Biomedical question answering: A survey

• Published in: Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 2010-07, Vol.99 (1), p.1-24
• Main Authors: Athenikos, Sofia J, Han, Hyoil
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Answer/reason extraction; Biological and medical sciences; Biomedical question answering; Biomedical Research; Databases, Factual; Information Storage and Retrieval - methods; Internal Medicine; Medical Informatics - methods; Medical sciences; Other; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects); Semantic information extraction; Semantics; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation
• ISSN: 0169-2607; 1872-7565
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.10.003

Abstract Objectives In this survey, we reviewed the current state of the art in biomedical QA (Question Answering), within a broader framework of semantic knowledge-based QA approaches, and projected directions for the future research development in this critical area of intersection between Artificial Intelligence, Information Retrieval, and Biomedical Informatics. Materials and methods We devised a conceptual framework within which to categorize current QA approaches. In particular, we used “semantic knowledge-based QA” as a category under which to subsume QA techniques and approaches, both corpus-based and knowledge base (KB)-based, that utilize semantic knowledge-informed techniques in the QA process, and we further classified those approaches into three subcategories: (1) semantics-based, (2) inference-based, and (3) logic-based. Based on the framework, we first conducted a survey of open-domain or non-biomedical-domain QA approaches that belong to each of the three subcategories. We then conducted an in-depth review of biomedical QA, by first noting the characteristics of, and resources available for, biomedical QA and then reviewing medical QA approaches and biological QA approaches, in turn. The research articles reviewed in this paper were found and selected through online searches. Results Our review suggested the following tasks ahead for the future research development in this area: (1) Construction of domain-specific typology and taxonomy of questions (biological QA), (2) Development of more sophisticated techniques for natural language (NL) question analysis and classification, (3) Development of effective methods for answer generation from potentially conflicting evidences, (4) More extensive and integrated utilization of semantic knowledge throughout the QA process, and (5) Incorporation of logic and reasoning mechanisms for answer inference. Conclusion Corresponding to the growth of biomedical information, there is a growing need for QA systems that can help users better utilize the ever-accumulating information. Continued research toward development of more sophisticated techniques for processing NL text, for utilizing semantic knowledge, and for incorporating logic and reasoning mechanisms, will lead to more useful QA systems.