Improving Molecular Detection of Fungal DNA in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissues: Comparison of Five Tissue DNA Extraction Methods Using Panfungal PCR

• Published in: Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2010-06, Vol.48 (6), p.2147-2153
• Main Authors: Muñoz-Cadavid, C, Rudd, S, Zaki, S.R, Patel, M, Moser, S.A, Brandt, M.E, Gómez, B.L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; DNA, Fungal - genetics; DNA, Fungal - isolation & purification; DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - genetics; DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - isolation & purification; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Fungi - classification; Fungi - genetics; Fungi - isolation & purification; Humans; Microbiology; Mycology; Mycoses - diagnosis; Paraffin Embedding; Pathology, Molecular - methods; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tissue Fixation
• ISSN: 0095-1137; 1098-660X
• DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00459-10

DNA extraction from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues is difficult and requires special protocols in order to extract small amounts of DNA suitable for amplification. Most described methods report an amplification success rate between 60 and 80%; therefore, there is a need to improve molecular detection and identification of fungi in FFPE tissue. Eighty-one archived FFPE tissues with a positive Gomori methenamine silver (GMS) stain were evaluated using five different commercial DNA extraction kits with some modifications. Three different panfungal PCR assays were used to detect fungal DNA, and two housekeeping genes were used to assess the presence of amplifiable DNA and to detect PCR inhibitors. The sensitivities of the five extraction protocols were compared, and the quality of DNA detection (calculated for each kit as the number of housekeeping gene PCR-positive samples divided by the total number of samples) was 60 to 91% among the five protocols. The efficiencies of the three different panfungals used (calculated as the number of panfungal-PCR-positive samples divided by the number of housekeeping gene PCR-positive samples) were 58 to 93%. The panfungal PCR using internal transcribed spacer 3 (ITS3) and ITS4 primers yielded a product in most FFPE tissues. Two of the five DNA extraction kits (from TaKaRa and Qiagen) showed similar and promising results. However, one method (TaKaRa) could extract fungal DNA from 69 of the 74 FFPE tissues from which a housekeeping gene could be amplified and was also cost-effective, with a nonlaborious protocol. Factors such as sensitivity, cost, and labor will help guide the selection of the most appropriate method for the needs of each laboratory.