Environmental Assessment of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Processes

Summary The environmental assessment of nanomanufacturing during the initial process design phase should lead to the development of competitive, safe, and environmentally responsible engineering and commercialization. Given the potential benefits and concerns regarding the use of single‐walled carbo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of industrial ecology 2008-06, Vol.12 (3), p.376-393
Main Authors: Healy, Meagan L., Dahlben, Lindsay J., Isaacs, Jacqueline A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Carbon
Chemical vapor deposition
Commercialization
Engineering
Environmental impact
Environmental impact studies
industrial ecology
Industrial production
life cycle assessment (LCA)
Life cycles
Manufacturing
Nanomaterials
Nanotechnology
Nanotubes
Product life cycle
Research methods
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary The environmental assessment of nanomanufacturing during the initial process design phase should lead to the development of competitive, safe, and environmentally responsible engineering and commercialization. Given the potential benefits and concerns regarding the use of single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), three SWNT production processes have been investigated to assess their associated environmental impacts. These processes include arc ablation (arc), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and high‐pressure carbon monoxide (HiPco). Without consideration of the currently unknown impacts of SWNT dispersion or other health impacts, life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is used to analyze the environmental impact and provide a baseline for the environmental footprint of each manufacturing process. Although the technical attributes of the product resulting from each process may not be fully comparable, this study presents comparisons that show that the life cycle impacts are dominated by energy, specifically the electricity used in production. Under base case yield conditions, HiPco shows the lowest environmental impact, while the arc process has the lowest impact under best case yield conditions.
ISSN:1088-1980
1530-9290
DOI:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00058.x