Loading…
Guidelines on Blood Cultures
Just over one-third of sepsis patients have positive blood cultures, mainly due to inadequate sampling volumes (50% of adults have < 1.0 CFU/mL blood) and the prior use of antibiotics. However, 20–30% of sepsis patients are given inappropriate empirical antibiotics. The Clinical and Laboratory St...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection immunology and infection, 2010-08, Vol.43 (4), p.347-349 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993 |
container_end_page | 349 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 347 |
container_title | Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Towns, Michael Lloyd Jarvis, William Robert Hsueh, Po-Ren |
description | Just over one-third of sepsis patients have positive blood cultures, mainly due to inadequate sampling volumes (50% of adults have < 1.0 CFU/mL blood) and the prior use of antibiotics. However, 20–30% of sepsis patients are given inappropriate empirical antibiotics. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines recommend paired culture sets to help discriminate between contaminant organisms and true pathogens; four 10-mL bottles (2 sets) should be used for the initial evaluation to detect about 90–95% of bacteremias and six 10-mL bottles (3 sets) should be used to detect about 95–99% of bacteremias. It has also been shown that the positivity rate increased by 15–35% with resin-based media in patients on antibiotics. For diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections, differential time-to-positivity is one method recommended to help determine whether the catheter is truly the source of infection. The proper training of personnel with regard to drawing an appropriate blood volume and the importance of clear labeling of culture bottles is also of critical importance. Furthermore, if the contamination rate is relatively high, hiring dedicated staff who are well-trained in order to get a lower blood culture contamination rate may be cost-effective. It is because high false-positive blood culture rates due to contamination are associated with significantly increased hospital and laboratory charges. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60054-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748955287</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1684118210600540</els_id><sourcerecordid>748955287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEgjH4B4B2Aw4FO19NLiCY-JImcQDOUZd6UqBrR7Ii8e_pvjhw4WTLev1Yfhg7RrhAQH35gtrIDNHwM4RzDaBkBlush9aqzKIQ212_ieyx_ZTeAaTgSu-yPQ7aGG7zHjt6aENJVagpDZp6cFs1TTkYttW8jZQO2M6kqBIdrmufvd3fvQ4fs9Hzw9PwZpR5qfU8K6wFAzrXyhsBOAausVS5UEKiVLwU44nOSyMLEh6FBK8sjbHg0qAnaa3os9MVdxabz5bS3E1D8lRVRU1Nm1wujVWKm7xLqlXSxyalSBM3i2FaxG-H4BZe3NKLWzy9GC29OOj2TtYX2vGUyt-tjYgucL0KUPfnV6Dokg9UeypDJD93ZRP-PXH1h-A7rcEX1Qd9U3pv2lh3Eh26xB2sIAsGwpIA4geaJYNO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748955287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Guidelines on Blood Cultures</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><creator>Towns, Michael Lloyd ; Jarvis, William Robert ; Hsueh, Po-Ren</creator><creatorcontrib>Towns, Michael Lloyd ; Jarvis, William Robert ; Hsueh, Po-Ren</creatorcontrib><description>Just over one-third of sepsis patients have positive blood cultures, mainly due to inadequate sampling volumes (50% of adults have < 1.0 CFU/mL blood) and the prior use of antibiotics. However, 20–30% of sepsis patients are given inappropriate empirical antibiotics. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines recommend paired culture sets to help discriminate between contaminant organisms and true pathogens; four 10-mL bottles (2 sets) should be used for the initial evaluation to detect about 90–95% of bacteremias and six 10-mL bottles (3 sets) should be used to detect about 95–99% of bacteremias. It has also been shown that the positivity rate increased by 15–35% with resin-based media in patients on antibiotics. For diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections, differential time-to-positivity is one method recommended to help determine whether the catheter is truly the source of infection. The proper training of personnel with regard to drawing an appropriate blood volume and the importance of clear labeling of culture bottles is also of critical importance. Furthermore, if the contamination rate is relatively high, hiring dedicated staff who are well-trained in order to get a lower blood culture contamination rate may be cost-effective. It is because high false-positive blood culture rates due to contamination are associated with significantly increased hospital and laboratory charges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1684-1182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1995-9133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60054-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20688297</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; antibiotics ; bacteremia ; Bacteriological Techniques - methods ; Bacteriological Techniques - standards ; Blood - microbiology ; blood cultures ; Humans ; Infectious Disease ; Medical Education ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; resin-based media ; Sepsis - diagnosis ; Sepsis - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection, 2010-08, Vol.43 (4), p.347-349</ispartof><rights>Taiwan Society of Microbiology</rights><rights>2010 Taiwan Society of Microbiology</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2010 Taiwan Society of Microbiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20688297$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Towns, Michael Lloyd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, William Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsueh, Po-Ren</creatorcontrib><title>Guidelines on Blood Cultures</title><title>Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection</title><addtitle>J Microbiol Immunol Infect</addtitle><description>Just over one-third of sepsis patients have positive blood cultures, mainly due to inadequate sampling volumes (50% of adults have < 1.0 CFU/mL blood) and the prior use of antibiotics. However, 20–30% of sepsis patients are given inappropriate empirical antibiotics. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines recommend paired culture sets to help discriminate between contaminant organisms and true pathogens; four 10-mL bottles (2 sets) should be used for the initial evaluation to detect about 90–95% of bacteremias and six 10-mL bottles (3 sets) should be used to detect about 95–99% of bacteremias. It has also been shown that the positivity rate increased by 15–35% with resin-based media in patients on antibiotics. For diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections, differential time-to-positivity is one method recommended to help determine whether the catheter is truly the source of infection. The proper training of personnel with regard to drawing an appropriate blood volume and the importance of clear labeling of culture bottles is also of critical importance. Furthermore, if the contamination rate is relatively high, hiring dedicated staff who are well-trained in order to get a lower blood culture contamination rate may be cost-effective. It is because high false-positive blood culture rates due to contamination are associated with significantly increased hospital and laboratory charges.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>antibiotics</subject><subject>bacteremia</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques - standards</subject><subject>Blood - microbiology</subject><subject>blood cultures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>resin-based media</subject><subject>Sepsis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sepsis - microbiology</subject><issn>1684-1182</issn><issn>1995-9133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEgjH4B4B2Aw4FO19NLiCY-JImcQDOUZd6UqBrR7Ii8e_pvjhw4WTLev1Yfhg7RrhAQH35gtrIDNHwM4RzDaBkBlush9aqzKIQ212_ieyx_ZTeAaTgSu-yPQ7aGG7zHjt6aENJVagpDZp6cFs1TTkYttW8jZQO2M6kqBIdrmufvd3fvQ4fs9Hzw9PwZpR5qfU8K6wFAzrXyhsBOAausVS5UEKiVLwU44nOSyMLEh6FBK8sjbHg0qAnaa3os9MVdxabz5bS3E1D8lRVRU1Nm1wujVWKm7xLqlXSxyalSBM3i2FaxG-H4BZe3NKLWzy9GC29OOj2TtYX2vGUyt-tjYgucL0KUPfnV6Dokg9UeypDJD93ZRP-PXH1h-A7rcEX1Qd9U3pv2lh3Eh26xB2sIAsGwpIA4geaJYNO</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Towns, Michael Lloyd</creator><creator>Jarvis, William Robert</creator><creator>Hsueh, Po-Ren</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Guidelines on Blood Cultures</title><author>Towns, Michael Lloyd ; Jarvis, William Robert ; Hsueh, Po-Ren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>antibiotics</topic><topic>bacteremia</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques - standards</topic><topic>Blood - microbiology</topic><topic>blood cultures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>resin-based media</topic><topic>Sepsis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sepsis - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Towns, Michael Lloyd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, William Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsueh, Po-Ren</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Towns, Michael Lloyd</au><au>Jarvis, William Robert</au><au>Hsueh, Po-Ren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Guidelines on Blood Cultures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Microbiol Immunol Infect</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>347-349</pages><issn>1684-1182</issn><eissn>1995-9133</eissn><abstract>Just over one-third of sepsis patients have positive blood cultures, mainly due to inadequate sampling volumes (50% of adults have < 1.0 CFU/mL blood) and the prior use of antibiotics. However, 20–30% of sepsis patients are given inappropriate empirical antibiotics. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines recommend paired culture sets to help discriminate between contaminant organisms and true pathogens; four 10-mL bottles (2 sets) should be used for the initial evaluation to detect about 90–95% of bacteremias and six 10-mL bottles (3 sets) should be used to detect about 95–99% of bacteremias. It has also been shown that the positivity rate increased by 15–35% with resin-based media in patients on antibiotics. For diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections, differential time-to-positivity is one method recommended to help determine whether the catheter is truly the source of infection. The proper training of personnel with regard to drawing an appropriate blood volume and the importance of clear labeling of culture bottles is also of critical importance. Furthermore, if the contamination rate is relatively high, hiring dedicated staff who are well-trained in order to get a lower blood culture contamination rate may be cost-effective. It is because high false-positive blood culture rates due to contamination are associated with significantly increased hospital and laboratory charges.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>20688297</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60054-0</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1684-1182 |
ispartof | Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection, 2010-08, Vol.43 (4), p.347-349 |
issn | 1684-1182 1995-9133 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748955287 |
source | BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS |
subjects | Adult antibiotics bacteremia Bacteriological Techniques - methods Bacteriological Techniques - standards Blood - microbiology blood cultures Humans Infectious Disease Medical Education Practice Guidelines as Topic resin-based media Sepsis - diagnosis Sepsis - microbiology |
title | Guidelines on Blood Cultures |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A14%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Guidelines%20on%20Blood%20Cultures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20microbiology,%20immunology%20and%20infection&rft.au=Towns,%20Michael%20Lloyd&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=347-349&rft.issn=1684-1182&rft.eissn=1995-9133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60054-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E748955287%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748955287&rft_id=info:pmid/20688297&rfr_iscdi=true |