Loading…

Error Analysis and Sampling Strategy Design for Using Fixed or Mobile Platforms to Estimate Ocean Flux

For estimating lateral flux in the ocean using fixed or mobile platforms, the authors present a method of analyzing the estimation error and designing the sampling strategy. When an array of moorings is used, spatial aliasing leads to an error in flux estimation. When an autonomous underwater vehicl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology 2010-03, Vol.27 (3), p.481-506
Main Authors: Zhang, Yanwu, Bellingham, James G, Chao, Yi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-438b07742c8d77a715790c395a842a07585b2890dab2a8a5ee3df9f1cb234fdb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-438b07742c8d77a715790c395a842a07585b2890dab2a8a5ee3df9f1cb234fdb3
container_end_page 506
container_issue 3
container_start_page 481
container_title Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology
container_volume 27
creator Zhang, Yanwu
Bellingham, James G
Chao, Yi
description For estimating lateral flux in the ocean using fixed or mobile platforms, the authors present a method of analyzing the estimation error and designing the sampling strategy. When an array of moorings is used, spatial aliasing leads to an error in flux estimation. When an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) is run, measurements along its course are made at different times. Such nonsynopticity in the measurements leads to an error in flux estimation. It is assumed that the temporal-spatial autocovariance function of the flux variable can be estimated from historical data or ocean models (as in this paper). Using the temporal-spatial autocovariance function of the flux variable, the mean-square error of the flux estimate by fixed or mobile platforms is derived. The method is used to understand the relative strengths of moorings and AUVs (assumed here to be able to maintain constant speed) under different scenarios of temporal and spatial variabilities. The flux estimate by moorings through trapezoidal approximation generally carries a bias that drops quadratically with the number of moorings. The authors also show that a larger number of slower AUVs may achieve a more accurate flux estimate than a smaller number of faster AUVs under the same cumulative speed, but the performance margin shrinks with the increase of the cumulative speed. Using the error analysis results, one can choose the type of platforms and optimize the sampling strategy under resource constraints. To verify the theoretical analysis, the authors run simulated surveys in synthesized ocean fields. The flux estimation errors agree very well with the analytical predictions. Using an ocean model dataset, the authors estimate the lateral heat flux across a section in Monterey Bay, California, and also compare the flux estimation errors with the analytical predictions.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/2009JTECHO700.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743424635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1642269709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-438b07742c8d77a715790c395a842a07585b2890dab2a8a5ee3df9f1cb234fdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90T1PwzAQBmALgUQpzKwWA7CEnr9iZ6xKSkFFRWo7R07iVKnyUexEav89rsoCQ6eT7x7fcC9C9wReCJFiRAGij1U8mS0k-NYFGhBBIQBOw0s0AMmiAISk1-jGuS0AEEbCASpia1uLx42uDq50WDc5Xup6V5XNBi87qzuzOeBX48pNgwsv1-44mZZ7k2P__GzTsjL4q9Kdn9YOdy2OXVfW_iNeZEY3eFr1-1t0VejKmbvfOkTrabyazIL54u19Mp4HGQfRBZypFKTkNFO5lFoSISPIWCS04lSDFEqkVEWQ65RqpYUxLC-igmQpZbzIUzZET6e9O9t-98Z1SV26zFSVbkzbu0RyxikPmfDy8aykhCup1BE-n4Uk5JSGkYTI04d_dNv21p_Wr_PxMJ8B82h0QpltnbOmSHbWn8seEgLJMcnkT5IJYT9nt49x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220037393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Error Analysis and Sampling Strategy Design for Using Fixed or Mobile Platforms to Estimate Ocean Flux</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Yanwu ; Bellingham, James G ; Chao, Yi</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yanwu ; Bellingham, James G ; Chao, Yi</creatorcontrib><description>For estimating lateral flux in the ocean using fixed or mobile platforms, the authors present a method of analyzing the estimation error and designing the sampling strategy. When an array of moorings is used, spatial aliasing leads to an error in flux estimation. When an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) is run, measurements along its course are made at different times. Such nonsynopticity in the measurements leads to an error in flux estimation. It is assumed that the temporal-spatial autocovariance function of the flux variable can be estimated from historical data or ocean models (as in this paper). Using the temporal-spatial autocovariance function of the flux variable, the mean-square error of the flux estimate by fixed or mobile platforms is derived. The method is used to understand the relative strengths of moorings and AUVs (assumed here to be able to maintain constant speed) under different scenarios of temporal and spatial variabilities. The flux estimate by moorings through trapezoidal approximation generally carries a bias that drops quadratically with the number of moorings. The authors also show that a larger number of slower AUVs may achieve a more accurate flux estimate than a smaller number of faster AUVs under the same cumulative speed, but the performance margin shrinks with the increase of the cumulative speed. Using the error analysis results, one can choose the type of platforms and optimize the sampling strategy under resource constraints. To verify the theoretical analysis, the authors run simulated surveys in synthesized ocean fields. The flux estimation errors agree very well with the analytical predictions. Using an ocean model dataset, the authors estimate the lateral heat flux across a section in Monterey Bay, California, and also compare the flux estimation errors with the analytical predictions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0739-0572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0426</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/2009JTECHO700.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Autonomous underwater vehicles ; Error analysis ; Estimates ; Fluctuations ; Flux ; Heat transfer ; Marine ; Marine ecology ; Mathematical models ; Moorings ; Oceans ; Platforms ; Sampling ; Standard deviation ; Studies ; Theoretical analysis ; Underwater vehicles ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology, 2010-03, Vol.27 (3), p.481-506</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Mar 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-438b07742c8d77a715790c395a842a07585b2890dab2a8a5ee3df9f1cb234fdb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-438b07742c8d77a715790c395a842a07585b2890dab2a8a5ee3df9f1cb234fdb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yanwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellingham, James G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Yi</creatorcontrib><title>Error Analysis and Sampling Strategy Design for Using Fixed or Mobile Platforms to Estimate Ocean Flux</title><title>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology</title><description>For estimating lateral flux in the ocean using fixed or mobile platforms, the authors present a method of analyzing the estimation error and designing the sampling strategy. When an array of moorings is used, spatial aliasing leads to an error in flux estimation. When an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) is run, measurements along its course are made at different times. Such nonsynopticity in the measurements leads to an error in flux estimation. It is assumed that the temporal-spatial autocovariance function of the flux variable can be estimated from historical data or ocean models (as in this paper). Using the temporal-spatial autocovariance function of the flux variable, the mean-square error of the flux estimate by fixed or mobile platforms is derived. The method is used to understand the relative strengths of moorings and AUVs (assumed here to be able to maintain constant speed) under different scenarios of temporal and spatial variabilities. The flux estimate by moorings through trapezoidal approximation generally carries a bias that drops quadratically with the number of moorings. The authors also show that a larger number of slower AUVs may achieve a more accurate flux estimate than a smaller number of faster AUVs under the same cumulative speed, but the performance margin shrinks with the increase of the cumulative speed. Using the error analysis results, one can choose the type of platforms and optimize the sampling strategy under resource constraints. To verify the theoretical analysis, the authors run simulated surveys in synthesized ocean fields. The flux estimation errors agree very well with the analytical predictions. Using an ocean model dataset, the authors estimate the lateral heat flux across a section in Monterey Bay, California, and also compare the flux estimation errors with the analytical predictions.</description><subject>Autonomous underwater vehicles</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Flux</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Moorings</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Platforms</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theoretical analysis</subject><subject>Underwater vehicles</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0739-0572</issn><issn>1520-0426</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90T1PwzAQBmALgUQpzKwWA7CEnr9iZ6xKSkFFRWo7R07iVKnyUexEav89rsoCQ6eT7x7fcC9C9wReCJFiRAGij1U8mS0k-NYFGhBBIQBOw0s0AMmiAISk1-jGuS0AEEbCASpia1uLx42uDq50WDc5Xup6V5XNBi87qzuzOeBX48pNgwsv1-44mZZ7k2P__GzTsjL4q9Kdn9YOdy2OXVfW_iNeZEY3eFr1-1t0VejKmbvfOkTrabyazIL54u19Mp4HGQfRBZypFKTkNFO5lFoSISPIWCS04lSDFEqkVEWQ65RqpYUxLC-igmQpZbzIUzZET6e9O9t-98Z1SV26zFSVbkzbu0RyxikPmfDy8aykhCup1BE-n4Uk5JSGkYTI04d_dNv21p_Wr_PxMJ8B82h0QpltnbOmSHbWn8seEgLJMcnkT5IJYT9nt49x</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Zhang, Yanwu</creator><creator>Bellingham, James G</creator><creator>Chao, Yi</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Error Analysis and Sampling Strategy Design for Using Fixed or Mobile Platforms to Estimate Ocean Flux</title><author>Zhang, Yanwu ; Bellingham, James G ; Chao, Yi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-438b07742c8d77a715790c395a842a07585b2890dab2a8a5ee3df9f1cb234fdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Autonomous underwater vehicles</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Flux</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Moorings</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Platforms</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theoretical analysis</topic><topic>Underwater vehicles</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yanwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellingham, James G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Yi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Yanwu</au><au>Bellingham, James G</au><au>Chao, Yi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Error Analysis and Sampling Strategy Design for Using Fixed or Mobile Platforms to Estimate Ocean Flux</atitle><jtitle>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology</jtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>481</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>481-506</pages><issn>0739-0572</issn><eissn>1520-0426</eissn><abstract>For estimating lateral flux in the ocean using fixed or mobile platforms, the authors present a method of analyzing the estimation error and designing the sampling strategy. When an array of moorings is used, spatial aliasing leads to an error in flux estimation. When an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) is run, measurements along its course are made at different times. Such nonsynopticity in the measurements leads to an error in flux estimation. It is assumed that the temporal-spatial autocovariance function of the flux variable can be estimated from historical data or ocean models (as in this paper). Using the temporal-spatial autocovariance function of the flux variable, the mean-square error of the flux estimate by fixed or mobile platforms is derived. The method is used to understand the relative strengths of moorings and AUVs (assumed here to be able to maintain constant speed) under different scenarios of temporal and spatial variabilities. The flux estimate by moorings through trapezoidal approximation generally carries a bias that drops quadratically with the number of moorings. The authors also show that a larger number of slower AUVs may achieve a more accurate flux estimate than a smaller number of faster AUVs under the same cumulative speed, but the performance margin shrinks with the increase of the cumulative speed. Using the error analysis results, one can choose the type of platforms and optimize the sampling strategy under resource constraints. To verify the theoretical analysis, the authors run simulated surveys in synthesized ocean fields. The flux estimation errors agree very well with the analytical predictions. Using an ocean model dataset, the authors estimate the lateral heat flux across a section in Monterey Bay, California, and also compare the flux estimation errors with the analytical predictions.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/2009JTECHO700.1</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0739-0572
ispartof Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology, 2010-03, Vol.27 (3), p.481-506
issn 0739-0572
1520-0426
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743424635
source Freely Accessible Journals
subjects Autonomous underwater vehicles
Error analysis
Estimates
Fluctuations
Flux
Heat transfer
Marine
Marine ecology
Mathematical models
Moorings
Oceans
Platforms
Sampling
Standard deviation
Studies
Theoretical analysis
Underwater vehicles
Velocity
title Error Analysis and Sampling Strategy Design for Using Fixed or Mobile Platforms to Estimate Ocean Flux
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T18%3A03%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Error%20Analysis%20and%20Sampling%20Strategy%20Design%20for%20Using%20Fixed%20or%20Mobile%20Platforms%20to%20Estimate%20Ocean%20Flux&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20atmospheric%20and%20oceanic%20technology&rft.au=Zhang,%20Yanwu&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=481&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=481-506&rft.issn=0739-0572&rft.eissn=1520-0426&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/2009JTECHO700.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1642269709%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-438b07742c8d77a715790c395a842a07585b2890dab2a8a5ee3df9f1cb234fdb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220037393&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true