Loading…
Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species
As one moves from the core to the periphery of a species' geographical range, populations occupy less favourable habitats and exhibit lower and more variable densities. Populations along the periphery of the range tend to be more fragmented and, as a result, are less likely to receive immigrant...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nature (London) 2000-01, Vol.403 (6765), p.84-86 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c714t-39290317c783b6fd08179eea8b89734c5244095b0d42134bcf0720609398ce403 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c714t-39290317c783b6fd08179eea8b89734c5244095b0d42134bcf0720609398ce403 |
container_end_page | 86 |
container_issue | 6765 |
container_start_page | 84 |
container_title | Nature (London) |
container_volume | 403 |
creator | Channell, Rob Lomolino, Mark V |
description | As one moves from the core to the periphery of a species' geographical
range, populations occupy less favourable habitats and exhibit lower and more
variable densities. Populations along the periphery
of the range tend to be more fragmented and, as a result, are less likely
to receive immigrants from other populations. A population's probability of
extinction is directly correlated with its variability and inversely correlated
with density and immigration rate. This has led
to the prediction that, when a species becomes endangered, its geographical
range should contract inwards, with the core populations persisting until
the final stages of decline. Convinced by these logical
but untested deductions, conservation biologists and wildlife managers have
been instructed to avoid the range periphery when planning conservation strategies
or allocating resources for endangered species. We
have analysed range contraction in 245 species from a broad range of taxonomic
groups and geographical regions. Here we report that observed patterns of
range contraction do not support the above predictions and that most species
examined persist in the periphery of their historical geographical ranges. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/47487 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743188212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A188115383</galeid><sourcerecordid>A188115383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c714t-39290317c783b6fd08179eea8b89734c5244095b0d42134bcf0720609398ce403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0m1r1TAUB_AiirvOfQJBiviASGfSnDYpvrpcnwZDQSe-DGl6WjN6ky5pxfvtzezFuzumIy8CyS8n5J-TJEeUHFPCxGvgIPidZEGBlxmUgt9NFoTkIiOClQfJgxDOCSEF5XA_OaCkZIIXfJG8ebuxam10WhvXoeu8Gn5sUmWbVDsb0P9Uo3E2dW2KtlG2Q49NGgbUBsPD5F6r-oBH2_kw-fb-3dnqY3b6-cPJanmaaU5hzFiVV4RRrrlgddk2RFBeISpRi4oz0EUOQKqiJg3klEGtW8JzUpKKVUIjEHaYvJjrDt5dTBhGuTZBY98ri24KkgOjQuQ0j_L5_yURhQBOb4UxJgAWU7oVQgE5lDzCJ9fguZu8jbnInABwUTIWUTajTvUojW3d6JXu0KJXvbPYmri8jI-htGCC7YrueT2YC3kVHd-A4mgwfuyNVV_uHYhmxF9jp6YQ5MnXL_v21b_t8uz76tO-fjZr7V0IHls5eLNWfiMpkZdtKv-0aXSPt2FN9RqbK2ruywieboEKWvWtV1absHM5r4qi2v1OiDuXzbkL_fqFj2Zo1Th5_Fto3v0NQI_7vQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204478633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species</title><source>Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><creator>Channell, Rob ; Lomolino, Mark V</creator><creatorcontrib>Channell, Rob ; Lomolino, Mark V</creatorcontrib><description>As one moves from the core to the periphery of a species' geographical
range, populations occupy less favourable habitats and exhibit lower and more
variable densities. Populations along the periphery
of the range tend to be more fragmented and, as a result, are less likely
to receive immigrants from other populations. A population's probability of
extinction is directly correlated with its variability and inversely correlated
with density and immigration rate. This has led
to the prediction that, when a species becomes endangered, its geographical
range should contract inwards, with the core populations persisting until
the final stages of decline. Convinced by these logical
but untested deductions, conservation biologists and wildlife managers have
been instructed to avoid the range periphery when planning conservation strategies
or allocating resources for endangered species. We
have analysed range contraction in 245 species from a broad range of taxonomic
groups and geographical regions. Here we report that observed patterns of
range contraction do not support the above predictions and that most species
examined persist in the periphery of their historical geographical ranges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/47487</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10638757</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NATUAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Biogeography ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Endangered & extinct species ; Endangered species ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geography ; Homing Behavior ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Immigrants ; letter ; multidisciplinary ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Population Dynamics ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Species extinction ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 2000-01, Vol.403 (6765), p.84-86</ispartof><rights>Macmillan Magazines Ltd. 2000</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Macmillan Journals Ltd. Jan 6, 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c714t-39290317c783b6fd08179eea8b89734c5244095b0d42134bcf0720609398ce403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c714t-39290317c783b6fd08179eea8b89734c5244095b0d42134bcf0720609398ce403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2727,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1279559$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10638757$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Channell, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomolino, Mark V</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>As one moves from the core to the periphery of a species' geographical
range, populations occupy less favourable habitats and exhibit lower and more
variable densities. Populations along the periphery
of the range tend to be more fragmented and, as a result, are less likely
to receive immigrants from other populations. A population's probability of
extinction is directly correlated with its variability and inversely correlated
with density and immigration rate. This has led
to the prediction that, when a species becomes endangered, its geographical
range should contract inwards, with the core populations persisting until
the final stages of decline. Convinced by these logical
but untested deductions, conservation biologists and wildlife managers have
been instructed to avoid the range periphery when planning conservation strategies
or allocating resources for endangered species. We
have analysed range contraction in 245 species from a broad range of taxonomic
groups and geographical regions. Here we report that observed patterns of
range contraction do not support the above predictions and that most species
examined persist in the periphery of their historical geographical ranges.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Homing Behavior</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>letter</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0m1r1TAUB_AiirvOfQJBiviASGfSnDYpvrpcnwZDQSe-DGl6WjN6ky5pxfvtzezFuzumIy8CyS8n5J-TJEeUHFPCxGvgIPidZEGBlxmUgt9NFoTkIiOClQfJgxDOCSEF5XA_OaCkZIIXfJG8ebuxam10WhvXoeu8Gn5sUmWbVDsb0P9Uo3E2dW2KtlG2Q49NGgbUBsPD5F6r-oBH2_kw-fb-3dnqY3b6-cPJanmaaU5hzFiVV4RRrrlgddk2RFBeISpRi4oz0EUOQKqiJg3klEGtW8JzUpKKVUIjEHaYvJjrDt5dTBhGuTZBY98ri24KkgOjQuQ0j_L5_yURhQBOb4UxJgAWU7oVQgE5lDzCJ9fguZu8jbnInABwUTIWUTajTvUojW3d6JXu0KJXvbPYmri8jI-htGCC7YrueT2YC3kVHd-A4mgwfuyNVV_uHYhmxF9jp6YQ5MnXL_v21b_t8uz76tO-fjZr7V0IHls5eLNWfiMpkZdtKv-0aXSPt2FN9RqbK2ruywieboEKWvWtV1absHM5r4qi2v1OiDuXzbkL_fqFj2Zo1Th5_Fto3v0NQI_7vQ</recordid><startdate>20000106</startdate><enddate>20000106</enddate><creator>Channell, Rob</creator><creator>Lomolino, Mark V</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ATWCN</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000106</creationdate><title>Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species</title><author>Channell, Rob ; Lomolino, Mark V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c714t-39290317c783b6fd08179eea8b89734c5244095b0d42134bcf0720609398ce403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Homing Behavior</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>letter</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Channell, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomolino, Mark V</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Middle School</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Channell, Rob</au><au>Lomolino, Mark V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><date>2000-01-06</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>403</volume><issue>6765</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>84-86</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><coden>NATUAS</coden><abstract>As one moves from the core to the periphery of a species' geographical
range, populations occupy less favourable habitats and exhibit lower and more
variable densities. Populations along the periphery
of the range tend to be more fragmented and, as a result, are less likely
to receive immigrants from other populations. A population's probability of
extinction is directly correlated with its variability and inversely correlated
with density and immigration rate. This has led
to the prediction that, when a species becomes endangered, its geographical
range should contract inwards, with the core populations persisting until
the final stages of decline. Convinced by these logical
but untested deductions, conservation biologists and wildlife managers have
been instructed to avoid the range periphery when planning conservation strategies
or allocating resources for endangered species. We
have analysed range contraction in 245 species from a broad range of taxonomic
groups and geographical regions. Here we report that observed patterns of
range contraction do not support the above predictions and that most species
examined persist in the periphery of their historical geographical ranges.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>10638757</pmid><doi>10.1038/47487</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-0836 |
ispartof | Nature (London), 2000-01, Vol.403 (6765), p.84-86 |
issn | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743188212 |
source | Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Applied ecology Biogeography Biological and medical sciences Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Ecosystem Ecosystems Endangered & extinct species Endangered species Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Geography Homing Behavior Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Immigrants letter multidisciplinary Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking Population Dynamics Science Science (multidisciplinary) Species extinction Wildlife conservation Wildlife management |
title | Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A26%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20biogeography%20and%20conservation%20of%20endangered%20species&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.au=Channell,%20Rob&rft.date=2000-01-06&rft.volume=403&rft.issue=6765&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=84-86&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft.coden=NATUAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/47487&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA188115383%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c714t-39290317c783b6fd08179eea8b89734c5244095b0d42134bcf0720609398ce403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204478633&rft_id=info:pmid/10638757&rft_galeid=A188115383&rfr_iscdi=true |