Loading…

A Bayesian spatiotemporal model for very large data sets

Functional MRI provides a unique perspective of neuronal organization; however, these data include many complex sources of spatiotemporal variability, which require spatial preprocessing and statistical analysis. For the latter, Bayesian models provide a promising alternative to classical inference,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2010-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1126-1141
Main Authors: Harrison, L.M., Green, G.G.R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553
container_end_page 1141
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1126
container_title NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)
container_volume 50
creator Harrison, L.M.
Green, G.G.R.
description Functional MRI provides a unique perspective of neuronal organization; however, these data include many complex sources of spatiotemporal variability, which require spatial preprocessing and statistical analysis. For the latter, Bayesian models provide a promising alternative to classical inference, which uses results from Gaussian random field theory to assess the significance of spatially correlated statistic images. A Bayesian approach generalizes the application of these ideas in that (1) random fields are used to model all spatial parameters, not solely observation error, (2) their smoothness is optimized, and (3) a broader class of models can be compared. The main problem, however, is computational, due to the large number of voxels in a brain volume. Sampling methods are time-consuming; however, approximate inference using variational Bayes (VB) offers a principled and transparent way to specify assumptions necessary for computational tractability. Penny et al. (2005b) described such a scheme using a joint spatial prior and approximated the joint posterior density with one that factorized over voxels. However, a further computational bottleneck is encountered when evaluating the log model evidence used to compare models. This has lead to dividing a brain volume into slices and treating each independently. This amounts to approximating the spatial prior over a full volume with stacked 2D priors. That is, smoothness along the z-axis is not included in the model. Here we describe a VB scheme that approximates the zero mean joint spatial prior with a non-zero mean empirical prior that factors over voxels, thereby overcoming this problem. We do this by modifying the original VB algorithm of Penny et al. using the conditional form of a so-called conditional autoregressive (CAR) prior to update a marginal prior over voxels. We refer to this as a spatially-informed voxel-wise prior (SVP) and use them to spatially regularise general linear model (GLM) and autoregressive (AR) coefficients (over time to model serial correlations). This algorithm scales more favourably with the number of voxels providing a truly 3D spatiotemporal model over volumes containing tens of thousands of voxels. We compare the scaling of compute times with the number of voxels and performance with a joint prior applied to synthetic and single-subject data.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.042
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745931378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811909013317</els_id><sourcerecordid>733183770</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtP3DAURq2qVXmUv1BZYlE2SX39iO0lIEorIXXTri0nvkEZJfFgJ0jz7_FooJVYwOp6cb778CGEAquBQfN9U8-4pjhM_h5rzpitgddM8g_kGJhVlVWaf9y_lagMgD0iJzlvWAFBms_kqER4wwU7JuaSXvkd5sHPNG_9MsQFp21MfqRTDDjSPib6iGlHR5_ukQa_eJpxyV_Ip96PGc-e6yn5--Pmz_XP6u737a_ry7uqk02zVFpC76UAptsOvbFoWoVSWY6aWdvIoBFbHVrb9LIFH2SQxjda2b4NLVNKnJJvh77bFB9WzIubhtzhOPoZ45qdLs0ECG3eJ4UAI7Rmhbx4k4RGAxdccVHQ81foJq5pLhcXCqQwxvD9kuZAdSnmnLB321TkpJ0D5vbG3Mb9N-b2xhxwV4yV6NfnAWs7YfgXfFFUgKsDgOWXHwdMLncDzh2GIWG3uBCH96c8Af6Tqjo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1614388825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Bayesian spatiotemporal model for very large data sets</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Harrison, L.M. ; Green, G.G.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harrison, L.M. ; Green, G.G.R.</creatorcontrib><description>Functional MRI provides a unique perspective of neuronal organization; however, these data include many complex sources of spatiotemporal variability, which require spatial preprocessing and statistical analysis. For the latter, Bayesian models provide a promising alternative to classical inference, which uses results from Gaussian random field theory to assess the significance of spatially correlated statistic images. A Bayesian approach generalizes the application of these ideas in that (1) random fields are used to model all spatial parameters, not solely observation error, (2) their smoothness is optimized, and (3) a broader class of models can be compared. The main problem, however, is computational, due to the large number of voxels in a brain volume. Sampling methods are time-consuming; however, approximate inference using variational Bayes (VB) offers a principled and transparent way to specify assumptions necessary for computational tractability. Penny et al. (2005b) described such a scheme using a joint spatial prior and approximated the joint posterior density with one that factorized over voxels. However, a further computational bottleneck is encountered when evaluating the log model evidence used to compare models. This has lead to dividing a brain volume into slices and treating each independently. This amounts to approximating the spatial prior over a full volume with stacked 2D priors. That is, smoothness along the z-axis is not included in the model. Here we describe a VB scheme that approximates the zero mean joint spatial prior with a non-zero mean empirical prior that factors over voxels, thereby overcoming this problem. We do this by modifying the original VB algorithm of Penny et al. using the conditional form of a so-called conditional autoregressive (CAR) prior to update a marginal prior over voxels. We refer to this as a spatially-informed voxel-wise prior (SVP) and use them to spatially regularise general linear model (GLM) and autoregressive (AR) coefficients (over time to model serial correlations). This algorithm scales more favourably with the number of voxels providing a truly 3D spatiotemporal model over volumes containing tens of thousands of voxels. We compare the scaling of compute times with the number of voxels and performance with a joint prior applied to synthetic and single-subject data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20026230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Approximation ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Brain - physiology ; Computation ; Computer Simulation ; Conditional autoregressive priors ; Correlation ; Economic models ; Estimates ; fMRI ; Gaussian Markov random fields ; Graph–Laplacian ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Inference ; Linear Models ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Mathematical models ; Models, Statistical ; Normal Distribution ; Random variables ; Regression Analysis ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Spatially-informed voxel-wise priors ; Spatiotemporal models ; Time Factors ; Variational Bayes</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2010-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1126-1141</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 15, 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20026230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harrison, L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, G.G.R.</creatorcontrib><title>A Bayesian spatiotemporal model for very large data sets</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>Functional MRI provides a unique perspective of neuronal organization; however, these data include many complex sources of spatiotemporal variability, which require spatial preprocessing and statistical analysis. For the latter, Bayesian models provide a promising alternative to classical inference, which uses results from Gaussian random field theory to assess the significance of spatially correlated statistic images. A Bayesian approach generalizes the application of these ideas in that (1) random fields are used to model all spatial parameters, not solely observation error, (2) their smoothness is optimized, and (3) a broader class of models can be compared. The main problem, however, is computational, due to the large number of voxels in a brain volume. Sampling methods are time-consuming; however, approximate inference using variational Bayes (VB) offers a principled and transparent way to specify assumptions necessary for computational tractability. Penny et al. (2005b) described such a scheme using a joint spatial prior and approximated the joint posterior density with one that factorized over voxels. However, a further computational bottleneck is encountered when evaluating the log model evidence used to compare models. This has lead to dividing a brain volume into slices and treating each independently. This amounts to approximating the spatial prior over a full volume with stacked 2D priors. That is, smoothness along the z-axis is not included in the model. Here we describe a VB scheme that approximates the zero mean joint spatial prior with a non-zero mean empirical prior that factors over voxels, thereby overcoming this problem. We do this by modifying the original VB algorithm of Penny et al. using the conditional form of a so-called conditional autoregressive (CAR) prior to update a marginal prior over voxels. We refer to this as a spatially-informed voxel-wise prior (SVP) and use them to spatially regularise general linear model (GLM) and autoregressive (AR) coefficients (over time to model serial correlations). This algorithm scales more favourably with the number of voxels providing a truly 3D spatiotemporal model over volumes containing tens of thousands of voxels. We compare the scaling of compute times with the number of voxels and performance with a joint prior applied to synthetic and single-subject data.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Conditional autoregressive priors</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Gaussian Markov random fields</subject><subject>Graph–Laplacian</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Normal Distribution</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Spatially-informed voxel-wise priors</subject><subject>Spatiotemporal models</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Variational Bayes</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtP3DAURq2qVXmUv1BZYlE2SX39iO0lIEorIXXTri0nvkEZJfFgJ0jz7_FooJVYwOp6cb778CGEAquBQfN9U8-4pjhM_h5rzpitgddM8g_kGJhVlVWaf9y_lagMgD0iJzlvWAFBms_kqER4wwU7JuaSXvkd5sHPNG_9MsQFp21MfqRTDDjSPib6iGlHR5_ukQa_eJpxyV_Ip96PGc-e6yn5--Pmz_XP6u737a_ry7uqk02zVFpC76UAptsOvbFoWoVSWY6aWdvIoBFbHVrb9LIFH2SQxjda2b4NLVNKnJJvh77bFB9WzIubhtzhOPoZ45qdLs0ECG3eJ4UAI7Rmhbx4k4RGAxdccVHQ81foJq5pLhcXCqQwxvD9kuZAdSnmnLB321TkpJ0D5vbG3Mb9N-b2xhxwV4yV6NfnAWs7YfgXfFFUgKsDgOWXHwdMLncDzh2GIWG3uBCH96c8Af6Tqjo</recordid><startdate>20100415</startdate><enddate>20100415</enddate><creator>Harrison, L.M.</creator><creator>Green, G.G.R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100415</creationdate><title>A Bayesian spatiotemporal model for very large data sets</title><author>Harrison, L.M. ; Green, G.G.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Conditional autoregressive priors</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Gaussian Markov random fields</topic><topic>Graph–Laplacian</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Normal Distribution</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Spatially-informed voxel-wise priors</topic><topic>Spatiotemporal models</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Variational Bayes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harrison, L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, G.G.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harrison, L.M.</au><au>Green, G.G.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Bayesian spatiotemporal model for very large data sets</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2010-04-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1126</spage><epage>1141</epage><pages>1126-1141</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>Functional MRI provides a unique perspective of neuronal organization; however, these data include many complex sources of spatiotemporal variability, which require spatial preprocessing and statistical analysis. For the latter, Bayesian models provide a promising alternative to classical inference, which uses results from Gaussian random field theory to assess the significance of spatially correlated statistic images. A Bayesian approach generalizes the application of these ideas in that (1) random fields are used to model all spatial parameters, not solely observation error, (2) their smoothness is optimized, and (3) a broader class of models can be compared. The main problem, however, is computational, due to the large number of voxels in a brain volume. Sampling methods are time-consuming; however, approximate inference using variational Bayes (VB) offers a principled and transparent way to specify assumptions necessary for computational tractability. Penny et al. (2005b) described such a scheme using a joint spatial prior and approximated the joint posterior density with one that factorized over voxels. However, a further computational bottleneck is encountered when evaluating the log model evidence used to compare models. This has lead to dividing a brain volume into slices and treating each independently. This amounts to approximating the spatial prior over a full volume with stacked 2D priors. That is, smoothness along the z-axis is not included in the model. Here we describe a VB scheme that approximates the zero mean joint spatial prior with a non-zero mean empirical prior that factors over voxels, thereby overcoming this problem. We do this by modifying the original VB algorithm of Penny et al. using the conditional form of a so-called conditional autoregressive (CAR) prior to update a marginal prior over voxels. We refer to this as a spatially-informed voxel-wise prior (SVP) and use them to spatially regularise general linear model (GLM) and autoregressive (AR) coefficients (over time to model serial correlations). This algorithm scales more favourably with the number of voxels providing a truly 3D spatiotemporal model over volumes containing tens of thousands of voxels. We compare the scaling of compute times with the number of voxels and performance with a joint prior applied to synthetic and single-subject data.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20026230</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.042</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8119
ispartof NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2010-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1126-1141
issn 1053-8119
1095-9572
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745931378
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Algorithms
Approximation
Bayes Theorem
Bayesian analysis
Brain - physiology
Computation
Computer Simulation
Conditional autoregressive priors
Correlation
Economic models
Estimates
fMRI
Gaussian Markov random fields
Graph–Laplacian
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Inference
Linear Models
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Mathematical models
Models, Statistical
Normal Distribution
Random variables
Regression Analysis
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Spatially-informed voxel-wise priors
Spatiotemporal models
Time Factors
Variational Bayes
title A Bayesian spatiotemporal model for very large data sets
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A21%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Bayesian%20spatiotemporal%20model%20for%20very%20large%20data%20sets&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Harrison,%20L.M.&rft.date=2010-04-15&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1126&rft.epage=1141&rft.pages=1126-1141&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733183770%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-741fa43107bcea89e8b5e4592e709964d7eeb7db96f4b1ad4d48a6759fbdb0553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1614388825&rft_id=info:pmid/20026230&rfr_iscdi=true