Loading…

Fate and transport of chlormequat in subsurface environments

Background, aim and scope Chlormequat (Cq) is a plant growth regulator used throughout the world. Despite indications of possible effects of Cq on mammalian health and fertility, little is known about its fate and transport in subsurface environments. The aim of this study was to determine the fate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science and pollution research international 2010-07, Vol.17 (6), p.1245-1256
Main Authors: Juhler, René K, Henriksen, Trine, Rosenbom, Annette E, Kjaer, Jeanne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-74d8bbb0ec1004c3a52fcc0d8a8c16d25f9799a452ffd3c8921b353e6453f9fd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-74d8bbb0ec1004c3a52fcc0d8a8c16d25f9799a452ffd3c8921b353e6453f9fd3
container_end_page 1256
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1245
container_title Environmental science and pollution research international
container_volume 17
creator Juhler, René K
Henriksen, Trine
Rosenbom, Annette E
Kjaer, Jeanne
description Background, aim and scope Chlormequat (Cq) is a plant growth regulator used throughout the world. Despite indications of possible effects of Cq on mammalian health and fertility, little is known about its fate and transport in subsurface environments. The aim of this study was to determine the fate of Cq in three Danish subsurface environments, in particular with respect to retardation of Cq in the A and B horizons and the risk of leaching to the aquatic environment. The study combines laboratory fate studies of Cq sorption and dissipation with field scale monitoring of the concentration of Cq in the subsurface environment, including artificial drains. Materials and methods For the laboratory studies, soil was sampled from the A and B horizons at three Danish field research stations—two clayey till sites and one coarse sandy site. Adsorption and desorption were described by means of the distribution coefficient (K d) and the Freundlich adsorption coefficient (K F,ads). The dissipation rate was estimated using soil sampled from the A horizon at the three sites. Half life (DT₅₀) was calculated by approximation to first-order kinetics. A total of 282 water samples were collected at the sites under the field monitoring study— groundwater from shallow monitoring screens located 1.5-4.5 m b.g.s. at all three sites as well as drainage water from the two clayey sites and porewater from suction cups at the sandy site, in both cases from 1 m b.g.s. The samples were analysed using LC-MS/MS. The field monitoring study was supported by hydrological modelling, which provided an overall water balance and a description of soil water dynamics in the vadose zone. Results The DT₅₀ of Cq from the A horizon ranged from 21 to 61 days. The Cq concentration-dependant distribution coefficient (K d) ranged from 2 to 566 cm³/g (median 18 cm³/g), and was lowest in the sandy soil (both the A and B horizons). The K F,ads ranged from 3 to 23 (µg¹ ⁻ ¹/n (cm³)¹/n g⁻¹) with the exponent (1/n) ranging from 0.44 to 0.87, and was lowest in the soil from the sandy site. Desorption of Cq was very low for the soil types investigated (
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11356-010-0303-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746012039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2064632821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-74d8bbb0ec1004c3a52fcc0d8a8c16d25f9799a452ffd3c8921b353e6453f9fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMotlZ_gBsd3LgavXnMI-BGilWh4EK7DplMUqd0kjaZEfz3pkxVcOHqwr3fOfdwEDrHcIMBituAMc3yFDCkQIGm2QEa4xyztGCcH6IxcMZSTBkboZMQVgAEOCmO0YgALoqC8zG6m8lOJ9LWSeelDRvnu8SZRL2vnW_1tpdd0tgk9FXovZFKJ9p-NN7ZVtsunKIjI9dBn-3nBC1mD2_Tp3T-8vg8vZ-nipG8i2nqsqoq0CqmZorKjBiloC5lqXBek8zwmEWyuDY1VSUnuKIZ1TnLqOFxNUHXg-_Gu22vQyfaJii9XkurXR9EwXLABCiP5NUfcuV6b2M4kUFRcsqBRggPkPIuBK-N2Pimlf5TYBC7YsVQrIjFil2xIouai71xX7W6_lF8NxkBMgAhnuxS-9_P_7leDiIjnZBL3wSxeI2WFHCZA-ScfgEz3Yud</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>507893903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fate and transport of chlormequat in subsurface environments</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><creator>Juhler, René K ; Henriksen, Trine ; Rosenbom, Annette E ; Kjaer, Jeanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Juhler, René K ; Henriksen, Trine ; Rosenbom, Annette E ; Kjaer, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><description>Background, aim and scope Chlormequat (Cq) is a plant growth regulator used throughout the world. Despite indications of possible effects of Cq on mammalian health and fertility, little is known about its fate and transport in subsurface environments. The aim of this study was to determine the fate of Cq in three Danish subsurface environments, in particular with respect to retardation of Cq in the A and B horizons and the risk of leaching to the aquatic environment. The study combines laboratory fate studies of Cq sorption and dissipation with field scale monitoring of the concentration of Cq in the subsurface environment, including artificial drains. Materials and methods For the laboratory studies, soil was sampled from the A and B horizons at three Danish field research stations—two clayey till sites and one coarse sandy site. Adsorption and desorption were described by means of the distribution coefficient (K d) and the Freundlich adsorption coefficient (K F,ads). The dissipation rate was estimated using soil sampled from the A horizon at the three sites. Half life (DT₅₀) was calculated by approximation to first-order kinetics. A total of 282 water samples were collected at the sites under the field monitoring study— groundwater from shallow monitoring screens located 1.5-4.5 m b.g.s. at all three sites as well as drainage water from the two clayey sites and porewater from suction cups at the sandy site, in both cases from 1 m b.g.s. The samples were analysed using LC-MS/MS. The field monitoring study was supported by hydrological modelling, which provided an overall water balance and a description of soil water dynamics in the vadose zone. Results The DT₅₀ of Cq from the A horizon ranged from 21 to 61 days. The Cq concentration-dependant distribution coefficient (K d) ranged from 2 to 566 cm³/g (median 18 cm³/g), and was lowest in the sandy soil (both the A and B horizons). The K F,ads ranged from 3 to 23 (µg¹ ⁻ ¹/n (cm³)¹/n g⁻¹) with the exponent (1/n) ranging from 0.44 to 0.87, and was lowest in the soil from the sandy site. Desorption of Cq was very low for the soil types investigated (&lt;10%w). Cq in concentrations exceeding the detection limit (0.01 µg/L) was only found in two of the 282 water samples, the highest concentration being 0.017 µg/L. Discussion That sorption was highest in the clayey till soils is attributable to the composition of the soil, the soil clay and iron content being the main determinant of Cq sorption in both the A and B horizons of the subsurface environment. Cq was not detected in concentrations exceeding the detection limit in either the groundwater or the porewater at the sandy site. The only two samples in which Cq was detected were drainage water samples from the two clayey till sites. The presence of Cq here was probably attributable to the hydrogeological setting as water flow at the two clayey till sites is dominated by macropore flow and less by the flow in the low permeability matrix. In contrast, water flow at the sandy site is dominated by matrix flow in the high permeability matrix, with negligible macropore flow. Given the characteristics of these field sites, Cq adsorption and desorption can be expected to be controlled by the clay composition and content and the iron content. Combining these observations with the findings of the sorption and dissipation studies indicates that the key determinant of Cq retardation and fate in the soil is sorption characteristics and bioavailability. Conclusions The leaching risk of Cq was negligible at the clayey till and sandy sites investigated. The adsorption and desorption experiments indicated that absorption of Cq was high at all three sites, in particular at the clayey till sites, and that desorption was generally very limited. The study indicates that leaching of Cq to the groundwater is hindered by sorption and dissipation. The detection of Cq in drainage water at the clayey till sites and the evidence for rapid transport through macropores indicate that heavy precipitation events may cause pulses of Cq. Recommendations and perspectives The present study is the first to indicate that the risk of Cq leaching to the groundwater and surface water is low. Prior to any generalisation of the present results, the fate of Cq needs to be studied in other soil types, application regimes and climatic conditions to determine the Cq retardation capacity of the soils. The study identifies bioavailability and heavy precipitation events as important factors when assessing the risk of Cq contamination of the aquatic environment. The possible effects of future climate change need to be considered when assessing whether or not Cq poses an environmental risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-010-0303-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20177799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Aquatic environment ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Bioavailability ; CCC ; Chloride ; chlormequat ; Chlormequat - analysis ; Chlormequat - chemistry ; Chlormequat - metabolism ; Chlorocholine chloride ; Clay ; Climate change ; Climatic conditions ; Contaminated sediments ; Contamination ; Cycocel ; Desorption ; Drainage ; Drainage water ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental risk ; Fertility ; Fresh Water - chemistry ; Freundlich isotherm ; Geology ; Groundwater ; Growth regulators ; Kinetics ; Laboratories ; Leaching ; Membrane permeability ; Moisture content ; Permeability ; Pesticides ; Plant growth ; Plant Growth Regulators - analysis ; Plant Growth Regulators - chemistry ; Plant Growth Regulators - metabolism ; Pollution ; Pore water ; Precipitation ; quaternary ammonium herbicides ; Research Article ; Sandy soils ; soil ; Soil adsorption ; Soil fertility ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; Soil Pollutants - chemistry ; Soil Pollutants - metabolism ; Soil pollution ; Soil types ; Soil water ; Soils ; Sorption ; Studies ; Surface water ; Surface-groundwater relations ; Vadose water ; Waste Water Technology ; Water analysis ; Water balance ; Water flow ; Water Management ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism ; Water Pollution Control ; Water sampling</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2010-07, Vol.17 (6), p.1245-1256</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-74d8bbb0ec1004c3a52fcc0d8a8c16d25f9799a452ffd3c8921b353e6453f9fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-74d8bbb0ec1004c3a52fcc0d8a8c16d25f9799a452ffd3c8921b353e6453f9fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/507893903/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/507893903?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20177799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Juhler, René K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriksen, Trine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbom, Annette E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjaer, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><title>Fate and transport of chlormequat in subsurface environments</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>Background, aim and scope Chlormequat (Cq) is a plant growth regulator used throughout the world. Despite indications of possible effects of Cq on mammalian health and fertility, little is known about its fate and transport in subsurface environments. The aim of this study was to determine the fate of Cq in three Danish subsurface environments, in particular with respect to retardation of Cq in the A and B horizons and the risk of leaching to the aquatic environment. The study combines laboratory fate studies of Cq sorption and dissipation with field scale monitoring of the concentration of Cq in the subsurface environment, including artificial drains. Materials and methods For the laboratory studies, soil was sampled from the A and B horizons at three Danish field research stations—two clayey till sites and one coarse sandy site. Adsorption and desorption were described by means of the distribution coefficient (K d) and the Freundlich adsorption coefficient (K F,ads). The dissipation rate was estimated using soil sampled from the A horizon at the three sites. Half life (DT₅₀) was calculated by approximation to first-order kinetics. A total of 282 water samples were collected at the sites under the field monitoring study— groundwater from shallow monitoring screens located 1.5-4.5 m b.g.s. at all three sites as well as drainage water from the two clayey sites and porewater from suction cups at the sandy site, in both cases from 1 m b.g.s. The samples were analysed using LC-MS/MS. The field monitoring study was supported by hydrological modelling, which provided an overall water balance and a description of soil water dynamics in the vadose zone. Results The DT₅₀ of Cq from the A horizon ranged from 21 to 61 days. The Cq concentration-dependant distribution coefficient (K d) ranged from 2 to 566 cm³/g (median 18 cm³/g), and was lowest in the sandy soil (both the A and B horizons). The K F,ads ranged from 3 to 23 (µg¹ ⁻ ¹/n (cm³)¹/n g⁻¹) with the exponent (1/n) ranging from 0.44 to 0.87, and was lowest in the soil from the sandy site. Desorption of Cq was very low for the soil types investigated (&lt;10%w). Cq in concentrations exceeding the detection limit (0.01 µg/L) was only found in two of the 282 water samples, the highest concentration being 0.017 µg/L. Discussion That sorption was highest in the clayey till soils is attributable to the composition of the soil, the soil clay and iron content being the main determinant of Cq sorption in both the A and B horizons of the subsurface environment. Cq was not detected in concentrations exceeding the detection limit in either the groundwater or the porewater at the sandy site. The only two samples in which Cq was detected were drainage water samples from the two clayey till sites. The presence of Cq here was probably attributable to the hydrogeological setting as water flow at the two clayey till sites is dominated by macropore flow and less by the flow in the low permeability matrix. In contrast, water flow at the sandy site is dominated by matrix flow in the high permeability matrix, with negligible macropore flow. Given the characteristics of these field sites, Cq adsorption and desorption can be expected to be controlled by the clay composition and content and the iron content. Combining these observations with the findings of the sorption and dissipation studies indicates that the key determinant of Cq retardation and fate in the soil is sorption characteristics and bioavailability. Conclusions The leaching risk of Cq was negligible at the clayey till and sandy sites investigated. The adsorption and desorption experiments indicated that absorption of Cq was high at all three sites, in particular at the clayey till sites, and that desorption was generally very limited. The study indicates that leaching of Cq to the groundwater is hindered by sorption and dissipation. The detection of Cq in drainage water at the clayey till sites and the evidence for rapid transport through macropores indicate that heavy precipitation events may cause pulses of Cq. Recommendations and perspectives The present study is the first to indicate that the risk of Cq leaching to the groundwater and surface water is low. Prior to any generalisation of the present results, the fate of Cq needs to be studied in other soil types, application regimes and climatic conditions to determine the Cq retardation capacity of the soils. The study identifies bioavailability and heavy precipitation events as important factors when assessing the risk of Cq contamination of the aquatic environment. The possible effects of future climate change need to be considered when assessing whether or not Cq poses an environmental risk.</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Aquatic environment</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>CCC</subject><subject>Chloride</subject><subject>chlormequat</subject><subject>Chlormequat - analysis</subject><subject>Chlormequat - chemistry</subject><subject>Chlormequat - metabolism</subject><subject>Chlorocholine chloride</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Contaminated sediments</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Cycocel</subject><subject>Desorption</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Drainage water</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fresh Water - chemistry</subject><subject>Freundlich isotherm</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Growth regulators</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Membrane permeability</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant Growth Regulators - analysis</subject><subject>Plant Growth Regulators - chemistry</subject><subject>Plant Growth Regulators - metabolism</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pore water</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>quaternary ammonium herbicides</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Sandy soils</subject><subject>soil</subject><subject>Soil adsorption</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - chemistry</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - metabolism</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sorption</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Surface-groundwater relations</subject><subject>Vadose water</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>Water balance</subject><subject>Water flow</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMotlZ_gBsd3LgavXnMI-BGilWh4EK7DplMUqd0kjaZEfz3pkxVcOHqwr3fOfdwEDrHcIMBituAMc3yFDCkQIGm2QEa4xyztGCcH6IxcMZSTBkboZMQVgAEOCmO0YgALoqC8zG6m8lOJ9LWSeelDRvnu8SZRL2vnW_1tpdd0tgk9FXovZFKJ9p-NN7ZVtsunKIjI9dBn-3nBC1mD2_Tp3T-8vg8vZ-nipG8i2nqsqoq0CqmZorKjBiloC5lqXBek8zwmEWyuDY1VSUnuKIZ1TnLqOFxNUHXg-_Gu22vQyfaJii9XkurXR9EwXLABCiP5NUfcuV6b2M4kUFRcsqBRggPkPIuBK-N2Pimlf5TYBC7YsVQrIjFil2xIouai71xX7W6_lF8NxkBMgAhnuxS-9_P_7leDiIjnZBL3wSxeI2WFHCZA-ScfgEz3Yud</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Juhler, René K</creator><creator>Henriksen, Trine</creator><creator>Rosenbom, Annette E</creator><creator>Kjaer, Jeanne</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Fate and transport of chlormequat in subsurface environments</title><author>Juhler, René K ; Henriksen, Trine ; Rosenbom, Annette E ; Kjaer, Jeanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-74d8bbb0ec1004c3a52fcc0d8a8c16d25f9799a452ffd3c8921b353e6453f9fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Aquatic environment</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>CCC</topic><topic>Chloride</topic><topic>chlormequat</topic><topic>Chlormequat - analysis</topic><topic>Chlormequat - chemistry</topic><topic>Chlormequat - metabolism</topic><topic>Chlorocholine chloride</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Contaminated sediments</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Cycocel</topic><topic>Desorption</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Drainage water</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fresh Water - chemistry</topic><topic>Freundlich isotherm</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Growth regulators</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Membrane permeability</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant Growth Regulators - analysis</topic><topic>Plant Growth Regulators - chemistry</topic><topic>Plant Growth Regulators - metabolism</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pore water</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>quaternary ammonium herbicides</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Sandy soils</topic><topic>soil</topic><topic>Soil adsorption</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - chemistry</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - metabolism</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sorption</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Surface-groundwater relations</topic><topic>Vadose water</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>Water balance</topic><topic>Water flow</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Juhler, René K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriksen, Trine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbom, Annette E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjaer, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Juhler, René K</au><au>Henriksen, Trine</au><au>Rosenbom, Annette E</au><au>Kjaer, Jeanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fate and transport of chlormequat in subsurface environments</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1245</spage><epage>1256</epage><pages>1245-1256</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>Background, aim and scope Chlormequat (Cq) is a plant growth regulator used throughout the world. Despite indications of possible effects of Cq on mammalian health and fertility, little is known about its fate and transport in subsurface environments. The aim of this study was to determine the fate of Cq in three Danish subsurface environments, in particular with respect to retardation of Cq in the A and B horizons and the risk of leaching to the aquatic environment. The study combines laboratory fate studies of Cq sorption and dissipation with field scale monitoring of the concentration of Cq in the subsurface environment, including artificial drains. Materials and methods For the laboratory studies, soil was sampled from the A and B horizons at three Danish field research stations—two clayey till sites and one coarse sandy site. Adsorption and desorption were described by means of the distribution coefficient (K d) and the Freundlich adsorption coefficient (K F,ads). The dissipation rate was estimated using soil sampled from the A horizon at the three sites. Half life (DT₅₀) was calculated by approximation to first-order kinetics. A total of 282 water samples were collected at the sites under the field monitoring study— groundwater from shallow monitoring screens located 1.5-4.5 m b.g.s. at all three sites as well as drainage water from the two clayey sites and porewater from suction cups at the sandy site, in both cases from 1 m b.g.s. The samples were analysed using LC-MS/MS. The field monitoring study was supported by hydrological modelling, which provided an overall water balance and a description of soil water dynamics in the vadose zone. Results The DT₅₀ of Cq from the A horizon ranged from 21 to 61 days. The Cq concentration-dependant distribution coefficient (K d) ranged from 2 to 566 cm³/g (median 18 cm³/g), and was lowest in the sandy soil (both the A and B horizons). The K F,ads ranged from 3 to 23 (µg¹ ⁻ ¹/n (cm³)¹/n g⁻¹) with the exponent (1/n) ranging from 0.44 to 0.87, and was lowest in the soil from the sandy site. Desorption of Cq was very low for the soil types investigated (&lt;10%w). Cq in concentrations exceeding the detection limit (0.01 µg/L) was only found in two of the 282 water samples, the highest concentration being 0.017 µg/L. Discussion That sorption was highest in the clayey till soils is attributable to the composition of the soil, the soil clay and iron content being the main determinant of Cq sorption in both the A and B horizons of the subsurface environment. Cq was not detected in concentrations exceeding the detection limit in either the groundwater or the porewater at the sandy site. The only two samples in which Cq was detected were drainage water samples from the two clayey till sites. The presence of Cq here was probably attributable to the hydrogeological setting as water flow at the two clayey till sites is dominated by macropore flow and less by the flow in the low permeability matrix. In contrast, water flow at the sandy site is dominated by matrix flow in the high permeability matrix, with negligible macropore flow. Given the characteristics of these field sites, Cq adsorption and desorption can be expected to be controlled by the clay composition and content and the iron content. Combining these observations with the findings of the sorption and dissipation studies indicates that the key determinant of Cq retardation and fate in the soil is sorption characteristics and bioavailability. Conclusions The leaching risk of Cq was negligible at the clayey till and sandy sites investigated. The adsorption and desorption experiments indicated that absorption of Cq was high at all three sites, in particular at the clayey till sites, and that desorption was generally very limited. The study indicates that leaching of Cq to the groundwater is hindered by sorption and dissipation. The detection of Cq in drainage water at the clayey till sites and the evidence for rapid transport through macropores indicate that heavy precipitation events may cause pulses of Cq. Recommendations and perspectives The present study is the first to indicate that the risk of Cq leaching to the groundwater and surface water is low. Prior to any generalisation of the present results, the fate of Cq needs to be studied in other soil types, application regimes and climatic conditions to determine the Cq retardation capacity of the soils. The study identifies bioavailability and heavy precipitation events as important factors when assessing the risk of Cq contamination of the aquatic environment. The possible effects of future climate change need to be considered when assessing whether or not Cq poses an environmental risk.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20177799</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-010-0303-5</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0944-1344
ispartof Environmental science and pollution research international, 2010-07, Vol.17 (6), p.1245-1256
issn 0944-1344
1614-7499
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746012039
source ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List
subjects Adsorption
Aquatic environment
Aquatic Pollution
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Bioavailability
CCC
Chloride
chlormequat
Chlormequat - analysis
Chlormequat - chemistry
Chlormequat - metabolism
Chlorocholine chloride
Clay
Climate change
Climatic conditions
Contaminated sediments
Contamination
Cycocel
Desorption
Drainage
Drainage water
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecotoxicology
Environment
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Health
Environmental impact
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental risk
Fertility
Fresh Water - chemistry
Freundlich isotherm
Geology
Groundwater
Growth regulators
Kinetics
Laboratories
Leaching
Membrane permeability
Moisture content
Permeability
Pesticides
Plant growth
Plant Growth Regulators - analysis
Plant Growth Regulators - chemistry
Plant Growth Regulators - metabolism
Pollution
Pore water
Precipitation
quaternary ammonium herbicides
Research Article
Sandy soils
soil
Soil adsorption
Soil fertility
Soil Pollutants - analysis
Soil Pollutants - chemistry
Soil Pollutants - metabolism
Soil pollution
Soil types
Soil water
Soils
Sorption
Studies
Surface water
Surface-groundwater relations
Vadose water
Waste Water Technology
Water analysis
Water balance
Water flow
Water Management
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry
Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism
Water Pollution Control
Water sampling
title Fate and transport of chlormequat in subsurface environments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T23%3A48%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fate%20and%20transport%20of%20chlormequat%20in%20subsurface%20environments&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Juhler,%20Ren%C3%A9%20K&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1245&rft.epage=1256&rft.pages=1245-1256&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-010-0303-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2064632821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-74d8bbb0ec1004c3a52fcc0d8a8c16d25f9799a452ffd3c8921b353e6453f9fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=507893903&rft_id=info:pmid/20177799&rfr_iscdi=true