Loading…

Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity?

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and the burden could be reduced by evidence-based strategies for the primary prevention of cancer, the early detection of malignancies and more adequate treatment of cancer patients. Previous research has shown that lifestyle factors are associated with c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Baillière's best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology 2010-08, Vol.24 (4), p.465-478
Main Authors: van der Aalst, C.M, van Klaveren, R.J, de Koning, H.J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-81ab164341fec124f1660526ffff9112c6d6208300550e7f0de12b2a2bdf1a263
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-81ab164341fec124f1660526ffff9112c6d6208300550e7f0de12b2a2bdf1a263
container_end_page 478
container_issue 4
container_start_page 465
container_title Baillière's best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology
container_volume 24
creator van der Aalst, C.M
van Klaveren, R.J
de Koning, H.J
description Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and the burden could be reduced by evidence-based strategies for the primary prevention of cancer, the early detection of malignancies and more adequate treatment of cancer patients. Previous research has shown that lifestyle factors are associated with common cancers and that several cancer screening programmes are cost-effective in reducing cancer-specific mortality. But, some recent studies reported that participants of screening programs might unintentionally change their lifestyle. Cancer screening might be a teachable moment or, on the other hand, have a false health certificate effect. Despite that the evidence is scarce, cancer screening might have opportunities for lifestyle improvements, although a possible health certificate effect still remains. Integrated approaches to combine primary and secondary prevention have the potential to optimise the efforts to improve cancer prevention and survival. More research is warranted to investigate evidence-based approaches.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754005327</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1521691810000624</els_id><sourcerecordid>2731703551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-81ab164341fec124f1660526ffff9112c6d6208300550e7f0de12b2a2bdf1a263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7jr6A7xIwIOnHlNJd2YaQZH1ExY8qOeQTiq7GTPpNkkv9L83zawu7MEc8kE9VeSttwh5DmwLDOTrw3aYrrac1TeTW8bgATmHTvAGepAP1zuHRvawPyNPcj6wSsi-f0zOONsLITp2TvKHETOddCre-EkXP0ZaRppNQow-XtG57gXjGtAhLNRHF2aMBmnwDnNZAtIBr_WNH-dEdbS0XM_5LtgkDLqgpccxDd76srx7Sh45HTI-uz035Oenjz8uvjSX3z5_vXh_2ZhWdKXZgx5AtqIFhwZ460BK1nHp6uoBuJFWrkIY6zqGO8csAh-45oN1oLkUG_LqVHdK4--5fkcdfTYYgo44zlnturbmCr6r5Mt75KGqqYKzAlaBDng9NwROlEljzgmdmpI_6rRUSK2GqIOqhqjVEMWkqu2uOS9uK8_DEe2_jL8OVODNCcDaiRuPSWXj1_5an9AUZUf_3_Jv72Wb4KM3OvzCBfOdCpW5Yur7OhHrQECdBSZ5K_4A7amxeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032751210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity?</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>van der Aalst, C.M ; van Klaveren, R.J ; de Koning, H.J</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Aalst, C.M ; van Klaveren, R.J ; de Koning, H.J</creatorcontrib><description>Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and the burden could be reduced by evidence-based strategies for the primary prevention of cancer, the early detection of malignancies and more adequate treatment of cancer patients. Previous research has shown that lifestyle factors are associated with common cancers and that several cancer screening programmes are cost-effective in reducing cancer-specific mortality. But, some recent studies reported that participants of screening programs might unintentionally change their lifestyle. Cancer screening might be a teachable moment or, on the other hand, have a false health certificate effect. Despite that the evidence is scarce, cancer screening might have opportunities for lifestyle improvements, although a possible health certificate effect still remains. Integrated approaches to combine primary and secondary prevention have the potential to optimise the efforts to improve cancer prevention and survival. More research is warranted to investigate evidence-based approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1521-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20833350</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BPRCB6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Diet - psychology ; Early Detection of Cancer - psychology ; Female ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Health Behavior ; Health Promotion ; Humans ; Life Style ; Lifestyle ; Lifestyle-related diseases ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Lung Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Male ; Mass screening ; Mass Screening - psychology ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Motor Activity ; Patient Participation ; Primary Prevention ; Smoking - psychology ; Teachable moment</subject><ispartof>Baillière's best practice &amp; research. Clinical gastroenterology, 2010-08, Vol.24 (4), p.465-478</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-81ab164341fec124f1660526ffff9112c6d6208300550e7f0de12b2a2bdf1a263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-81ab164341fec124f1660526ffff9112c6d6208300550e7f0de12b2a2bdf1a263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20833350$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Aalst, C.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Klaveren, R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Koning, H.J</creatorcontrib><title>Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity?</title><title>Baillière's best practice &amp; research. Clinical gastroenterology</title><addtitle>Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and the burden could be reduced by evidence-based strategies for the primary prevention of cancer, the early detection of malignancies and more adequate treatment of cancer patients. Previous research has shown that lifestyle factors are associated with common cancers and that several cancer screening programmes are cost-effective in reducing cancer-specific mortality. But, some recent studies reported that participants of screening programs might unintentionally change their lifestyle. Cancer screening might be a teachable moment or, on the other hand, have a false health certificate effect. Despite that the evidence is scarce, cancer screening might have opportunities for lifestyle improvements, although a possible health certificate effect still remains. Integrated approaches to combine primary and secondary prevention have the potential to optimise the efforts to improve cancer prevention and survival. More research is warranted to investigate evidence-based approaches.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Diet - psychology</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Style</subject><subject>Lifestyle</subject><subject>Lifestyle-related diseases</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass screening</subject><subject>Mass Screening - psychology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Primary Prevention</subject><subject>Smoking - psychology</subject><subject>Teachable moment</subject><issn>1521-6918</issn><issn>1532-1916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7jr6A7xIwIOnHlNJd2YaQZH1ExY8qOeQTiq7GTPpNkkv9L83zawu7MEc8kE9VeSttwh5DmwLDOTrw3aYrrac1TeTW8bgATmHTvAGepAP1zuHRvawPyNPcj6wSsi-f0zOONsLITp2TvKHETOddCre-EkXP0ZaRppNQow-XtG57gXjGtAhLNRHF2aMBmnwDnNZAtIBr_WNH-dEdbS0XM_5LtgkDLqgpccxDd76srx7Sh45HTI-uz035Oenjz8uvjSX3z5_vXh_2ZhWdKXZgx5AtqIFhwZ460BK1nHp6uoBuJFWrkIY6zqGO8csAh-45oN1oLkUG_LqVHdK4--5fkcdfTYYgo44zlnturbmCr6r5Mt75KGqqYKzAlaBDng9NwROlEljzgmdmpI_6rRUSK2GqIOqhqjVEMWkqu2uOS9uK8_DEe2_jL8OVODNCcDaiRuPSWXj1_5an9AUZUf_3_Jv72Wb4KM3OvzCBfOdCpW5Yur7OhHrQECdBSZ5K_4A7amxeQ</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>van der Aalst, C.M</creator><creator>van Klaveren, R.J</creator><creator>de Koning, H.J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity?</title><author>van der Aalst, C.M ; van Klaveren, R.J ; de Koning, H.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-81ab164341fec124f1660526ffff9112c6d6208300550e7f0de12b2a2bdf1a263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Diet - psychology</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Style</topic><topic>Lifestyle</topic><topic>Lifestyle-related diseases</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass screening</topic><topic>Mass Screening - psychology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Primary Prevention</topic><topic>Smoking - psychology</topic><topic>Teachable moment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Aalst, C.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Klaveren, R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Koning, H.J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Baillière's best practice &amp; research. Clinical gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Aalst, C.M</au><au>van Klaveren, R.J</au><au>de Koning, H.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity?</atitle><jtitle>Baillière's best practice &amp; research. Clinical gastroenterology</jtitle><addtitle>Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>465</spage><epage>478</epage><pages>465-478</pages><issn>1521-6918</issn><eissn>1532-1916</eissn><coden>BPRCB6</coden><abstract>Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and the burden could be reduced by evidence-based strategies for the primary prevention of cancer, the early detection of malignancies and more adequate treatment of cancer patients. Previous research has shown that lifestyle factors are associated with common cancers and that several cancer screening programmes are cost-effective in reducing cancer-specific mortality. But, some recent studies reported that participants of screening programs might unintentionally change their lifestyle. Cancer screening might be a teachable moment or, on the other hand, have a false health certificate effect. Despite that the evidence is scarce, cancer screening might have opportunities for lifestyle improvements, although a possible health certificate effect still remains. Integrated approaches to combine primary and secondary prevention have the potential to optimise the efforts to improve cancer prevention and survival. More research is warranted to investigate evidence-based approaches.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20833350</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.001</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1521-6918
ispartof Baillière's best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, 2010-08, Vol.24 (4), p.465-478
issn 1521-6918
1532-1916
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754005327
source Elsevier
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology
Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control
Diet - psychology
Early Detection of Cancer - psychology
Female
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Health Behavior
Health Promotion
Humans
Life Style
Lifestyle
Lifestyle-related diseases
Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis
Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology
Lung Neoplasms - prevention & control
Male
Mass screening
Mass Screening - psychology
Middle Aged
Morbidity
Motor Activity
Patient Participation
Primary Prevention
Smoking - psychology
Teachable moment
title Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A00%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20participation%20to%20screening%20unintentionally%20influence%20lifestyle%20behaviour%20and%20thus%20lifestyle-related%20morbidity?&rft.jtitle=Bailli%C3%A8re's%20best%20practice%20&%20research.%20Clinical%20gastroenterology&rft.au=van%20der%20Aalst,%20C.M&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=465&rft.epage=478&rft.pages=465-478&rft.issn=1521-6918&rft.eissn=1532-1916&rft.coden=BPRCB6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2731703551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-81ab164341fec124f1660526ffff9112c6d6208300550e7f0de12b2a2bdf1a263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032751210&rft_id=info:pmid/20833350&rfr_iscdi=true