Loading…

Energetic costs of foraging in breeding Cape gannets Morus capensis

Seabirds fly considerable distances during the breeding season in search for food for themselves and their young. Variation in the distance from the breeding colony to the offshore food resources is expected to impact the energy spent on foraging trips. In 2005-06 and 2006-07 we studied foraging beh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2009-10, Vol.393, p.161-171
Main Authors: Mullers, RHE, Navarro, RA, Daan, S, Tinbergen, JM, Meijer, HAJ
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-fe36efc827311e55572e302143dda41df9c57dadc2d88839e6f7def8277b1d153
cites
container_end_page 171
container_issue
container_start_page 161
container_title Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)
container_volume 393
creator Mullers, RHE
Navarro, RA
Daan, S
Tinbergen, JM
Meijer, HAJ
description Seabirds fly considerable distances during the breeding season in search for food for themselves and their young. Variation in the distance from the breeding colony to the offshore food resources is expected to impact the energy spent on foraging trips. In 2005-06 and 2006-07 we studied foraging behaviour, derived time budgets during foraging trips (commuting, hunting or drifting on the sea surface) and measured the associated energy expenditure in 2 colonies of breeding Cape gannets Morus capensis. Around Ichaboe Island (Namibia) the winds were stronger and more variable than at Malgas Island (South Africa). Gannet foraging trip duration did not vary between the islands, but at Ichaboe gannets spent more time on hunting and less time drifting on the sea surface compared to Malgas birds. Gannets from Malgas made more dives during foraging trips than Ichaboe gannets (75 and 43 dives respectively). Energy expenditure during foraging trips (TEE) was estimated on average at 4203 kJ d super(-1) (+/-693, n = 27), which was 5.5 x basal metabolic rate (BMR), and did not differ between the islands. Energetic costs of foraging increased with wind speed and the fraction flying during foraging trips. The average flight costs were estimated at 85 W, after correction for wind speed. The increased energetic cost during foraging at Malgas was associated with the large number of dives and less profitable winds: taking off after each plunge-dive would be more costly in weaker winds. The fact that TEE did not differ between the islands might suggest that Cape gannets at both islands were foraging at the boundaries of their sustainable energetic expenditure.
doi_str_mv 10.3354/meps08250
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744721160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>744721160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-fe36efc827311e55572e302143dda41df9c57dadc2d88839e6f7def8277b1d153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLFOwzAURS0EEqUw8AfZEEPAz47tZERRKUhFLDBHrv0cBbV28EsH_p5URUz36uroDoexW-APUqrqcY8j8VoofsYWoEGXoJrmnC04GChrLfkluyL64hx0ZfSCtauIucdpcIVLNFGRQhFStv0Q-2KIxTYj-mNv7YhFb2PEGXpL-UCFm6dIA12zi2B3hDd_uWSfz6uP9qXcvK9f26dN6aQWUxlQagyuFkYCoFLKCJRcQCW9txX40DhlvPVO-LquZYM6GI9h5s0WPCi5ZHen3zGn7wPS1O0Hcrjb2YjpQJ2pKiMANJ_J-xPpciLKGLoxD3ubfzrg3dFT9-9J_gLwpltI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>744721160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energetic costs of foraging in breeding Cape gannets Morus capensis</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Mullers, RHE ; Navarro, RA ; Daan, S ; Tinbergen, JM ; Meijer, HAJ</creator><creatorcontrib>Mullers, RHE ; Navarro, RA ; Daan, S ; Tinbergen, JM ; Meijer, HAJ</creatorcontrib><description>Seabirds fly considerable distances during the breeding season in search for food for themselves and their young. Variation in the distance from the breeding colony to the offshore food resources is expected to impact the energy spent on foraging trips. In 2005-06 and 2006-07 we studied foraging behaviour, derived time budgets during foraging trips (commuting, hunting or drifting on the sea surface) and measured the associated energy expenditure in 2 colonies of breeding Cape gannets Morus capensis. Around Ichaboe Island (Namibia) the winds were stronger and more variable than at Malgas Island (South Africa). Gannet foraging trip duration did not vary between the islands, but at Ichaboe gannets spent more time on hunting and less time drifting on the sea surface compared to Malgas birds. Gannets from Malgas made more dives during foraging trips than Ichaboe gannets (75 and 43 dives respectively). Energy expenditure during foraging trips (TEE) was estimated on average at 4203 kJ d super(-1) (+/-693, n = 27), which was 5.5 x basal metabolic rate (BMR), and did not differ between the islands. Energetic costs of foraging increased with wind speed and the fraction flying during foraging trips. The average flight costs were estimated at 85 W, after correction for wind speed. The increased energetic cost during foraging at Malgas was associated with the large number of dives and less profitable winds: taking off after each plunge-dive would be more costly in weaker winds. The fact that TEE did not differ between the islands might suggest that Cape gannets at both islands were foraging at the boundaries of their sustainable energetic expenditure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps08250</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Marine ; Morus capensis</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2009-10, Vol.393, p.161-171</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-fe36efc827311e55572e302143dda41df9c57dadc2d88839e6f7def8277b1d153</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mullers, RHE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, RA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinbergen, JM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, HAJ</creatorcontrib><title>Energetic costs of foraging in breeding Cape gannets Morus capensis</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>Seabirds fly considerable distances during the breeding season in search for food for themselves and their young. Variation in the distance from the breeding colony to the offshore food resources is expected to impact the energy spent on foraging trips. In 2005-06 and 2006-07 we studied foraging behaviour, derived time budgets during foraging trips (commuting, hunting or drifting on the sea surface) and measured the associated energy expenditure in 2 colonies of breeding Cape gannets Morus capensis. Around Ichaboe Island (Namibia) the winds were stronger and more variable than at Malgas Island (South Africa). Gannet foraging trip duration did not vary between the islands, but at Ichaboe gannets spent more time on hunting and less time drifting on the sea surface compared to Malgas birds. Gannets from Malgas made more dives during foraging trips than Ichaboe gannets (75 and 43 dives respectively). Energy expenditure during foraging trips (TEE) was estimated on average at 4203 kJ d super(-1) (+/-693, n = 27), which was 5.5 x basal metabolic rate (BMR), and did not differ between the islands. Energetic costs of foraging increased with wind speed and the fraction flying during foraging trips. The average flight costs were estimated at 85 W, after correction for wind speed. The increased energetic cost during foraging at Malgas was associated with the large number of dives and less profitable winds: taking off after each plunge-dive would be more costly in weaker winds. The fact that TEE did not differ between the islands might suggest that Cape gannets at both islands were foraging at the boundaries of their sustainable energetic expenditure.</description><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Morus capensis</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kLFOwzAURS0EEqUw8AfZEEPAz47tZERRKUhFLDBHrv0cBbV28EsH_p5URUz36uroDoexW-APUqrqcY8j8VoofsYWoEGXoJrmnC04GChrLfkluyL64hx0ZfSCtauIucdpcIVLNFGRQhFStv0Q-2KIxTYj-mNv7YhFb2PEGXpL-UCFm6dIA12zi2B3hDd_uWSfz6uP9qXcvK9f26dN6aQWUxlQagyuFkYCoFLKCJRcQCW9txX40DhlvPVO-LquZYM6GI9h5s0WPCi5ZHen3zGn7wPS1O0Hcrjb2YjpQJ2pKiMANJ_J-xPpciLKGLoxD3ubfzrg3dFT9-9J_gLwpltI</recordid><startdate>20091030</startdate><enddate>20091030</enddate><creator>Mullers, RHE</creator><creator>Navarro, RA</creator><creator>Daan, S</creator><creator>Tinbergen, JM</creator><creator>Meijer, HAJ</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091030</creationdate><title>Energetic costs of foraging in breeding Cape gannets Morus capensis</title><author>Mullers, RHE ; Navarro, RA ; Daan, S ; Tinbergen, JM ; Meijer, HAJ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-fe36efc827311e55572e302143dda41df9c57dadc2d88839e6f7def8277b1d153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Morus capensis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mullers, RHE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, RA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinbergen, JM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, HAJ</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mullers, RHE</au><au>Navarro, RA</au><au>Daan, S</au><au>Tinbergen, JM</au><au>Meijer, HAJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energetic costs of foraging in breeding Cape gannets Morus capensis</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>2009-10-30</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>393</volume><spage>161</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>161-171</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>Seabirds fly considerable distances during the breeding season in search for food for themselves and their young. Variation in the distance from the breeding colony to the offshore food resources is expected to impact the energy spent on foraging trips. In 2005-06 and 2006-07 we studied foraging behaviour, derived time budgets during foraging trips (commuting, hunting or drifting on the sea surface) and measured the associated energy expenditure in 2 colonies of breeding Cape gannets Morus capensis. Around Ichaboe Island (Namibia) the winds were stronger and more variable than at Malgas Island (South Africa). Gannet foraging trip duration did not vary between the islands, but at Ichaboe gannets spent more time on hunting and less time drifting on the sea surface compared to Malgas birds. Gannets from Malgas made more dives during foraging trips than Ichaboe gannets (75 and 43 dives respectively). Energy expenditure during foraging trips (TEE) was estimated on average at 4203 kJ d super(-1) (+/-693, n = 27), which was 5.5 x basal metabolic rate (BMR), and did not differ between the islands. Energetic costs of foraging increased with wind speed and the fraction flying during foraging trips. The average flight costs were estimated at 85 W, after correction for wind speed. The increased energetic cost during foraging at Malgas was associated with the large number of dives and less profitable winds: taking off after each plunge-dive would be more costly in weaker winds. The fact that TEE did not differ between the islands might suggest that Cape gannets at both islands were foraging at the boundaries of their sustainable energetic expenditure.</abstract><doi>10.3354/meps08250</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-8630
ispartof Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2009-10, Vol.393, p.161-171
issn 0171-8630
1616-1599
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744721160
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Marine
Morus capensis
title Energetic costs of foraging in breeding Cape gannets Morus capensis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T17%3A55%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energetic%20costs%20of%20foraging%20in%20breeding%20Cape%20gannets%20Morus%20capensis&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Mullers,%20RHE&rft.date=2009-10-30&rft.volume=393&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=161-171&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps08250&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E744721160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-fe36efc827311e55572e302143dda41df9c57dadc2d88839e6f7def8277b1d153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=744721160&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true