Loading…
Economic evaluation of enhanced staff contact for the promotion of breastfeeding for low birth weight infants
Objectives: There is evidence that breastmilk feeding reduces mortality and short and long-term morbidity among infants born too soon or too small. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced staff contact for mothers with infants in a neonatal unit with a birth weight o...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of technology assessment in health care 2010-04, Vol.26 (2), p.133-140 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43 |
container_end_page | 140 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 133 |
container_title | International journal of technology assessment in health care |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Rice, Stephen J. C. Craig, Dawn McCormick, Felicia Renfrew, Mary J. Williams, Anthony F. |
description | Objectives: There is evidence that breastmilk feeding reduces mortality and short and long-term morbidity among infants born too soon or too small. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced staff contact for mothers with infants in a neonatal unit with a birth weight of 500–2,500 g from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Methods: A decision-tree model linked clinical outcomes with long-term health outcomes. The study population was divided into three weight bands: 500–999 g, 1000–1,749 g, and 1,750–2,500 g. Clinical and resource use data were obtained from literature reviews. The measure of benefit was quality-adjusted life-years. Uncertainty was evaluated using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and sensitivity analyses. Results: The intervention was less costly and more effective than the comparator in the base–case analysis for each birth weight group. The results were quite robust to the sensitivity analyses performed. Conclusions: This is the first economic evaluation in this complex field and offers a model to be developed in future research. The results provide preliminary indications that enhanced staff contact may be cost-effective. However, the limited evidence available, and the limited UK data in particular, suggest that further research is required to provide results with confidence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0266462310000115 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743650278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462310000115</cupid><sourcerecordid>2011151011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UFvFCEUB3BiNHbb-gG8GOKlp6kwDDBzNJt2NTY1pvbihTDw2KXODBUYq9--rLuticbIhcP7vZf_y0PoJSWnlFD55orUQjSiZpSURyl_gha0kbQSrGmfosW2XG3rB-gwpZtCGOnIc3RQE9aVLr5A45kJUxi9wfBdD7POPkw4OAzTRk8GLE5ZO4cLytpk7ELEeQP4NoYxPNg-gk7ZAVg_rX-RIdzh3se8wXfg15uM_eT0lNMxeub0kODF_j9C1-dnn5fvqouPq_fLtxeVaRqaKys5M520wLvWAOOaCUl5yWzKYpZzZ13bCkqFI5wy61jvQJO-o4xbqW3DjtDJbm7J-W2GlNXok4Fh0BOEOSnZMMFJLdv_S8batqVMFvn6D3kT5jiVNVRNCWsJYaIgukMmhpQiOHUb_ajjT0WJ2t5M_XWz0vNqP3juR7CPHQ9HKqDaAZ8y_His6_hVCckkV2L1SV0ur-rVlw_nalk824fQYx-9XcPvqP-OcQ8oIq9u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210380036</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic evaluation of enhanced staff contact for the promotion of breastfeeding for low birth weight infants</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Rice, Stephen J. C. ; Craig, Dawn ; McCormick, Felicia ; Renfrew, Mary J. ; Williams, Anthony F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rice, Stephen J. C. ; Craig, Dawn ; McCormick, Felicia ; Renfrew, Mary J. ; Williams, Anthony F.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: There is evidence that breastmilk feeding reduces mortality and short and long-term morbidity among infants born too soon or too small. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced staff contact for mothers with infants in a neonatal unit with a birth weight of 500–2,500 g from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Methods: A decision-tree model linked clinical outcomes with long-term health outcomes. The study population was divided into three weight bands: 500–999 g, 1000–1,749 g, and 1,750–2,500 g. Clinical and resource use data were obtained from literature reviews. The measure of benefit was quality-adjusted life-years. Uncertainty was evaluated using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and sensitivity analyses. Results: The intervention was less costly and more effective than the comparator in the base–case analysis for each birth weight group. The results were quite robust to the sensitivity analyses performed. Conclusions: This is the first economic evaluation in this complex field and offers a model to be developed in future research. The results provide preliminary indications that enhanced staff contact may be cost-effective. However, the limited evidence available, and the limited UK data in particular, suggest that further research is required to provide results with confidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462310000115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20392315</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Babies ; Birth weight ; Breast Feeding ; Breastfeeding & lactation ; Breastmilk ; Clinical outcomes ; Cost analysis ; Cost control ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Cost-effectiveness ; Data Collection ; Decision Trees ; England - epidemiology ; Health Care Costs ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant Mortality ; Infant, Low Birth Weight ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Intervention ; Low birth weight ; Medical Staff ; Mothers ; Population ; Professional-Patient Relations ; Public health ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Review Literature as Topic ; Sepsis ; Staff contact ; Wales - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2010-04, Vol.26 (2), p.133-140</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/210380036/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/210380036?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,11671,27907,27908,36043,36044,44346,72711,74646</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20392315$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rice, Stephen J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfrew, Mary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Anthony F.</creatorcontrib><title>Economic evaluation of enhanced staff contact for the promotion of breastfeeding for low birth weight infants</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>Objectives: There is evidence that breastmilk feeding reduces mortality and short and long-term morbidity among infants born too soon or too small. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced staff contact for mothers with infants in a neonatal unit with a birth weight of 500–2,500 g from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Methods: A decision-tree model linked clinical outcomes with long-term health outcomes. The study population was divided into three weight bands: 500–999 g, 1000–1,749 g, and 1,750–2,500 g. Clinical and resource use data were obtained from literature reviews. The measure of benefit was quality-adjusted life-years. Uncertainty was evaluated using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and sensitivity analyses. Results: The intervention was less costly and more effective than the comparator in the base–case analysis for each birth weight group. The results were quite robust to the sensitivity analyses performed. Conclusions: This is the first economic evaluation in this complex field and offers a model to be developed in future research. The results provide preliminary indications that enhanced staff contact may be cost-effective. However, the limited evidence available, and the limited UK data in particular, suggest that further research is required to provide results with confidence.</description><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Breast Feeding</subject><subject>Breastfeeding & lactation</subject><subject>Breastmilk</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Cost-effectiveness</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Decision Trees</subject><subject>England - epidemiology</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant Mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Low Birth Weight</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Low birth weight</subject><subject>Medical Staff</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Review Literature as Topic</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Staff contact</subject><subject>Wales - epidemiology</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UFvFCEUB3BiNHbb-gG8GOKlp6kwDDBzNJt2NTY1pvbihTDw2KXODBUYq9--rLuticbIhcP7vZf_y0PoJSWnlFD55orUQjSiZpSURyl_gha0kbQSrGmfosW2XG3rB-gwpZtCGOnIc3RQE9aVLr5A45kJUxi9wfBdD7POPkw4OAzTRk8GLE5ZO4cLytpk7ELEeQP4NoYxPNg-gk7ZAVg_rX-RIdzh3se8wXfg15uM_eT0lNMxeub0kODF_j9C1-dnn5fvqouPq_fLtxeVaRqaKys5M520wLvWAOOaCUl5yWzKYpZzZ13bCkqFI5wy61jvQJO-o4xbqW3DjtDJbm7J-W2GlNXok4Fh0BOEOSnZMMFJLdv_S8batqVMFvn6D3kT5jiVNVRNCWsJYaIgukMmhpQiOHUb_ajjT0WJ2t5M_XWz0vNqP3juR7CPHQ9HKqDaAZ8y_His6_hVCckkV2L1SV0ur-rVlw_nalk824fQYx-9XcPvqP-OcQ8oIq9u</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Rice, Stephen J. C.</creator><creator>Craig, Dawn</creator><creator>McCormick, Felicia</creator><creator>Renfrew, Mary J.</creator><creator>Williams, Anthony F.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Economic evaluation of enhanced staff contact for the promotion of breastfeeding for low birth weight infants</title><author>Rice, Stephen J. C. ; Craig, Dawn ; McCormick, Felicia ; Renfrew, Mary J. ; Williams, Anthony F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Breast Feeding</topic><topic>Breastfeeding & lactation</topic><topic>Breastmilk</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Cost-effectiveness</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Decision Trees</topic><topic>England - epidemiology</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant Mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Low Birth Weight</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Low birth weight</topic><topic>Medical Staff</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Review Literature as Topic</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Staff contact</topic><topic>Wales - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rice, Stephen J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfrew, Mary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Anthony F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rice, Stephen J. C.</au><au>Craig, Dawn</au><au>McCormick, Felicia</au><au>Renfrew, Mary J.</au><au>Williams, Anthony F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic evaluation of enhanced staff contact for the promotion of breastfeeding for low birth weight infants</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>133-140</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>Objectives: There is evidence that breastmilk feeding reduces mortality and short and long-term morbidity among infants born too soon or too small. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced staff contact for mothers with infants in a neonatal unit with a birth weight of 500–2,500 g from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Methods: A decision-tree model linked clinical outcomes with long-term health outcomes. The study population was divided into three weight bands: 500–999 g, 1000–1,749 g, and 1,750–2,500 g. Clinical and resource use data were obtained from literature reviews. The measure of benefit was quality-adjusted life-years. Uncertainty was evaluated using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and sensitivity analyses. Results: The intervention was less costly and more effective than the comparator in the base–case analysis for each birth weight group. The results were quite robust to the sensitivity analyses performed. Conclusions: This is the first economic evaluation in this complex field and offers a model to be developed in future research. The results provide preliminary indications that enhanced staff contact may be cost-effective. However, the limited evidence available, and the limited UK data in particular, suggest that further research is required to provide results with confidence.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>20392315</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0266462310000115</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4623 |
ispartof | International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2010-04, Vol.26 (2), p.133-140 |
issn | 0266-4623 1471-6348 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743650278 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Babies Birth weight Breast Feeding Breastfeeding & lactation Breastmilk Clinical outcomes Cost analysis Cost control Cost-Benefit Analysis Cost-effectiveness Data Collection Decision Trees England - epidemiology Health Care Costs Health technology assessment Humans Infant Infant Mortality Infant, Low Birth Weight Infant, Newborn Infants Intervention Low birth weight Medical Staff Mothers Population Professional-Patient Relations Public health Quality-Adjusted Life Years Review Literature as Topic Sepsis Staff contact Wales - epidemiology |
title | Economic evaluation of enhanced staff contact for the promotion of breastfeeding for low birth weight infants |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A56%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20evaluation%20of%20enhanced%20staff%20contact%20for%20the%20promotion%20of%20breastfeeding%20for%20low%20birth%20weight%20infants&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Rice,%20Stephen%20J.%20C.&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=133-140&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462310000115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2011151011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210380036&rft_id=info:pmid/20392315&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462310000115&rfr_iscdi=true |