A Conditional Reasoning Measure for Aggression

This article describes a new approach for assessing cognitive precursors to aggression. Referred to as the Conditional Reasoning Measurement System, this procedure focuses on how people solve what on the surface appear to be traditional inductive reasoning problems. The true intent of the problems i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Organizational research methods 2005-01, Vol.8 (1), p.69-99
Main Authors: James, Lawrence R., McIntyre, Michael D., Glisson, Charles A., Green, Phillip D., Patton, Timothy W., LeBreton, James M., Frost, Brian C., Russell, Sara M., Sablynski, Chris J., Mitchell, Terence R., Williams, Larry J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acceptability
Aggression
Aggressiveness
Behavior
Cognition & reasoning
Consciousness
Criteria
Defense mechanisms
Discriminant analysis
Empirical analysis
Indicators
Personality
Precursors
Principles
Quantitative psychology
Reasoning
Regression analysis
Social psychology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article describes a new approach for assessing cognitive precursors to aggression. Referred to as the Conditional Reasoning Measurement System, this procedure focuses on how people solve what on the surface appear to be traditional inductive reasoning problems. The true intent of the problems is to determine if solutions based on implicit biases (i.e., biases that operate below the surface of consciousness) are logically attractive to a respondent. The authors focus on the types of implicit biases that underlie aggressive individuals’attempts to justify aggressive behavior. People who consistently select solutions based on these types of biases are scored as being potentially aggressive because they are cognitively prepared to rationalize aggression. Empirical tests of the conditional reasoning system are interpreted in terms of Ozer’s criteria for ideal personality instruments. Noteworthy findings are that the system has acceptable psychometric properties and an average, uncorrected empirical validity of 0.44 against behavioral indicators of aggression (based on 11 studies).
ISSN:1094-4281
1552-7425
DOI:10.1177/1094428104272182