Loading…
Do Chinese Readers Obtain Preview Benefit From Word n + 2? Evidence From Eye Movements
The boundary paradigm ( K. Rayner, 1975 ) was used to determine the extent to which Chinese readers obtain information from the right of fixation during reading. As characters are the basic visual unit in written Chinese, they were used as targets in Experiment 1 to examine whether readers obtain pr...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2009-08, Vol.35 (4), p.1192-1204 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a485t-993b3876f71912f84bb869d0aa5b7f59a70e966333b70b402e0cf646908d015e3 |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 1204 |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1192 |
| container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Yang, Jinmian Wang, Suiping Xu, Yimin Rayner, Keith |
| description | The boundary paradigm (
K. Rayner, 1975
) was used to determine the extent to which Chinese readers obtain information from the right of fixation during reading. As characters are the basic visual unit in written Chinese, they were used as targets in Experiment 1 to examine whether readers obtain preview information from character
n
+ 1 and character
n
+ 2. The results from Experiment 1 suggest they do. In Experiment 2, 2-character target words were used to determine whether readers obtain preview information from word
n
+ 2 as well as word
n
+ 1. Robust preview effects were obtained for word
n
+ 1. There was also evidence from gaze duration (but not first fixation duration), suggesting preview effects for word
n
+ 2. Moreover, there was evidence for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in Chinese reading in both experiments. Implications of these results for models of eye movement control are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0013554 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742722601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ860076</ericid><sourcerecordid>1850697281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a485t-993b3876f71912f84bb869d0aa5b7f59a70e966333b70b402e0cf646908d015e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90VlrFEEQB_BGFLOugh9ApAl4gI72fTyJrhsPIhHxeGx6ZmpIh7nsnlndb2-HXRPYh_RLP9SPKqr-CD2k5BUlXL_2hFAupbiFFtRyW1Cm9W20IMSqgkrGj9C9lC5IftTIu-iIWiW5lmaBfr4f8Oo89JAAfwNfQ0z4rJx86PHXCJsAf_A76KEJEz6JQ4d_DbHGPX6B2Ru83oQa-gp2lfUW8JdhAx30U7qP7jS-TfBg_y_Rj5P199XH4vTsw6fV29PCCyOnwlpecqNVo6mlrDGiLI2yNfFelrqR1msCVinOealJKQgDUjVKKEtMTagEvkTPdn3HOPyeIU2uC6mCtvU9DHNyWjDNmMrXWaKnN0qlpcwXIRkeH8CLYY593sIpKmQey_RNiFEhjMhTM3q-Q1UcUorQuDGGzseto8Rd5ub-55bp432_ueygvob7oDJ4sgc-Vb5tou-rkK4co9oQZS_XfLRzEEN1VV5_NooQrXL55a7sR-_GtK18nELVQqrmGHNw7u_56Lh0wlFq2fXUQ37g_gG2Gr-N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614501527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Chinese Readers Obtain Preview Benefit From Word n + 2? Evidence From Eye Movements</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Yang, Jinmian ; Wang, Suiping ; Xu, Yimin ; Rayner, Keith</creator><contributor>Humphreys, Glyn W</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jinmian ; Wang, Suiping ; Xu, Yimin ; Rayner, Keith ; Humphreys, Glyn W</creatorcontrib><description>The boundary paradigm (
K. Rayner, 1975
) was used to determine the extent to which Chinese readers obtain information from the right of fixation during reading. As characters are the basic visual unit in written Chinese, they were used as targets in Experiment 1 to examine whether readers obtain preview information from character
n
+ 1 and character
n
+ 2. The results from Experiment 1 suggest they do. In Experiment 2, 2-character target words were used to determine whether readers obtain preview information from word
n
+ 2 as well as word
n
+ 1. Robust preview effects were obtained for word
n
+ 1. There was also evidence from gaze duration (but not first fixation duration), suggesting preview effects for word
n
+ 2. Moreover, there was evidence for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in Chinese reading in both experiments. Implications of these results for models of eye movement control are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0013554</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19653758</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Asian people ; Biological and medical sciences ; Characters ; China ; Chinese ; Chinese people ; English ; Experimental psychology ; Experiments ; Eye fixation ; Eye Movements ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Fixation ; Fixation, Ocular - physiology ; Fovea Centralis - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Information processing ; Language ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reader Text Relationship ; Reading ; Reading Fluency ; Time Factors ; Visual Fields - physiology ; Written Language</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2009-08, Vol.35 (4), p.1192-1204</ispartof><rights>2009 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2009</rights><rights>2009, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a485t-993b3876f71912f84bb869d0aa5b7f59a70e966333b70b402e0cf646908d015e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ860076$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21780691$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19653758$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Humphreys, Glyn W</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jinmian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Suiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayner, Keith</creatorcontrib><title>Do Chinese Readers Obtain Preview Benefit From Word n + 2? Evidence From Eye Movements</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>The boundary paradigm (
K. Rayner, 1975
) was used to determine the extent to which Chinese readers obtain information from the right of fixation during reading. As characters are the basic visual unit in written Chinese, they were used as targets in Experiment 1 to examine whether readers obtain preview information from character
n
+ 1 and character
n
+ 2. The results from Experiment 1 suggest they do. In Experiment 2, 2-character target words were used to determine whether readers obtain preview information from word
n
+ 2 as well as word
n
+ 1. Robust preview effects were obtained for word
n
+ 1. There was also evidence from gaze duration (but not first fixation duration), suggesting preview effects for word
n
+ 2. Moreover, there was evidence for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in Chinese reading in both experiments. Implications of these results for models of eye movement control are discussed.</description><subject>Asian people</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Characters</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese</subject><subject>Chinese people</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Eye fixation</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Fixation</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Fovea Centralis - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reader Text Relationship</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Fluency</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Visual Fields - physiology</subject><subject>Written Language</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90VlrFEEQB_BGFLOugh9ApAl4gI72fTyJrhsPIhHxeGx6ZmpIh7nsnlndb2-HXRPYh_RLP9SPKqr-CD2k5BUlXL_2hFAupbiFFtRyW1Cm9W20IMSqgkrGj9C9lC5IftTIu-iIWiW5lmaBfr4f8Oo89JAAfwNfQ0z4rJx86PHXCJsAf_A76KEJEz6JQ4d_DbHGPX6B2Ru83oQa-gp2lfUW8JdhAx30U7qP7jS-TfBg_y_Rj5P199XH4vTsw6fV29PCCyOnwlpecqNVo6mlrDGiLI2yNfFelrqR1msCVinOealJKQgDUjVKKEtMTagEvkTPdn3HOPyeIU2uC6mCtvU9DHNyWjDNmMrXWaKnN0qlpcwXIRkeH8CLYY593sIpKmQey_RNiFEhjMhTM3q-Q1UcUorQuDGGzseto8Rd5ub-55bp432_ueygvob7oDJ4sgc-Vb5tou-rkK4co9oQZS_XfLRzEEN1VV5_NooQrXL55a7sR-_GtK18nELVQqrmGHNw7u_56Lh0wlFq2fXUQ37g_gG2Gr-N</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Yang, Jinmian</creator><creator>Wang, Suiping</creator><creator>Xu, Yimin</creator><creator>Rayner, Keith</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Do Chinese Readers Obtain Preview Benefit From Word n + 2? Evidence From Eye Movements</title><author>Yang, Jinmian ; Wang, Suiping ; Xu, Yimin ; Rayner, Keith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a485t-993b3876f71912f84bb869d0aa5b7f59a70e966333b70b402e0cf646908d015e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Asian people</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Characters</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese</topic><topic>Chinese people</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Eye fixation</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Fixation</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Fovea Centralis - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reader Text Relationship</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Fluency</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Visual Fields - physiology</topic><topic>Written Language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jinmian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Suiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayner, Keith</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Jinmian</au><au>Wang, Suiping</au><au>Xu, Yimin</au><au>Rayner, Keith</au><au>Humphreys, Glyn W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ860076</ericid><atitle>Do Chinese Readers Obtain Preview Benefit From Word n + 2? Evidence From Eye Movements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1192</spage><epage>1204</epage><pages>1192-1204</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>The boundary paradigm (
K. Rayner, 1975
) was used to determine the extent to which Chinese readers obtain information from the right of fixation during reading. As characters are the basic visual unit in written Chinese, they were used as targets in Experiment 1 to examine whether readers obtain preview information from character
n
+ 1 and character
n
+ 2. The results from Experiment 1 suggest they do. In Experiment 2, 2-character target words were used to determine whether readers obtain preview information from word
n
+ 2 as well as word
n
+ 1. Robust preview effects were obtained for word
n
+ 1. There was also evidence from gaze duration (but not first fixation duration), suggesting preview effects for word
n
+ 2. Moreover, there was evidence for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in Chinese reading in both experiments. Implications of these results for models of eye movement control are discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>19653758</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0013554</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0096-1523 |
| ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2009-08, Vol.35 (4), p.1192-1204 |
| issn | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742722601 |
| source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ERIC |
| subjects | Asian people Biological and medical sciences Characters China Chinese Chinese people English Experimental psychology Experiments Eye fixation Eye Movements Eye Movements - physiology Fixation Fixation, Ocular - physiology Fovea Centralis - physiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Information processing Language Production and perception of written language Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reader Text Relationship Reading Reading Fluency Time Factors Visual Fields - physiology Written Language |
| title | Do Chinese Readers Obtain Preview Benefit From Word n + 2? Evidence From Eye Movements |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A06%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Chinese%20Readers%20Obtain%20Preview%20Benefit%20From%20Word%20n%20+%202?%20Evidence%20From%20Eye%20Movements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Yang,%20Jinmian&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1192&rft.epage=1204&rft.pages=1192-1204&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0013554&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1850697281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a485t-993b3876f71912f84bb869d0aa5b7f59a70e966333b70b402e0cf646908d015e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614501527&rft_id=info:pmid/19653758&rft_ericid=EJ860076&rfr_iscdi=true |