Doing the right thing online: a survey of bloggers' ethical beliefs and practices

This study explores the ethical beliefs and practices of two distinct groups of bloggers — personal and non-personal — through a worldwide web survey. A stratified purposive sample of 1224 bloggers provided information about their blogging experience, blogging habits and demographics. They were aske...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:New media & society 2009-06, Vol.11 (4), p.575-597
Main Authors: Cenite, Mark, Detenber, Benjamin H., Koh, Andy W.K., Lim, Alvin L.H., Ng Ee Soon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accountability
Blogs
Codes of conduct
Demography
Ethics
Internet
Surveys
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study explores the ethical beliefs and practices of two distinct groups of bloggers — personal and non-personal — through a worldwide web survey. A stratified purposive sample of 1224 bloggers provided information about their blogging experience, blogging habits and demographics. They were asked about their beliefs and practices for four ethical principles: truth-telling, attribution, accountability and minimizing harm. The findings reveal that the two groups differ in terms of who they are and what they do in their weblogs (blogs). In addition, there were significant differences in the extent to which they value and adhere to the four principles, and some interesting similarities. For example, both groups believe that attribution is most important and accountability least important. Scholars have proposed blogging ethics codes, and this study found that bloggers themselves support such a code.
ISSN:1461-4448
1461-7315
DOI:10.1177/1461444809102961