Loading…
Do Non-Native Invasive Fish Support Elevated Lamprey Populations?
1. Managing populations of predators and their prey to achieve conservation or resource management goals is usually technically challenging and frequently socially controversial. This is true even in the simplest ecosystems but can be made much worse when predator—prey relationships are influenced b...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of applied ecology 2010-02, Vol.47 (1), p.121-129 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-da1b2e652df16c0e81b03892edc1e3d0c601f636b653ca759a3c52571b3a1a5a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-da1b2e652df16c0e81b03892edc1e3d0c601f636b653ca759a3c52571b3a1a5a3 |
container_end_page | 129 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | The Journal of applied ecology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Inger, Richard McDonald, Robbie A. Rogowski, David Jackson, Andrew L. Parnell, Andrew Preston, S. Jane Harrod, Chris Goodwin, Claire Griffiths, David Dick, Jaimie T. A. Elwood, Robert W. Newton, Jason Bearhop, Stuart |
description | 1. Managing populations of predators and their prey to achieve conservation or resource management goals is usually technically challenging and frequently socially controversial. This is true even in the simplest ecosystems but can be made much worse when predator—prey relationships are influenced by complex interactions, such as biological invasions, population trends or animal movements. 2. Lough Neagh in Northern Ireland is a European stronghold for pollan Coregonus autumnalis, a coregonine fish and for river lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis, which feeds parasitically as an adult. Both species are of high conservation importance. Lampreys are known to consume pollan but detailed knowledge of their interactions is scant. While pollan is well known to be a landlocked species in Ireland, the life cycle of normally anadromous river lamprey in Lough Neagh has been unclear. The Lough is also a highly perturbed ecosystem, supporting several invasive, non-native fish species that have the potential to influence lamprey—pollan interactions. 3. We applied stable isotope techniques to resolve both the movement patterns of lamprey and trophic interactions in this complex community. Recognizing that stable isotope studies are often hampered by high-levels of variability and uncertainty in the systems of interest, we employed novel Bayesian mixing models, which incorporate variability and uncertainty. 4. Stable isotope analyses identified trout Salmo trutta and non-native bream Abramis brama as the main items in lamprey diet. Pollan only represented a major food source for lamprey between May and July. 5. Stable isotope ratios of carbon in tissues from 71 adult lamprey showed no evidence of marine carbon sources, strongly suggesting that Lough Neagh is host to a highly unusual, nonanadromous freshwater population. This finding marks out the Lough's lamprey population as of particular scientific interest and enhances the conservation significance of this feature of the Lough. 6. Synthesis and applications. Our Bayesian isotopic mixing models illustrate an unusual pattern of animal movement, enhancing conservation interest in an already threatened population. We have also revealed a complex relationship between lamprey and their food species that is suggestive of hyperpredation, whereby non-native species may sustain high lamprey populations that may in turn be detrimental to native pollan. Long-term conservation of lamprey and pollan in this system is likely to require ma |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01761.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746231083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25623144</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25623144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-da1b2e652df16c0e81b03892edc1e3d0c601f636b653ca759a3c52571b3a1a5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkNFKwzAUhoMoOKePIBRBvGrNSZq0uxAZc-pkTEG9DlmaYkvX1KSd7u1N3VDwytzkQL7_5-RDKAAcgT-XZQSUs5BwHkcE41GEIeEQfe6hwc_DPhpgTCBMRxgO0ZFzJfYko3SAxjcmWJg6XMi2WOtgVq-l64fbwr0Fz13TGNsG00qvZauzYC5XjdWb4Mk0XeUTpnbXx-ggl5XTJ7t7iF5vpy-T-3D-eDebjOehipMYwkzCkmjOSJYDV1insMQ0HRGdKdA0w4pjyDnlS86okgkbSaoYYQksqQTJJB2ii21vY817p10rVoVTuqpkrU3nRBJzQgGn1JNnf8jSdLb2ywlCaQwxYOahdAspa5yzOheNLVbSbgRg0ZsVpegFil6g6M2Kb7Pi00fPd_3SKVnlVtaqcD95QignDIjnrrbcR1Hpzb_7xcPTtJ98_nSbL11r7G8_6z8ax_QLHbSTfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233414105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Non-Native Invasive Fish Support Elevated Lamprey Populations?</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Inger, Richard ; McDonald, Robbie A. ; Rogowski, David ; Jackson, Andrew L. ; Parnell, Andrew ; Preston, S. Jane ; Harrod, Chris ; Goodwin, Claire ; Griffiths, David ; Dick, Jaimie T. A. ; Elwood, Robert W. ; Newton, Jason ; Bearhop, Stuart</creator><creatorcontrib>Inger, Richard ; McDonald, Robbie A. ; Rogowski, David ; Jackson, Andrew L. ; Parnell, Andrew ; Preston, S. Jane ; Harrod, Chris ; Goodwin, Claire ; Griffiths, David ; Dick, Jaimie T. A. ; Elwood, Robert W. ; Newton, Jason ; Bearhop, Stuart</creatorcontrib><description>1. Managing populations of predators and their prey to achieve conservation or resource management goals is usually technically challenging and frequently socially controversial. This is true even in the simplest ecosystems but can be made much worse when predator—prey relationships are influenced by complex interactions, such as biological invasions, population trends or animal movements. 2. Lough Neagh in Northern Ireland is a European stronghold for pollan Coregonus autumnalis, a coregonine fish and for river lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis, which feeds parasitically as an adult. Both species are of high conservation importance. Lampreys are known to consume pollan but detailed knowledge of their interactions is scant. While pollan is well known to be a landlocked species in Ireland, the life cycle of normally anadromous river lamprey in Lough Neagh has been unclear. The Lough is also a highly perturbed ecosystem, supporting several invasive, non-native fish species that have the potential to influence lamprey—pollan interactions. 3. We applied stable isotope techniques to resolve both the movement patterns of lamprey and trophic interactions in this complex community. Recognizing that stable isotope studies are often hampered by high-levels of variability and uncertainty in the systems of interest, we employed novel Bayesian mixing models, which incorporate variability and uncertainty. 4. Stable isotope analyses identified trout Salmo trutta and non-native bream Abramis brama as the main items in lamprey diet. Pollan only represented a major food source for lamprey between May and July. 5. Stable isotope ratios of carbon in tissues from 71 adult lamprey showed no evidence of marine carbon sources, strongly suggesting that Lough Neagh is host to a highly unusual, nonanadromous freshwater population. This finding marks out the Lough's lamprey population as of particular scientific interest and enhances the conservation significance of this feature of the Lough. 6. Synthesis and applications. Our Bayesian isotopic mixing models illustrate an unusual pattern of animal movement, enhancing conservation interest in an already threatened population. We have also revealed a complex relationship between lamprey and their food species that is suggestive of hyperpredation, whereby non-native species may sustain high lamprey populations that may in turn be detrimental to native pollan. Long-term conservation of lamprey and pollan in this system is likely to require management intervention, but in light of this exceptional complexity, no simple management options are currently supported. Conservation plans will require better characterization of population-level interactions and simulation modelling of interventions. More generally, our study demonstrates the importance of considering a full range of possible trophic interactions, particularly in complex ecosystems, and highlights Bayesian isotopic mixing models as powerful tools in resolving trophic relationships.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01761.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Abramis brama ; Agnatha. Pisces ; Anadromous fishes ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Bayesian ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bream ; conservation dilemma ; Coregonus autumnalis ; Diet ; Environmental conservation ; Fish ; Freshwater ; Freshwater fishes ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; hyperpredation ; Invasive Species ; Isotopes ; Lampetra fluviatilis ; Life cycles ; Marine ecology ; Natural resource management ; Nonnative species ; Petromyzontidae ; pollan ; potamodromous ; Predation ; River lamprey ; Salmo trutta ; stable isotope ; stable isotope analysis in R ; Trout ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2010-02, Vol.47 (1), p.121-129</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2010 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Feb 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-da1b2e652df16c0e81b03892edc1e3d0c601f636b653ca759a3c52571b3a1a5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-da1b2e652df16c0e81b03892edc1e3d0c601f636b653ca759a3c52571b3a1a5a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25623144$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25623144$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22362512$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Inger, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Robbie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogowski, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Andrew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parnell, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, S. Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrod, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dick, Jaimie T. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elwood, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bearhop, Stuart</creatorcontrib><title>Do Non-Native Invasive Fish Support Elevated Lamprey Populations?</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. Managing populations of predators and their prey to achieve conservation or resource management goals is usually technically challenging and frequently socially controversial. This is true even in the simplest ecosystems but can be made much worse when predator—prey relationships are influenced by complex interactions, such as biological invasions, population trends or animal movements. 2. Lough Neagh in Northern Ireland is a European stronghold for pollan Coregonus autumnalis, a coregonine fish and for river lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis, which feeds parasitically as an adult. Both species are of high conservation importance. Lampreys are known to consume pollan but detailed knowledge of their interactions is scant. While pollan is well known to be a landlocked species in Ireland, the life cycle of normally anadromous river lamprey in Lough Neagh has been unclear. The Lough is also a highly perturbed ecosystem, supporting several invasive, non-native fish species that have the potential to influence lamprey—pollan interactions. 3. We applied stable isotope techniques to resolve both the movement patterns of lamprey and trophic interactions in this complex community. Recognizing that stable isotope studies are often hampered by high-levels of variability and uncertainty in the systems of interest, we employed novel Bayesian mixing models, which incorporate variability and uncertainty. 4. Stable isotope analyses identified trout Salmo trutta and non-native bream Abramis brama as the main items in lamprey diet. Pollan only represented a major food source for lamprey between May and July. 5. Stable isotope ratios of carbon in tissues from 71 adult lamprey showed no evidence of marine carbon sources, strongly suggesting that Lough Neagh is host to a highly unusual, nonanadromous freshwater population. This finding marks out the Lough's lamprey population as of particular scientific interest and enhances the conservation significance of this feature of the Lough. 6. Synthesis and applications. Our Bayesian isotopic mixing models illustrate an unusual pattern of animal movement, enhancing conservation interest in an already threatened population. We have also revealed a complex relationship between lamprey and their food species that is suggestive of hyperpredation, whereby non-native species may sustain high lamprey populations that may in turn be detrimental to native pollan. Long-term conservation of lamprey and pollan in this system is likely to require management intervention, but in light of this exceptional complexity, no simple management options are currently supported. Conservation plans will require better characterization of population-level interactions and simulation modelling of interventions. More generally, our study demonstrates the importance of considering a full range of possible trophic interactions, particularly in complex ecosystems, and highlights Bayesian isotopic mixing models as powerful tools in resolving trophic relationships.</description><subject>Abramis brama</subject><subject>Agnatha. Pisces</subject><subject>Anadromous fishes</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Bayesian</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bream</subject><subject>conservation dilemma</subject><subject>Coregonus autumnalis</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>hyperpredation</subject><subject>Invasive Species</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Lampetra fluviatilis</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Petromyzontidae</subject><subject>pollan</subject><subject>potamodromous</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>River lamprey</subject><subject>Salmo trutta</subject><subject>stable isotope</subject><subject>stable isotope analysis in R</subject><subject>Trout</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkNFKwzAUhoMoOKePIBRBvGrNSZq0uxAZc-pkTEG9DlmaYkvX1KSd7u1N3VDwytzkQL7_5-RDKAAcgT-XZQSUs5BwHkcE41GEIeEQfe6hwc_DPhpgTCBMRxgO0ZFzJfYko3SAxjcmWJg6XMi2WOtgVq-l64fbwr0Fz13TGNsG00qvZauzYC5XjdWb4Mk0XeUTpnbXx-ggl5XTJ7t7iF5vpy-T-3D-eDebjOehipMYwkzCkmjOSJYDV1insMQ0HRGdKdA0w4pjyDnlS86okgkbSaoYYQksqQTJJB2ii21vY817p10rVoVTuqpkrU3nRBJzQgGn1JNnf8jSdLb2ywlCaQwxYOahdAspa5yzOheNLVbSbgRg0ZsVpegFil6g6M2Kb7Pi00fPd_3SKVnlVtaqcD95QignDIjnrrbcR1Hpzb_7xcPTtJ98_nSbL11r7G8_6z8ax_QLHbSTfA</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>Inger, Richard</creator><creator>McDonald, Robbie A.</creator><creator>Rogowski, David</creator><creator>Jackson, Andrew L.</creator><creator>Parnell, Andrew</creator><creator>Preston, S. Jane</creator><creator>Harrod, Chris</creator><creator>Goodwin, Claire</creator><creator>Griffiths, David</creator><creator>Dick, Jaimie T. A.</creator><creator>Elwood, Robert W.</creator><creator>Newton, Jason</creator><creator>Bearhop, Stuart</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>Do Non-Native Invasive Fish Support Elevated Lamprey Populations?</title><author>Inger, Richard ; McDonald, Robbie A. ; Rogowski, David ; Jackson, Andrew L. ; Parnell, Andrew ; Preston, S. Jane ; Harrod, Chris ; Goodwin, Claire ; Griffiths, David ; Dick, Jaimie T. A. ; Elwood, Robert W. ; Newton, Jason ; Bearhop, Stuart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-da1b2e652df16c0e81b03892edc1e3d0c601f636b653ca759a3c52571b3a1a5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abramis brama</topic><topic>Agnatha. Pisces</topic><topic>Anadromous fishes</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Bayesian</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bream</topic><topic>conservation dilemma</topic><topic>Coregonus autumnalis</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>hyperpredation</topic><topic>Invasive Species</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Lampetra fluviatilis</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Petromyzontidae</topic><topic>pollan</topic><topic>potamodromous</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>River lamprey</topic><topic>Salmo trutta</topic><topic>stable isotope</topic><topic>stable isotope analysis in R</topic><topic>Trout</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Inger, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Robbie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogowski, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Andrew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parnell, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, S. Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrod, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dick, Jaimie T. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elwood, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bearhop, Stuart</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Inger, Richard</au><au>McDonald, Robbie A.</au><au>Rogowski, David</au><au>Jackson, Andrew L.</au><au>Parnell, Andrew</au><au>Preston, S. Jane</au><au>Harrod, Chris</au><au>Goodwin, Claire</au><au>Griffiths, David</au><au>Dick, Jaimie T. A.</au><au>Elwood, Robert W.</au><au>Newton, Jason</au><au>Bearhop, Stuart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Non-Native Invasive Fish Support Elevated Lamprey Populations?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>121-129</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>1. Managing populations of predators and their prey to achieve conservation or resource management goals is usually technically challenging and frequently socially controversial. This is true even in the simplest ecosystems but can be made much worse when predator—prey relationships are influenced by complex interactions, such as biological invasions, population trends or animal movements. 2. Lough Neagh in Northern Ireland is a European stronghold for pollan Coregonus autumnalis, a coregonine fish and for river lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis, which feeds parasitically as an adult. Both species are of high conservation importance. Lampreys are known to consume pollan but detailed knowledge of their interactions is scant. While pollan is well known to be a landlocked species in Ireland, the life cycle of normally anadromous river lamprey in Lough Neagh has been unclear. The Lough is also a highly perturbed ecosystem, supporting several invasive, non-native fish species that have the potential to influence lamprey—pollan interactions. 3. We applied stable isotope techniques to resolve both the movement patterns of lamprey and trophic interactions in this complex community. Recognizing that stable isotope studies are often hampered by high-levels of variability and uncertainty in the systems of interest, we employed novel Bayesian mixing models, which incorporate variability and uncertainty. 4. Stable isotope analyses identified trout Salmo trutta and non-native bream Abramis brama as the main items in lamprey diet. Pollan only represented a major food source for lamprey between May and July. 5. Stable isotope ratios of carbon in tissues from 71 adult lamprey showed no evidence of marine carbon sources, strongly suggesting that Lough Neagh is host to a highly unusual, nonanadromous freshwater population. This finding marks out the Lough's lamprey population as of particular scientific interest and enhances the conservation significance of this feature of the Lough. 6. Synthesis and applications. Our Bayesian isotopic mixing models illustrate an unusual pattern of animal movement, enhancing conservation interest in an already threatened population. We have also revealed a complex relationship between lamprey and their food species that is suggestive of hyperpredation, whereby non-native species may sustain high lamprey populations that may in turn be detrimental to native pollan. Long-term conservation of lamprey and pollan in this system is likely to require management intervention, but in light of this exceptional complexity, no simple management options are currently supported. Conservation plans will require better characterization of population-level interactions and simulation modelling of interventions. More generally, our study demonstrates the importance of considering a full range of possible trophic interactions, particularly in complex ecosystems, and highlights Bayesian isotopic mixing models as powerful tools in resolving trophic relationships.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01761.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8901 |
ispartof | The Journal of applied ecology, 2010-02, Vol.47 (1), p.121-129 |
issn | 0021-8901 1365-2664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746231083 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Abramis brama Agnatha. Pisces Anadromous fishes Animal populations Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Bayesian Biological and medical sciences Bream conservation dilemma Coregonus autumnalis Diet Environmental conservation Fish Freshwater Freshwater fishes Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects hyperpredation Invasive Species Isotopes Lampetra fluviatilis Life cycles Marine ecology Natural resource management Nonnative species Petromyzontidae pollan potamodromous Predation River lamprey Salmo trutta stable isotope stable isotope analysis in R Trout Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution |
title | Do Non-Native Invasive Fish Support Elevated Lamprey Populations? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A13%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Non-Native%20Invasive%20Fish%20Support%20Elevated%20Lamprey%20Populations?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Inger,%20Richard&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=121-129&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01761.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25623144%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-da1b2e652df16c0e81b03892edc1e3d0c601f636b653ca759a3c52571b3a1a5a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233414105&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25623144&rfr_iscdi=true |