Loading…
A Bayesian spatiotemporal model for very large data sets
Functional MRI provides a unique perspective of neuronal organization; however, these data include many complex sources of spatiotemporal variability, which require spatial preprocessing and statistical analysis. For the latter, Bayesian models provide a promising alternative to classical inference,...
Saved in:
Published in: | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2010-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1126-1141 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553 |
container_end_page | 1141 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1126 |
container_title | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Harrison, L.M. Green, G.G.R. |
description | Functional MRI provides a unique perspective of neuronal organization; however, these data include many complex sources of spatiotemporal variability, which require spatial preprocessing and statistical analysis. For the latter, Bayesian models provide a promising alternative to classical inference, which uses results from Gaussian random field theory to assess the significance of spatially correlated statistic images. A Bayesian approach generalizes the application of these ideas in that (1) random fields are used to model all spatial parameters, not solely observation error, (2) their smoothness is optimized, and (3) a broader class of models can be compared. The main problem, however, is computational, due to the large number of voxels in a brain volume. Sampling methods are time-consuming; however, approximate inference using variational Bayes (VB) offers a principled and transparent way to specify assumptions necessary for computational tractability. Penny et al. (2005b) described such a scheme using a joint spatial prior and approximated the joint posterior density with one that factorized over voxels. However, a further computational bottleneck is encountered when evaluating the log model evidence used to compare models. This has lead to dividing a brain volume into slices and treating each independently. This amounts to approximating the spatial prior over a full volume with stacked 2D priors. That is, smoothness along the z-axis is not included in the model. Here we describe a VB scheme that approximates the zero mean joint spatial prior with a non-zero mean empirical prior that factors over voxels, thereby overcoming this problem. We do this by modifying the original VB algorithm of Penny et al. using the conditional form of a so-called conditional autoregressive (CAR) prior to update a marginal prior over voxels. We refer to this as a spatially-informed voxel-wise prior (SVP) and use them to spatially regularise general linear model (GLM) and autoregressive (AR) coefficients (over time to model serial correlations). This algorithm scales more favourably with the number of voxels providing a truly 3D spatiotemporal model over volumes containing tens of thousands of voxels. We compare the scaling of compute times with the number of voxels and performance with a joint prior applied to synthetic and single-subject data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.042 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745931378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811909013317</els_id><sourcerecordid>733183770</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtP3DAURq2qVXmUv1BZYlE2SX39iO0lIEorIXXTri0nvkEZJfFgJ0jz7_FooJVYwOp6cb778CGEAquBQfN9U8-4pjhM_h5rzpitgddM8g_kGJhVlVWaf9y_lagMgD0iJzlvWAFBms_kqER4wwU7JuaSXvkd5sHPNG_9MsQFp21MfqRTDDjSPib6iGlHR5_ukQa_eJpxyV_Ip96PGc-e6yn5--Pmz_XP6u737a_ry7uqk02zVFpC76UAptsOvbFoWoVSWY6aWdvIoBFbHVrb9LIFH2SQxjda2b4NLVNKnJJvh77bFB9WzIubhtzhOPoZ45qdLs0ECG3eJ4UAI7Rmhbx4k4RGAxdccVHQ81foJq5pLhcXCqQwxvD9kuZAdSnmnLB321TkpJ0D5vbG3Mb9N-b2xhxwV4yV6NfnAWs7YfgXfFFUgKsDgOWXHwdMLncDzh2GIWG3uBCH96c8Af6Tqjo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1614388825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Bayesian spatiotemporal model for very large data sets</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Harrison, L.M. ; Green, G.G.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harrison, L.M. ; Green, G.G.R.</creatorcontrib><description>Functional MRI provides a unique perspective of neuronal organization; however, these data include many complex sources of spatiotemporal variability, which require spatial preprocessing and statistical analysis. For the latter, Bayesian models provide a promising alternative to classical inference, which uses results from Gaussian random field theory to assess the significance of spatially correlated statistic images. A Bayesian approach generalizes the application of these ideas in that (1) random fields are used to model all spatial parameters, not solely observation error, (2) their smoothness is optimized, and (3) a broader class of models can be compared. The main problem, however, is computational, due to the large number of voxels in a brain volume. Sampling methods are time-consuming; however, approximate inference using variational Bayes (VB) offers a principled and transparent way to specify assumptions necessary for computational tractability. Penny et al. (2005b) described such a scheme using a joint spatial prior and approximated the joint posterior density with one that factorized over voxels. However, a further computational bottleneck is encountered when evaluating the log model evidence used to compare models. This has lead to dividing a brain volume into slices and treating each independently. This amounts to approximating the spatial prior over a full volume with stacked 2D priors. That is, smoothness along the z-axis is not included in the model. Here we describe a VB scheme that approximates the zero mean joint spatial prior with a non-zero mean empirical prior that factors over voxels, thereby overcoming this problem. We do this by modifying the original VB algorithm of Penny et al. using the conditional form of a so-called conditional autoregressive (CAR) prior to update a marginal prior over voxels. We refer to this as a spatially-informed voxel-wise prior (SVP) and use them to spatially regularise general linear model (GLM) and autoregressive (AR) coefficients (over time to model serial correlations). This algorithm scales more favourably with the number of voxels providing a truly 3D spatiotemporal model over volumes containing tens of thousands of voxels. We compare the scaling of compute times with the number of voxels and performance with a joint prior applied to synthetic and single-subject data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20026230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Approximation ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Brain - physiology ; Computation ; Computer Simulation ; Conditional autoregressive priors ; Correlation ; Economic models ; Estimates ; fMRI ; Gaussian Markov random fields ; Graph–Laplacian ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Inference ; Linear Models ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Mathematical models ; Models, Statistical ; Normal Distribution ; Random variables ; Regression Analysis ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Spatially-informed voxel-wise priors ; Spatiotemporal models ; Time Factors ; Variational Bayes</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2010-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1126-1141</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 15, 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20026230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harrison, L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, G.G.R.</creatorcontrib><title>A Bayesian spatiotemporal model for very large data sets</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>Functional MRI provides a unique perspective of neuronal organization; however, these data include many complex sources of spatiotemporal variability, which require spatial preprocessing and statistical analysis. For the latter, Bayesian models provide a promising alternative to classical inference, which uses results from Gaussian random field theory to assess the significance of spatially correlated statistic images. A Bayesian approach generalizes the application of these ideas in that (1) random fields are used to model all spatial parameters, not solely observation error, (2) their smoothness is optimized, and (3) a broader class of models can be compared. The main problem, however, is computational, due to the large number of voxels in a brain volume. Sampling methods are time-consuming; however, approximate inference using variational Bayes (VB) offers a principled and transparent way to specify assumptions necessary for computational tractability. Penny et al. (2005b) described such a scheme using a joint spatial prior and approximated the joint posterior density with one that factorized over voxels. However, a further computational bottleneck is encountered when evaluating the log model evidence used to compare models. This has lead to dividing a brain volume into slices and treating each independently. This amounts to approximating the spatial prior over a full volume with stacked 2D priors. That is, smoothness along the z-axis is not included in the model. Here we describe a VB scheme that approximates the zero mean joint spatial prior with a non-zero mean empirical prior that factors over voxels, thereby overcoming this problem. We do this by modifying the original VB algorithm of Penny et al. using the conditional form of a so-called conditional autoregressive (CAR) prior to update a marginal prior over voxels. We refer to this as a spatially-informed voxel-wise prior (SVP) and use them to spatially regularise general linear model (GLM) and autoregressive (AR) coefficients (over time to model serial correlations). This algorithm scales more favourably with the number of voxels providing a truly 3D spatiotemporal model over volumes containing tens of thousands of voxels. We compare the scaling of compute times with the number of voxels and performance with a joint prior applied to synthetic and single-subject data.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Conditional autoregressive priors</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Gaussian Markov random fields</subject><subject>Graph–Laplacian</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Normal Distribution</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Spatially-informed voxel-wise priors</subject><subject>Spatiotemporal models</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Variational Bayes</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtP3DAURq2qVXmUv1BZYlE2SX39iO0lIEorIXXTri0nvkEZJfFgJ0jz7_FooJVYwOp6cb778CGEAquBQfN9U8-4pjhM_h5rzpitgddM8g_kGJhVlVWaf9y_lagMgD0iJzlvWAFBms_kqER4wwU7JuaSXvkd5sHPNG_9MsQFp21MfqRTDDjSPib6iGlHR5_ukQa_eJpxyV_Ip96PGc-e6yn5--Pmz_XP6u737a_ry7uqk02zVFpC76UAptsOvbFoWoVSWY6aWdvIoBFbHVrb9LIFH2SQxjda2b4NLVNKnJJvh77bFB9WzIubhtzhOPoZ45qdLs0ECG3eJ4UAI7Rmhbx4k4RGAxdccVHQ81foJq5pLhcXCqQwxvD9kuZAdSnmnLB321TkpJ0D5vbG3Mb9N-b2xhxwV4yV6NfnAWs7YfgXfFFUgKsDgOWXHwdMLncDzh2GIWG3uBCH96c8Af6Tqjo</recordid><startdate>20100415</startdate><enddate>20100415</enddate><creator>Harrison, L.M.</creator><creator>Green, G.G.R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100415</creationdate><title>A Bayesian spatiotemporal model for very large data sets</title><author>Harrison, L.M. ; Green, G.G.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Conditional autoregressive priors</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Gaussian Markov random fields</topic><topic>Graph–Laplacian</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Normal Distribution</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Spatially-informed voxel-wise priors</topic><topic>Spatiotemporal models</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Variational Bayes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harrison, L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, G.G.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harrison, L.M.</au><au>Green, G.G.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Bayesian spatiotemporal model for very large data sets</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2010-04-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1126</spage><epage>1141</epage><pages>1126-1141</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>Functional MRI provides a unique perspective of neuronal organization; however, these data include many complex sources of spatiotemporal variability, which require spatial preprocessing and statistical analysis. For the latter, Bayesian models provide a promising alternative to classical inference, which uses results from Gaussian random field theory to assess the significance of spatially correlated statistic images. A Bayesian approach generalizes the application of these ideas in that (1) random fields are used to model all spatial parameters, not solely observation error, (2) their smoothness is optimized, and (3) a broader class of models can be compared. The main problem, however, is computational, due to the large number of voxels in a brain volume. Sampling methods are time-consuming; however, approximate inference using variational Bayes (VB) offers a principled and transparent way to specify assumptions necessary for computational tractability. Penny et al. (2005b) described such a scheme using a joint spatial prior and approximated the joint posterior density with one that factorized over voxels. However, a further computational bottleneck is encountered when evaluating the log model evidence used to compare models. This has lead to dividing a brain volume into slices and treating each independently. This amounts to approximating the spatial prior over a full volume with stacked 2D priors. That is, smoothness along the z-axis is not included in the model. Here we describe a VB scheme that approximates the zero mean joint spatial prior with a non-zero mean empirical prior that factors over voxels, thereby overcoming this problem. We do this by modifying the original VB algorithm of Penny et al. using the conditional form of a so-called conditional autoregressive (CAR) prior to update a marginal prior over voxels. We refer to this as a spatially-informed voxel-wise prior (SVP) and use them to spatially regularise general linear model (GLM) and autoregressive (AR) coefficients (over time to model serial correlations). This algorithm scales more favourably with the number of voxels providing a truly 3D spatiotemporal model over volumes containing tens of thousands of voxels. We compare the scaling of compute times with the number of voxels and performance with a joint prior applied to synthetic and single-subject data.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20026230</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.042</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-8119 |
ispartof | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2010-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1126-1141 |
issn | 1053-8119 1095-9572 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745931378 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Algorithms Approximation Bayes Theorem Bayesian analysis Brain - physiology Computation Computer Simulation Conditional autoregressive priors Correlation Economic models Estimates fMRI Gaussian Markov random fields Graph–Laplacian Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Inference Linear Models Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Mathematical models Models, Statistical Normal Distribution Random variables Regression Analysis Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Spatially-informed voxel-wise priors Spatiotemporal models Time Factors Variational Bayes |
title | A Bayesian spatiotemporal model for very large data sets |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A21%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Bayesian%20spatiotemporal%20model%20for%20very%20large%20data%20sets&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Harrison,%20L.M.&rft.date=2010-04-15&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1126&rft.epage=1141&rft.pages=1126-1141&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733183770%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1614388825&rft_id=info:pmid/20026230&rfr_iscdi=true |