Loading…
Children's Labor Market Involvement, Household Work, and Welfare: A Brazilian Case Study
The large numbers of children working in developing countries continue to provoke calls for an end to such employment. However, many reformers argue that efforts should focus on ending the exploitation of children rather than depriving them of all opportunities to work. This posture reflects recogni...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of business ethics 2010-03, Vol.92 (1), p.63-78 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-c272ef2240ca53118679702c74c43c7c03eb56b8bd27b1ffe39dd9fff2df489e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-c272ef2240ca53118679702c74c43c7c03eb56b8bd27b1ffe39dd9fff2df489e3 |
container_end_page | 78 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | Journal of business ethics |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | French, J. Lawrence |
description | The large numbers of children working in developing countries continue to provoke calls for an end to such employment. However, many reformers argue that efforts should focus on ending the exploitation of children rather than depriving them of all opportunities to work. This posture reflects recognition of the multiplicity of needs children have and the diversity of situations in which they work. Unfortunately, research typically neglects these complexities and fails to distinguish between types of labor market jobs, dismisses household chores as irrelevant, and conceptualizes children's needs largely in terms of the education they require for successful careers. Based on data collected in schools in Franca, Brazil, where children often combine school with work in the shoe industry, this study first examined the implications of labor market jobs and household work for their health, life satisfaction, and education. Analyses suggested that both forms of work negatively affected children's welfare, but the effects of household work were more extensive, especially for girls. The second part focused on children with labor market jobs and examined how facets of their jobs as well as their after-work household duties affected their welfare. A lack of discretion on the job undermined the health of both boys and girls, higher pay adversely affected boys' education, and housework had detrimental effects on all indicators of girls' welfare. This paper discusses the implications of these findings for further research and suggests the needs for attention to different forms of work activities within families. It concludes with suggestions for multinationals sourcing in developing areas that go beyond the usual calls for ridding their facilities and supply networks of child workers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10551-009-0140-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743804041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25621544</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25621544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-c272ef2240ca53118679702c74c43c7c03eb56b8bd27b1ffe39dd9fff2df489e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk2P0zAUtBBIlIUfwAHJ4rKXDTx_xTG3pQK6UhEHQHCzHOeZpk2TrJ1WCr8er4JWiAPC0vj5MDPv2WNCnjN4xQD068RAKVYAmAKYhGJ-QFZMaVFAafRDsgJW6kIqKR-TJyntIS_F5Ip8X-_aronYXya6dfUQ6UcXDzjRm_48dGc8Yj9d0c1wSrgbuoZ-G-Lhiro-n7ALLuIbek3fRvez7VrX07VLSD9Pp2Z-Sh4F1yV89rtekK_v331Zb4rtpw836-tt4aXRU-G55hg4l-CdEoxVpTYauNfSS-G1B4G1KuuqbriuWQgoTNOYEAJvgqwMigtyufiOcbg9YZrssU0eu871mKe2WooKJEj2H0xuFHCuM_PlX8z9cIp9voZlpgIFqjSZxBaSj0NKEYMdY3t0cbYM7F0mdsnE5kzsXSZ2zprNook4or8XHNy4r_MLT_ZshTM8b3MGh-wkXJvBMsaMUlhd2d10zFZ8sUrZpf-B8Y8Z_9H_xSLap2mI9_25KjnLf0P8Aqt9r-s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198050569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Children's Labor Market Involvement, Household Work, and Welfare: A Brazilian Case Study</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Springer Link</source><source>EBSCOHost: Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>French, J. Lawrence</creator><creatorcontrib>French, J. Lawrence</creatorcontrib><description>The large numbers of children working in developing countries continue to provoke calls for an end to such employment. However, many reformers argue that efforts should focus on ending the exploitation of children rather than depriving them of all opportunities to work. This posture reflects recognition of the multiplicity of needs children have and the diversity of situations in which they work. Unfortunately, research typically neglects these complexities and fails to distinguish between types of labor market jobs, dismisses household chores as irrelevant, and conceptualizes children's needs largely in terms of the education they require for successful careers. Based on data collected in schools in Franca, Brazil, where children often combine school with work in the shoe industry, this study first examined the implications of labor market jobs and household work for their health, life satisfaction, and education. Analyses suggested that both forms of work negatively affected children's welfare, but the effects of household work were more extensive, especially for girls. The second part focused on children with labor market jobs and examined how facets of their jobs as well as their after-work household duties affected their welfare. A lack of discretion on the job undermined the health of both boys and girls, higher pay adversely affected boys' education, and housework had detrimental effects on all indicators of girls' welfare. This paper discusses the implications of these findings for further research and suggests the needs for attention to different forms of work activities within families. It concludes with suggestions for multinationals sourcing in developing areas that go beyond the usual calls for ridding their facilities and supply networks of child workers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-009-0140-y</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBUEDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Boys education ; Brazil ; Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Child care ; Child labor ; Child labour ; Child welfare ; Children ; Children & youth ; Developing countries ; Economists ; Education ; Employment ; Ethics ; Footwear industry ; Foreign labor ; Gender ; Girls ; household ; Households ; Housekeeping ; Housework ; Labor force ; Labor market ; Labor markets ; Labour market ; LDCs ; Legal advocacy ; Management ; Philosophy ; Quality of Life Research ; School age children ; Shoe industry ; Social change ; Unemployment ; Union leadership ; Work ; Younger workers</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2010-03, Vol.92 (1), p.63-78</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2010 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-c272ef2240ca53118679702c74c43c7c03eb56b8bd27b1ffe39dd9fff2df489e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-c272ef2240ca53118679702c74c43c7c03eb56b8bd27b1ffe39dd9fff2df489e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/198050569/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/198050569?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,11885,12826,12840,21366,21373,27842,27843,27901,27902,33200,33201,33588,33589,33962,33963,34752,34753,36027,36028,36037,36038,43709,43924,44176,44337,44339,58213,58446,74192,74438,74698,74863,74865</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/kapjbuset/v_3a92_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a63-78.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>French, J. Lawrence</creatorcontrib><title>Children's Labor Market Involvement, Household Work, and Welfare: A Brazilian Case Study</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>The large numbers of children working in developing countries continue to provoke calls for an end to such employment. However, many reformers argue that efforts should focus on ending the exploitation of children rather than depriving them of all opportunities to work. This posture reflects recognition of the multiplicity of needs children have and the diversity of situations in which they work. Unfortunately, research typically neglects these complexities and fails to distinguish between types of labor market jobs, dismisses household chores as irrelevant, and conceptualizes children's needs largely in terms of the education they require for successful careers. Based on data collected in schools in Franca, Brazil, where children often combine school with work in the shoe industry, this study first examined the implications of labor market jobs and household work for their health, life satisfaction, and education. Analyses suggested that both forms of work negatively affected children's welfare, but the effects of household work were more extensive, especially for girls. The second part focused on children with labor market jobs and examined how facets of their jobs as well as their after-work household duties affected their welfare. A lack of discretion on the job undermined the health of both boys and girls, higher pay adversely affected boys' education, and housework had detrimental effects on all indicators of girls' welfare. This paper discusses the implications of these findings for further research and suggests the needs for attention to different forms of work activities within families. It concludes with suggestions for multinationals sourcing in developing areas that go beyond the usual calls for ridding their facilities and supply networks of child workers.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Boys education</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Child labor</subject><subject>Child labour</subject><subject>Child welfare</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Footwear industry</subject><subject>Foreign labor</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Girls</subject><subject>household</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housekeeping</subject><subject>Housework</subject><subject>Labor force</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Labor markets</subject><subject>Labour market</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Legal advocacy</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>School age children</subject><subject>Shoe industry</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Union leadership</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>Younger workers</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk2P0zAUtBBIlIUfwAHJ4rKXDTx_xTG3pQK6UhEHQHCzHOeZpk2TrJ1WCr8er4JWiAPC0vj5MDPv2WNCnjN4xQD068RAKVYAmAKYhGJ-QFZMaVFAafRDsgJW6kIqKR-TJyntIS_F5Ip8X-_aronYXya6dfUQ6UcXDzjRm_48dGc8Yj9d0c1wSrgbuoZ-G-Lhiro-n7ALLuIbek3fRvez7VrX07VLSD9Pp2Z-Sh4F1yV89rtekK_v331Zb4rtpw836-tt4aXRU-G55hg4l-CdEoxVpTYauNfSS-G1B4G1KuuqbriuWQgoTNOYEAJvgqwMigtyufiOcbg9YZrssU0eu871mKe2WooKJEj2H0xuFHCuM_PlX8z9cIp9voZlpgIFqjSZxBaSj0NKEYMdY3t0cbYM7F0mdsnE5kzsXSZ2zprNook4or8XHNy4r_MLT_ZshTM8b3MGh-wkXJvBMsaMUlhd2d10zFZ8sUrZpf-B8Y8Z_9H_xSLap2mI9_25KjnLf0P8Aqt9r-s</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>French, J. Lawrence</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PEJEM</scope><scope>PGAAH</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PMKZF</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Children's Labor Market Involvement, Household Work, and Welfare: A Brazilian Case Study</title><author>French, J. Lawrence</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-c272ef2240ca53118679702c74c43c7c03eb56b8bd27b1ffe39dd9fff2df489e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Boys education</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Child labor</topic><topic>Child labour</topic><topic>Child welfare</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Footwear industry</topic><topic>Foreign labor</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Girls</topic><topic>household</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housekeeping</topic><topic>Housework</topic><topic>Labor force</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Labor markets</topic><topic>Labour market</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Legal advocacy</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>School age children</topic><topic>Shoe industry</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Union leadership</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>Younger workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>French, J. Lawrence</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Proquest Entrepreneurship</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health Management Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Visual Arts & Design</collection><collection>ProQuest One Religion & Philosophy</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Digital Collections</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>French, J. Lawrence</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Children's Labor Market Involvement, Household Work, and Welfare: A Brazilian Case Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>63-78</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><coden>JBUEDJ</coden><abstract>The large numbers of children working in developing countries continue to provoke calls for an end to such employment. However, many reformers argue that efforts should focus on ending the exploitation of children rather than depriving them of all opportunities to work. This posture reflects recognition of the multiplicity of needs children have and the diversity of situations in which they work. Unfortunately, research typically neglects these complexities and fails to distinguish between types of labor market jobs, dismisses household chores as irrelevant, and conceptualizes children's needs largely in terms of the education they require for successful careers. Based on data collected in schools in Franca, Brazil, where children often combine school with work in the shoe industry, this study first examined the implications of labor market jobs and household work for their health, life satisfaction, and education. Analyses suggested that both forms of work negatively affected children's welfare, but the effects of household work were more extensive, especially for girls. The second part focused on children with labor market jobs and examined how facets of their jobs as well as their after-work household duties affected their welfare. A lack of discretion on the job undermined the health of both boys and girls, higher pay adversely affected boys' education, and housework had detrimental effects on all indicators of girls' welfare. This paper discusses the implications of these findings for further research and suggests the needs for attention to different forms of work activities within families. It concludes with suggestions for multinationals sourcing in developing areas that go beyond the usual calls for ridding their facilities and supply networks of child workers.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-009-0140-y</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-4544 |
ispartof | Journal of business ethics, 2010-03, Vol.92 (1), p.63-78 |
issn | 0167-4544 1573-0697 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743804041 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM global; Art, Design and Architecture Collection; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; PAIS Index; Springer Link; EBSCOHost: Business Source Ultimate; ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection |
subjects | Adolescents Boys education Brazil Business and Management Business Ethics Child care Child labor Child labour Child welfare Children Children & youth Developing countries Economists Education Employment Ethics Footwear industry Foreign labor Gender Girls household Households Housekeeping Housework Labor force Labor market Labor markets Labour market LDCs Legal advocacy Management Philosophy Quality of Life Research School age children Shoe industry Social change Unemployment Union leadership Work Younger workers |
title | Children's Labor Market Involvement, Household Work, and Welfare: A Brazilian Case Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T08%3A31%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Children's%20Labor%20Market%20Involvement,%20Household%20Work,%20and%20Welfare:%20A%20Brazilian%20Case%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=French,%20J.%20Lawrence&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=63-78&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft.coden=JBUEDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-009-0140-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25621544%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-c272ef2240ca53118679702c74c43c7c03eb56b8bd27b1ffe39dd9fff2df489e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198050569&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25621544&rfr_iscdi=true |