When Ezekiel was born? The significance of the dates in libel libelous on Sun Casmurro

This article reconstructs & examines the timeline in Dom Casmurro with a view to offering an interpretation for the chronological makeup of the novel. Aspects that characterize Bento Santiago as a deceptive narrator are noted, with an emphasis on the omission of dates in the narrative. The lacun...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Luso-Brazilian review 2009-01, Vol.46 (2), p.54-75
Main Author: Vasconcelos, Erika Franca de Souza
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Subjects:
Biographies
Childhood
Credibility
Lawyers
Narratives
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article reconstructs & examines the timeline in Dom Casmurro with a view to offering an interpretation for the chronological makeup of the novel. Aspects that characterize Bento Santiago as a deceptive narrator are noted, with an emphasis on the omission of dates in the narrative. The lacunae in the timeline significantly pertain to Ezequiel's biography. By filling in the lacunae, it is demonstrated that the chronology surrounding Ezequiel's birthdate & the alleged events that took place in Ezequiel's childhood at ages 5 & 6, allegedly in the presence of Escobar, are inconsistent. Irreconcilable facts are foregrounded, impacting the credibility of the narrative as a whole. It is suggested that the accusatory piece that sagacious & experienced attorney Bento Santiago weaves against his wife Capitu be examined from a legalistic perspective. As Bento's deceptive narration is revealed, it is evidenced that the case he makes against Capitu suffers from the absence of an accurate chronological & factual record -- a sine qua non condition for the validity of any legal process. Finally, the enigma of Capitu is examined in light of a vicious & nullifiable legal process. Adapted from the source document.
ISSN:0024-7413