Loading…

Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of fast- and slow-growing temperate seaweeds in Oslofjord, Norway

During coastal eutrophication, fast-growing, ephemeral macroalgae bloom at the expense of slow-growing, perennial macroalgae. This change in community composition has been explained by a differential ability to exploit and utilize inorganic nitrogen among macroalgae with different growth strategies....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2010-01, Vol.399, p.103-115
Main Authors: Pedersen, Morten Foldager, Borum, Jens, Fotel, Frank Leck
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8d131814ee3a37931e8620091d52a4767953953f24193cb24b43328b57799ea03
cites
container_end_page 115
container_issue
container_start_page 103
container_title Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)
container_volume 399
creator Pedersen, Morten Foldager
Borum, Jens
Fotel, Frank Leck
description During coastal eutrophication, fast-growing, ephemeral macroalgae bloom at the expense of slow-growing, perennial macroalgae. This change in community composition has been explained by a differential ability to exploit and utilize inorganic nitrogen among macroalgae with different growth strategies. However, some coastal areas are becoming phosphorus- rather than nitrogen-limited; we therefore compared phosphorus dynamics among 6 temperate species of macroalgae with different growth rates in order to test whether differences in algal P-dynamics may explain macroalgal community changes. Thin, fast-growing algae (UlvaandCeramium) took up dissolved inorganic P (DIP) much faster than thicker, slower growing species (belonging toFucus,AscophyllumandLaminaria) but also had much higher P-demands per unit biomass and time. DIP concentrations in the Oslofjord were low from April through August, and fast-growing species were unable to meet their P-demand from uptake for several months during summer. Hence,CeramiumandUlvawere potentially P-limited during summer, whereasAscophyllumandLaminariawere able to acquire sufficient external DIP to remain P-replete throughout the year. Storage of P preventedFucusspecies from suffering severe P-limitation for several weeks in summer. The absolute amount of P stored within the algae per unit biomass did not differ systematically among the 6 species, but the storage capacity (i.e. the period of time for which stored P could support growth) was much larger for slower growing species since this parameter depended heavily on realized growth rate. Our results show how differences in macroalgal P-dynamics may explain the changing balance among macroalgae with different growth strategies in P-deficient coastal areas.
doi_str_mv 10.3354/meps08350
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744707881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24873732</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24873732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8d131814ee3a37931e8620091d52a4767953953f24193cb24b43328b57799ea03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90N9LwzAQB_AgCs7pg3-AkDcRrCa9tEkeZfgLhvNBn0vWXreOtqm5jLH_3upEODg4Pnw5voxdSnEHkKn7DgcSBjJxxCYyl3kiM2uP2URILROTgzhlZ0QbIWSudD5h1fva07D2YUu82veua0rirq9423RNdLHxPfc1rx3F5PdOrd8lq-B3Tb_iEbsBg4vICd0OsSLe9HwxmnrjQ3XL33zYuf05O6ldS3jxt6fs8-nxY_aSzBfPr7OHeVKCUTExlQRppEIEB9qCRJOnQlhZZakbv9U2g3HqVEkL5TJVSwWQmmWmtbXoBEzZ9SF3CP5rixSLrqES29b16LdUaKW00MbIUd4cZBk8UcC6GELTubAvpCh-iiz-ixzt1cFuKPrwD1NlNGhI4RuGVm-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>744707881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of fast- and slow-growing temperate seaweeds in Oslofjord, Norway</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Pedersen, Morten Foldager ; Borum, Jens ; Fotel, Frank Leck</creator><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, Morten Foldager ; Borum, Jens ; Fotel, Frank Leck</creatorcontrib><description>During coastal eutrophication, fast-growing, ephemeral macroalgae bloom at the expense of slow-growing, perennial macroalgae. This change in community composition has been explained by a differential ability to exploit and utilize inorganic nitrogen among macroalgae with different growth strategies. However, some coastal areas are becoming phosphorus- rather than nitrogen-limited; we therefore compared phosphorus dynamics among 6 temperate species of macroalgae with different growth rates in order to test whether differences in algal P-dynamics may explain macroalgal community changes. Thin, fast-growing algae (UlvaandCeramium) took up dissolved inorganic P (DIP) much faster than thicker, slower growing species (belonging toFucus,AscophyllumandLaminaria) but also had much higher P-demands per unit biomass and time. DIP concentrations in the Oslofjord were low from April through August, and fast-growing species were unable to meet their P-demand from uptake for several months during summer. Hence,CeramiumandUlvawere potentially P-limited during summer, whereasAscophyllumandLaminariawere able to acquire sufficient external DIP to remain P-replete throughout the year. Storage of P preventedFucusspecies from suffering severe P-limitation for several weeks in summer. The absolute amount of P stored within the algae per unit biomass did not differ systematically among the 6 species, but the storage capacity (i.e. the period of time for which stored P could support growth) was much larger for slower growing species since this parameter depended heavily on realized growth rate. Our results show how differences in macroalgal P-dynamics may explain the changing balance among macroalgae with different growth strategies in P-deficient coastal areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps08350</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Inter-Research</publisher><subject>Algae ; Ascophyllum ; Ceramium ; Coastal water ; Eutrophication ; Fucus ; Kinetics ; Laminaria ; Macroalgae ; Marine ; Nitrogen ; Nutrient uptake ; Phosphorus ; Photosynthesis ; Seaweeds ; Ulva</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2010-01, Vol.399, p.103-115</ispartof><rights>Inter-Research 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8d131814ee3a37931e8620091d52a4767953953f24193cb24b43328b57799ea03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24873732$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24873732$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, Morten Foldager</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borum, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotel, Frank Leck</creatorcontrib><title>Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of fast- and slow-growing temperate seaweeds in Oslofjord, Norway</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>During coastal eutrophication, fast-growing, ephemeral macroalgae bloom at the expense of slow-growing, perennial macroalgae. This change in community composition has been explained by a differential ability to exploit and utilize inorganic nitrogen among macroalgae with different growth strategies. However, some coastal areas are becoming phosphorus- rather than nitrogen-limited; we therefore compared phosphorus dynamics among 6 temperate species of macroalgae with different growth rates in order to test whether differences in algal P-dynamics may explain macroalgal community changes. Thin, fast-growing algae (UlvaandCeramium) took up dissolved inorganic P (DIP) much faster than thicker, slower growing species (belonging toFucus,AscophyllumandLaminaria) but also had much higher P-demands per unit biomass and time. DIP concentrations in the Oslofjord were low from April through August, and fast-growing species were unable to meet their P-demand from uptake for several months during summer. Hence,CeramiumandUlvawere potentially P-limited during summer, whereasAscophyllumandLaminariawere able to acquire sufficient external DIP to remain P-replete throughout the year. Storage of P preventedFucusspecies from suffering severe P-limitation for several weeks in summer. The absolute amount of P stored within the algae per unit biomass did not differ systematically among the 6 species, but the storage capacity (i.e. the period of time for which stored P could support growth) was much larger for slower growing species since this parameter depended heavily on realized growth rate. Our results show how differences in macroalgal P-dynamics may explain the changing balance among macroalgae with different growth strategies in P-deficient coastal areas.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Ascophyllum</subject><subject>Ceramium</subject><subject>Coastal water</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Fucus</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Laminaria</subject><subject>Macroalgae</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrient uptake</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><subject>Ulva</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90N9LwzAQB_AgCs7pg3-AkDcRrCa9tEkeZfgLhvNBn0vWXreOtqm5jLH_3upEODg4Pnw5voxdSnEHkKn7DgcSBjJxxCYyl3kiM2uP2URILROTgzhlZ0QbIWSudD5h1fva07D2YUu82veua0rirq9423RNdLHxPfc1rx3F5PdOrd8lq-B3Tb_iEbsBg4vICd0OsSLe9HwxmnrjQ3XL33zYuf05O6ldS3jxt6fs8-nxY_aSzBfPr7OHeVKCUTExlQRppEIEB9qCRJOnQlhZZakbv9U2g3HqVEkL5TJVSwWQmmWmtbXoBEzZ9SF3CP5rixSLrqES29b16LdUaKW00MbIUd4cZBk8UcC6GELTubAvpCh-iiz-ixzt1cFuKPrwD1NlNGhI4RuGVm-c</recordid><startdate>20100128</startdate><enddate>20100128</enddate><creator>Pedersen, Morten Foldager</creator><creator>Borum, Jens</creator><creator>Fotel, Frank Leck</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100128</creationdate><title>Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of fast- and slow-growing temperate seaweeds in Oslofjord, Norway</title><author>Pedersen, Morten Foldager ; Borum, Jens ; Fotel, Frank Leck</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8d131814ee3a37931e8620091d52a4767953953f24193cb24b43328b57799ea03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Ascophyllum</topic><topic>Ceramium</topic><topic>Coastal water</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Fucus</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Laminaria</topic><topic>Macroalgae</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrient uptake</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><topic>Ulva</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, Morten Foldager</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borum, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotel, Frank Leck</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pedersen, Morten Foldager</au><au>Borum, Jens</au><au>Fotel, Frank Leck</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of fast- and slow-growing temperate seaweeds in Oslofjord, Norway</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>2010-01-28</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>399</volume><spage>103</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>103-115</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>During coastal eutrophication, fast-growing, ephemeral macroalgae bloom at the expense of slow-growing, perennial macroalgae. This change in community composition has been explained by a differential ability to exploit and utilize inorganic nitrogen among macroalgae with different growth strategies. However, some coastal areas are becoming phosphorus- rather than nitrogen-limited; we therefore compared phosphorus dynamics among 6 temperate species of macroalgae with different growth rates in order to test whether differences in algal P-dynamics may explain macroalgal community changes. Thin, fast-growing algae (UlvaandCeramium) took up dissolved inorganic P (DIP) much faster than thicker, slower growing species (belonging toFucus,AscophyllumandLaminaria) but also had much higher P-demands per unit biomass and time. DIP concentrations in the Oslofjord were low from April through August, and fast-growing species were unable to meet their P-demand from uptake for several months during summer. Hence,CeramiumandUlvawere potentially P-limited during summer, whereasAscophyllumandLaminariawere able to acquire sufficient external DIP to remain P-replete throughout the year. Storage of P preventedFucusspecies from suffering severe P-limitation for several weeks in summer. The absolute amount of P stored within the algae per unit biomass did not differ systematically among the 6 species, but the storage capacity (i.e. the period of time for which stored P could support growth) was much larger for slower growing species since this parameter depended heavily on realized growth rate. Our results show how differences in macroalgal P-dynamics may explain the changing balance among macroalgae with different growth strategies in P-deficient coastal areas.</abstract><pub>Inter-Research</pub><doi>10.3354/meps08350</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-8630
ispartof Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2010-01, Vol.399, p.103-115
issn 0171-8630
1616-1599
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744707881
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Algae
Ascophyllum
Ceramium
Coastal water
Eutrophication
Fucus
Kinetics
Laminaria
Macroalgae
Marine
Nitrogen
Nutrient uptake
Phosphorus
Photosynthesis
Seaweeds
Ulva
title Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of fast- and slow-growing temperate seaweeds in Oslofjord, Norway
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A44%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phosphorus%20dynamics%20and%20limitation%20of%20fast-%20and%20slow-growing%20temperate%20seaweeds%20in%20Oslofjord,%20Norway&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Pedersen,%20Morten%20Foldager&rft.date=2010-01-28&rft.volume=399&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=103-115&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps08350&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24873732%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8d131814ee3a37931e8620091d52a4767953953f24193cb24b43328b57799ea03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=744707881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24873732&rfr_iscdi=true