Loading…

Electromyographic comparison of two lumbar support mechanisms intended for automotive seating applications

Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the effect of two lumbar support mechanisms on low back muscle activity. These mechanisms were designed to provide either microadjustment or massage. In the control condition, the lumbar support mechanism was set to the full-off position...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering Journal of automobile engineering, 2001-01, Vol.215 (7), p.771-777
Main Authors: Kolich, M, Taboun, S. M., Mohamed, A. I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663
container_end_page 777
container_issue 7
container_start_page 771
container_title Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering
container_volume 215
creator Kolich, M
Taboun, S. M.
Mohamed, A. I.
description Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the effect of two lumbar support mechanisms on low back muscle activity. These mechanisms were designed to provide either microadjustment or massage. In the control condition, the lumbar support mechanism was set to the full-off position (0 mm of mechanism prominence). In this position, the foam contour supplied only a minimal amount of support. This condition, which is representative of traditional lumbar support design, was used to obtain an indication of the typical amount of low back muscle activity expected from automotive sitting. The data were collected using surface electrodes located at the L3 and L5 levels. Both lumbar support mechanisms provided a small reduction in low back muscle activity during a 1 h session. This can be contrasted with the control condition, which resulted in a small increase. In this respect, the mechanisms were considered an improvement on traditional lumbar support designs.
doi_str_mv 10.1243/0954407011528356
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746169128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1243_0954407011528356</sage_id><sourcerecordid>746169128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOI7ePQYRPbVWvruPsqwfsOBFz011JpnN0J20SVrZf2-GWVAWtC4pqp56qypFyEsG7xiX4j0MSkowwJjivVD6EdlxkKzjw8Aek9053Z3zT8mzUk7QzEi1I6fr2dma03KXjhnX22CpTcuKOZQUafK0_kp03pYJMy3buqZc6eLsLcZQlkJDrC4e3IH6lCluNS2php-OFoc1xCPFdZ2DbX6K5Tl54nEu7sX9uyffP15_u_rc3Xz99OXqw01nxdDXzipQiAP0ctITahiMh4n1koM2Qh2E75nl1qMCP4HmLaIlKGGUNBNwrcWevL3orjn92Fyp4xKKdfOM0aWtjEZqpgfWfmlP3vyX5NoY0MI08NUD8JS2HNsWI29z9UoOokFwgWxOpWTnxzWHBfPdyGA832h8eKNW8vpeF4vF2WeMNpS_6rRhwBvWXbCCR_en9T9lfwM53Z3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220685493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electromyographic comparison of two lumbar support mechanisms intended for automotive seating applications</title><source>SAGE</source><source>IMechE Titles Via Sage</source><creator>Kolich, M ; Taboun, S. M. ; Mohamed, A. I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolich, M ; Taboun, S. M. ; Mohamed, A. I.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the effect of two lumbar support mechanisms on low back muscle activity. These mechanisms were designed to provide either microadjustment or massage. In the control condition, the lumbar support mechanism was set to the full-off position (0 mm of mechanism prominence). In this position, the foam contour supplied only a minimal amount of support. This condition, which is representative of traditional lumbar support design, was used to obtain an indication of the typical amount of low back muscle activity expected from automotive sitting. The data were collected using surface electrodes located at the L3 and L5 levels. Both lumbar support mechanisms provided a small reduction in low back muscle activity during a 1 h session. This can be contrasted with the control condition, which resulted in a small increase. In this respect, the mechanisms were considered an improvement on traditional lumbar support designs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-4070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-2991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1243/0954407011528356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Applied physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanics ; Electromyography ; Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology ; Medical sciences ; Musculoskeletal system ; Riding qualities ; Transports. Aerospace. Diving. Altitude</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering, 2001-01, Vol.215 (7), p.771-777</ispartof><rights>2001 Institution of Mechanical Engineers</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Mechanical Engineering Publications, Ltd. 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1243/0954407011528356$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1243/0954407011528356$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21913,27924,27925,45059,45447,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1067102$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolich, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taboun, S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, A. I.</creatorcontrib><title>Electromyographic comparison of two lumbar support mechanisms intended for automotive seating applications</title><title>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering</title><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the effect of two lumbar support mechanisms on low back muscle activity. These mechanisms were designed to provide either microadjustment or massage. In the control condition, the lumbar support mechanism was set to the full-off position (0 mm of mechanism prominence). In this position, the foam contour supplied only a minimal amount of support. This condition, which is representative of traditional lumbar support design, was used to obtain an indication of the typical amount of low back muscle activity expected from automotive sitting. The data were collected using surface electrodes located at the L3 and L5 levels. Both lumbar support mechanisms provided a small reduction in low back muscle activity during a 1 h session. This can be contrasted with the control condition, which resulted in a small increase. In this respect, the mechanisms were considered an improvement on traditional lumbar support designs.</description><subject>Applied physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal system</subject><subject>Riding qualities</subject><subject>Transports. Aerospace. Diving. Altitude</subject><issn>0954-4070</issn><issn>2041-2991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOI7ePQYRPbVWvruPsqwfsOBFz011JpnN0J20SVrZf2-GWVAWtC4pqp56qypFyEsG7xiX4j0MSkowwJjivVD6EdlxkKzjw8Aek9053Z3zT8mzUk7QzEi1I6fr2dma03KXjhnX22CpTcuKOZQUafK0_kp03pYJMy3buqZc6eLsLcZQlkJDrC4e3IH6lCluNS2php-OFoc1xCPFdZ2DbX6K5Tl54nEu7sX9uyffP15_u_rc3Xz99OXqw01nxdDXzipQiAP0ctITahiMh4n1koM2Qh2E75nl1qMCP4HmLaIlKGGUNBNwrcWevL3orjn92Fyp4xKKdfOM0aWtjEZqpgfWfmlP3vyX5NoY0MI08NUD8JS2HNsWI29z9UoOokFwgWxOpWTnxzWHBfPdyGA832h8eKNW8vpeF4vF2WeMNpS_6rRhwBvWXbCCR_en9T9lfwM53Z3A</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Kolich, M</creator><creator>Taboun, S. M.</creator><creator>Mohamed, A. I.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Professional Engineering</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>Electromyographic comparison of two lumbar support mechanisms intended for automotive seating applications</title><author>Kolich, M ; Taboun, S. M. ; Mohamed, A. I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Applied physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal system</topic><topic>Riding qualities</topic><topic>Transports. Aerospace. Diving. Altitude</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolich, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taboun, S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, A. I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Mechanical Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolich, M</au><au>Taboun, S. M.</au><au>Mohamed, A. I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electromyographic comparison of two lumbar support mechanisms intended for automotive seating applications</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering</jtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>215</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>771</spage><epage>777</epage><pages>771-777</pages><issn>0954-4070</issn><eissn>2041-2991</eissn><abstract>Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the effect of two lumbar support mechanisms on low back muscle activity. These mechanisms were designed to provide either microadjustment or massage. In the control condition, the lumbar support mechanism was set to the full-off position (0 mm of mechanism prominence). In this position, the foam contour supplied only a minimal amount of support. This condition, which is representative of traditional lumbar support design, was used to obtain an indication of the typical amount of low back muscle activity expected from automotive sitting. The data were collected using surface electrodes located at the L3 and L5 levels. Both lumbar support mechanisms provided a small reduction in low back muscle activity during a 1 h session. This can be contrasted with the control condition, which resulted in a small increase. In this respect, the mechanisms were considered an improvement on traditional lumbar support designs.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1243/0954407011528356</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-4070
ispartof Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering, 2001-01, Vol.215 (7), p.771-777
issn 0954-4070
2041-2991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746169128
source SAGE; IMechE Titles Via Sage
subjects Applied physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Biomechanics
Electromyography
Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology
Medical sciences
Musculoskeletal system
Riding qualities
Transports. Aerospace. Diving. Altitude
title Electromyographic comparison of two lumbar support mechanisms intended for automotive seating applications
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A03%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electromyographic%20comparison%20of%20two%20lumbar%20support%20mechanisms%20intended%20for%20automotive%20seating%20applications&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Institution%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers.%20Part%20D,%20Journal%20of%20automobile%20engineering&rft.au=Kolich,%20M&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=215&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=771&rft.epage=777&rft.pages=771-777&rft.issn=0954-4070&rft.eissn=2041-2991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1243/0954407011528356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E746169128%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220685493&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1243_0954407011528356&rfr_iscdi=true