Loading…

Guidelines on Blood Cultures

Just over one-third of sepsis patients have positive blood cultures, mainly due to inadequate sampling volumes (50% of adults have < 1.0 CFU/mL blood) and the prior use of antibiotics. However, 20–30% of sepsis patients are given inappropriate empirical antibiotics. The Clinical and Laboratory St...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection immunology and infection, 2010-08, Vol.43 (4), p.347-349
Main Authors: Towns, Michael Lloyd, Jarvis, William Robert, Hsueh, Po-Ren
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993
container_end_page 349
container_issue 4
container_start_page 347
container_title Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection
container_volume 43
creator Towns, Michael Lloyd
Jarvis, William Robert
Hsueh, Po-Ren
description Just over one-third of sepsis patients have positive blood cultures, mainly due to inadequate sampling volumes (50% of adults have < 1.0 CFU/mL blood) and the prior use of antibiotics. However, 20–30% of sepsis patients are given inappropriate empirical antibiotics. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines recommend paired culture sets to help discriminate between contaminant organisms and true pathogens; four 10-mL bottles (2 sets) should be used for the initial evaluation to detect about 90–95% of bacteremias and six 10-mL bottles (3 sets) should be used to detect about 95–99% of bacteremias. It has also been shown that the positivity rate increased by 15–35% with resin-based media in patients on antibiotics. For diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections, differential time-to-positivity is one method recommended to help determine whether the catheter is truly the source of infection. The proper training of personnel with regard to drawing an appropriate blood volume and the importance of clear labeling of culture bottles is also of critical importance. Furthermore, if the contamination rate is relatively high, hiring dedicated staff who are well-trained in order to get a lower blood culture contamination rate may be cost-effective. It is because high false-positive blood culture rates due to contamination are associated with significantly increased hospital and laboratory charges.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60054-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748955287</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1684118210600540</els_id><sourcerecordid>748955287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEgjH4B4B2Aw4FO19NLiCY-JImcQDOUZd6UqBrR7Ii8e_pvjhw4WTLev1Yfhg7RrhAQH35gtrIDNHwM4RzDaBkBlush9aqzKIQ212_ieyx_ZTeAaTgSu-yPQ7aGG7zHjt6aENJVagpDZp6cFs1TTkYttW8jZQO2M6kqBIdrmufvd3fvQ4fs9Hzw9PwZpR5qfU8K6wFAzrXyhsBOAausVS5UEKiVLwU44nOSyMLEh6FBK8sjbHg0qAnaa3os9MVdxabz5bS3E1D8lRVRU1Nm1wujVWKm7xLqlXSxyalSBM3i2FaxG-H4BZe3NKLWzy9GC29OOj2TtYX2vGUyt-tjYgucL0KUPfnV6Dokg9UeypDJD93ZRP-PXH1h-A7rcEX1Qd9U3pv2lh3Eh26xB2sIAsGwpIA4geaJYNO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748955287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Guidelines on Blood Cultures</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><creator>Towns, Michael Lloyd ; Jarvis, William Robert ; Hsueh, Po-Ren</creator><creatorcontrib>Towns, Michael Lloyd ; Jarvis, William Robert ; Hsueh, Po-Ren</creatorcontrib><description>Just over one-third of sepsis patients have positive blood cultures, mainly due to inadequate sampling volumes (50% of adults have &lt; 1.0 CFU/mL blood) and the prior use of antibiotics. However, 20–30% of sepsis patients are given inappropriate empirical antibiotics. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines recommend paired culture sets to help discriminate between contaminant organisms and true pathogens; four 10-mL bottles (2 sets) should be used for the initial evaluation to detect about 90–95% of bacteremias and six 10-mL bottles (3 sets) should be used to detect about 95–99% of bacteremias. It has also been shown that the positivity rate increased by 15–35% with resin-based media in patients on antibiotics. For diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections, differential time-to-positivity is one method recommended to help determine whether the catheter is truly the source of infection. The proper training of personnel with regard to drawing an appropriate blood volume and the importance of clear labeling of culture bottles is also of critical importance. Furthermore, if the contamination rate is relatively high, hiring dedicated staff who are well-trained in order to get a lower blood culture contamination rate may be cost-effective. It is because high false-positive blood culture rates due to contamination are associated with significantly increased hospital and laboratory charges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1684-1182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1995-9133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60054-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20688297</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; antibiotics ; bacteremia ; Bacteriological Techniques - methods ; Bacteriological Techniques - standards ; Blood - microbiology ; blood cultures ; Humans ; Infectious Disease ; Medical Education ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; resin-based media ; Sepsis - diagnosis ; Sepsis - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection, 2010-08, Vol.43 (4), p.347-349</ispartof><rights>Taiwan Society of Microbiology</rights><rights>2010 Taiwan Society of Microbiology</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2010 Taiwan Society of Microbiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20688297$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Towns, Michael Lloyd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, William Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsueh, Po-Ren</creatorcontrib><title>Guidelines on Blood Cultures</title><title>Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection</title><addtitle>J Microbiol Immunol Infect</addtitle><description>Just over one-third of sepsis patients have positive blood cultures, mainly due to inadequate sampling volumes (50% of adults have &lt; 1.0 CFU/mL blood) and the prior use of antibiotics. However, 20–30% of sepsis patients are given inappropriate empirical antibiotics. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines recommend paired culture sets to help discriminate between contaminant organisms and true pathogens; four 10-mL bottles (2 sets) should be used for the initial evaluation to detect about 90–95% of bacteremias and six 10-mL bottles (3 sets) should be used to detect about 95–99% of bacteremias. It has also been shown that the positivity rate increased by 15–35% with resin-based media in patients on antibiotics. For diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections, differential time-to-positivity is one method recommended to help determine whether the catheter is truly the source of infection. The proper training of personnel with regard to drawing an appropriate blood volume and the importance of clear labeling of culture bottles is also of critical importance. Furthermore, if the contamination rate is relatively high, hiring dedicated staff who are well-trained in order to get a lower blood culture contamination rate may be cost-effective. It is because high false-positive blood culture rates due to contamination are associated with significantly increased hospital and laboratory charges.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>antibiotics</subject><subject>bacteremia</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques - standards</subject><subject>Blood - microbiology</subject><subject>blood cultures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>resin-based media</subject><subject>Sepsis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sepsis - microbiology</subject><issn>1684-1182</issn><issn>1995-9133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEgjH4B4B2Aw4FO19NLiCY-JImcQDOUZd6UqBrR7Ii8e_pvjhw4WTLev1Yfhg7RrhAQH35gtrIDNHwM4RzDaBkBlush9aqzKIQ212_ieyx_ZTeAaTgSu-yPQ7aGG7zHjt6aENJVagpDZp6cFs1TTkYttW8jZQO2M6kqBIdrmufvd3fvQ4fs9Hzw9PwZpR5qfU8K6wFAzrXyhsBOAausVS5UEKiVLwU44nOSyMLEh6FBK8sjbHg0qAnaa3os9MVdxabz5bS3E1D8lRVRU1Nm1wujVWKm7xLqlXSxyalSBM3i2FaxG-H4BZe3NKLWzy9GC29OOj2TtYX2vGUyt-tjYgucL0KUPfnV6Dokg9UeypDJD93ZRP-PXH1h-A7rcEX1Qd9U3pv2lh3Eh26xB2sIAsGwpIA4geaJYNO</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Towns, Michael Lloyd</creator><creator>Jarvis, William Robert</creator><creator>Hsueh, Po-Ren</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Guidelines on Blood Cultures</title><author>Towns, Michael Lloyd ; Jarvis, William Robert ; Hsueh, Po-Ren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>antibiotics</topic><topic>bacteremia</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques - standards</topic><topic>Blood - microbiology</topic><topic>blood cultures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>resin-based media</topic><topic>Sepsis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sepsis - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Towns, Michael Lloyd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, William Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsueh, Po-Ren</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Towns, Michael Lloyd</au><au>Jarvis, William Robert</au><au>Hsueh, Po-Ren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Guidelines on Blood Cultures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Microbiol Immunol Infect</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>347-349</pages><issn>1684-1182</issn><eissn>1995-9133</eissn><abstract>Just over one-third of sepsis patients have positive blood cultures, mainly due to inadequate sampling volumes (50% of adults have &lt; 1.0 CFU/mL blood) and the prior use of antibiotics. However, 20–30% of sepsis patients are given inappropriate empirical antibiotics. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines recommend paired culture sets to help discriminate between contaminant organisms and true pathogens; four 10-mL bottles (2 sets) should be used for the initial evaluation to detect about 90–95% of bacteremias and six 10-mL bottles (3 sets) should be used to detect about 95–99% of bacteremias. It has also been shown that the positivity rate increased by 15–35% with resin-based media in patients on antibiotics. For diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections, differential time-to-positivity is one method recommended to help determine whether the catheter is truly the source of infection. The proper training of personnel with regard to drawing an appropriate blood volume and the importance of clear labeling of culture bottles is also of critical importance. Furthermore, if the contamination rate is relatively high, hiring dedicated staff who are well-trained in order to get a lower blood culture contamination rate may be cost-effective. It is because high false-positive blood culture rates due to contamination are associated with significantly increased hospital and laboratory charges.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>20688297</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60054-0</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1684-1182
ispartof Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection, 2010-08, Vol.43 (4), p.347-349
issn 1684-1182
1995-9133
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748955287
source BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS
subjects Adult
antibiotics
bacteremia
Bacteriological Techniques - methods
Bacteriological Techniques - standards
Blood - microbiology
blood cultures
Humans
Infectious Disease
Medical Education
Practice Guidelines as Topic
resin-based media
Sepsis - diagnosis
Sepsis - microbiology
title Guidelines on Blood Cultures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A14%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Guidelines%20on%20Blood%20Cultures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20microbiology,%20immunology%20and%20infection&rft.au=Towns,%20Michael%20Lloyd&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=347-349&rft.issn=1684-1182&rft.eissn=1995-9133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60054-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E748955287%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-a990806765c8301b0261d5735341452d3bf67d84ae3c1340c59eb1a2481ce4993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748955287&rft_id=info:pmid/20688297&rfr_iscdi=true