Loading…
A MacIntyrian perspective on organizational learning
This article examines the meaning of organizational learning (OL) from a MacIntyrian perspective. Key MacIntyrian terms such as practice, institution and relational dependence are explained and related to OL. It is argued that much of the literature concerned with OL, including that concerned with C...
Saved in:
Published in: | Management learning 2010-02, Vol.41 (1), p.37-51 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-845504b08fe6306e592106be874155f69e5e9e84ca798bd8bdb6f76f872d864b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-845504b08fe6306e592106be874155f69e5e9e84ca798bd8bdb6f76f872d864b3 |
container_end_page | 51 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Management learning |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Halliday, John Johnsson, Mary |
description | This article examines the meaning of organizational learning (OL) from a MacIntyrian perspective. Key MacIntyrian terms such as practice, institution and relational dependence are explained and related to OL. It is argued that much of the literature concerned with OL, including that concerned with Communities of Practice, misses the moral and relational dimensions of organizations. An alternative MacIntyrian perspective considers the enduring nature of practices which transcends both individual and organizational interests. The notion of relational dependence extends practical involvement to consideration of what is in the collective interest even where people fundamentally disagree. Such dependence involves generosity towards others and the recognition that conflict is inevitable and desirable. The article concludes with an outline of what OL might be and some indicators of success. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1350507609347589 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743809557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1350507609347589</sage_id><sourcerecordid>743809557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-845504b08fe6306e592106be874155f69e5e9e84ca798bd8bdb6f76f872d864b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwsePK1OskkmOZbiR0Hxouclu50tKdvsmmyF-te7pR6kIAzMwPu9x_AYu-ZwxzniPS8UKEANtpCojD1hEy41z7EAPB3vUc73-jm7SGkNABq1mDA5y15dvQjDLnoXsp5i6qke_BdlXci6uHLBf7vBd8G1WUsuBh9Wl-yscW2iq989ZR-PD-_z5_zl7Wkxn73ktTA45EYqBbIC05AuQJOygoOuyKDkSjXakiJLRtYOramW41S6Qd0YFEujZVVM2e0ht4_d55bSUG58qqltXaBum0qUhQGrFI7kzRG57rZx_DmV3AojlEElRgoOVB27lCI1ZR_9xsVdyaHct1getzha8oMluRX9Cf2P_wHLEW-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928258752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A MacIntyrian perspective on organizational learning</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Halliday, John ; Johnsson, Mary</creator><creatorcontrib>Halliday, John ; Johnsson, Mary</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the meaning of organizational learning (OL) from a MacIntyrian perspective. Key MacIntyrian terms such as practice, institution and relational dependence are explained and related to OL. It is argued that much of the literature concerned with OL, including that concerned with Communities of Practice, misses the moral and relational dimensions of organizations. An alternative MacIntyrian perspective considers the enduring nature of practices which transcends both individual and organizational interests. The notion of relational dependence extends practical involvement to consideration of what is in the collective interest even where people fundamentally disagree. Such dependence involves generosity towards others and the recognition that conflict is inevitable and desirable. The article concludes with an outline of what OL might be and some indicators of success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-5076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7307</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1350507609347589</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Economic indicators ; Institutionalism ; Learning ; Management science ; Meaning ; Organizational analysis ; Organizational behaviour ; Organizational culture ; Organizational learning</subject><ispartof>Management learning, 2010-02, Vol.41 (1), p.37-51</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Feb 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-845504b08fe6306e592106be874155f69e5e9e84ca798bd8bdb6f76f872d864b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-845504b08fe6306e592106be874155f69e5e9e84ca798bd8bdb6f76f872d864b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halliday, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnsson, Mary</creatorcontrib><title>A MacIntyrian perspective on organizational learning</title><title>Management learning</title><description>This article examines the meaning of organizational learning (OL) from a MacIntyrian perspective. Key MacIntyrian terms such as practice, institution and relational dependence are explained and related to OL. It is argued that much of the literature concerned with OL, including that concerned with Communities of Practice, misses the moral and relational dimensions of organizations. An alternative MacIntyrian perspective considers the enduring nature of practices which transcends both individual and organizational interests. The notion of relational dependence extends practical involvement to consideration of what is in the collective interest even where people fundamentally disagree. Such dependence involves generosity towards others and the recognition that conflict is inevitable and desirable. The article concludes with an outline of what OL might be and some indicators of success.</description><subject>Economic indicators</subject><subject>Institutionalism</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Management science</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Organizational analysis</subject><subject>Organizational behaviour</subject><subject>Organizational culture</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><issn>1350-5076</issn><issn>1461-7307</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwsePK1OskkmOZbiR0Hxouclu50tKdvsmmyF-te7pR6kIAzMwPu9x_AYu-ZwxzniPS8UKEANtpCojD1hEy41z7EAPB3vUc73-jm7SGkNABq1mDA5y15dvQjDLnoXsp5i6qke_BdlXci6uHLBf7vBd8G1WUsuBh9Wl-yscW2iq989ZR-PD-_z5_zl7Wkxn73ktTA45EYqBbIC05AuQJOygoOuyKDkSjXakiJLRtYOramW41S6Qd0YFEujZVVM2e0ht4_d55bSUG58qqltXaBum0qUhQGrFI7kzRG57rZx_DmV3AojlEElRgoOVB27lCI1ZR_9xsVdyaHct1getzha8oMluRX9Cf2P_wHLEW-g</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>Halliday, John</creator><creator>Johnsson, Mary</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>A MacIntyrian perspective on organizational learning</title><author>Halliday, John ; Johnsson, Mary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-845504b08fe6306e592106be874155f69e5e9e84ca798bd8bdb6f76f872d864b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Economic indicators</topic><topic>Institutionalism</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Management science</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Organizational analysis</topic><topic>Organizational behaviour</topic><topic>Organizational culture</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halliday, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnsson, Mary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Management learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halliday, John</au><au>Johnsson, Mary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A MacIntyrian perspective on organizational learning</atitle><jtitle>Management learning</jtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>37-51</pages><issn>1350-5076</issn><eissn>1461-7307</eissn><abstract>This article examines the meaning of organizational learning (OL) from a MacIntyrian perspective. Key MacIntyrian terms such as practice, institution and relational dependence are explained and related to OL. It is argued that much of the literature concerned with OL, including that concerned with Communities of Practice, misses the moral and relational dimensions of organizations. An alternative MacIntyrian perspective considers the enduring nature of practices which transcends both individual and organizational interests. The notion of relational dependence extends practical involvement to consideration of what is in the collective interest even where people fundamentally disagree. Such dependence involves generosity towards others and the recognition that conflict is inevitable and desirable. The article concludes with an outline of what OL might be and some indicators of success.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1350507609347589</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1350-5076 |
ispartof | Management learning, 2010-02, Vol.41 (1), p.37-51 |
issn | 1350-5076 1461-7307 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743809557 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Economic indicators Institutionalism Learning Management science Meaning Organizational analysis Organizational behaviour Organizational culture Organizational learning |
title | A MacIntyrian perspective on organizational learning |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A08%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20MacIntyrian%20perspective%20on%20organizational%20learning&rft.jtitle=Management%20learning&rft.au=Halliday,%20John&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=37-51&rft.issn=1350-5076&rft.eissn=1461-7307&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1350507609347589&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743809557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-845504b08fe6306e592106be874155f69e5e9e84ca798bd8bdb6f76f872d864b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928258752&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1350507609347589&rfr_iscdi=true |