The Lotmar-Picken X-Ray Diagram of Dried Muscle

OWING to a number of unforeseen circumstances, mostly beyond our control, an incorrect version of part of our communication under the above title was printed in Nature of December 22, 1951. Our main conclusion, that a fibre repeat of 5.3–5.4 A. is in better agreement with the original Lotmar–Picken...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature (London) 1952-01, Vol.169 (4290), p.120-120
Main Authors: BAMFORD, C. H, HANBY, W. E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
letter
multidisciplinary
Muscles
Old Medline
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
X-Rays
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:OWING to a number of unforeseen circumstances, mostly beyond our control, an incorrect version of part of our communication under the above title was printed in Nature of December 22, 1951. Our main conclusion, that a fibre repeat of 5.3–5.4 A. is in better agreement with the original Lotmar–Picken diagram than the value 5.65 A. given by Lotmar and Picken, was stated correctly and was deduced from the χ-values of the reflexions on the first layer line.
ISSN:0028-0836
1476-4687
DOI:10.1038/169120b0