Loading…
Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of fast- and slow-growing temperate seaweeds in Oslofjord, Norway
During coastal eutrophication, fast-growing, ephemeral macroalgae bloom at the expense of slow-growing, perennial macroalgae. This change in community composition has been explained by a differential ability to exploit and utilize inorganic nitrogen among macroalgae with different growth strategies....
Saved in:
Published in: | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2010-01, Vol.399, p.103-115 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8d131814ee3a37931e8620091d52a4767953953f24193cb24b43328b57799ea03 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 115 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) |
container_volume | 399 |
creator | Pedersen, Morten Foldager Borum, Jens Fotel, Frank Leck |
description | During coastal eutrophication, fast-growing, ephemeral macroalgae bloom at the expense of slow-growing, perennial macroalgae. This change in community composition has been explained by a differential ability to exploit and utilize inorganic nitrogen among macroalgae with different growth strategies. However, some coastal areas are becoming phosphorus- rather than nitrogen-limited; we therefore compared phosphorus dynamics among 6 temperate species of macroalgae with different growth rates in order to test whether differences in algal P-dynamics may explain macroalgal community changes. Thin, fast-growing algae (UlvaandCeramium) took up dissolved inorganic P (DIP) much faster than thicker, slower growing species (belonging toFucus,AscophyllumandLaminaria) but also had much higher P-demands per unit biomass and time. DIP concentrations in the Oslofjord were low from April through August, and fast-growing species were unable to meet their P-demand from uptake for several months during summer. Hence,CeramiumandUlvawere potentially P-limited during summer, whereasAscophyllumandLaminariawere able to acquire sufficient external DIP to remain P-replete throughout the year. Storage of P preventedFucusspecies from suffering severe P-limitation for several weeks in summer. The absolute amount of P stored within the algae per unit biomass did not differ systematically among the 6 species, but the storage capacity (i.e. the period of time for which stored P could support growth) was much larger for slower growing species since this parameter depended heavily on realized growth rate. Our results show how differences in macroalgal P-dynamics may explain the changing balance among macroalgae with different growth strategies in P-deficient coastal areas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3354/meps08350 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744707881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24873732</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24873732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8d131814ee3a37931e8620091d52a4767953953f24193cb24b43328b57799ea03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90N9LwzAQB_AgCs7pg3-AkDcRrCa9tEkeZfgLhvNBn0vWXreOtqm5jLH_3upEODg4Pnw5voxdSnEHkKn7DgcSBjJxxCYyl3kiM2uP2URILROTgzhlZ0QbIWSudD5h1fva07D2YUu82veua0rirq9423RNdLHxPfc1rx3F5PdOrd8lq-B3Tb_iEbsBg4vICd0OsSLe9HwxmnrjQ3XL33zYuf05O6ldS3jxt6fs8-nxY_aSzBfPr7OHeVKCUTExlQRppEIEB9qCRJOnQlhZZakbv9U2g3HqVEkL5TJVSwWQmmWmtbXoBEzZ9SF3CP5rixSLrqES29b16LdUaKW00MbIUd4cZBk8UcC6GELTubAvpCh-iiz-ixzt1cFuKPrwD1NlNGhI4RuGVm-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>744707881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of fast- and slow-growing temperate seaweeds in Oslofjord, Norway</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Pedersen, Morten Foldager ; Borum, Jens ; Fotel, Frank Leck</creator><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, Morten Foldager ; Borum, Jens ; Fotel, Frank Leck</creatorcontrib><description>During coastal eutrophication, fast-growing, ephemeral macroalgae bloom at the expense of slow-growing, perennial macroalgae. This change in community composition has been explained by a differential ability to exploit and utilize inorganic nitrogen among macroalgae with different growth strategies. However, some coastal areas are becoming phosphorus- rather than nitrogen-limited; we therefore compared phosphorus dynamics among 6 temperate species of macroalgae with different growth rates in order to test whether differences in algal P-dynamics may explain macroalgal community changes. Thin, fast-growing algae (UlvaandCeramium) took up dissolved inorganic P (DIP) much faster than thicker, slower growing species (belonging toFucus,AscophyllumandLaminaria) but also had much higher P-demands per unit biomass and time. DIP concentrations in the Oslofjord were low from April through August, and fast-growing species were unable to meet their P-demand from uptake for several months during summer. Hence,CeramiumandUlvawere potentially P-limited during summer, whereasAscophyllumandLaminariawere able to acquire sufficient external DIP to remain P-replete throughout the year. Storage of P preventedFucusspecies from suffering severe P-limitation for several weeks in summer. The absolute amount of P stored within the algae per unit biomass did not differ systematically among the 6 species, but the storage capacity (i.e. the period of time for which stored P could support growth) was much larger for slower growing species since this parameter depended heavily on realized growth rate. Our results show how differences in macroalgal P-dynamics may explain the changing balance among macroalgae with different growth strategies in P-deficient coastal areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps08350</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Inter-Research</publisher><subject>Algae ; Ascophyllum ; Ceramium ; Coastal water ; Eutrophication ; Fucus ; Kinetics ; Laminaria ; Macroalgae ; Marine ; Nitrogen ; Nutrient uptake ; Phosphorus ; Photosynthesis ; Seaweeds ; Ulva</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2010-01, Vol.399, p.103-115</ispartof><rights>Inter-Research 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8d131814ee3a37931e8620091d52a4767953953f24193cb24b43328b57799ea03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24873732$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24873732$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, Morten Foldager</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borum, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotel, Frank Leck</creatorcontrib><title>Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of fast- and slow-growing temperate seaweeds in Oslofjord, Norway</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>During coastal eutrophication, fast-growing, ephemeral macroalgae bloom at the expense of slow-growing, perennial macroalgae. This change in community composition has been explained by a differential ability to exploit and utilize inorganic nitrogen among macroalgae with different growth strategies. However, some coastal areas are becoming phosphorus- rather than nitrogen-limited; we therefore compared phosphorus dynamics among 6 temperate species of macroalgae with different growth rates in order to test whether differences in algal P-dynamics may explain macroalgal community changes. Thin, fast-growing algae (UlvaandCeramium) took up dissolved inorganic P (DIP) much faster than thicker, slower growing species (belonging toFucus,AscophyllumandLaminaria) but also had much higher P-demands per unit biomass and time. DIP concentrations in the Oslofjord were low from April through August, and fast-growing species were unable to meet their P-demand from uptake for several months during summer. Hence,CeramiumandUlvawere potentially P-limited during summer, whereasAscophyllumandLaminariawere able to acquire sufficient external DIP to remain P-replete throughout the year. Storage of P preventedFucusspecies from suffering severe P-limitation for several weeks in summer. The absolute amount of P stored within the algae per unit biomass did not differ systematically among the 6 species, but the storage capacity (i.e. the period of time for which stored P could support growth) was much larger for slower growing species since this parameter depended heavily on realized growth rate. Our results show how differences in macroalgal P-dynamics may explain the changing balance among macroalgae with different growth strategies in P-deficient coastal areas.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Ascophyllum</subject><subject>Ceramium</subject><subject>Coastal water</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Fucus</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Laminaria</subject><subject>Macroalgae</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrient uptake</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><subject>Ulva</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90N9LwzAQB_AgCs7pg3-AkDcRrCa9tEkeZfgLhvNBn0vWXreOtqm5jLH_3upEODg4Pnw5voxdSnEHkKn7DgcSBjJxxCYyl3kiM2uP2URILROTgzhlZ0QbIWSudD5h1fva07D2YUu82veua0rirq9423RNdLHxPfc1rx3F5PdOrd8lq-B3Tb_iEbsBg4vICd0OsSLe9HwxmnrjQ3XL33zYuf05O6ldS3jxt6fs8-nxY_aSzBfPr7OHeVKCUTExlQRppEIEB9qCRJOnQlhZZakbv9U2g3HqVEkL5TJVSwWQmmWmtbXoBEzZ9SF3CP5rixSLrqES29b16LdUaKW00MbIUd4cZBk8UcC6GELTubAvpCh-iiz-ixzt1cFuKPrwD1NlNGhI4RuGVm-c</recordid><startdate>20100128</startdate><enddate>20100128</enddate><creator>Pedersen, Morten Foldager</creator><creator>Borum, Jens</creator><creator>Fotel, Frank Leck</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100128</creationdate><title>Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of fast- and slow-growing temperate seaweeds in Oslofjord, Norway</title><author>Pedersen, Morten Foldager ; Borum, Jens ; Fotel, Frank Leck</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8d131814ee3a37931e8620091d52a4767953953f24193cb24b43328b57799ea03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Ascophyllum</topic><topic>Ceramium</topic><topic>Coastal water</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Fucus</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Laminaria</topic><topic>Macroalgae</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrient uptake</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><topic>Ulva</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, Morten Foldager</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borum, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotel, Frank Leck</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pedersen, Morten Foldager</au><au>Borum, Jens</au><au>Fotel, Frank Leck</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of fast- and slow-growing temperate seaweeds in Oslofjord, Norway</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>2010-01-28</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>399</volume><spage>103</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>103-115</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>During coastal eutrophication, fast-growing, ephemeral macroalgae bloom at the expense of slow-growing, perennial macroalgae. This change in community composition has been explained by a differential ability to exploit and utilize inorganic nitrogen among macroalgae with different growth strategies. However, some coastal areas are becoming phosphorus- rather than nitrogen-limited; we therefore compared phosphorus dynamics among 6 temperate species of macroalgae with different growth rates in order to test whether differences in algal P-dynamics may explain macroalgal community changes. Thin, fast-growing algae (UlvaandCeramium) took up dissolved inorganic P (DIP) much faster than thicker, slower growing species (belonging toFucus,AscophyllumandLaminaria) but also had much higher P-demands per unit biomass and time. DIP concentrations in the Oslofjord were low from April through August, and fast-growing species were unable to meet their P-demand from uptake for several months during summer. Hence,CeramiumandUlvawere potentially P-limited during summer, whereasAscophyllumandLaminariawere able to acquire sufficient external DIP to remain P-replete throughout the year. Storage of P preventedFucusspecies from suffering severe P-limitation for several weeks in summer. The absolute amount of P stored within the algae per unit biomass did not differ systematically among the 6 species, but the storage capacity (i.e. the period of time for which stored P could support growth) was much larger for slower growing species since this parameter depended heavily on realized growth rate. Our results show how differences in macroalgal P-dynamics may explain the changing balance among macroalgae with different growth strategies in P-deficient coastal areas.</abstract><pub>Inter-Research</pub><doi>10.3354/meps08350</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0171-8630 |
ispartof | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2010-01, Vol.399, p.103-115 |
issn | 0171-8630 1616-1599 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744707881 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Algae Ascophyllum Ceramium Coastal water Eutrophication Fucus Kinetics Laminaria Macroalgae Marine Nitrogen Nutrient uptake Phosphorus Photosynthesis Seaweeds Ulva |
title | Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of fast- and slow-growing temperate seaweeds in Oslofjord, Norway |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A44%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phosphorus%20dynamics%20and%20limitation%20of%20fast-%20and%20slow-growing%20temperate%20seaweeds%20in%20Oslofjord,%20Norway&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Pedersen,%20Morten%20Foldager&rft.date=2010-01-28&rft.volume=399&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=103-115&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps08350&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24873732%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8d131814ee3a37931e8620091d52a4767953953f24193cb24b43328b57799ea03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=744707881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24873732&rfr_iscdi=true |