Human prostate androgen receptor quantitation: effects of temperature on assay parameters

• Published in: Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 1982-11, Vol.42 (11), p.4849-4854
• Main Authors: Shain, S A, Gorelic, L S, Boesel, R W, Radwin, H M, Lamm, D L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cell Nucleus - metabolism; Estrenes - metabolism; Humans; Kinetics; Male; Metribolone; Prostate - metabolism; Prostate - pathology; Prostatic Neoplasms - metabolism; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery; Receptors, Androgen - metabolism; Receptors, Steroid - metabolism; Temperature; Testosterone Congeners - metabolism
• ISSN: 0008-5472

When cytoplasmic extracts of human prostatic tissues were split to permit quantitation of total androgen receptor (RCT) content by saturation analysis at 15 degrees and 2 degrees, we observed that 30% (10 of 32) of the specimens yielded statistically increased values for RCT following incubation at 15 degrees as compared to 2 degrees. Considering only those specimens (13 of 32) showing statistically differentiated RCT yield, 77% (10 of 13) yielded greater RCT content following incubation at 15 degrees. The families of association constants (Ka) obtained for RCT determinations at 2 degrees and 15 degrees were not statistically differentiated. The increased yield of RCT content determined at 15 degrees was 95% (mean) and 20 to 350% (range). Nuclear androgen receptor content determined at 15 degrees was greater for 25% (2 of 8) of the patient specimens when compared to split determinations performed at 2 degrees. Incubation of nuclear extracts at 15 degrees resulted in a significant 3-fold reduction in receptor Ka for methyltrienolone (R1881). This did not appear to affect assay precision. These studies showed that incubation at 15 degrees is preferable to incubation at 2 degrees for quantitation of RCT and nuclear androgen receptor content by saturation analysis. Single saturating dose determinations of RCT consistently yielded underestimates. The extent of underestimate was variable from specimen to specimen and was both ligand concentration and assay temperature dependent. Our data suggest that results of single saturating dose determinations of RCT require cautious interpretation.