Economic impact of storage and handling regulations on retail fertilizer and pesticide plants

• Published in: Agribusiness (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1996-07, Vol.12 (4), p.327-337
• Main Authors: Rogers, D.S. (Farmers National Bank of Geneseo, Geneseo, IL.), Akridge, J.T
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: ABONOS; Agribusiness; Agricultural economics; ALMACENAMIENTO; Ammonia; AMMONIAC; AMONIACO; Compliance; COMPORTAMIENTO ECONOMICO; COMPORTEMENT ECONOMIQUE; Construction costs; Cost analysis; Cost estimates; COSTOS; COUT; Economic impact; Economies of scale; ENGRAIS; Facilities planning; Federal regulation; Fertilizers; INDIANA; INDUSTRIA; Industrial plants; INDUSTRIE; MANIPULACION; MANUTENTION; Mathematical models; MODELE MATHEMATIQUE; MODELOS MATEMATICOS; PESTICIDE; Pesticides; PLAGUICIDAS; Product lines; Profitability; Rain; REGLAMENTACIONES; REGLEMENTATION; Regulation; RENTABILIDAD; RENTABILITE; Retail stores; STOCKAGE; Studies; VENTA AL POR MENOR; VENTE AU DETAIL
• ISSN: 0742-4477; 1520-6297
• DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6297(199607/08)12:4<327::AID-AGR3>3.0.CO;2-0

A budgeting model was developed to estimate the cost of retailing dry bulk fertilizer, liquid bulk fertilizer, anhydrous ammonia, and pesticides for three sizes of plants. Estimates were obtained of the cost to upgrade each of the model plants to comply with Indiana's regulations on the handling and storage of fertilizers and pesticides. Results suggest that there are significant scale economies associated with the regulations and that smaller plants will have a more difficult time rationalizing the investment in containment facilities. The implications of these regulations for the retail fertilizer industry are explored using Porter's five-forces model