Loading…
Building Strategic Capacity: The Political Underpinnings of Coordinated Wage Bargaining
Encompassing labor movements and coordinated wage setting are central to the social democratic economic model that has proven successful among the nations of Western Europe. The coordination of wage bargaining across many unions and employers has been used to explain everything from inequality to un...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of political science 2010-02, Vol.104 (1), p.171-188 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-c158547bd92af556eebd0db5b1fca5eaf4288419b3588934eb7f3fa972564e683 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-c158547bd92af556eebd0db5b1fca5eaf4288419b3588934eb7f3fa972564e683 |
container_end_page | 188 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 171 |
container_title | American journal of political science |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | AHLQUIST, JOHN S. |
description | Encompassing labor movements and coordinated wage setting are central to the social democratic economic model that has proven successful among the nations of Western Europe. The coordination of wage bargaining across many unions and employers has been used to explain everything from inequality to unemployment. Yet there has been limited theoretical and quantitative empirical work exploring the determinants of bargaining coordination. I argue formally that more unequally distributed resources across unions should inhibit the centralization of strike powers in union federations. Using membership as a proxy for union resources, I find empirical evidence for this hypothesis in a panel of 15 OECD democracies, 1950–2000. I then show that the centralization of strike powers is a strong predictor of coordinated bargaining. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0003055409990384 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753837600</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0003055409990384</cupid><jstor_id>27798545</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27798545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-c158547bd92af556eebd0db5b1fca5eaf4288419b3588934eb7f3fa972564e683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9LHDEYh4NYcNV-AA-F0EtPo8kk7yTprTttXUGoVkVvITOTmWadnazJLNRvb4YVBUvxFMLz_F7ePwgdUXJMCRUnV4QQRgA4UUoRJvkOmlFgIgPF2S6aTTib-B7aj3GZvoQSOUO3843rGzd0-GoMZrSdq3Fp1qZ24-NXfP3H4gvfu9HVpsc3Q2PD2g1D0iP2LS69DymbYg2-NZ3FcxM64yZ-iD60po_24_N7gG5-_rguF9n5r9Oz8tt5VkPBxqymIIGLqlG5aQEKa6uGNBVUtK0NWNPyXEpOVcVASsW4rUTLWqNEDgW3hWQH6Mu27jr4h42No165WNu-N4P1m6gFMMlEkaZ_1-SM5CRXU83Pb8yl34QhjaFzyjkngqgk0a1UBx9jsK1eB7cy4VFToqeT6H9OkjKftpllHH14CeRCqLQFSDzbchdH-_eFm3CvC8EE6OL0Ul8uyu8wX9zp38lnzz2YVRVc09nXTv_fxROqZ6U7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214440709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building Strategic Capacity: The Political Underpinnings of Coordinated Wage Bargaining</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>AHLQUIST, JOHN S.</creator><creatorcontrib>AHLQUIST, JOHN S.</creatorcontrib><description>Encompassing labor movements and coordinated wage setting are central to the social democratic economic model that has proven successful among the nations of Western Europe. The coordination of wage bargaining across many unions and employers has been used to explain everything from inequality to unemployment. Yet there has been limited theoretical and quantitative empirical work exploring the determinants of bargaining coordination. I argue formally that more unequally distributed resources across unions should inhibit the centralization of strike powers in union federations. Using membership as a proxy for union resources, I find empirical evidence for this hypothesis in a panel of 15 OECD democracies, 1950–2000. I then show that the centralization of strike powers is a strong predictor of coordinated bargaining.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0554</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0092-5853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0003055409990384</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APORBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Bargaining ; Case Studies ; Centralization ; Collective bargaining ; Confederation ; Coordination ; Decision making ; Economic models ; Empirical research ; Employers ; Employment ; Endowments ; Federations ; Income inequality ; Industrial Structure ; Labor ; Labor unions ; Labour movements ; Macroeconomics ; Modeling ; Negotiation ; Political economy ; Political parties ; Political partisanship ; Political science ; Politics ; Postdoctoral Education ; Power ; Social democracy ; Strategic behaviour ; Strikes ; Trade unions ; Unemployment ; Union leadership ; Union Members ; Union membership ; Unions ; Wage determination ; Wages ; Wages & salaries</subject><ispartof>American journal of political science, 2010-02, Vol.104 (1), p.171-188</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Political Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-c158547bd92af556eebd0db5b1fca5eaf4288419b3588934eb7f3fa972564e683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-c158547bd92af556eebd0db5b1fca5eaf4288419b3588934eb7f3fa972564e683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/214440709/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/214440709?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12845,12847,21378,21387,21394,27924,27925,33223,33224,33611,33612,33877,33878,33985,33986,36060,36061,43733,43880,43948,44363,58238,58471,72832,74093,74269,74340,74767</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>AHLQUIST, JOHN S.</creatorcontrib><title>Building Strategic Capacity: The Political Underpinnings of Coordinated Wage Bargaining</title><title>American journal of political science</title><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><description>Encompassing labor movements and coordinated wage setting are central to the social democratic economic model that has proven successful among the nations of Western Europe. The coordination of wage bargaining across many unions and employers has been used to explain everything from inequality to unemployment. Yet there has been limited theoretical and quantitative empirical work exploring the determinants of bargaining coordination. I argue formally that more unequally distributed resources across unions should inhibit the centralization of strike powers in union federations. Using membership as a proxy for union resources, I find empirical evidence for this hypothesis in a panel of 15 OECD democracies, 1950–2000. I then show that the centralization of strike powers is a strong predictor of coordinated bargaining.</description><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Centralization</subject><subject>Collective bargaining</subject><subject>Confederation</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Endowments</subject><subject>Federations</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Industrial Structure</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Labor unions</subject><subject>Labour movements</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political partisanship</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Postdoctoral Education</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Social democracy</subject><subject>Strategic behaviour</subject><subject>Strikes</subject><subject>Trade unions</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Union leadership</subject><subject>Union Members</subject><subject>Union membership</subject><subject>Unions</subject><subject>Wage determination</subject><subject>Wages</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>0092-5853</issn><issn>1537-5943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9LHDEYh4NYcNV-AA-F0EtPo8kk7yTprTttXUGoVkVvITOTmWadnazJLNRvb4YVBUvxFMLz_F7ePwgdUXJMCRUnV4QQRgA4UUoRJvkOmlFgIgPF2S6aTTib-B7aj3GZvoQSOUO3843rGzd0-GoMZrSdq3Fp1qZ24-NXfP3H4gvfu9HVpsc3Q2PD2g1D0iP2LS69DymbYg2-NZ3FcxM64yZ-iD60po_24_N7gG5-_rguF9n5r9Oz8tt5VkPBxqymIIGLqlG5aQEKa6uGNBVUtK0NWNPyXEpOVcVASsW4rUTLWqNEDgW3hWQH6Mu27jr4h42No165WNu-N4P1m6gFMMlEkaZ_1-SM5CRXU83Pb8yl34QhjaFzyjkngqgk0a1UBx9jsK1eB7cy4VFToqeT6H9OkjKftpllHH14CeRCqLQFSDzbchdH-_eFm3CvC8EE6OL0Ul8uyu8wX9zp38lnzz2YVRVc09nXTv_fxROqZ6U7</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>AHLQUIST, JOHN S.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>Building Strategic Capacity: The Political Underpinnings of Coordinated Wage Bargaining</title><author>AHLQUIST, JOHN S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-c158547bd92af556eebd0db5b1fca5eaf4288419b3588934eb7f3fa972564e683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Centralization</topic><topic>Collective bargaining</topic><topic>Confederation</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Endowments</topic><topic>Federations</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Industrial Structure</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Labor unions</topic><topic>Labour movements</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political partisanship</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Postdoctoral Education</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Social democracy</topic><topic>Strategic behaviour</topic><topic>Strikes</topic><topic>Trade unions</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Union leadership</topic><topic>Union Members</topic><topic>Union membership</topic><topic>Unions</topic><topic>Wage determination</topic><topic>Wages</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AHLQUIST, JOHN S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>American journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AHLQUIST, JOHN S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building Strategic Capacity: The Political Underpinnings of Coordinated Wage Bargaining</atitle><jtitle>American journal of political science</jtitle><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>171-188</pages><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>0092-5853</issn><eissn>1537-5943</eissn><coden>APORBP</coden><abstract>Encompassing labor movements and coordinated wage setting are central to the social democratic economic model that has proven successful among the nations of Western Europe. The coordination of wage bargaining across many unions and employers has been used to explain everything from inequality to unemployment. Yet there has been limited theoretical and quantitative empirical work exploring the determinants of bargaining coordination. I argue formally that more unequally distributed resources across unions should inhibit the centralization of strike powers in union federations. Using membership as a proxy for union resources, I find empirical evidence for this hypothesis in a panel of 15 OECD democracies, 1950–2000. I then show that the centralization of strike powers is a strong predictor of coordinated bargaining.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0003055409990384</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0554 |
ispartof | American journal of political science, 2010-02, Vol.104 (1), p.171-188 |
issn | 0003-0554 0092-5853 1537-5943 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753837600 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Bargaining Case Studies Centralization Collective bargaining Confederation Coordination Decision making Economic models Empirical research Employers Employment Endowments Federations Income inequality Industrial Structure Labor Labor unions Labour movements Macroeconomics Modeling Negotiation Political economy Political parties Political partisanship Political science Politics Postdoctoral Education Power Social democracy Strategic behaviour Strikes Trade unions Unemployment Union leadership Union Members Union membership Unions Wage determination Wages Wages & salaries |
title | Building Strategic Capacity: The Political Underpinnings of Coordinated Wage Bargaining |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A15%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20Strategic%20Capacity:%20The%20Political%20Underpinnings%20of%20Coordinated%20Wage%20Bargaining&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=AHLQUIST,%20JOHN%20S.&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=171-188&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft.coden=APORBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0003055409990384&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27798545%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-c158547bd92af556eebd0db5b1fca5eaf4288419b3588934eb7f3fa972564e683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214440709&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0003055409990384&rft_jstor_id=27798545&rfr_iscdi=true |