EFFECTS OF METHOD ERROR ON THE POWER OF A STATISTICAL TEST: IMPLICATIONS OF IMPERFECT SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY IN RETROSPECTIVE CHART REVIEW

Errors In classlfylng indlvlduals as to whether they have a certain characteristlc may adversely affect the power of a statlstlcal test to detect differences in the incidence of that characteristic between groups or to detect changes in the incldence over time. To determine whether the classificatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of epidemiology 1980-05, Vol.111 (5), p.534-542
Main Authors: WHALEY, FREDRICK S., QUADE, DANA, HALEY, ROBERT W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
cross infection
Cross Infection - epidemiology
Cross Infection - prevention & control
Epidemiologic Methods
health surveys
Hospitals
Humans
Medical Records
Research Design
Retrospective Studies
retrospectlve studies
statistics
Statistics as Topic
United States
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Errors In classlfylng indlvlduals as to whether they have a certain characteristlc may adversely affect the power of a statlstlcal test to detect differences in the incidence of that characteristic between groups or to detect changes in the incldence over time. To determine whether the classification method to be used in the Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomiai infection Control (SENIC Project)—retrospectlve chart review—would provide sufficient power for a test of the study's main hypothesis, the authors calculated power as a function of the sensitivity and specificity of the method. They then contrasted the case in which sensitivity and specificity are constant for all hospitals in the study with cases in which the measures vary between groups of hospitals or between time perlods. it was found that varlation within the observed ranges of sensitivity and specificity, even if systematic, has little effect on power unless it is related to the hypothesis under study. The authors thus concluded that SENIC's study design is adequate to detect any substantial success of infection survelliance and control programs in combatting nose comial infection, unless such programs affect the accuracy of the chart review method.
ISSN:0002-9262
1476-6256
DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112932