Loading…

Analysis of birth-related medical malpractice litigation cases in Japan: Review and discussion towards implementation of a no-fault compensation system

Aim:  We examined birth‐related malpractice civil litigation cases in Japan to clarify the actual status related to the implementation of an obstetrical no‐fault compensation system in 2009. Material & Methods:  In this retrospective review, we analyzed legal and medical information from 64 case...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research 2010-08, Vol.36 (4), p.717-725
Main Authors: Uesugi, Nana, Yamanaka, Michiko, Suzuki, Toshihiro, Hirahara, Fumiki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4590-23087c3a6495e727c89fa458f92be7497a398fcc8b415269c2ffce03c10414293
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4590-23087c3a6495e727c89fa458f92be7497a398fcc8b415269c2ffce03c10414293
container_end_page 725
container_issue 4
container_start_page 717
container_title The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
container_volume 36
creator Uesugi, Nana
Yamanaka, Michiko
Suzuki, Toshihiro
Hirahara, Fumiki
description Aim:  We examined birth‐related malpractice civil litigation cases in Japan to clarify the actual status related to the implementation of an obstetrical no‐fault compensation system in 2009. Material & Methods:  In this retrospective review, we analyzed legal and medical information from 64 cases with a delivery date after 1987 and a judgment date between April 1997 and March 2007. Results:  The malpractice claim was accepted in 44 cases and rejected in 20 cases. The period from the delivery to the judgment date was lengthy (90.1 months overall). The average amount of damages awarded was ¥97 810 000 for cases of cerebral palsy (CP). Preterm births and less than 2500 g infants represented a higher incidence rate in the rejected cases. There were 32 cases (50.0%) with CP, 18 (28.1%) with infant death, 10 (15.6%) with neonatal death, and 4 (6.3%) with fetal death. Twenty‐three of 44 accepted cases (52.3%) and 11/20 rejected cases (55.0%) had a gestational age of more than 33 weeks at birth and weighed more than 2000 g. Forced deliveries were performed in 45/64 cases (70.3%), and augmentation/induction of labor was performed in 28/64 cases (43.8%). There were 13/16 (81.3%) accepted cases that underwent vacuum and/or forceps extraction after labor augmentation/induction. Conclusions:  More than half of our cases could be sufficient for a no‐fault compensation system in Japan. Though the system is considered to have some problems that need to be solved, this finding suggests that many children and their families may benefit from the new system without having to file.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01240.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748983443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>748983443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4590-23087c3a6495e727c89fa458f92be7497a398fcc8b415269c2ffce03c10414293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc-O0zAQxiMEYpeFV0C-cUqxYye2kTisVkuhVKyEQHu0ps4EXJw_xA5tn4TXxSFLz_jikef7zVjfl2WE0RVL5_V-xYSQOZVltSpoeqWsEHR1fJRdnhuPU80FyxWV1UX2LIQ9pUxqpp5mFwWtqkrz8jL7fd2BPwUXSN-QnRvj93xEDxFr0mLtLHjSgh9GsNFZJN5F9w2i6ztiIWAgriMbGKB7Qz7jL4cHAl1NahfsFMKsiv0Bxjrp2sFji11c4LQMSNfnDUw-Etu3A3ZhaYVTiNg-z5404AO-eLivsq_vbr_cvM-3d-sPN9fb3IpS07zgVEnLoRK6RFlIq3QDolSNLnYohZbAtWqsVTvByqLStmgai5RbRgUTheZX2atl7jD2PycM0bTp8-g9dNhPwUihtOJC8KRUi9KOfQgjNmYYXQvjyTBq5lTM3szmm9l8M6di_qZijgl9-bBk2iVXz-C_GJLg7SI4OI-n_x5sNnfruUp8vvAueXc88zD-MJXksjT3n9Zm_VFv7recG83_APeNrPI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748983443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of birth-related medical malpractice litigation cases in Japan: Review and discussion towards implementation of a no-fault compensation system</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Uesugi, Nana ; Yamanaka, Michiko ; Suzuki, Toshihiro ; Hirahara, Fumiki</creator><creatorcontrib>Uesugi, Nana ; Yamanaka, Michiko ; Suzuki, Toshihiro ; Hirahara, Fumiki</creatorcontrib><description>Aim:  We examined birth‐related malpractice civil litigation cases in Japan to clarify the actual status related to the implementation of an obstetrical no‐fault compensation system in 2009. Material &amp; Methods:  In this retrospective review, we analyzed legal and medical information from 64 cases with a delivery date after 1987 and a judgment date between April 1997 and March 2007. Results:  The malpractice claim was accepted in 44 cases and rejected in 20 cases. The period from the delivery to the judgment date was lengthy (90.1 months overall). The average amount of damages awarded was ¥97 810 000 for cases of cerebral palsy (CP). Preterm births and less than 2500 g infants represented a higher incidence rate in the rejected cases. There were 32 cases (50.0%) with CP, 18 (28.1%) with infant death, 10 (15.6%) with neonatal death, and 4 (6.3%) with fetal death. Twenty‐three of 44 accepted cases (52.3%) and 11/20 rejected cases (55.0%) had a gestational age of more than 33 weeks at birth and weighed more than 2000 g. Forced deliveries were performed in 45/64 cases (70.3%), and augmentation/induction of labor was performed in 28/64 cases (43.8%). There were 13/16 (81.3%) accepted cases that underwent vacuum and/or forceps extraction after labor augmentation/induction. Conclusions:  More than half of our cases could be sufficient for a no‐fault compensation system in Japan. Though the system is considered to have some problems that need to be solved, this finding suggests that many children and their families may benefit from the new system without having to file.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1341-8076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1447-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01240.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20666935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>business of medicine ; cesarean section ; Compensation and Redress - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Delivery, Obstetric - economics ; Delivery, Obstetric - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Female ; Humans ; Japan ; labor management/labor induction and augmentation ; Liability, Legal - economics ; Malpractice - economics ; Malpractice - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; neonatology ; Obstetrics - economics ; Obstetrics - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; perinatal brain damage ; Pregnancy ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2010-08, Vol.36 (4), p.717-725</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4590-23087c3a6495e727c89fa458f92be7497a398fcc8b415269c2ffce03c10414293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4590-23087c3a6495e727c89fa458f92be7497a398fcc8b415269c2ffce03c10414293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20666935$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uesugi, Nana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamanaka, Michiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirahara, Fumiki</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of birth-related medical malpractice litigation cases in Japan: Review and discussion towards implementation of a no-fault compensation system</title><title>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</title><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol Res</addtitle><description>Aim:  We examined birth‐related malpractice civil litigation cases in Japan to clarify the actual status related to the implementation of an obstetrical no‐fault compensation system in 2009. Material &amp; Methods:  In this retrospective review, we analyzed legal and medical information from 64 cases with a delivery date after 1987 and a judgment date between April 1997 and March 2007. Results:  The malpractice claim was accepted in 44 cases and rejected in 20 cases. The period from the delivery to the judgment date was lengthy (90.1 months overall). The average amount of damages awarded was ¥97 810 000 for cases of cerebral palsy (CP). Preterm births and less than 2500 g infants represented a higher incidence rate in the rejected cases. There were 32 cases (50.0%) with CP, 18 (28.1%) with infant death, 10 (15.6%) with neonatal death, and 4 (6.3%) with fetal death. Twenty‐three of 44 accepted cases (52.3%) and 11/20 rejected cases (55.0%) had a gestational age of more than 33 weeks at birth and weighed more than 2000 g. Forced deliveries were performed in 45/64 cases (70.3%), and augmentation/induction of labor was performed in 28/64 cases (43.8%). There were 13/16 (81.3%) accepted cases that underwent vacuum and/or forceps extraction after labor augmentation/induction. Conclusions:  More than half of our cases could be sufficient for a no‐fault compensation system in Japan. Though the system is considered to have some problems that need to be solved, this finding suggests that many children and their families may benefit from the new system without having to file.</description><subject>business of medicine</subject><subject>cesarean section</subject><subject>Compensation and Redress - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - economics</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>labor management/labor induction and augmentation</subject><subject>Liability, Legal - economics</subject><subject>Malpractice - economics</subject><subject>Malpractice - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>neonatology</subject><subject>Obstetrics - economics</subject><subject>Obstetrics - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>perinatal brain damage</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1341-8076</issn><issn>1447-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc-O0zAQxiMEYpeFV0C-cUqxYye2kTisVkuhVKyEQHu0ps4EXJw_xA5tn4TXxSFLz_jikef7zVjfl2WE0RVL5_V-xYSQOZVltSpoeqWsEHR1fJRdnhuPU80FyxWV1UX2LIQ9pUxqpp5mFwWtqkrz8jL7fd2BPwUXSN-QnRvj93xEDxFr0mLtLHjSgh9GsNFZJN5F9w2i6ztiIWAgriMbGKB7Qz7jL4cHAl1NahfsFMKsiv0Bxjrp2sFji11c4LQMSNfnDUw-Etu3A3ZhaYVTiNg-z5404AO-eLivsq_vbr_cvM-3d-sPN9fb3IpS07zgVEnLoRK6RFlIq3QDolSNLnYohZbAtWqsVTvByqLStmgai5RbRgUTheZX2atl7jD2PycM0bTp8-g9dNhPwUihtOJC8KRUi9KOfQgjNmYYXQvjyTBq5lTM3szmm9l8M6di_qZijgl9-bBk2iVXz-C_GJLg7SI4OI-n_x5sNnfruUp8vvAueXc88zD-MJXksjT3n9Zm_VFv7recG83_APeNrPI</recordid><startdate>201008</startdate><enddate>201008</enddate><creator>Uesugi, Nana</creator><creator>Yamanaka, Michiko</creator><creator>Suzuki, Toshihiro</creator><creator>Hirahara, Fumiki</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201008</creationdate><title>Analysis of birth-related medical malpractice litigation cases in Japan: Review and discussion towards implementation of a no-fault compensation system</title><author>Uesugi, Nana ; Yamanaka, Michiko ; Suzuki, Toshihiro ; Hirahara, Fumiki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4590-23087c3a6495e727c89fa458f92be7497a398fcc8b415269c2ffce03c10414293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>business of medicine</topic><topic>cesarean section</topic><topic>Compensation and Redress - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - economics</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>labor management/labor induction and augmentation</topic><topic>Liability, Legal - economics</topic><topic>Malpractice - economics</topic><topic>Malpractice - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>neonatology</topic><topic>Obstetrics - economics</topic><topic>Obstetrics - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>perinatal brain damage</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uesugi, Nana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamanaka, Michiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirahara, Fumiki</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uesugi, Nana</au><au>Yamanaka, Michiko</au><au>Suzuki, Toshihiro</au><au>Hirahara, Fumiki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of birth-related medical malpractice litigation cases in Japan: Review and discussion towards implementation of a no-fault compensation system</atitle><jtitle>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</jtitle><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol Res</addtitle><date>2010-08</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>717</spage><epage>725</epage><pages>717-725</pages><issn>1341-8076</issn><eissn>1447-0756</eissn><abstract>Aim:  We examined birth‐related malpractice civil litigation cases in Japan to clarify the actual status related to the implementation of an obstetrical no‐fault compensation system in 2009. Material &amp; Methods:  In this retrospective review, we analyzed legal and medical information from 64 cases with a delivery date after 1987 and a judgment date between April 1997 and March 2007. Results:  The malpractice claim was accepted in 44 cases and rejected in 20 cases. The period from the delivery to the judgment date was lengthy (90.1 months overall). The average amount of damages awarded was ¥97 810 000 for cases of cerebral palsy (CP). Preterm births and less than 2500 g infants represented a higher incidence rate in the rejected cases. There were 32 cases (50.0%) with CP, 18 (28.1%) with infant death, 10 (15.6%) with neonatal death, and 4 (6.3%) with fetal death. Twenty‐three of 44 accepted cases (52.3%) and 11/20 rejected cases (55.0%) had a gestational age of more than 33 weeks at birth and weighed more than 2000 g. Forced deliveries were performed in 45/64 cases (70.3%), and augmentation/induction of labor was performed in 28/64 cases (43.8%). There were 13/16 (81.3%) accepted cases that underwent vacuum and/or forceps extraction after labor augmentation/induction. Conclusions:  More than half of our cases could be sufficient for a no‐fault compensation system in Japan. Though the system is considered to have some problems that need to be solved, this finding suggests that many children and their families may benefit from the new system without having to file.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>20666935</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01240.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1341-8076
ispartof The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2010-08, Vol.36 (4), p.717-725
issn 1341-8076
1447-0756
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748983443
source Wiley
subjects business of medicine
cesarean section
Compensation and Redress - legislation & jurisprudence
Delivery, Obstetric - economics
Delivery, Obstetric - legislation & jurisprudence
Female
Humans
Japan
labor management/labor induction and augmentation
Liability, Legal - economics
Malpractice - economics
Malpractice - legislation & jurisprudence
neonatology
Obstetrics - economics
Obstetrics - legislation & jurisprudence
perinatal brain damage
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
title Analysis of birth-related medical malpractice litigation cases in Japan: Review and discussion towards implementation of a no-fault compensation system
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A54%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20birth-related%20medical%20malpractice%20litigation%20cases%20in%20Japan:%20Review%20and%20discussion%20towards%20implementation%20of%20a%20no-fault%20compensation%20system&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology%20research&rft.au=Uesugi,%20Nana&rft.date=2010-08&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=717&rft.epage=725&rft.pages=717-725&rft.issn=1341-8076&rft.eissn=1447-0756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01240.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E748983443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4590-23087c3a6495e727c89fa458f92be7497a398fcc8b415269c2ffce03c10414293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748983443&rft_id=info:pmid/20666935&rfr_iscdi=true