was not enhanced by either or both types of thermogram. Despite specific criteria, thermographic interpretation was inconsistent except in thermograms reported as “normal.” On the basis of the findings, the authors could not recommend that an abnormal thermogram be used as an indication for mammography, since this would result in an inordinate number of these studies, particularly in young women. The findings suggest that thermography is not a sufficiently precise modality for use in routine breast diagnosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1097-0142(19820715)50:2<323::AID-CNCR2820500226>3.0.CO;2-S
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74011723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>74011723</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4666-9751a8ad9a3bc5f9096aaf9328a0d42b5a66050418b1e6de02c981758229e0a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE9Lw0AQxRdRaq1-BCEn0UPq7G422a0i1PgXigVbQbwMm2TbRpKmZluk394trQU9CJ6G4b158_gRck2hTQHYOQUV-UADdkqVZBBRcSagwy45451O9_HGj5_iZ-YU4dwsvOJtaMf9C-YPdkhze7xLmgAgfRHw131yYO27WyMmeIM0IpCcctkk3nBi6rIa13o2WXr51Etqo-3cy3I9nlY2t4dkb6QLa442s0Ve7m6H8YPf698_xt2enwZhGPoqElRLnSnNk1SMFKhQ65HiTGrIApYIHYaubkBlQk2YGWCpkjQSkjFlQEveIifr3FldfSyMnWOZ29QUhZ6aamExCoDSiHFnfFsb07qytjYjnNV5qeslUsAVPlwRwBUB_MaHApChw4fo8OFPfMgRMO47w8CFH29aLJLSZNvoDS-nm7X-mRdm-a_Pfz7-pfAv4CqKRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>74011723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thermography in breast diagnosis</title><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><creator>Sterns, Ernest E. ; Curtis, Arthur C. ; Miller, Sally ; Hancock, John R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sterns, Ernest E. ; Curtis, Arthur C. ; Miller, Sally ; Hancock, John R.</creatorcontrib><description>The role of two types of thermography in the diagnosis of breast disease was studied in 502 women seen over a two‐year period. Thirteen cancers were diagnosed in eleven women. The most significant finding was the large number of equivocal or abnormal thermograms in women with normal breasts or benign disease, while in patients with proven cancer, the thermogram was abnormal in less than half. Clinical diagnosis of breast cancer was not enhanced by either or both types of thermogram. Despite specific criteria, thermographic interpretation was inconsistent except in thermograms reported as “normal.” On the basis of the findings, the authors could not recommend that an abnormal thermogram be used as an indication for mammography, since this would result in an inordinate number of these studies, particularly in young women. The findings suggest that thermography is not a sufficiently precise modality for use in routine breast diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820715)50:2&lt;323::AID-CNCR2820500226&gt;3.0.CO;2-S</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7083138</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Diagnostic Errors ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Thermography</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 1982-07, Vol.50 (2), p.323-325</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1982 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4666-9751a8ad9a3bc5f9096aaf9328a0d42b5a66050418b1e6de02c981758229e0a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7083138$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sterns, Ernest E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, Arthur C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, John R.</creatorcontrib><title>Thermography in breast diagnosis</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>The role of two types of thermography in the diagnosis of breast disease was studied in 502 women seen over a two‐year period. Thirteen cancers were diagnosed in eleven women. The most significant finding was the large number of equivocal or abnormal thermograms in women with normal breasts or benign disease, while in patients with proven cancer, the thermogram was abnormal in less than half. Clinical diagnosis of breast cancer was not enhanced by either or both types of thermogram. Despite specific criteria, thermographic interpretation was inconsistent except in thermograms reported as “normal.” On the basis of the findings, the authors could not recommend that an abnormal thermogram be used as an indication for mammography, since this would result in an inordinate number of these studies, particularly in young women. The findings suggest that thermography is not a sufficiently precise modality for use in routine breast diagnosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Thermography</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkE9Lw0AQxRdRaq1-BCEn0UPq7G422a0i1PgXigVbQbwMm2TbRpKmZluk394trQU9CJ6G4b158_gRck2hTQHYOQUV-UADdkqVZBBRcSagwy45451O9_HGj5_iZ-YU4dwsvOJtaMf9C-YPdkhze7xLmgAgfRHw131yYO27WyMmeIM0IpCcctkk3nBi6rIa13o2WXr51Etqo-3cy3I9nlY2t4dkb6QLa442s0Ve7m6H8YPf698_xt2enwZhGPoqElRLnSnNk1SMFKhQ65HiTGrIApYIHYaubkBlQk2YGWCpkjQSkjFlQEveIifr3FldfSyMnWOZ29QUhZ6aamExCoDSiHFnfFsb07qytjYjnNV5qeslUsAVPlwRwBUB_MaHApChw4fo8OFPfMgRMO47w8CFH29aLJLSZNvoDS-nm7X-mRdm-a_Pfz7-pfAv4CqKRg</recordid><startdate>19820715</startdate><enddate>19820715</enddate><creator>Sterns, Ernest E.</creator><creator>Curtis, Arthur C.</creator><creator>Miller, Sally</creator><creator>Hancock, John R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820715</creationdate><title>Thermography in breast diagnosis</title><author>Sterns, Ernest E. ; Curtis, Arthur C. ; Miller, Sally ; Hancock, John R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4666-9751a8ad9a3bc5f9096aaf9328a0d42b5a66050418b1e6de02c981758229e0a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Thermography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sterns, Ernest E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, Arthur C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, John R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sterns, Ernest E.</au><au>Curtis, Arthur C.</au><au>Miller, Sally</au><au>Hancock, John R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thermography in breast diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>1982-07-15</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>323-325</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>The role of two types of thermography in the diagnosis of breast disease was studied in 502 women seen over a two‐year period. Thirteen cancers were diagnosed in eleven women. The most significant finding was the large number of equivocal or abnormal thermograms in women with normal breasts or benign disease, while in patients with proven cancer, the thermogram was abnormal in less than half. Clinical diagnosis of breast cancer was not enhanced by either or both types of thermogram. Despite specific criteria, thermographic interpretation was inconsistent except in thermograms reported as “normal.” On the basis of the findings, the authors could not recommend that an abnormal thermogram be used as an indication for mammography, since this would result in an inordinate number of these studies, particularly in young women. The findings suggest that thermography is not a sufficiently precise modality for use in routine breast diagnosis.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>7083138</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-0142(19820715)50:2&lt;323::AID-CNCR2820500226&gt;3.0.CO;2-S</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 1982-07, Vol.50 (2), p.323-325
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74011723
source EZB Free E-Journals
subjects Adult
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Diagnostic Errors
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Thermography
title Thermography in breast diagnosis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A35%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thermography%20in%20breast%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Sterns,%20Ernest%20E.&rft.date=1982-07-15&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=323-325&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19820715)50:2%3C323::AID-CNCR2820500226%3E3.0.CO;2-S&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E74011723%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4666-9751a8ad9a3bc5f9096aaf9328a0d42b5a66050418b1e6de02c981758229e0a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=74011723&rft_id=info:pmid/7083138&rfr_iscdi=true