Loading…
Supplemental health insurance and equality of access in Belgium
The effects of supplemental health insurance on health‐care consumption crucially depend on specific institutional features of the health‐care system. We analyse the situation in Belgium, a country with a very broad coverage in compulsory social health insurance and where supplemental insurance main...
Saved in:
Published in: | Health economics 2010-04, Vol.19 (4), p.377-395 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5818-334d1d50db6279e3b6a84593becf61f6e2e19cca66170dfdf7a4038926b6cee33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5818-334d1d50db6279e3b6a84593becf61f6e2e19cca66170dfdf7a4038926b6cee33 |
container_end_page | 395 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 377 |
container_title | Health economics |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Schokkaert, Erik Van Ourti, Tom De Graeve, Diana Lecluyse, Ann Van de Voorde, Carine |
description | The effects of supplemental health insurance on health‐care consumption crucially depend on specific institutional features of the health‐care system. We analyse the situation in Belgium, a country with a very broad coverage in compulsory social health insurance and where supplemental insurance mainly refers to extra‐billing in hospitals. Within this institutional background, we find only weak evidence of adverse selection in the coverage of supplemental health insurance. We find much stronger effects of socio‐economic background. We estimate a bivariate probit model and cannot reject the assumption of exogeneity of insurance availability for the explanation of health‐care use. A count model for hospital care shows that supplemental insurance has no significant effect on the number of spells, but a negative effect on the number of nights per spell. We comment on the implications of our findings for equality of access to health care in Belgium. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hec.1478 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742728206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1982951851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5818-334d1d50db6279e3b6a84593becf61f6e2e19cca66170dfdf7a4038926b6cee33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhS0EoqUg8QtQxAY2KbYntuMVKlftvaDykACxtBxnQlKcR-Okbf49vroBJCTE4tjW-NOZ8TEhTxk9ZZTyVzW6U5ap_B45ZlTrlFFB7-_PQqWaAz0ij0K4ojTeUfmQHDENAgTXx-T153kYPLbYTdYnNVo_1UnThXm0ncPEdmWC17P1zbQkfZVY5zCECCRv0H9v5vYxeVBZH_DJup-QrxfnXza79PLj9u3m7DJ1Imd5CpCVrBS0LCRXGqGQNs-EhgJdJVklkSPTzlkpmaJlVVbKZhRyzWUhHSLACXlx8B3G_nrGMJm2CQ69tx32czAq44rnnMr_kwAgpII8ks__Iq_6eeziMwwHTjOqMxahlwfIjX0II1ZmGJvWjoth1OzDNzF8sw8_ou8O6IhDrP3ibv1Sx1Rj5caAZTouSxSn0QBsE5VFDVGglAEtTD210ezZOtxctFj-6bp-XQTSA3DbeFz-OZXZnW_W6Va-CRPe_ebt-MPENJQw3z5sjZDiYvN-uzOf4Cc397P3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232040941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supplemental health insurance and equality of access in Belgium</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Schokkaert, Erik ; Van Ourti, Tom ; De Graeve, Diana ; Lecluyse, Ann ; Van de Voorde, Carine</creator><creatorcontrib>Schokkaert, Erik ; Van Ourti, Tom ; De Graeve, Diana ; Lecluyse, Ann ; Van de Voorde, Carine</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of supplemental health insurance on health‐care consumption crucially depend on specific institutional features of the health‐care system. We analyse the situation in Belgium, a country with a very broad coverage in compulsory social health insurance and where supplemental insurance mainly refers to extra‐billing in hospitals. Within this institutional background, we find only weak evidence of adverse selection in the coverage of supplemental health insurance. We find much stronger effects of socio‐economic background. We estimate a bivariate probit model and cannot reject the assumption of exogeneity of insurance availability for the explanation of health‐care use. A count model for hospital care shows that supplemental insurance has no significant effect on the number of spells, but a negative effect on the number of nights per spell. We comment on the implications of our findings for equality of access to health care in Belgium. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9230</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hec.1478</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19353529</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HEECEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; adverse selection ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Belgium ; Coverage ; Economic models ; Equality ; equality of access ; Female ; Health care access ; Health economics ; Health insurance ; Health Services - utilization ; Health Services Accessibility ; Health Surveys ; Healthcare Disparities ; healthcare use ; hospital spells ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Impact analysis ; Insurance Coverage - organization & administration ; Insurance, Health ; Male ; Middle Aged ; moral hazard ; Private Sector ; Socioeconomic factors ; State Medicine ; Studies ; supplemental insurance ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Health economics, 2010-04, Vol.19 (4), p.377-395</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5818-334d1d50db6279e3b6a84593becf61f6e2e19cca66170dfdf7a4038926b6cee33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5818-334d1d50db6279e3b6a84593becf61f6e2e19cca66170dfdf7a4038926b6cee33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19353529$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/wlyhlthec/v_3a19_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a377-395.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schokkaert, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Ourti, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Graeve, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecluyse, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Voorde, Carine</creatorcontrib><title>Supplemental health insurance and equality of access in Belgium</title><title>Health economics</title><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><description>The effects of supplemental health insurance on health‐care consumption crucially depend on specific institutional features of the health‐care system. We analyse the situation in Belgium, a country with a very broad coverage in compulsory social health insurance and where supplemental insurance mainly refers to extra‐billing in hospitals. Within this institutional background, we find only weak evidence of adverse selection in the coverage of supplemental health insurance. We find much stronger effects of socio‐economic background. We estimate a bivariate probit model and cannot reject the assumption of exogeneity of insurance availability for the explanation of health‐care use. A count model for hospital care shows that supplemental insurance has no significant effect on the number of spells, but a negative effect on the number of nights per spell. We comment on the implications of our findings for equality of access to health care in Belgium. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>adverse selection</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Belgium</subject><subject>Coverage</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>equality of access</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health Services - utilization</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities</subject><subject>healthcare use</subject><subject>hospital spells</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Insurance Coverage - organization & administration</subject><subject>Insurance, Health</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>moral hazard</subject><subject>Private Sector</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>State Medicine</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>supplemental insurance</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhS0EoqUg8QtQxAY2KbYntuMVKlftvaDykACxtBxnQlKcR-Okbf49vroBJCTE4tjW-NOZ8TEhTxk9ZZTyVzW6U5ap_B45ZlTrlFFB7-_PQqWaAz0ij0K4ojTeUfmQHDENAgTXx-T153kYPLbYTdYnNVo_1UnThXm0ncPEdmWC17P1zbQkfZVY5zCECCRv0H9v5vYxeVBZH_DJup-QrxfnXza79PLj9u3m7DJ1Imd5CpCVrBS0LCRXGqGQNs-EhgJdJVklkSPTzlkpmaJlVVbKZhRyzWUhHSLACXlx8B3G_nrGMJm2CQ69tx32czAq44rnnMr_kwAgpII8ks__Iq_6eeziMwwHTjOqMxahlwfIjX0II1ZmGJvWjoth1OzDNzF8sw8_ou8O6IhDrP3ibv1Sx1Rj5caAZTouSxSn0QBsE5VFDVGglAEtTD210ezZOtxctFj-6bp-XQTSA3DbeFz-OZXZnW_W6Va-CRPe_ebt-MPENJQw3z5sjZDiYvN-uzOf4Cc397P3</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Schokkaert, Erik</creator><creator>Van Ourti, Tom</creator><creator>De Graeve, Diana</creator><creator>Lecluyse, Ann</creator><creator>Van de Voorde, Carine</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Supplemental health insurance and equality of access in Belgium</title><author>Schokkaert, Erik ; Van Ourti, Tom ; De Graeve, Diana ; Lecluyse, Ann ; Van de Voorde, Carine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5818-334d1d50db6279e3b6a84593becf61f6e2e19cca66170dfdf7a4038926b6cee33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>adverse selection</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Belgium</topic><topic>Coverage</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>equality of access</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health Services - utilization</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities</topic><topic>healthcare use</topic><topic>hospital spells</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Insurance Coverage - organization & administration</topic><topic>Insurance, Health</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>moral hazard</topic><topic>Private Sector</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>State Medicine</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>supplemental insurance</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schokkaert, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Ourti, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Graeve, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecluyse, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Voorde, Carine</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schokkaert, Erik</au><au>Van Ourti, Tom</au><au>De Graeve, Diana</au><au>Lecluyse, Ann</au><au>Van de Voorde, Carine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supplemental health insurance and equality of access in Belgium</atitle><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>377</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>377-395</pages><issn>1057-9230</issn><eissn>1099-1050</eissn><coden>HEECEZ</coden><abstract>The effects of supplemental health insurance on health‐care consumption crucially depend on specific institutional features of the health‐care system. We analyse the situation in Belgium, a country with a very broad coverage in compulsory social health insurance and where supplemental insurance mainly refers to extra‐billing in hospitals. Within this institutional background, we find only weak evidence of adverse selection in the coverage of supplemental health insurance. We find much stronger effects of socio‐economic background. We estimate a bivariate probit model and cannot reject the assumption of exogeneity of insurance availability for the explanation of health‐care use. A count model for hospital care shows that supplemental insurance has no significant effect on the number of spells, but a negative effect on the number of nights per spell. We comment on the implications of our findings for equality of access to health care in Belgium. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>19353529</pmid><doi>10.1002/hec.1478</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1057-9230 |
ispartof | Health economics, 2010-04, Vol.19 (4), p.377-395 |
issn | 1057-9230 1099-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742728206 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult adverse selection Aged Aged, 80 and over Algorithms Belgium Coverage Economic models Equality equality of access Female Health care access Health economics Health insurance Health Services - utilization Health Services Accessibility Health Surveys Healthcare Disparities healthcare use hospital spells Hospitals Humans Impact analysis Insurance Coverage - organization & administration Insurance, Health Male Middle Aged moral hazard Private Sector Socioeconomic factors State Medicine Studies supplemental insurance Young Adult |
title | Supplemental health insurance and equality of access in Belgium |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A51%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supplemental%20health%20insurance%20and%20equality%20of%20access%20in%20Belgium&rft.jtitle=Health%20economics&rft.au=Schokkaert,%20Erik&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=377&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=377-395&rft.issn=1057-9230&rft.eissn=1099-1050&rft.coden=HEECEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hec.1478&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1982951851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5818-334d1d50db6279e3b6a84593becf61f6e2e19cca66170dfdf7a4038926b6cee33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232040941&rft_id=info:pmid/19353529&rfr_iscdi=true |