Loading…
Neurological and neuropsychological examination and outcome after use of an intra-aortic filter device during cardiac surgery
Cerebral embolization of particles after cardiac surgery is frequently associated with neurological deficits. Aortic crossclamp manipulation seems to be the most significant cause of emboli release during cardiac surgery. The goal of this study was to demonstrate whether the use of an intra-aortic f...
Saved in:
Published in: | Perfusion 2003, Vol.18 (1_suppl), p.55-60 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Cerebral embolization of particles after cardiac surgery is frequently
associated with neurological deficits. Aortic crossclamp manipulation seems to
be the most significant cause of emboli release during cardiac surgery. The goal
of this study was to demonstrate whether the use of an intra-aortic filter
device has an effect on the magnet resonance imaging (MRI) and functional
neurological outcome.Twenty-four patients undergoing cardiosurgical procedures using cardiopulmonary
bypass (CPB) were selected: coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (n=17),
aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery (n= 4) or combined procedures
(n=3). Patients were evaluated by diffusion weighted MRI of the brain,
neurological examination and neuropsychological assessment regarding alertness
as well as divided and selective attention before and five to seven days after
surgery. The patients were divided into two groups. In group I, 12 patients
received a filter through a modified 24 F arterial cannula immediately before
the aortic crossclamp was released. Filters remained in the aorta until CPB was
discontinued. Intraoperatively, bilateral middle cerebral artery transcranial
Doppler (TCD) was monitored at baseline, at the beginning of CPB, at a timepoint
when the aorta was crossclamped, when the filter was inserted and while the
crossclamp was switched to partial clamping until the CPB was discontinued. TCD
was used for detection of microembolic signals (MES). The captured material in
the filter was examined histologically. Twelve patients served as controls
without aortic filtration (group II).The MRI of the brain did not show any diffusion alterations in either group
before or after surgery. No patient developed a focal neurological deficit or
stroke. Intraoperative quantitative MES detection revealed a four to tenfold
increase in patients of group I compared with group II (5 - 6 versus 0.5 - 1
MES/min) during the filter dwell time. There was no consistent pattern regarding
the neurobehavioural sequelae. Filters showed arteriosclerotic debris in 75% of
the patients.The use of the intra-aortic filter device did not show a positive effect on
neurological, neuroradiographical and neuropsychological outcomes. The increase
of the MES rate in group I patients may be due to microbubbles generated as
microcavitations by the filter or the aortic filter cannula. The intra-aortic
filter was able to capture atheromatous material in 75% of the patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0267-6591 1477-111X |
DOI: | 10.1191/0267659103pf628oa |