I'm not gonna hit a lady': Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women

This article examines the way male suspects deny accusations of assaulting women in interrogations by police officers. It draws on a large corpus of British police interrogation materials, and uses conversation analysis to shed light on the location and design of, and responses to, suspects' &#...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Discourse & society 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.59-82
Main Author: Stokoe, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Assault
Classification
Conversation
Conversation analysis
Corpus analysis
Criminal arrests
Discourse analysis
Discourses
Domestic violence
Females
Gender
Gender-based violence
Interrogations
Membership
Men
Police
Policing
Questioning
Recruitment
Research Responses
Sequential analysis
Sexual violence
Social interaction
United Kingdom
Violence
Violence against women
Violent crimes
Women
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article examines the way male suspects deny accusations of assaulting women in interrogations by police officers. It draws on a large corpus of British police interrogation materials, and uses conversation analysis to shed light on the location and design of, and responses to, suspects' ' category-based denials' that they are not 'the kind of men who hit women'. Two sections of analysis identify how, first, such denials routinely follow police officers' direct questions about violent behaviour, and, second, how they become embedded in extended narratives that are not directly describing violence. In contrast to other discourse-analytic studies of men's accounts of violence towards women, the article unpacks the component features that comprise what others might label grossly as the 'discourse of gendered violence'. Rather than see how such 'discourses' operate in interview contexts, it shows how suspects construct, in a high-stakes setting for a particular purpose, different categories of men, claiming membership in one (who do not hit women) by recruiting the notion of the other (who do). Thus, in addition to its contribution to the study of gender and violence, the article takes new steps in the ongoing development of membership categorization and conversation analysis, showcasing a type of systematic sequential analysis that can be done with membership categories.
ISSN:0957-9265
1460-3624
DOI:10.1177/0957926509345072