Loading…

Measuring Depression in the Community: A Comparison of Telephone and Personal Interviews

Interview method effects in response to the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) are compared among a community sample (N=546) of adults randomly assigned to either telephone or in-person interviews. The interviews were conducted in Los Angeles during 1980. No significant differ...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Public opinion quarterly 1982-01, Vol.46 (1), p.110-121
Main Authors:	ANESHENSEL, CAROL S., FRERICHS, RALPH R., CLARK, VIRGINIA A., YOKOPENIC, PATRICIA A.
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	Adult California Communities Depression Depressive disorders Epidemiology Health administration Health Surveys Hispanics Humans Interview/Interviews/Interviewing Interviews as Topic - methods Measure/Measures/Measuring/ Measurement Method/Methods (see also Methodology) Proportions Psychological interviews Public health Social interaction Socioeconomic Factors Telephone - statistics & numerical data Telephone interviews Telephones
Citations:	Items that cite this one
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-1a8dc1dd065fb32b06c9d603828694a7f88e2371da3f95d36134f783041274e93
cites
container_end_page	121
container_issue	1
container_start_page	110
container_title	Public opinion quarterly
container_volume	46
creator	ANESHENSEL, CAROL S. FRERICHS, RALPH R. CLARK, VIRGINIA A. YOKOPENIC, PATRICIA A.
description	Interview method effects in response to the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) are compared among a community sample (N=546) of adults randomly assigned to either telephone or in-person interviews. The interviews were conducted in Los Angeles during 1980. No significant differences were observed between the two interview methods in nonresponse to symptom items, preference for specific response categories, reliability, mean level of depression, or proportion classified as depressed. Furthermore, no significant interactions were found between sociodemographic characteristics and the method of interview.
doi_str_mv	10.1086/268703
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74084397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2748815</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2748815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-1a8dc1dd065fb32b06c9d603828694a7f88e2371da3f95d36134f783041274e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokuBX4CQJSRuAdvj-INbtXy00iJ6WMSqF8ubTKiXJA52AvTfk1WqquKCLyPP82hGo5eQ55y94cyot0IZzeABWfESdFEC8IdkxRhAAUrsTsiTnA9sfkKKx-SEM1EqLssV2X1Gn6cU-u_0PQ4Jcw6xp6Gn4zXSdey6qQ_jzTt6dvwMPoU849jQLbY4XMceqe9reolp7vuWXvQjpl8Bf-en5FHj24zPbusp-frxw3Z9Xmy-fLpYn22KCiyMBfemrnhdM1U2exB7pipbKwZGGGWl140xKEDz2kNjyxoUB9loA0xyoSVaOCWvl7lDij8nzKPrQq6wbX2PccpOS2YkWP1fUXEmrZByFl_9Ix7ilObrsuPCKsuV5vf2VinmnLBxQwqdTzeOM3eMxC2RzOLL23HTvsP6nrZkMAsvFuGQx5ju-HyeMfyIiwWHPOKfO-zTD6c06NKd767c5bdSbbdXwm3gLxpym_s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296916719</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Depression in the Community: A Comparison of Telephone and Personal Interviews</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Oxford University Press Archive</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>ANESHENSEL, CAROL S. ; FRERICHS, RALPH R. ; CLARK, VIRGINIA A. ; YOKOPENIC, PATRICIA A.</creator><creatorcontrib>ANESHENSEL, CAROL S. ; FRERICHS, RALPH R. ; CLARK, VIRGINIA A. ; YOKOPENIC, PATRICIA A.</creatorcontrib><description>Interview method effects in response to the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) are compared among a community sample (N=546) of adults randomly assigned to either telephone or in-person interviews. The interviews were conducted in Los Angeles during 1980. No significant differences were observed between the two interview methods in nonresponse to symptom items, preference for specific response categories, reliability, mean level of depression, or proportion classified as depressed. Furthermore, no significant interactions were found between sociodemographic characteristics and the method of interview.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-362X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/268703</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10256145</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POPQAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; California ; Communities ; Depression ; Depressive disorders ; Epidemiology ; Health administration ; Health Surveys ; Hispanics ; Humans ; Interview/Interviews/Interviewing ; Interviews as Topic - methods ; Measure/Measures/Measuring/ Measurement ; Method/Methods (see also Methodology) ; Proportions ; Psychological interviews ; Public health ; Social interaction ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Telephone - statistics & numerical data ; Telephone interviews ; Telephones</subject><ispartof>Public opinion quarterly, 1982-01, Vol.46 (1), p.110-121</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1982 The Trustees of Columbia University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-1a8dc1dd065fb32b06c9d603828694a7f88e2371da3f95d36134f783041274e93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2748815$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2748815$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33775,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10256145$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ANESHENSEL, CAROL S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRERICHS, RALPH R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLARK, VIRGINIA A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOKOPENIC, PATRICIA A.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Depression in the Community: A Comparison of Telephone and Personal Interviews</title><title>Public opinion quarterly</title><addtitle>Public Opin Q</addtitle><description>Interview method effects in response to the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) are compared among a community sample (N=546) of adults randomly assigned to either telephone or in-person interviews. The interviews were conducted in Los Angeles during 1980. No significant differences were observed between the two interview methods in nonresponse to symptom items, preference for specific response categories, reliability, mean level of depression, or proportion classified as depressed. Furthermore, no significant interactions were found between sociodemographic characteristics and the method of interview.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depressive disorders</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Hispanics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview/Interviews/Interviewing</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Measure/Measures/Measuring/ Measurement</subject><subject>Method/Methods (see also Methodology)</subject><subject>Proportions</subject><subject>Psychological interviews</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Telephone - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Telephone interviews</subject><subject>Telephones</subject><issn>0033-362X</issn><issn>1537-5331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokuBX4CQJSRuAdvj-INbtXy00iJ6WMSqF8ubTKiXJA52AvTfk1WqquKCLyPP82hGo5eQ55y94cyot0IZzeABWfESdFEC8IdkxRhAAUrsTsiTnA9sfkKKx-SEM1EqLssV2X1Gn6cU-u_0PQ4Jcw6xp6Gn4zXSdey6qQ_jzTt6dvwMPoU849jQLbY4XMceqe9reolp7vuWXvQjpl8Bf-en5FHj24zPbusp-frxw3Z9Xmy-fLpYn22KCiyMBfemrnhdM1U2exB7pipbKwZGGGWl140xKEDz2kNjyxoUB9loA0xyoSVaOCWvl7lDij8nzKPrQq6wbX2PccpOS2YkWP1fUXEmrZByFl_9Ix7ilObrsuPCKsuV5vf2VinmnLBxQwqdTzeOM3eMxC2RzOLL23HTvsP6nrZkMAsvFuGQx5ju-HyeMfyIiwWHPOKfO-zTD6c06NKd767c5bdSbbdXwm3gLxpym_s</recordid><startdate>19820101</startdate><enddate>19820101</enddate><creator>ANESHENSEL, CAROL S.</creator><creator>FRERICHS, RALPH R.</creator><creator>CLARK, VIRGINIA A.</creator><creator>YOKOPENIC, PATRICIA A.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Elsevier North-Holland, Inc</general><general>Public Opinion Quarterly, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820101</creationdate><title>Measuring Depression in the Community: A Comparison of Telephone and Personal Interviews</title><author>ANESHENSEL, CAROL S. ; FRERICHS, RALPH R. ; CLARK, VIRGINIA A. ; YOKOPENIC, PATRICIA A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-1a8dc1dd065fb32b06c9d603828694a7f88e2371da3f95d36134f783041274e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depressive disorders</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Hispanics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview/Interviews/Interviewing</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Measure/Measures/Measuring/ Measurement</topic><topic>Method/Methods (see also Methodology)</topic><topic>Proportions</topic><topic>Psychological interviews</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Telephone - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Telephone interviews</topic><topic>Telephones</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ANESHENSEL, CAROL S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRERICHS, RALPH R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLARK, VIRGINIA A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOKOPENIC, PATRICIA A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Public opinion quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ANESHENSEL, CAROL S.</au><au>FRERICHS, RALPH R.</au><au>CLARK, VIRGINIA A.</au><au>YOKOPENIC, PATRICIA A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Depression in the Community: A Comparison of Telephone and Personal Interviews</atitle><jtitle>Public opinion quarterly</jtitle><addtitle>Public Opin Q</addtitle><date>1982-01-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>110</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>110-121</pages><issn>0033-362X</issn><eissn>1537-5331</eissn><coden>POPQAE</coden><abstract>Interview method effects in response to the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) are compared among a community sample (N=546) of adults randomly assigned to either telephone or in-person interviews. The interviews were conducted in Los Angeles during 1980. No significant differences were observed between the two interview methods in nonresponse to symptom items, preference for specific response categories, reliability, mean level of depression, or proportion classified as depressed. Furthermore, no significant interactions were found between sociodemographic characteristics and the method of interview.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>10256145</pmid><doi>10.1086/268703</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0033-362X
ispartof	Public opinion quarterly, 1982-01, Vol.46 (1), p.110-121
issn	0033-362X 1537-5331
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74084397
source	JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Oxford University Press Archive; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate); Sociological Abstracts
subjects	Adult California Communities Depression Depressive disorders Epidemiology Health administration Health Surveys Hispanics Humans Interview/Interviews/Interviewing Interviews as Topic - methods Measure/Measures/Measuring/ Measurement Method/Methods (see also Methodology) Proportions Psychological interviews Public health Social interaction Socioeconomic Factors Telephone - statistics & numerical data Telephone interviews Telephones
title	Measuring Depression in the Community: A Comparison of Telephone and Personal Interviews
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A32%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Depression%20in%20the%20Community:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Telephone%20and%20Personal%20Interviews&rft.jtitle=Public%20opinion%20quarterly&rft.au=ANESHENSEL,%20CAROL%20S.&rft.date=1982-01-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=110-121&rft.issn=0033-362X&rft.eissn=1537-5331&rft.coden=POPQAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/268703&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2748815%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-1a8dc1dd065fb32b06c9d603828694a7f88e2371da3f95d36134f783041274e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296916719&rft_id=info:pmid/10256145&rft_jstor_id=2748815&rfr_iscdi=true