mismeasurement of sexual selection

Sexual selection can explain major micro- and macro-evolutionary patterns. Much of current theory predicts that the strength of sexual selection (i) is driven by the relative abundance of males and females prepared to mate (i.e. the operational sex ratio, OSR) and (ii) can be generally estimated by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of evolutionary biology 2010-03, Vol.23 (3), p.447-462
Main Authors: KLUG, H, HEUSCHELE, J, JENNIONS, M.D, KOKKO, H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abundance
Animal reproduction
Animals
Evolutionary biology
Female
Male
mate competition
Mating
mating systems
Models, Genetic
operational sex ratio
opportunity for sexual selection
Selection, Genetic
Sex Characteristics
Sex Ratio
Sexual selection
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Sexual selection can explain major micro- and macro-evolutionary patterns. Much of current theory predicts that the strength of sexual selection (i) is driven by the relative abundance of males and females prepared to mate (i.e. the operational sex ratio, OSR) and (ii) can be generally estimated by calculating intra-sexual variation in mating success (e.g. the opportunity for sexual selection, Is). Here, we demonstrate the problematic nature of these predictions. The OSR and Is only accurately predict sexual selection under a limited set of circumstances, and more specifically, only when mate monopolization is extremely strong. If mate monopolization is not strong, using OSR or Is as proxies or measures of sexual selection is expected to produce spurious results that lead to the false conclusion that sexual selection is strong when it is actually weak. These findings call into question the validity of empirical conclusions based on these measures of sexual selection.
ISSN:1010-061X
1420-9101
DOI:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01921.x