Differential escape from parasites by two competing introduced crabs

Although introduced species often interact with one another in their novel communities, the role of parasites in these interactions remains less clear. We examined parasite richness and prevalence in 2 shorecrab species with different invasion histories and residency times in an introduced region wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2009-10, Vol.393, p.83-96
Main Authors: Blakeslee, April M. H., Keogh, Carolyn L., Byers, James E., Kuris, Armand M., Lafferty, Kevin D., Torchin, Mark E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Carcinus maenas
Coastal ranges
Crabs
Decapoda
Ecological competition
Ecological invasion
Hemigrapsus sanguineus
Infections
Introduced species
Marine
Parasite hosts
Parasites
Parasitism
Population ecology
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although introduced species often interact with one another in their novel communities, the role of parasites in these interactions remains less clear. We examined parasite richness and prevalence in 2 shorecrab species with different invasion histories and residency times in an introduced region where their distributions overlap broadly. On the northeastern coast of the USA, the Asian shorecrabHemigrapsus sanguineuswas discovered 20 yr ago, while the European green crabCarcinus maenashas been established for over 200 yr. We used literature and field surveys to evaluate parasitism in both crabs in their native and introduced ranges. We found only 1 parasite species infectingH. sanguineuson the US East Coast compared to 6 species in its native range, whileC. maenaswas host to 3 parasite species on the East Coast compared to 10 in its native range. The prevalence of parasite infection was also lower for both crabs in the introduced range compared to their native ranges; however, the difference was almost twice as much forH. sanguineusas forC. maenas. There are several explanations that could contribute toC. maenas’ greater parasite diversity than that ofH. sanguineuson the US East Coast, including differences in susceptibility, time since introduction, manner of introduction (vector), distance from native range, taxonomic isolation, and the potential for parasite identification bias. Our study underscores not just that non-native species lose parasites upon introduction, but that they may do so differentially, with ramifications for their direct interactions and with potential community-level influences.
ISSN:0171-8630
1616-1599
DOI:10.3354/meps08225