Loading…
Global Administrative Law Dimensions of International Organizations Law
Several important legal features of the contemporary practice of international organizations (IOs) are not easily accommodated in standard approaches to international organizations law. This article argues that Global Administrative Law (GAL) approaches may strengthen analysis of operational issues...
Saved in:
Published in: | International organizations law review 2009-01, Vol.6 (2), p.319-358 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b489t-80b4da21e64750e792c416c4a4ed868b9e65c5451e280d5eacdc33663920961d3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 358 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 319 |
container_title | International organizations law review |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Kingsbury, Benedict Casini, Lorenzo |
description | Several important legal features of the contemporary practice of international organizations (IOs) are not easily accommodated in standard approaches to international organizations law. This article argues that Global Administrative Law (GAL) approaches may strengthen analysis of operational issues such as emergency actions by IOs and the human rights implications of IO activities, structural issues such as the involvement of IOs in field missions and in public-private partnerships, and normative issues concerning the production and effects of non-treaty regulatory instruments by IOs (guidelines, best practices, national policy assessments, and other documents rather amorphously analyzed under the 'soft law' rubric). In examining these activities as forms of administration (broadly understood), subject to precepts of good administration and legal standards concerning transparency, participation, reason-giving, review, and accountability, a GAL perspective provides a basis both for critique of problematic practices, and for increasing the effectiveness and legitimacy of some beneficial IO activities which are contentious or currently not undertaken. GAL also responds to the proliferation and differentiation of IOs and other entities in global governance through applying legal standards to their interactions, bringing a principled 'inter-public' approach to the legal relations among global public entities. GAL provides a valuable, and thus far overly neglected, addition to the field of international institutional law. Adapted from the source document. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/157237409X12670188734311 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743028884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>743028884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b489t-80b4da21e64750e792c416c4a4ed868b9e65c5451e280d5eacdc33663920961d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOAyEUhonRxFp9h9m5GoWB4bJsWlurTbqpl7ghzAw1VAoVpt6eXuqY7owrDvm__5zkAyBD8AIhii9RyQrMCBSPqKAMIs4ZJhihA9DbRXnK2OF-xuIYnMS4ghALDHkPTCbWV8pmg2ZtnIltUK1509lMvWcjs9YuGu9i5pfZ1LU6uJR6l_B5eFbOfP18444-BUdLZaM--3374G58tRhe57P5ZDoczPKKcNHmHFakUQXSlLASaiaKmiBaE0V0wymvhKZlXZIS6YLDptSqbmqMKcWigIKiBvfBebd3E_zrVsdWrk2stbXKab-NkhEMC845SSTvyDr4GINeyk0waxU-JYJyp07-pS5V866ahOiPfU-FF0kZZqW8uV3IBzYa4yc0lveJpx1fBWOtXPltMmXj_4e-Af2Of5E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>743028884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global Administrative Law Dimensions of International Organizations Law</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kingsbury, Benedict ; Casini, Lorenzo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kingsbury, Benedict ; Casini, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><description>Several important legal features of the contemporary practice of international organizations (IOs) are not easily accommodated in standard approaches to international organizations law. This article argues that Global Administrative Law (GAL) approaches may strengthen analysis of operational issues such as emergency actions by IOs and the human rights implications of IO activities, structural issues such as the involvement of IOs in field missions and in public-private partnerships, and normative issues concerning the production and effects of non-treaty regulatory instruments by IOs (guidelines, best practices, national policy assessments, and other documents rather amorphously analyzed under the 'soft law' rubric). In examining these activities as forms of administration (broadly understood), subject to precepts of good administration and legal standards concerning transparency, participation, reason-giving, review, and accountability, a GAL perspective provides a basis both for critique of problematic practices, and for increasing the effectiveness and legitimacy of some beneficial IO activities which are contentious or currently not undertaken. GAL also responds to the proliferation and differentiation of IOs and other entities in global governance through applying legal standards to their interactions, bringing a principled 'inter-public' approach to the legal relations among global public entities. GAL provides a valuable, and thus far overly neglected, addition to the field of international institutional law. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-3739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-3747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-3739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/157237409X12670188734311</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff</publisher><subject>ACCOUNTABILITY ; Administrative Law ; EMERGENCY POWERS ; FIELD OPERATIONS ; GLOBAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW ; HUMAN RIGHTS ; INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL LAW ; International Law ; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ; Management ; NORMATIVE FRAGMENTATION ; Participation ; PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS</subject><ispartof>International organizations law review, 2009-01, Vol.6 (2), p.319-358</ispartof><rights>2009 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b489t-80b4da21e64750e792c416c4a4ed868b9e65c5451e280d5eacdc33663920961d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kingsbury, Benedict</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casini, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><title>Global Administrative Law Dimensions of International Organizations Law</title><title>International organizations law review</title><addtitle>IOLR</addtitle><description>Several important legal features of the contemporary practice of international organizations (IOs) are not easily accommodated in standard approaches to international organizations law. This article argues that Global Administrative Law (GAL) approaches may strengthen analysis of operational issues such as emergency actions by IOs and the human rights implications of IO activities, structural issues such as the involvement of IOs in field missions and in public-private partnerships, and normative issues concerning the production and effects of non-treaty regulatory instruments by IOs (guidelines, best practices, national policy assessments, and other documents rather amorphously analyzed under the 'soft law' rubric). In examining these activities as forms of administration (broadly understood), subject to precepts of good administration and legal standards concerning transparency, participation, reason-giving, review, and accountability, a GAL perspective provides a basis both for critique of problematic practices, and for increasing the effectiveness and legitimacy of some beneficial IO activities which are contentious or currently not undertaken. GAL also responds to the proliferation and differentiation of IOs and other entities in global governance through applying legal standards to their interactions, bringing a principled 'inter-public' approach to the legal relations among global public entities. GAL provides a valuable, and thus far overly neglected, addition to the field of international institutional law. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>ACCOUNTABILITY</subject><subject>Administrative Law</subject><subject>EMERGENCY POWERS</subject><subject>FIELD OPERATIONS</subject><subject>GLOBAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW</subject><subject>HUMAN RIGHTS</subject><subject>INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL LAW</subject><subject>International Law</subject><subject>INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>NORMATIVE FRAGMENTATION</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS</subject><issn>1572-3739</issn><issn>1572-3747</issn><issn>1572-3739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOAyEUhonRxFp9h9m5GoWB4bJsWlurTbqpl7ghzAw1VAoVpt6eXuqY7owrDvm__5zkAyBD8AIhii9RyQrMCBSPqKAMIs4ZJhihA9DbRXnK2OF-xuIYnMS4ghALDHkPTCbWV8pmg2ZtnIltUK1509lMvWcjs9YuGu9i5pfZ1LU6uJR6l_B5eFbOfP18444-BUdLZaM--3374G58tRhe57P5ZDoczPKKcNHmHFakUQXSlLASaiaKmiBaE0V0wymvhKZlXZIS6YLDptSqbmqMKcWigIKiBvfBebd3E_zrVsdWrk2stbXKab-NkhEMC845SSTvyDr4GINeyk0waxU-JYJyp07-pS5V866ahOiPfU-FF0kZZqW8uV3IBzYa4yc0lveJpx1fBWOtXPltMmXj_4e-Af2Of5E</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Kingsbury, Benedict</creator><creator>Casini, Lorenzo</creator><general>Martinus Nijhoff</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Global Administrative Law Dimensions of International Organizations Law</title><author>Kingsbury, Benedict ; Casini, Lorenzo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b489t-80b4da21e64750e792c416c4a4ed868b9e65c5451e280d5eacdc33663920961d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>ACCOUNTABILITY</topic><topic>Administrative Law</topic><topic>EMERGENCY POWERS</topic><topic>FIELD OPERATIONS</topic><topic>GLOBAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW</topic><topic>HUMAN RIGHTS</topic><topic>INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL LAW</topic><topic>International Law</topic><topic>INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>NORMATIVE FRAGMENTATION</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kingsbury, Benedict</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casini, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International organizations law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kingsbury, Benedict</au><au>Casini, Lorenzo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global Administrative Law Dimensions of International Organizations Law</atitle><jtitle>International organizations law review</jtitle><addtitle>IOLR</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>358</epage><pages>319-358</pages><issn>1572-3739</issn><eissn>1572-3747</eissn><eissn>1572-3739</eissn><abstract>Several important legal features of the contemporary practice of international organizations (IOs) are not easily accommodated in standard approaches to international organizations law. This article argues that Global Administrative Law (GAL) approaches may strengthen analysis of operational issues such as emergency actions by IOs and the human rights implications of IO activities, structural issues such as the involvement of IOs in field missions and in public-private partnerships, and normative issues concerning the production and effects of non-treaty regulatory instruments by IOs (guidelines, best practices, national policy assessments, and other documents rather amorphously analyzed under the 'soft law' rubric). In examining these activities as forms of administration (broadly understood), subject to precepts of good administration and legal standards concerning transparency, participation, reason-giving, review, and accountability, a GAL perspective provides a basis both for critique of problematic practices, and for increasing the effectiveness and legitimacy of some beneficial IO activities which are contentious or currently not undertaken. GAL also responds to the proliferation and differentiation of IOs and other entities in global governance through applying legal standards to their interactions, bringing a principled 'inter-public' approach to the legal relations among global public entities. GAL provides a valuable, and thus far overly neglected, addition to the field of international institutional law. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>Martinus Nijhoff</pub><doi>10.1163/157237409X12670188734311</doi><tpages>40</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1572-3739 |
ispartof | International organizations law review, 2009-01, Vol.6 (2), p.319-358 |
issn | 1572-3739 1572-3747 1572-3739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743028884 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | ACCOUNTABILITY Administrative Law EMERGENCY POWERS FIELD OPERATIONS GLOBAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW HUMAN RIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL LAW International Law INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Management NORMATIVE FRAGMENTATION Participation PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS |
title | Global Administrative Law Dimensions of International Organizations Law |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T23%3A31%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20Administrative%20Law%20Dimensions%20of%20International%20Organizations%20Law&rft.jtitle=International%20organizations%20law%20review&rft.au=Kingsbury,%20Benedict&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=358&rft.pages=319-358&rft.issn=1572-3739&rft.eissn=1572-3747&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/157237409X12670188734311&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743028884%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b489t-80b4da21e64750e792c416c4a4ed868b9e65c5451e280d5eacdc33663920961d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=743028884&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |