Loading…

Economic evaluation of enhanced staff contact for the promotion of breastfeeding for low birth weight infants

Objectives: There is evidence that breastmilk feeding reduces mortality and short and long-term morbidity among infants born too soon or too small. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced staff contact for mothers with infants in a neonatal unit with a birth weight o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of technology assessment in health care 2010-04, Vol.26 (2), p.133-140
Main Authors: Rice, Stephen J. C., Craig, Dawn, McCormick, Felicia, Renfrew, Mary J., Williams, Anthony F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43
container_end_page 140
container_issue 2
container_start_page 133
container_title International journal of technology assessment in health care
container_volume 26
creator Rice, Stephen J. C.
Craig, Dawn
McCormick, Felicia
Renfrew, Mary J.
Williams, Anthony F.
description Objectives: There is evidence that breastmilk feeding reduces mortality and short and long-term morbidity among infants born too soon or too small. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced staff contact for mothers with infants in a neonatal unit with a birth weight of 500–2,500 g from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Methods: A decision-tree model linked clinical outcomes with long-term health outcomes. The study population was divided into three weight bands: 500–999 g, 1000–1,749 g, and 1,750–2,500 g. Clinical and resource use data were obtained from literature reviews. The measure of benefit was quality-adjusted life-years. Uncertainty was evaluated using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and sensitivity analyses. Results: The intervention was less costly and more effective than the comparator in the base–case analysis for each birth weight group. The results were quite robust to the sensitivity analyses performed. Conclusions: This is the first economic evaluation in this complex field and offers a model to be developed in future research. The results provide preliminary indications that enhanced staff contact may be cost-effective. However, the limited evidence available, and the limited UK data in particular, suggest that further research is required to provide results with confidence.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0266462310000115
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743650278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462310000115</cupid><sourcerecordid>2011151011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UFvFCEUB3BiNHbb-gG8GOKlp6kwDDBzNJt2NTY1pvbihTDw2KXODBUYq9--rLuticbIhcP7vZf_y0PoJSWnlFD55orUQjSiZpSURyl_gha0kbQSrGmfosW2XG3rB-gwpZtCGOnIc3RQE9aVLr5A45kJUxi9wfBdD7POPkw4OAzTRk8GLE5ZO4cLytpk7ELEeQP4NoYxPNg-gk7ZAVg_rX-RIdzh3se8wXfg15uM_eT0lNMxeub0kODF_j9C1-dnn5fvqouPq_fLtxeVaRqaKys5M520wLvWAOOaCUl5yWzKYpZzZ13bCkqFI5wy61jvQJO-o4xbqW3DjtDJbm7J-W2GlNXok4Fh0BOEOSnZMMFJLdv_S8batqVMFvn6D3kT5jiVNVRNCWsJYaIgukMmhpQiOHUb_ajjT0WJ2t5M_XWz0vNqP3juR7CPHQ9HKqDaAZ8y_His6_hVCckkV2L1SV0ur-rVlw_nalk824fQYx-9XcPvqP-OcQ8oIq9u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210380036</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic evaluation of enhanced staff contact for the promotion of breastfeeding for low birth weight infants</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Rice, Stephen J. C. ; Craig, Dawn ; McCormick, Felicia ; Renfrew, Mary J. ; Williams, Anthony F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rice, Stephen J. C. ; Craig, Dawn ; McCormick, Felicia ; Renfrew, Mary J. ; Williams, Anthony F.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: There is evidence that breastmilk feeding reduces mortality and short and long-term morbidity among infants born too soon or too small. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced staff contact for mothers with infants in a neonatal unit with a birth weight of 500–2,500 g from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Methods: A decision-tree model linked clinical outcomes with long-term health outcomes. The study population was divided into three weight bands: 500–999 g, 1000–1,749 g, and 1,750–2,500 g. Clinical and resource use data were obtained from literature reviews. The measure of benefit was quality-adjusted life-years. Uncertainty was evaluated using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and sensitivity analyses. Results: The intervention was less costly and more effective than the comparator in the base–case analysis for each birth weight group. The results were quite robust to the sensitivity analyses performed. Conclusions: This is the first economic evaluation in this complex field and offers a model to be developed in future research. The results provide preliminary indications that enhanced staff contact may be cost-effective. However, the limited evidence available, and the limited UK data in particular, suggest that further research is required to provide results with confidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462310000115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20392315</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Babies ; Birth weight ; Breast Feeding ; Breastfeeding &amp; lactation ; Breastmilk ; Clinical outcomes ; Cost analysis ; Cost control ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Cost-effectiveness ; Data Collection ; Decision Trees ; England - epidemiology ; Health Care Costs ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant Mortality ; Infant, Low Birth Weight ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Intervention ; Low birth weight ; Medical Staff ; Mothers ; Population ; Professional-Patient Relations ; Public health ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Review Literature as Topic ; Sepsis ; Staff contact ; Wales - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2010-04, Vol.26 (2), p.133-140</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/210380036/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/210380036?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,11671,27907,27908,36043,36044,44346,72711,74646</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20392315$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rice, Stephen J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfrew, Mary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Anthony F.</creatorcontrib><title>Economic evaluation of enhanced staff contact for the promotion of breastfeeding for low birth weight infants</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>Objectives: There is evidence that breastmilk feeding reduces mortality and short and long-term morbidity among infants born too soon or too small. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced staff contact for mothers with infants in a neonatal unit with a birth weight of 500–2,500 g from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Methods: A decision-tree model linked clinical outcomes with long-term health outcomes. The study population was divided into three weight bands: 500–999 g, 1000–1,749 g, and 1,750–2,500 g. Clinical and resource use data were obtained from literature reviews. The measure of benefit was quality-adjusted life-years. Uncertainty was evaluated using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and sensitivity analyses. Results: The intervention was less costly and more effective than the comparator in the base–case analysis for each birth weight group. The results were quite robust to the sensitivity analyses performed. Conclusions: This is the first economic evaluation in this complex field and offers a model to be developed in future research. The results provide preliminary indications that enhanced staff contact may be cost-effective. However, the limited evidence available, and the limited UK data in particular, suggest that further research is required to provide results with confidence.</description><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Breast Feeding</subject><subject>Breastfeeding &amp; lactation</subject><subject>Breastmilk</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Cost-effectiveness</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Decision Trees</subject><subject>England - epidemiology</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant Mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Low Birth Weight</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Low birth weight</subject><subject>Medical Staff</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Review Literature as Topic</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Staff contact</subject><subject>Wales - epidemiology</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UFvFCEUB3BiNHbb-gG8GOKlp6kwDDBzNJt2NTY1pvbihTDw2KXODBUYq9--rLuticbIhcP7vZf_y0PoJSWnlFD55orUQjSiZpSURyl_gha0kbQSrGmfosW2XG3rB-gwpZtCGOnIc3RQE9aVLr5A45kJUxi9wfBdD7POPkw4OAzTRk8GLE5ZO4cLytpk7ELEeQP4NoYxPNg-gk7ZAVg_rX-RIdzh3se8wXfg15uM_eT0lNMxeub0kODF_j9C1-dnn5fvqouPq_fLtxeVaRqaKys5M520wLvWAOOaCUl5yWzKYpZzZ13bCkqFI5wy61jvQJO-o4xbqW3DjtDJbm7J-W2GlNXok4Fh0BOEOSnZMMFJLdv_S8batqVMFvn6D3kT5jiVNVRNCWsJYaIgukMmhpQiOHUb_ajjT0WJ2t5M_XWz0vNqP3juR7CPHQ9HKqDaAZ8y_His6_hVCckkV2L1SV0ur-rVlw_nalk824fQYx-9XcPvqP-OcQ8oIq9u</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Rice, Stephen J. C.</creator><creator>Craig, Dawn</creator><creator>McCormick, Felicia</creator><creator>Renfrew, Mary J.</creator><creator>Williams, Anthony F.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Economic evaluation of enhanced staff contact for the promotion of breastfeeding for low birth weight infants</title><author>Rice, Stephen J. C. ; Craig, Dawn ; McCormick, Felicia ; Renfrew, Mary J. ; Williams, Anthony F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Breast Feeding</topic><topic>Breastfeeding &amp; lactation</topic><topic>Breastmilk</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Cost-effectiveness</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Decision Trees</topic><topic>England - epidemiology</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant Mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Low Birth Weight</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Low birth weight</topic><topic>Medical Staff</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Review Literature as Topic</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Staff contact</topic><topic>Wales - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rice, Stephen J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfrew, Mary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Anthony F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rice, Stephen J. C.</au><au>Craig, Dawn</au><au>McCormick, Felicia</au><au>Renfrew, Mary J.</au><au>Williams, Anthony F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic evaluation of enhanced staff contact for the promotion of breastfeeding for low birth weight infants</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>133-140</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>Objectives: There is evidence that breastmilk feeding reduces mortality and short and long-term morbidity among infants born too soon or too small. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced staff contact for mothers with infants in a neonatal unit with a birth weight of 500–2,500 g from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Methods: A decision-tree model linked clinical outcomes with long-term health outcomes. The study population was divided into three weight bands: 500–999 g, 1000–1,749 g, and 1,750–2,500 g. Clinical and resource use data were obtained from literature reviews. The measure of benefit was quality-adjusted life-years. Uncertainty was evaluated using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and sensitivity analyses. Results: The intervention was less costly and more effective than the comparator in the base–case analysis for each birth weight group. The results were quite robust to the sensitivity analyses performed. Conclusions: This is the first economic evaluation in this complex field and offers a model to be developed in future research. The results provide preliminary indications that enhanced staff contact may be cost-effective. However, the limited evidence available, and the limited UK data in particular, suggest that further research is required to provide results with confidence.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>20392315</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0266462310000115</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-4623
ispartof International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2010-04, Vol.26 (2), p.133-140
issn 0266-4623
1471-6348
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743650278
source ABI/INFORM Global; Cambridge University Press
subjects Babies
Birth weight
Breast Feeding
Breastfeeding & lactation
Breastmilk
Clinical outcomes
Cost analysis
Cost control
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cost-effectiveness
Data Collection
Decision Trees
England - epidemiology
Health Care Costs
Health technology assessment
Humans
Infant
Infant Mortality
Infant, Low Birth Weight
Infant, Newborn
Infants
Intervention
Low birth weight
Medical Staff
Mothers
Population
Professional-Patient Relations
Public health
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Review Literature as Topic
Sepsis
Staff contact
Wales - epidemiology
title Economic evaluation of enhanced staff contact for the promotion of breastfeeding for low birth weight infants
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A56%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20evaluation%20of%20enhanced%20staff%20contact%20for%20the%20promotion%20of%20breastfeeding%20for%20low%20birth%20weight%20infants&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Rice,%20Stephen%20J.%20C.&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=133-140&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462310000115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2011151011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d753c97de598ce35a36715039c634d55fdf886116f0513df3bfea0b9135d7ad43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210380036&rft_id=info:pmid/20392315&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462310000115&rfr_iscdi=true