Comparison Between Large-Eddy Simulation and Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Computations for the MUST Field Experiment. Part II: Effects of Incident Wind Angle Deviation on the Mean Flow and Plume Dispersion

• Published in: Boundary-layer meteorology 2010-04, Vol.135 (1), p.133-150
• Main Authors: Dejoan, A, Santiago, J. L, Martilli, A, Martin, F, Pinelli, A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Applied sciences; Atmospheric pollution; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution; Atmospheric Sciences; Channelling; Channelling effects; Comparative studies; Computation; Convection, turbulence, diffusion. Boundary layer structure and dynamics; Deflection; Deviation; Dispersions; Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Earth, ocean, space; Exact sciences and technology; External geophysics; Field study; Fluid dynamics; Grounds; Large-eddy simulation; Meteorology; MUST experiment; Navier-Stokes equations; Plume deflection; Plumes; Pollutants; Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution; Pollution; Pollution dispersion; Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes; Simulation; Urban areas; Wind
• ISSN: 0006-8314; 1573-1472
• DOI: 10.1007/s10546-010-9467-2

Large-eddy simulations (LES) and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computations of pollutant dispersion are reported for the Mock Urban Setting Test (MUST) field experiment flow. In particular we address the effects of incident wind angle deviation on the mean velocity and on the mean concentration fields. Both computational fluid dynamical methods are assessed by comparing the simulation results with experimental field data. The comparative analysis proposes to relate the plume deflection with the flow channelling effects. The results show that the plume deflection angle varies with the altitude. As the ground is approached the plume is shown to be almost aligned with the street canyon direction and independent of the incident wind directions considered. At higher altitudes well above the obstacles, the plume direction is aligned with the mean wind direction as in dispersion over flat terrain. The near-ground plume deflection is the consequence of a strong channelling effect in the region near the ground. The mean concentration profiles predicted by LES and RANS are both in good qualitative agreement with experimental data but exhibit discrepancies that can be partly explained by the influence of small incident wind angle deviation effects. Compared to RANS, LES predicts a higher channelling and thus a higher deflection of the plume. Results on the fluctuating intensity of the concentration obtained from LES show a satisfactory agreement with experiments. This information is not available from RANS for which only the mean concentration modelling is considered.