Loading…
Electromyographic comparison of two lumbar support mechanisms intended for automotive seating applications
Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the effect of two lumbar support mechanisms on low back muscle activity. These mechanisms were designed to provide either microadjustment or massage. In the control condition, the lumbar support mechanism was set to the full-off position...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering Journal of automobile engineering, 2001-01, Vol.215 (7), p.771-777 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663 |
container_end_page | 777 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 771 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering |
container_volume | 215 |
creator | Kolich, M Taboun, S. M. Mohamed, A. I. |
description | Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the effect of two lumbar support mechanisms on low back muscle activity. These mechanisms were designed to provide either microadjustment or massage. In the control condition, the lumbar support mechanism was set to the full-off position (0 mm of mechanism prominence). In this position, the foam contour supplied only a minimal amount of support. This condition, which is representative of traditional lumbar support design, was used to obtain an indication of the typical amount of low back muscle activity expected from automotive sitting. The data were collected using surface electrodes located at the L3 and L5 levels. Both lumbar support mechanisms provided a small reduction in low back muscle activity during a 1 h session. This can be contrasted with the control condition, which resulted in a small increase. In this respect, the mechanisms were considered an improvement on traditional lumbar support designs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1243/0954407011528356 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746169128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1243_0954407011528356</sage_id><sourcerecordid>746169128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOI7ePQYRPbVWvruPsqwfsOBFz011JpnN0J20SVrZf2-GWVAWtC4pqp56qypFyEsG7xiX4j0MSkowwJjivVD6EdlxkKzjw8Aek9053Z3zT8mzUk7QzEi1I6fr2dma03KXjhnX22CpTcuKOZQUafK0_kp03pYJMy3buqZc6eLsLcZQlkJDrC4e3IH6lCluNS2php-OFoc1xCPFdZ2DbX6K5Tl54nEu7sX9uyffP15_u_rc3Xz99OXqw01nxdDXzipQiAP0ctITahiMh4n1koM2Qh2E75nl1qMCP4HmLaIlKGGUNBNwrcWevL3orjn92Fyp4xKKdfOM0aWtjEZqpgfWfmlP3vyX5NoY0MI08NUD8JS2HNsWI29z9UoOokFwgWxOpWTnxzWHBfPdyGA832h8eKNW8vpeF4vF2WeMNpS_6rRhwBvWXbCCR_en9T9lfwM53Z3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220685493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electromyographic comparison of two lumbar support mechanisms intended for automotive seating applications</title><source>SAGE</source><source>IMechE Titles Via Sage</source><creator>Kolich, M ; Taboun, S. M. ; Mohamed, A. I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolich, M ; Taboun, S. M. ; Mohamed, A. I.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the effect of two lumbar support mechanisms on low back muscle activity. These mechanisms were designed to provide either microadjustment or massage. In the control condition, the lumbar support mechanism was set to the full-off position (0 mm of mechanism prominence). In this position, the foam contour supplied only a minimal amount of support. This condition, which is representative of traditional lumbar support design, was used to obtain an indication of the typical amount of low back muscle activity expected from automotive sitting. The data were collected using surface electrodes located at the L3 and L5 levels. Both lumbar support mechanisms provided a small reduction in low back muscle activity during a 1 h session. This can be contrasted with the control condition, which resulted in a small increase. In this respect, the mechanisms were considered an improvement on traditional lumbar support designs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-4070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-2991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1243/0954407011528356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Applied physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanics ; Electromyography ; Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology ; Medical sciences ; Musculoskeletal system ; Riding qualities ; Transports. Aerospace. Diving. Altitude</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering, 2001-01, Vol.215 (7), p.771-777</ispartof><rights>2001 Institution of Mechanical Engineers</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Mechanical Engineering Publications, Ltd. 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1243/0954407011528356$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1243/0954407011528356$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21913,27924,27925,45059,45447,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1067102$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolich, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taboun, S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, A. I.</creatorcontrib><title>Electromyographic comparison of two lumbar support mechanisms intended for automotive seating applications</title><title>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering</title><description>Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the effect of two lumbar support mechanisms on low back muscle activity. These mechanisms were designed to provide either microadjustment or massage. In the control condition, the lumbar support mechanism was set to the full-off position (0 mm of mechanism prominence). In this position, the foam contour supplied only a minimal amount of support. This condition, which is representative of traditional lumbar support design, was used to obtain an indication of the typical amount of low back muscle activity expected from automotive sitting. The data were collected using surface electrodes located at the L3 and L5 levels. Both lumbar support mechanisms provided a small reduction in low back muscle activity during a 1 h session. This can be contrasted with the control condition, which resulted in a small increase. In this respect, the mechanisms were considered an improvement on traditional lumbar support designs.</description><subject>Applied physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal system</subject><subject>Riding qualities</subject><subject>Transports. Aerospace. Diving. Altitude</subject><issn>0954-4070</issn><issn>2041-2991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOI7ePQYRPbVWvruPsqwfsOBFz011JpnN0J20SVrZf2-GWVAWtC4pqp56qypFyEsG7xiX4j0MSkowwJjivVD6EdlxkKzjw8Aek9053Z3zT8mzUk7QzEi1I6fr2dma03KXjhnX22CpTcuKOZQUafK0_kp03pYJMy3buqZc6eLsLcZQlkJDrC4e3IH6lCluNS2php-OFoc1xCPFdZ2DbX6K5Tl54nEu7sX9uyffP15_u_rc3Xz99OXqw01nxdDXzipQiAP0ctITahiMh4n1koM2Qh2E75nl1qMCP4HmLaIlKGGUNBNwrcWevL3orjn92Fyp4xKKdfOM0aWtjEZqpgfWfmlP3vyX5NoY0MI08NUD8JS2HNsWI29z9UoOokFwgWxOpWTnxzWHBfPdyGA832h8eKNW8vpeF4vF2WeMNpS_6rRhwBvWXbCCR_en9T9lfwM53Z3A</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Kolich, M</creator><creator>Taboun, S. M.</creator><creator>Mohamed, A. I.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Professional Engineering</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>Electromyographic comparison of two lumbar support mechanisms intended for automotive seating applications</title><author>Kolich, M ; Taboun, S. M. ; Mohamed, A. I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Applied physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal system</topic><topic>Riding qualities</topic><topic>Transports. Aerospace. Diving. Altitude</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolich, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taboun, S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, A. I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Mechanical Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolich, M</au><au>Taboun, S. M.</au><au>Mohamed, A. I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electromyographic comparison of two lumbar support mechanisms intended for automotive seating applications</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering</jtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>215</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>771</spage><epage>777</epage><pages>771-777</pages><issn>0954-4070</issn><eissn>2041-2991</eissn><abstract>Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the effect of two lumbar support mechanisms on low back muscle activity. These mechanisms were designed to provide either microadjustment or massage. In the control condition, the lumbar support mechanism was set to the full-off position (0 mm of mechanism prominence). In this position, the foam contour supplied only a minimal amount of support. This condition, which is representative of traditional lumbar support design, was used to obtain an indication of the typical amount of low back muscle activity expected from automotive sitting. The data were collected using surface electrodes located at the L3 and L5 levels. Both lumbar support mechanisms provided a small reduction in low back muscle activity during a 1 h session. This can be contrasted with the control condition, which resulted in a small increase. In this respect, the mechanisms were considered an improvement on traditional lumbar support designs.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1243/0954407011528356</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0954-4070 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering, 2001-01, Vol.215 (7), p.771-777 |
issn | 0954-4070 2041-2991 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746169128 |
source | SAGE; IMechE Titles Via Sage |
subjects | Applied physiology Biological and medical sciences Biomechanics Electromyography Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology Medical sciences Musculoskeletal system Riding qualities Transports. Aerospace. Diving. Altitude |
title | Electromyographic comparison of two lumbar support mechanisms intended for automotive seating applications |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A03%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electromyographic%20comparison%20of%20two%20lumbar%20support%20mechanisms%20intended%20for%20automotive%20seating%20applications&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Institution%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers.%20Part%20D,%20Journal%20of%20automobile%20engineering&rft.au=Kolich,%20M&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=215&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=771&rft.epage=777&rft.pages=771-777&rft.issn=0954-4070&rft.eissn=2041-2991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1243/0954407011528356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E746169128%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c505aa9084b6ba6097f0b184206735d3f81c2cfa50fb0625d3640537547b02663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220685493&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1243_0954407011528356&rfr_iscdi=true |