Loading…
Flame propagation in industrial scale piping
The use of pipelines to connect vessels and transport material is a common practice in the processing industry. Often, these pipelines carry potentially hazardous materials, such as flammable gases. The potential of fires and explosions in the process industry has been well recognized and is address...
Saved in:
Published in: | Process safety progress 2001-12, Vol.20 (4), p.286-294 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4171-edff3e883b68e51612f9afc10a5859e132f55a2f7ce9f4f225a2241145264dd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4171-edff3e883b68e51612f9afc10a5859e132f55a2f7ce9f4f225a2241145264dd3 |
container_end_page | 294 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 286 |
container_title | Process safety progress |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Chatrathi, Kris Going, John E. Grandestaff, Bill |
description | The use of pipelines to connect vessels and transport material is a common practice in the processing industry. Often, these pipelines carry potentially hazardous materials, such as flammable gases. The potential of fires and explosions in the process industry has been well recognized and is addressed in consensus guidelines such as N F PA 68 – Guide for Venting of Deflagrations and N F PA 69 – Explosion Prevention Systems. Both of these guides differentiate between vessels and piping systems by providing diff e rent rules to address the differences in explosion propagation behavior. Both NFPA 68 and NFPA 69 are based on an understanding of explosion propagation behavior developed from empirical or experimental evidence.
The purposes of this paper are to present experimental evidence and to further develop a detailed understanding of combustion propagation in industrial scale piping, primarily deflagration propagation in pipes. However, it is also the intent to understand the transition points between fires and deflagrations, and between deflagrations and detonations as related to piping systems. In order to study combustion propagation in industrial scale piping, three pipe diameters and three fuels were selected. Although, gaseous fuel mixtures are often transported in waste streams, only pure fuels were used in this study. The effect of bends was evaluated but other piping system components were not evaluated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/prs.680200411 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743201348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>743201348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4171-edff3e883b68e51612f9afc10a5859e132f55a2f7ce9f4f225a2241145264dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKtH78WLF7fm--MoxbZKraKFegtxNymp2-6a7KL996a0iHgQBmZe5pmZlwHgHME-ghBf1yH2uYQYQorQAeggRkXGFCKHqYacZ5JhcQxOYlxCCCWXqgOuhqVZ2V4dqtosTOOrdc9vo2hjE7wpezE3Zer72q8Xp-DImTLas33ugtnwdjYYZ5PH0d3gZpLlFAmU2cI5YqUkb1xahjjCThmXI2iYZMoigh1jBjuRW-WowzgJnCxThjktCtIFl7u1ydVHa2OjVz7mtizN2lZt1IISDBGhMpEXf8hl1YZ18qaRUgphJkiCsh2UhyrGYJ2ug1-ZsNEI6u3jko7653GJFzv-05d28z-sn55ffk_uL_nY2K-fSRPeNRdEMD2fjjR8ZQ_388lUj8k3VX5-pA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199912573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flame propagation in industrial scale piping</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Chatrathi, Kris ; Going, John E. ; Grandestaff, Bill</creator><creatorcontrib>Chatrathi, Kris ; Going, John E. ; Grandestaff, Bill</creatorcontrib><description>The use of pipelines to connect vessels and transport material is a common practice in the processing industry. Often, these pipelines carry potentially hazardous materials, such as flammable gases. The potential of fires and explosions in the process industry has been well recognized and is addressed in consensus guidelines such as N F PA 68 – Guide for Venting of Deflagrations and N F PA 69 – Explosion Prevention Systems. Both of these guides differentiate between vessels and piping systems by providing diff e rent rules to address the differences in explosion propagation behavior. Both NFPA 68 and NFPA 69 are based on an understanding of explosion propagation behavior developed from empirical or experimental evidence.
The purposes of this paper are to present experimental evidence and to further develop a detailed understanding of combustion propagation in industrial scale piping, primarily deflagration propagation in pipes. However, it is also the intent to understand the transition points between fires and deflagrations, and between deflagrations and detonations as related to piping systems. In order to study combustion propagation in industrial scale piping, three pipe diameters and three fuels were selected. Although, gaseous fuel mixtures are often transported in waste streams, only pure fuels were used in this study. The effect of bends was evaluated but other piping system components were not evaluated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1066-8527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/prs.680200411</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><ispartof>Process safety progress, 2001-12, Vol.20 (4), p.286-294</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Chemical Engineers Dec 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4171-edff3e883b68e51612f9afc10a5859e132f55a2f7ce9f4f225a2241145264dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4171-edff3e883b68e51612f9afc10a5859e132f55a2f7ce9f4f225a2241145264dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chatrathi, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Going, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandestaff, Bill</creatorcontrib><title>Flame propagation in industrial scale piping</title><title>Process safety progress</title><addtitle>Proc. Safety Prog</addtitle><description>The use of pipelines to connect vessels and transport material is a common practice in the processing industry. Often, these pipelines carry potentially hazardous materials, such as flammable gases. The potential of fires and explosions in the process industry has been well recognized and is addressed in consensus guidelines such as N F PA 68 – Guide for Venting of Deflagrations and N F PA 69 – Explosion Prevention Systems. Both of these guides differentiate between vessels and piping systems by providing diff e rent rules to address the differences in explosion propagation behavior. Both NFPA 68 and NFPA 69 are based on an understanding of explosion propagation behavior developed from empirical or experimental evidence.
The purposes of this paper are to present experimental evidence and to further develop a detailed understanding of combustion propagation in industrial scale piping, primarily deflagration propagation in pipes. However, it is also the intent to understand the transition points between fires and deflagrations, and between deflagrations and detonations as related to piping systems. In order to study combustion propagation in industrial scale piping, three pipe diameters and three fuels were selected. Although, gaseous fuel mixtures are often transported in waste streams, only pure fuels were used in this study. The effect of bends was evaluated but other piping system components were not evaluated.</description><issn>1066-8527</issn><issn>1547-5913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKtH78WLF7fm--MoxbZKraKFegtxNymp2-6a7KL996a0iHgQBmZe5pmZlwHgHME-ghBf1yH2uYQYQorQAeggRkXGFCKHqYacZ5JhcQxOYlxCCCWXqgOuhqVZ2V4dqtosTOOrdc9vo2hjE7wpezE3Zer72q8Xp-DImTLas33ugtnwdjYYZ5PH0d3gZpLlFAmU2cI5YqUkb1xahjjCThmXI2iYZMoigh1jBjuRW-WowzgJnCxThjktCtIFl7u1ydVHa2OjVz7mtizN2lZt1IISDBGhMpEXf8hl1YZ18qaRUgphJkiCsh2UhyrGYJ2ug1-ZsNEI6u3jko7653GJFzv-05d28z-sn55ffk_uL_nY2K-fSRPeNRdEMD2fjjR8ZQ_388lUj8k3VX5-pA</recordid><startdate>200112</startdate><enddate>200112</enddate><creator>Chatrathi, Kris</creator><creator>Going, John E.</creator><creator>Grandestaff, Bill</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200112</creationdate><title>Flame propagation in industrial scale piping</title><author>Chatrathi, Kris ; Going, John E. ; Grandestaff, Bill</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4171-edff3e883b68e51612f9afc10a5859e132f55a2f7ce9f4f225a2241145264dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chatrathi, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Going, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandestaff, Bill</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Process safety progress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chatrathi, Kris</au><au>Going, John E.</au><au>Grandestaff, Bill</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flame propagation in industrial scale piping</atitle><jtitle>Process safety progress</jtitle><addtitle>Proc. Safety Prog</addtitle><date>2001-12</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>286</spage><epage>294</epage><pages>286-294</pages><issn>1066-8527</issn><eissn>1547-5913</eissn><abstract>The use of pipelines to connect vessels and transport material is a common practice in the processing industry. Often, these pipelines carry potentially hazardous materials, such as flammable gases. The potential of fires and explosions in the process industry has been well recognized and is addressed in consensus guidelines such as N F PA 68 – Guide for Venting of Deflagrations and N F PA 69 – Explosion Prevention Systems. Both of these guides differentiate between vessels and piping systems by providing diff e rent rules to address the differences in explosion propagation behavior. Both NFPA 68 and NFPA 69 are based on an understanding of explosion propagation behavior developed from empirical or experimental evidence.
The purposes of this paper are to present experimental evidence and to further develop a detailed understanding of combustion propagation in industrial scale piping, primarily deflagration propagation in pipes. However, it is also the intent to understand the transition points between fires and deflagrations, and between deflagrations and detonations as related to piping systems. In order to study combustion propagation in industrial scale piping, three pipe diameters and three fuels were selected. Although, gaseous fuel mixtures are often transported in waste streams, only pure fuels were used in this study. The effect of bends was evaluated but other piping system components were not evaluated.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/prs.680200411</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1066-8527 |
ispartof | Process safety progress, 2001-12, Vol.20 (4), p.286-294 |
issn | 1066-8527 1547-5913 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743201348 |
source | Wiley |
title | Flame propagation in industrial scale piping |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A55%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flame%20propagation%20in%20industrial%20scale%20piping&rft.jtitle=Process%20safety%20progress&rft.au=Chatrathi,%20Kris&rft.date=2001-12&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=286&rft.epage=294&rft.pages=286-294&rft.issn=1066-8527&rft.eissn=1547-5913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/prs.680200411&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743201348%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4171-edff3e883b68e51612f9afc10a5859e132f55a2f7ce9f4f225a2241145264dd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199912573&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |