Participation of marginalized groups in evaluation: Mission impossible?

Responsive evaluation facilitates a dialogical process by creating social conditions that enhance equal input from all stakeholders. However, when multiple stakeholders are involved, some groups tend to go unheard or not be taken seriously. In these cases, empowerment of the more silent voices is ne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evaluation and program planning 2010-08, Vol.33 (3), p.238-245
Main Authors: Baur, Vivianne E., Abma, Tineke A., Widdershoven, Guy A.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Evaluation
Groups
Hermeneutic dialogue
Hermeneutics
Marginalized groups
Marginalized people
Nursing homes
Participation
Policy making
Responsive evaluation
Responsive evaluation Participation Hermeneutic dialogue Marginalized groups
Social conditions
Social conditions & trends
Stakeholders
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Responsive evaluation facilitates a dialogical process by creating social conditions that enhance equal input from all stakeholders. However, when multiple stakeholders are involved, some groups tend to go unheard or not be taken seriously. In these cases, empowerment of the more silent voices is needed. The inclusion of marginalized groups in evaluation is thus a challenge for evaluators. It raises questions about how to include all stakeholders in the evaluation process in a way that empowers marginalized stakeholder groups, and at the same time is acceptable for the dominant stakeholder groups. In this article we describe our experiences with a responsive evaluation project on the participation of client councils in policy processes in a Dutch residential care and nursing home organization. We focus on the value of hermeneutic dialogue (fostering mutual understanding and learning processes) in addressing the challenges of working with stakeholders in unequal relationships.
ISSN:0149-7189
1873-7870
DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.09.002