Loading…
Thermography in breast diagnosis
The role of two types of thermography in the diagnosis of breast disease was studied in 502 women seen over a two‐year period. Thirteen cancers were diagnosed in eleven women. The most significant finding was the large number of equivocal or abnormal thermograms in women with normal breasts or benig...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancer 1982-07, Vol.50 (2), p.323-325 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4666-9751a8ad9a3bc5f9096aaf9328a0d42b5a66050418b1e6de02c981758229e0a83 |
container_end_page | 325 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 323 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Sterns, Ernest E. Curtis, Arthur C. Miller, Sally Hancock, John R. |
description | The role of two types of thermography in the diagnosis of breast disease was studied in 502 women seen over a two‐year period. Thirteen cancers were diagnosed in eleven women. The most significant finding was the large number of equivocal or abnormal thermograms in women with normal breasts or benign disease, while in patients with proven cancer, the thermogram was abnormal in less than half. Clinical diagnosis of breast cancer was not enhanced by either or both types of thermogram. Despite specific criteria, thermographic interpretation was inconsistent except in thermograms reported as “normal.” On the basis of the findings, the authors could not recommend that an abnormal thermogram be used as an indication for mammography, since this would result in an inordinate number of these studies, particularly in young women. The findings suggest that thermography is not a sufficiently precise modality for use in routine breast diagnosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/1097-0142(19820715)50:2<323::AID-CNCR2820500226>3.0.CO;2-S |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74011723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>74011723</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4666-9751a8ad9a3bc5f9096aaf9328a0d42b5a66050418b1e6de02c981758229e0a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE9Lw0AQxRdRaq1-BCEn0UPq7G422a0i1PgXigVbQbwMm2TbRpKmZluk394trQU9CJ6G4b158_gRck2hTQHYOQUV-UADdkqVZBBRcSagwy45451O9_HGj5_iZ-YU4dwsvOJtaMf9C-YPdkhze7xLmgAgfRHw131yYO27WyMmeIM0IpCcctkk3nBi6rIa13o2WXr51Etqo-3cy3I9nlY2t4dkb6QLa442s0Ve7m6H8YPf698_xt2enwZhGPoqElRLnSnNk1SMFKhQ65HiTGrIApYIHYaubkBlQk2YGWCpkjQSkjFlQEveIifr3FldfSyMnWOZ29QUhZ6aamExCoDSiHFnfFsb07qytjYjnNV5qeslUsAVPlwRwBUB_MaHApChw4fo8OFPfMgRMO47w8CFH29aLJLSZNvoDS-nm7X-mRdm-a_Pfz7-pfAv4CqKRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>74011723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thermography in breast diagnosis</title><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><creator>Sterns, Ernest E. ; Curtis, Arthur C. ; Miller, Sally ; Hancock, John R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sterns, Ernest E. ; Curtis, Arthur C. ; Miller, Sally ; Hancock, John R.</creatorcontrib><description>The role of two types of thermography in the diagnosis of breast disease was studied in 502 women seen over a two‐year period. Thirteen cancers were diagnosed in eleven women. The most significant finding was the large number of equivocal or abnormal thermograms in women with normal breasts or benign disease, while in patients with proven cancer, the thermogram was abnormal in less than half. Clinical diagnosis of breast cancer was not enhanced by either or both types of thermogram. Despite specific criteria, thermographic interpretation was inconsistent except in thermograms reported as “normal.” On the basis of the findings, the authors could not recommend that an abnormal thermogram be used as an indication for mammography, since this would result in an inordinate number of these studies, particularly in young women. The findings suggest that thermography is not a sufficiently precise modality for use in routine breast diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820715)50:2<323::AID-CNCR2820500226>3.0.CO;2-S</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7083138</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Diagnostic Errors ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Thermography</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 1982-07, Vol.50 (2), p.323-325</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1982 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4666-9751a8ad9a3bc5f9096aaf9328a0d42b5a66050418b1e6de02c981758229e0a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7083138$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sterns, Ernest E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, Arthur C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, John R.</creatorcontrib><title>Thermography in breast diagnosis</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>The role of two types of thermography in the diagnosis of breast disease was studied in 502 women seen over a two‐year period. Thirteen cancers were diagnosed in eleven women. The most significant finding was the large number of equivocal or abnormal thermograms in women with normal breasts or benign disease, while in patients with proven cancer, the thermogram was abnormal in less than half. Clinical diagnosis of breast cancer was not enhanced by either or both types of thermogram. Despite specific criteria, thermographic interpretation was inconsistent except in thermograms reported as “normal.” On the basis of the findings, the authors could not recommend that an abnormal thermogram be used as an indication for mammography, since this would result in an inordinate number of these studies, particularly in young women. The findings suggest that thermography is not a sufficiently precise modality for use in routine breast diagnosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Thermography</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkE9Lw0AQxRdRaq1-BCEn0UPq7G422a0i1PgXigVbQbwMm2TbRpKmZluk394trQU9CJ6G4b158_gRck2hTQHYOQUV-UADdkqVZBBRcSagwy45451O9_HGj5_iZ-YU4dwsvOJtaMf9C-YPdkhze7xLmgAgfRHw131yYO27WyMmeIM0IpCcctkk3nBi6rIa13o2WXr51Etqo-3cy3I9nlY2t4dkb6QLa442s0Ve7m6H8YPf698_xt2enwZhGPoqElRLnSnNk1SMFKhQ65HiTGrIApYIHYaubkBlQk2YGWCpkjQSkjFlQEveIifr3FldfSyMnWOZ29QUhZ6aamExCoDSiHFnfFsb07qytjYjnNV5qeslUsAVPlwRwBUB_MaHApChw4fo8OFPfMgRMO47w8CFH29aLJLSZNvoDS-nm7X-mRdm-a_Pfz7-pfAv4CqKRg</recordid><startdate>19820715</startdate><enddate>19820715</enddate><creator>Sterns, Ernest E.</creator><creator>Curtis, Arthur C.</creator><creator>Miller, Sally</creator><creator>Hancock, John R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820715</creationdate><title>Thermography in breast diagnosis</title><author>Sterns, Ernest E. ; Curtis, Arthur C. ; Miller, Sally ; Hancock, John R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4666-9751a8ad9a3bc5f9096aaf9328a0d42b5a66050418b1e6de02c981758229e0a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Thermography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sterns, Ernest E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, Arthur C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, John R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sterns, Ernest E.</au><au>Curtis, Arthur C.</au><au>Miller, Sally</au><au>Hancock, John R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thermography in breast diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>1982-07-15</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>323-325</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>The role of two types of thermography in the diagnosis of breast disease was studied in 502 women seen over a two‐year period. Thirteen cancers were diagnosed in eleven women. The most significant finding was the large number of equivocal or abnormal thermograms in women with normal breasts or benign disease, while in patients with proven cancer, the thermogram was abnormal in less than half. Clinical diagnosis of breast cancer was not enhanced by either or both types of thermogram. Despite specific criteria, thermographic interpretation was inconsistent except in thermograms reported as “normal.” On the basis of the findings, the authors could not recommend that an abnormal thermogram be used as an indication for mammography, since this would result in an inordinate number of these studies, particularly in young women. The findings suggest that thermography is not a sufficiently precise modality for use in routine breast diagnosis.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>7083138</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-0142(19820715)50:2<323::AID-CNCR2820500226>3.0.CO;2-S</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 1982-07, Vol.50 (2), p.323-325 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74011723 |
source | EZB Free E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Diagnostic Errors Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Humans Middle Aged Thermography |
title | Thermography in breast diagnosis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A35%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thermography%20in%20breast%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Sterns,%20Ernest%20E.&rft.date=1982-07-15&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=323-325&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19820715)50:2%3C323::AID-CNCR2820500226%3E3.0.CO;2-S&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E74011723%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4666-9751a8ad9a3bc5f9096aaf9328a0d42b5a66050418b1e6de02c981758229e0a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=74011723&rft_id=info:pmid/7083138&rfr_iscdi=true |